PDA

View Full Version : Recent research shows there are five kinds of sex.



SnakebyteXX
12-07-2005, 07:45 AM
Recent research shows that there are five kinds of sex.

# 1 The first kind of sex is Smurf Sex. This kind of sex happens when you first meet someone and you both have sex until you are blue in the face.

# 2 The second kind of sex is Kitchen Sex. This is when you have been with your partner for a short time and you are so horny you will have sex anywhere, even in the kitchen.

# 3 The third kind of sex is Bedroom Sex. This is when you have been with your partner for a long time. Your sex has gotten routine and you usually have sex in your bedroom.

# 4 The fourth kind of sex is Hallway Sex. This is when you have been with your partner for too long. When you pass each other in the hallway you both say "F*ck You."

# 5 The fifth kind of sex is Courtroom Sex. This is when you can not stand your wife any more. She takes you to court and screws you in front of everyone.


web page (http://lasvegas.craigslist.org/rnr/116150736.html)

dg-in-centralpa
12-07-2005, 09:25 AM
#2.5-step sex -when you can't make to the bedroom and do it on the steps. (See the movie Body Heat)

DG - Hmmmm....

Sid_Vicious
12-07-2005, 09:29 AM
Ya know, these jokes are funny because they relate to real life and this one for sure. IMO as a high testosterone level man...the relationship has begun to die between #2 ans #3. We just fail to find the willpower to move on to a new beginning elsewhere with someone else, we instead accept lackluster compromises, and eventual stagnation leading toward simply dullsville, #3 and #4. Many will say that "you have to work at a good relationship", but the word work in itself greatly smothers that spontaneity and electricity of good sex which we find in #1 and #2. If anyone honestly says they've gotten to #3 or beyond and then back to at least a SUSTAINING level #2 with the same mate, then either the lady had cosmetic surgery, the man won the lottery or came into a huge inheritance! Money gives a lot of power, some good and some bad. God maybe played a dirty trick with the differences in sex drives between the genders, especially when you figure in that the peaks during a life cycle for males and females aren't in harmony. Oh well, I guess that's why the old adage, "FFF&Forget" them. Now with the women having their own jobs, own finances, power if you will, I see both genders becoming just like the men of yesteryear("FFF&Forget" them on both sides),,, independently selfish, and quick to not stick around for long if it's not exactly what they want anymore. Both genders, with equality of money and power, aren't going to be near as "hot and heavy" for one and only one mate for the duration than the pairs with financial disparity. We've economically grown the different genders into it's own little "Battle of Iraq",,,we can stay the course but many walking casualties will be produced.

I may be stating only my opinion in all of this, but to me, men are built to want and need the raw physical attention a lot more than women, day in and day out. Either that or Sid sucks at pickin' life-partners or isn't liberal and inventive enough in the bedroom after phase #2, OUCH!

Disclaimer: I don't begrudge women becoming financially independent over the years, but IMSO, it hasn't helped the traditional sexual bonding we had during the pre-2-income family units following the 40s and 1950s. The sixties were fantastic though /ccboard/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ccboard/images/graemlins/grin.gif..sid~~~feels like legal prostitution or the acceptance of mistresses wouldn't be just fine in the long term of one's sexual life

Deeman3
12-07-2005, 10:13 AM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote Sid_Vicious:</font><hr> Ya know, these jokes are funny because they relate to real life and this one for sure. IMO as a high testosterone level man...the relationship has begun to die between #2 ans #3. We just fail to find the willpower to move on to a new beginning elsewhere with someone else, we instead accept lackluster compromises, and eventual stagnation leading toward simply dullsville, #3 and #4. <font color="blue">Sid, really, many of us don't accept these things. </font color> Many will say that "you have to work at a good relationship", but the word work in itself greatly smothers that spontaneity and electricity of good sex which we find in #1 and #2. <font color="blue">BS, working at a relationship is not a bad thing. Maybe you're concentrating onthe worng things. </font color> If anyone honestly says they've gotten to #3 or beyond and then back to at least a SUSTAINING level #2 with the same mate, then either the lady had cosmetic surgery, the man won the lottery or came into a huge inheritance! <font color="blue">When I look at my lady, I only see her as a beautify young thing. Maybe she has a wrinkle or two but looks great and certainly better than I ever deserve. Hey, a look in the mirror for most of us should let us know none of us are perfect and, as I have told you before, I have very little interest in a woman my daughter's age and even less in common. You are my friend but you gotta stop looking for all this physical beauty, it's a mirage anyway. Find their soul and you'll be so happy you can see her real looks, not the movie version. </font color> Money gives a lot of power, some good and some bad. <font color="blue"> Maybe, but if the ladies you are looking at are just focused on money, maybe you need to look at others. </font color> God maybe played a dirty trick with the differences in sex drives between the genders, especially when you figure in that the peaks during a life cycle for males and females aren't in harmony. <font color="blue"> I have not found this to be true at all. </font color> Oh well, I guess that's why the old adage, "FFF&amp;Forget" them. Now with the women having their own jobs, own finances, power if you will, I see both genders becoming just like the men of yesteryear("FFF&amp;Forget" them on both sides),,, independently selfish, and quick to not stick around for long if it's not exactly what they want anymore. Both genders, with equality of money and power, aren't going to be near as "hot and heavy" for one and only one mate for the duration than the pairs with financial disparity. We've economically grown the different genders into it's own little "Battle of Iraq",,,we can stay the course but many walking casualties will be produced. <font color="blue"> Sid, I think you may be overthinking this a bit. Maybe, just maybe, you have to look for shared interests, not just sexual compatibility in the earlier part of the relationship, then do your "Big Stud" stuff if you feel it really makes her more attracted to you.

I bet, if you use that "super testosterone" male thing you say you have going on, you will keep her interest and you might just find a companion and good friend as well. </font color>

I may be stating only my opinion in all of this, but to me, men are built to want and need the raw physical attention a lot more than women, day in and day out. <font color="blue"> Sid, my little leftist friend, where in the world did you ever come up with that? Could it be at a Hate Bush rally? If anything, women demand more physical attention, and more. </font color> Either that or Sid sucks at pickin' life-partners or isn't liberal and inventive enough in the bedroom after phase #2, OUCH! <font color="blue"> You gotta read Deeman's Guide to the Human Female." </font color>

Disclaimer: I don't begrudge women becoming financially independent over the years, but IMSO, it hasn't helped the traditional sexual bonding we had during the pre-2-income family units following the 40s and 1950s. <font color="blue">So, do like I do and let you partner stay at home. </font color> The sixties were fantastic though /ccboard/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ccboard/images/graemlins/grin.gif..sid~~~feels like legal prostitution or the acceptance of mistresses wouldn't be just fine in the long term of one's sexual life <font color="blue"> Yep of course, if you have a right to keep a mistress, some woman, somewhere, has a right to keep a man as a mister. /ccboard/images/graemlins/grin.gif</font color> <hr /></blockquote>

<font color="blue"> Sid, you are a nice guy, despite your misguided liberal bent. However, you need to study this a while longer before you fly solo..... </font color>


Deeman
wishes Sid luck, wishes his ladies even more luck.....

Sid_Vicious
12-07-2005, 11:14 AM
"Sid, you are a nice guy, despite your misguided liberal bent. However, you need to study this a while longer before you fly solo....."

Well I'm 52 and not a viagra study, YET! We all collect knowledge through lifelong experiences, so today I am in the conclusion status as written. If women need the same amount of physical attention, then you are obviously finding the right ones and I'm not, or else you and I ride different highs in our daily desires. A minimum of twice a day for me was what I happen to so-called, require for my personal harmony. The ex-wife(one point she agreed with me on during counceling sessions), and recently lost GFs won't argue on that fact. These among many others merely, imo, fit my phylosophy stated in this post. Only when I was in my 20s, dating someone 10yrs older, did I have adequate, long term responses, lasted for a GREAT ten year stretch. I feel fairly well studied, and now have less years left to keep on believing the "norm" of society's psychology material of the learn-ed PHDs and the such. I am going to adjust to my current way of thinking, but congrats on your success. One more thing though, my Dear Ol Mom once told me that as women get older that they don't think about sex near as much. Sadly, this seems true and the ironic thing is that I for one, think a lot about it with age.

As far as looks in a waman...you know from a social evevt or two that I'm not high on my standards in looks as long as the emotional bond is there, i.e. I am entirely inside the love cycle.

Nuff said except to say that your reference to liberal and a Bush rally was beneath you. It had no content with this, NONE...sid~~~feels evolution is in progress within the opposite sex, making them less feminine, more Hillary-like

Thought about it and just maybe there is a liberal/conservative relationship I hadn't acknowledged Dee so I'm editing this post. Maybe us non neo-conservatives desire to "jump bones" by personal decision, i.e. we "don't worry, be happy/horny" kinda thing. We may only differ in opinions to degrees within this topic due to our independent lib/conserv fibers, resulting in bigger and lesser animal instincts. Sorry for the jab about the "It had no content with this, NONE" comment. The formula for liberalistic and neo-conservativenss might just contain a vast array of difference besides politics, including our own appetites, expectation and needs. sv~~~probably just has a personal problem and none of this means nuthin'

supergreenman
12-07-2005, 02:17 PM
Oh dear lord, we're politicizing sex on a non-pool related pool forum. I've seen it all now. See what Monica L has done to world. ~sighs

When in doubt blame the intern /ccboard/images/graemlins/tongue.gif /ccboard/images/graemlins/tongue.gif

Sid_Vicious
12-07-2005, 02:55 PM
Where's Monica when you really need her? /ccboard/images/graemlins/blush.gif sid

Deeman3
12-08-2005, 07:12 AM
Naw, those were just some of my little asides to Sid. We both actually never talk politics when we see each other. However, I did get that feeling like I was playing Dear Abby for a minute there.

Deeman
I know Sid will find his princess, just may take a while...

Chopstick
12-08-2005, 08:55 AM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote Deeman3:</font><hr> <font color="blue"> Sid, I think you may be overthinking this a bit.</font color> /ccboard/images/graemlins/laugh.gif /ccboard/images/graemlins/laugh.gif /ccboard/images/graemlins/laugh.gifYA THINK!!

<font color="green"> Sid your takin this woman thing way too seriously. If a woman wants to be with me then that's fine. If they don't, that's fine too. There's fish to be caught, pool to be shot, work to be done, people to aggravate, and last time I checked they were still making liquor faster than I could drank it(although I did have em on the run there for a while).

The thing is, what you're lookin for can't be found. Lookin for it will just make it worse. It's something that finds you while you're busy doing something else. Forget about it and go have some fun. Believe me there's nothing that bugs women more than men having a bunch of fun without them. If you're out in life busy with other things, you can just bet it won't be long before a woman comes along to stick her nose into whatever you're doing. </font color>
/ccboard/images/graemlins/laugh.gif /ccboard/images/graemlins/laugh.gif /ccboard/images/graemlins/laugh.gif

Maybe, just maybe, you have to look for shared interests, not just sexual compatibility in the earlier part of the relationship, then do your "Big Stud" stuff <font color="green">Big Stud Sidney, now you're talkin. Make em beg. </font color> /ccboard/images/graemlins/laugh.gif

I may be stating only my opinion in all of this, but to me, men are built to want and need the raw physical attention a lot more than women, day in and day out. <font color="blue"> Sid, my little leftist friend, where in the world did you ever come up with that? Could it be at a Hate Bush rally? If anything, women demand more physical attention, and more. </font color> Either that or Sid sucks at pickin' life-partners or isn't liberal and inventive enough in the bedroom after phase #2, OUCH! <font color="blue"> You gotta read Deeman's Guide to the Human Female." </font color> <font color="green"> Is there a brass pole involed? </font color>

Disclaimer: I don't begrudge women becoming financially independent over the years, but IMSO, it hasn't helped the traditional sexual bonding <font color="green">That's all over and done with. Modern American women, in terms of value to a mans life, are little more than disposable commodities. If you want those old time values you're going to have to look in other cultures.</font color>

<font color="blue"> Sid, you are a nice guy, despite your misguided liberal bent. However, you need to study this a while longer before you fly solo..... </font color>


Deeman
wishes Sid luck, wishes his ladies even more luck..... /ccboard/images/graemlins/laugh.gif /ccboard/images/graemlins/laugh.gif /ccboard/images/graemlins/laugh.gif LMAOF <hr /></blockquote>

Deeman3
12-08-2005, 10:13 AM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote Chopstick:</font><hr> <blockquote><font class="small">Quote Deeman3:</font><hr> <font color="blue"> Sid, I think you may be overthinking this a bit.</font color> /ccboard/images/graemlins/laugh.gif /ccboard/images/graemlins/laugh.gif /ccboard/images/graemlins/laugh.gifYA THINK!! <font color="red"> </font color>

<font color="green"> Sid your takin this woman thing way too seriously. If a woman wants to be with me then that's fine. If they don't, that's fine too. There's fish to be caught, pool to be shot, work to be done, people to aggravate, and last time I checked they were still making liquor faster than I could drank it(although I did have em on the run there for a while). <font color="red"> Spoken like a man who doesn't give a s**t. Just the type more than a few women are looking for. </font color>

The thing is, what you're lookin for can't be found. Lookin for it will just make it worse. It's something that finds you while you're busy doing something else. Forget about it and go have some fun. Believe me there's nothing that bugs women more than men having a bunch of fun without them. If you're out in life busy with other things, you can just bet it won't be long before a woman comes along to stick her nose into whatever you're doing. </font color> <font color="red"> Never truer words spoken. Kill more than a dozen women and ditch their bodies some where, you then have forty sitting in the courtroom throwing their underwear at you. Never figured this one out. </font color>
/ccboard/images/graemlins/laugh.gif /ccboard/images/graemlins/laugh.gif /ccboard/images/graemlins/laugh.gif

Maybe, just maybe, you have to look for shared interests, not just sexual compatibility in the earlier part of the relationship, then do your "Big Stud" stuff <font color="green">Big Stud Sidney, now you're talkin. Make em beg. </font color> /ccboard/images/graemlins/laugh.gif <font color="red"> Now you're talkin' </font color>

I may be stating only my opinion in all of this, but to me, men are built to want and need the raw physical attention a lot more than women, day in and day out. <font color="blue"> Sid, my little leftist friend, where in the world did you ever come up with that? Could it be at a Hate Bush rally? If anything, women demand more physical attention, and more. </font color> Either that or Sid sucks at pickin' life-partners or isn't liberal and inventive enough in the bedroom after phase #2, OUCH! <font color="blue"> You gotta read Deeman's Guide to the Human Female." </font color> <font color="green"> Is there a brass pole involed? </font color> <font color="red"> More than one. If your lady don't have bruse on her right thigh from hittin the brass pole too hard, you aint really tryin'</font color>

Disclaimer: I don't begrudge women becoming financially independent over the years, but IMSO, it hasn't helped the traditional sexual bonding <font color="green">That's all over and done with. Modern American women, in terms of value to a mans life, are little more than disposable commodities. If you want those old time values you're going to have to look in other cultures.</font color>

<font color="blue"> Sid, you are a nice guy, despite your misguided liberal bent. However, you need to study this a while longer before you fly solo..... </font color> <font color="red"> Come on Sid, let's see the old tiger come out a bit. Walk into that Texas bar, pick out the biggest biker clown in the place, bitch slap him and say, "Sid Vitious here, anybody want some of this? You'll either have women fighting to get to you or a useful purpose for all that Blue Cross/Blue shield insurance. </font color>


Deeman
wishes Sid luck, wishes his ladies even more luck..... /ccboard/images/graemlins/laugh.gif /ccboard/images/graemlins/laugh.gif /ccboard/images/graemlins/laugh.gif LMAOF <hr /></blockquote> <hr /></blockquote>