PQQLK9
11-12-2004, 06:30 AM
What the FCC Said on `Private Ryan'
ABC has twice aired "Saving Private Ryan" and the FCC investigated a complaint about "violence, bloodshed, language and profanity" in 2002 from the American Family Association of Tupelo, Miss. In a staff ruling, the agency ruled it was not indecent. Excerpts from the agency's response:
• "It does not appear that any of the material depicts or describes sexual conduct in a patently offensive manner."
• "The sexual references ... do not appear to be so graphic or explicit as to be indecent."
What the FCC said on broadcasting "Schindler's List":
• "Frontal nudity scenes were not `patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards for the broadcast medium' when viewed in context, noting that the film depicts a historical view of WWII and wartime atrocities that is not presented in a pandering, titillating or vulgar matter."
WTF is this? "the American Family Association of Tupelo, Miss" /ccboard/images/graemlins/confused.gif
ABC has twice aired "Saving Private Ryan" and the FCC investigated a complaint about "violence, bloodshed, language and profanity" in 2002 from the American Family Association of Tupelo, Miss. In a staff ruling, the agency ruled it was not indecent. Excerpts from the agency's response:
• "It does not appear that any of the material depicts or describes sexual conduct in a patently offensive manner."
• "The sexual references ... do not appear to be so graphic or explicit as to be indecent."
What the FCC said on broadcasting "Schindler's List":
• "Frontal nudity scenes were not `patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards for the broadcast medium' when viewed in context, noting that the film depicts a historical view of WWII and wartime atrocities that is not presented in a pandering, titillating or vulgar matter."
WTF is this? "the American Family Association of Tupelo, Miss" /ccboard/images/graemlins/confused.gif