Tom_In_Cincy
10-13-2004, 05:33 PM
Mike Shamos wrote in this month's Billiards Digest ("You make the CALL") that is was a foul and 'possible' warning for a player to use their cue to measure for clearence between the rail and an OB.
With some stipulations:
The player had ball in hand behind the headstring. He put the cue ball against the rail and used his cue to measure the distance and then held the measurement with his hand on the cue shaft and went down table to measure if there was clearence.
The non-shooting player called a foul, the ref agreed and could have put the player on a warning of 'unsportsmanship' conduct.
IMO I think the rules need some more specific wording. In one case, you can use your cue to make measurements. In the other case, you CAN'T use the cue ball (with ball in hand)
This also made me think, what if you were to make a small mark on your cue stick (butt end or ferrule end) that would represent the distance of the width of a OB (which would be the same as a cue ball)?
Since the rules state you can use your cue for measurements and angles, as long as you don't let go of the cue.
Thoughts?
With some stipulations:
The player had ball in hand behind the headstring. He put the cue ball against the rail and used his cue to measure the distance and then held the measurement with his hand on the cue shaft and went down table to measure if there was clearence.
The non-shooting player called a foul, the ref agreed and could have put the player on a warning of 'unsportsmanship' conduct.
IMO I think the rules need some more specific wording. In one case, you can use your cue to make measurements. In the other case, you CAN'T use the cue ball (with ball in hand)
This also made me think, what if you were to make a small mark on your cue stick (butt end or ferrule end) that would represent the distance of the width of a OB (which would be the same as a cue ball)?
Since the rules state you can use your cue for measurements and angles, as long as you don't let go of the cue.
Thoughts?