nAz
07-06-2004, 11:30 AM
I was reading eg8rs thread about how some WMD were found but not reported and then today i come across this article quoting are most staunch ally...
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/07/06/iraq.main/index.html
(CNN) -- British Prime Minister Tony Blair has said weapons of mass destruction may never be found in Iraq, but he insisted former leader Saddam Hussein posed a threat to "the wider world."
"We know that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and we know that we haven't found them," Blair told a committee of lawmakers Tuesday.
"I have to accept we have not found them, that we may not find them.
"But what I wouldn't accept is that (Saddam) was not a threat and a threat in WMD terms," Blair said.
so which is it, did we find any or not?
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/07/06/iraq.main/index.html
(CNN) -- British Prime Minister Tony Blair has said weapons of mass destruction may never be found in Iraq, but he insisted former leader Saddam Hussein posed a threat to "the wider world."
"We know that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and we know that we haven't found them," Blair told a committee of lawmakers Tuesday.
"I have to accept we have not found them, that we may not find them.
"But what I wouldn't accept is that (Saddam) was not a threat and a threat in WMD terms," Blair said.
so which is it, did we find any or not?