Qtec
08-19-2004, 03:03 AM
US soldier sues over Iraq call-up
A veteran US soldier is suing the Defence Department over its plans to forcibly extend his reservist's contract and send him to Iraq.
The man, known by the pseudonym John Doe, has been with the army for nine years and last year served in Iraq.
He took on a one-year reservist contract after returning to the US and may now be required to return to Iraq under the army's "stop-loss" policy.
Thousands of soldiers' tours of duty have been stretched under the policy.
Mr Doe's contract was due to have expired in December this year.
But the summoning of his California-based unit to Iraq could extend his period of service by up to two years.
The army has argued that the policy is vital to ensure the army is staffed by seasoned professionals at times of emergency.
But Mr Doe's lawyers say the US Congress has not officially declared war in Iraq or elsewhere, so the emergency provision enabling the army to forcibly extend soldiers' contracts is illegal.
"American citizens cannot constitutionally be required to serve involuntarily and indefinitely at whim," the lawsuit says.
Does he have a point? You cant have it both ways, you are either at war or you are not.[There were no POWs taken in Afgahnistan, I dont know about Iraq.]
If this guy wins his case, will the Govt be forced to introduce the draft?
Would the American people accept it?
Would it be a draft with no exceptions?
Is this the begining of the end for GW? /ccboard/images/graemlins/laugh.gif
Your thoughts.
Q
[ whatever happens, Iraq cannot be abandoned to the religious fanatics. That would be a disaster for everybody, Iraqis included]
A veteran US soldier is suing the Defence Department over its plans to forcibly extend his reservist's contract and send him to Iraq.
The man, known by the pseudonym John Doe, has been with the army for nine years and last year served in Iraq.
He took on a one-year reservist contract after returning to the US and may now be required to return to Iraq under the army's "stop-loss" policy.
Thousands of soldiers' tours of duty have been stretched under the policy.
Mr Doe's contract was due to have expired in December this year.
But the summoning of his California-based unit to Iraq could extend his period of service by up to two years.
The army has argued that the policy is vital to ensure the army is staffed by seasoned professionals at times of emergency.
But Mr Doe's lawyers say the US Congress has not officially declared war in Iraq or elsewhere, so the emergency provision enabling the army to forcibly extend soldiers' contracts is illegal.
"American citizens cannot constitutionally be required to serve involuntarily and indefinitely at whim," the lawsuit says.
Does he have a point? You cant have it both ways, you are either at war or you are not.[There were no POWs taken in Afgahnistan, I dont know about Iraq.]
If this guy wins his case, will the Govt be forced to introduce the draft?
Would the American people accept it?
Would it be a draft with no exceptions?
Is this the begining of the end for GW? /ccboard/images/graemlins/laugh.gif
Your thoughts.
Q
[ whatever happens, Iraq cannot be abandoned to the religious fanatics. That would be a disaster for everybody, Iraqis included]