eg8r
03-09-2006, 12:02 PM
It appears DPW is backing away from the port deal. Is it a lucky break for W? Now he does not have to try and figure out a way to defend his horrible decision to allow it to take place from the beginning? From CNN website.... [ QUOTE ]
A Dubai-owned company has agreed to turn over all its operations at U.S. ports to an American entity, Sen. John Warner said today. Reading a statement from DP World on the Senate floor, Warner said the company wants to preserve the strong relationship between Dubai and the United States. The announcement came soon after congressional leaders reportedly told President Bush that the DP World deal appeared dead on Capitol Hill.
<hr /></blockquote> Does this get the monkey off Bush's back (for now)? Here is the rest of the story (http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/03/09/port.security/index.html). I think DPW is saving W's butt in backing down. Congress was not going to even allow W to veto their bill against it, so basically by backing out DPW has allowed W to save face.
For all the conspiracy theorists out there, why do you think DPW backed away? Any chance it is because of the reasons given on the hill today? I really have no idea but I think W might have just gotten a lucky break.
eg8r
A Dubai-owned company has agreed to turn over all its operations at U.S. ports to an American entity, Sen. John Warner said today. Reading a statement from DP World on the Senate floor, Warner said the company wants to preserve the strong relationship between Dubai and the United States. The announcement came soon after congressional leaders reportedly told President Bush that the DP World deal appeared dead on Capitol Hill.
<hr /></blockquote> Does this get the monkey off Bush's back (for now)? Here is the rest of the story (http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/03/09/port.security/index.html). I think DPW is saving W's butt in backing down. Congress was not going to even allow W to veto their bill against it, so basically by backing out DPW has allowed W to save face.
For all the conspiracy theorists out there, why do you think DPW backed away? Any chance it is because of the reasons given on the hill today? I really have no idea but I think W might have just gotten a lucky break.
eg8r