eg8r
08-25-2004, 03:14 PM
John Kerry is just beside himself that fellow Vietnam veterans have a different view of John Kerry than John Kerry himself. Kerry is so screwed up over this SBV stuff he cannot even think. You know, if everything Kerry has said was true he would not be sweating this so much. It turns out that Kerry might have even lied about his first purple heart, his diary seems to mention he never came under enemy fire. The SBVs knew this and now his diary states it. The Kerry camp is trying to turn it around but it is there in plain english.
It seems Kerry does not mind what Moore has done and is perfectly accepting of MoveOn.org and all the smear they have tried to do and he notices that it has all rubbed right off and the Bush campaign has continued. This is steaming Kerry because this one little group of Veterans is causing much more of a stir and Kerry does not like it. He is hypocritical in calling for Bush to come out against the ads but has never said he was against the lies perpetuated by Moore. Kerry has never denounced MoveOn for the little Hitler/Bush commercial.
Well, now Kerry has sent his henchmen to Bush to deliver a letter asking Bush to come out against the SBVs. Bush was not there but sent a representative to pick up the letter. Turns out that is not good enough. Here is the article (http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/08/25/cleland.swiftboat/index.html) . The funny part is that the Bush supporters had a letter for Kerry also. The article does not say if Cleland took the letter or not.
I am just wondering if Kerry ever read the letter before it was sent to Bush... <blockquote><font class="small">Quote letter to Bush from Kerry:</font><hr> "As you yourself have said, there is nothing complicated about supporting our troops, and the leaders of this nation should make it clear that the members of our military will not only be supported when they wear the uniform, but also when they return home to the land they fought to defend," it said. <hr /></blockquote> This is absolutely contradictory of Kerry's actions when he came back from Vietnam. He was a traitor to those men fighting in Vietnam. He called the murders, rapists, etc. He said they were all participating in atrocious acts. Is this the type of expected action coming from a guy that says, "members of our military will not only be supported when they wear the uniform, but also when they return home to the land they fought to defend"? He is a hypocrite.
Earlier this week the traitor was out calling veterans wondering why they are against him. He is to dumb to figure it out. He had the audacity to say that he was not saying those things about the SBVs but all the other men fighting. LOL, does that sound like a guy who still supports those men?
You might believe this is all a smear campaign by the Bush admin but it would behoove you to take a step back and look at all of it. Kerry went to war and got out as fast as possible (quite possibly lying about injuries). Then when he got back he lied about the men over there still fighting. He went on to a career in the Senate where he has voted against every single major military program and most of the funding. He has voted every time to reduce the intelligence community and subsequently their budget. And now, he wants to tell you he will be tough on terrorists. What do you think?
Even if all that is baloney in your eyes, don't you just question for one second what kind of man Kerry is politically when the leader of North Korea puts his full support behind Kerry. If a terrorist like Kim Jong Il is rooting for Kerry, does that not scare you? Doesn't that tell you something about how the rest of the world (at least the terrorists) views Kerry as a leader of a war on terrorism?
eg8r
It seems Kerry does not mind what Moore has done and is perfectly accepting of MoveOn.org and all the smear they have tried to do and he notices that it has all rubbed right off and the Bush campaign has continued. This is steaming Kerry because this one little group of Veterans is causing much more of a stir and Kerry does not like it. He is hypocritical in calling for Bush to come out against the ads but has never said he was against the lies perpetuated by Moore. Kerry has never denounced MoveOn for the little Hitler/Bush commercial.
Well, now Kerry has sent his henchmen to Bush to deliver a letter asking Bush to come out against the SBVs. Bush was not there but sent a representative to pick up the letter. Turns out that is not good enough. Here is the article (http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/08/25/cleland.swiftboat/index.html) . The funny part is that the Bush supporters had a letter for Kerry also. The article does not say if Cleland took the letter or not.
I am just wondering if Kerry ever read the letter before it was sent to Bush... <blockquote><font class="small">Quote letter to Bush from Kerry:</font><hr> "As you yourself have said, there is nothing complicated about supporting our troops, and the leaders of this nation should make it clear that the members of our military will not only be supported when they wear the uniform, but also when they return home to the land they fought to defend," it said. <hr /></blockquote> This is absolutely contradictory of Kerry's actions when he came back from Vietnam. He was a traitor to those men fighting in Vietnam. He called the murders, rapists, etc. He said they were all participating in atrocious acts. Is this the type of expected action coming from a guy that says, "members of our military will not only be supported when they wear the uniform, but also when they return home to the land they fought to defend"? He is a hypocrite.
Earlier this week the traitor was out calling veterans wondering why they are against him. He is to dumb to figure it out. He had the audacity to say that he was not saying those things about the SBVs but all the other men fighting. LOL, does that sound like a guy who still supports those men?
You might believe this is all a smear campaign by the Bush admin but it would behoove you to take a step back and look at all of it. Kerry went to war and got out as fast as possible (quite possibly lying about injuries). Then when he got back he lied about the men over there still fighting. He went on to a career in the Senate where he has voted against every single major military program and most of the funding. He has voted every time to reduce the intelligence community and subsequently their budget. And now, he wants to tell you he will be tough on terrorists. What do you think?
Even if all that is baloney in your eyes, don't you just question for one second what kind of man Kerry is politically when the leader of North Korea puts his full support behind Kerry. If a terrorist like Kim Jong Il is rooting for Kerry, does that not scare you? Doesn't that tell you something about how the rest of the world (at least the terrorists) views Kerry as a leader of a war on terrorism?
eg8r