PDA

View Full Version : Even his own party notes Bush's incompetence



Ross
09-19-2004, 08:47 PM
Senators ask Bush to rethink Iraq policies

WASHINGTON (AP) Senators from both parties urged the Bush administration on Sunday to face the reality of the situation in Iraq and change its occupation policies.
...

A major problem, said leaders of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, was incompetence by the administration in reconstructing the country's shattered infrastructure.

The chairman, Sen. Richard Lugar, noted that Congress appropriated $18.4 billion a year ago this week for reconstruction. No more than $1 billion has been spent. "This is the incompetence in the administration," Lugar, R-Ind., said on ABC's This Week.


"Exactly right," interjected Delaware Sen. Joseph Biden, the committee's top Democrat. He said later: "This has been incompetence so far. Five percent of the $18.4 billion that George Bush keeps ... beating the other candidate up and about the head for how he voted and didn't vote, and he's released 5%."

...

McCain was asked about a report in Sunday's New York Times that U.S. commanders were planning a drive in November or December to retake areas where insurgents have won control. Such a timetable would place the operations after the Nov. 2 election for the White House.

McCain said Bush was not being "as straight as we would want him to be" about the situation. "The longer we delay with these sanctuaries, the more difficult the challenge is going to be and the more casualties we will incur and the Iraqi people will suffer because they will be able to operate out of these sanctuaries obviously now with somewhat of impunity," McCain said.

Ross
09-19-2004, 09:09 PM
More:

Republican senators lobbed criticisms of President Bush's Iraq war policies during yesterday's news talk shows, arguing that the U.S. military needs more troops on the ground and should move without haste to turn the tide against a deadly and persistent insurgency.

Following a recent spate of attacks that have killed scores of American soldiers and Iraqi citizens, some senators said yesterday that U.S. policy has been misdirected and needs to be refocused. As the presidential election nears, the Republicans blasted what they called a sometimes stubborn administration and called on military leaders to launch attacks on insurgent strongholds sooner rather than later.

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said on "Fox News Sunday" that he never would have allowed sanctuaries for anti-coalition fighters in cities such as Fallujah, where officials believe the insurgency has been strengthening.

"Allowing those sanctuaries has contributed significantly to the difficulties that we're facing, which are very, very significant," McCain said. "We made serious mistakes right after the initial successes by not having enough troops there on the ground, by allowing the looting, by not securing the borders. There was a number of things that we did. Most of it can be traced back to not having sufficient numbers of troops there."

Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) , said he believes the situation in Iraq is going to get worse before it gets better, adding that he believes the administration has done a "poor job of implementing and adjusting at times." Speaking on CNN's "Late Edition," he called for more troops in Iraq.

"The administration has been stubborn about troops," Graham said, referring to repeated administration contentions that the U.S. military does not need to be expanded to handle the global war on terror. "We do not need to paint a rosy scenario for the American people. We need to let the American people know this is just like World War II; we're in it for the duration."

On CBS's "Face the Nation," Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.) announced that he is going to make nearly two dozen policy suggestions to the State Department and national security adviser Condoleezza Rice to improve the situation in Iraq. In particular, he suggested starting training camps for security forces in the region surrounding Iraq and offering economic development initiatives throughout the region.

"The fact is, we're in trouble. We're in deep trouble in Iraq," Hagel said. "And I think we're going to have to look at some recalibration of policy."


Ahhh...the brilliance of Rumsfeld who ignored his own Generals. And the brilliance of Bush who appointed him and has stood beside him despite his arrogance and error-ridden Iraq "strategery"... You would think his time in the National Guard would have trained him to be a better military leader...

eg8r
09-20-2004, 08:23 AM
[ QUOTE ]
the Republicans blasted what they called a sometimes stubborn administration and called on military leaders to launch attacks on insurgent strongholds sooner rather than later.
<hr /></blockquote> A few points I found interesting: <ul type="square"> Don't you find it funny how often the media uses the word "blasts"? It seems everyone on all sides are just "blasting" each other. One politician will make a statement and the media will say they were blasting the other guy. /ccboard/images/graemlins/smile.gif I agree with the Reps on this one. We should be going in sooner than later, this is however, in general, starkly contrasting to the Democratic viewpoint. The dems, for the most part, would like to carry a pitcher of tea and see if they could sit down and talk with the terrorists. Why won't the media refer to those people as terrorists? They love the word insurgent simply because it helps build the appearance that we are not battling terrorists. [/list]

eg8r

Fair_Play
09-21-2004, 11:05 PM
/ccboard/images/graemlins/wink.gif