View Full Version : Newt Gingrich's hypocracy Knows no Bounds!

Gayle in MD
03-09-2007, 08:19 AM

OMG! Didn't know he married his High School Teacher! I had read about how he went to his second wife's hospital bed, when she was fighting cancer, and demanded a divorce! This has got to be one of the biggest hypocrits to ever surface from under a rock! When I think of all his pompus statements against Bill Clinton, and read this BS he tries to fly now, it's nauseating! I don't know how this party continues to come up with so much scum!

Gayle in Md.

03-09-2007, 11:44 AM
Gayle, in leading the charge to investigate Bill Clinton's affair, while having one of his own....was both hypocritical and unbelievably arrogant.
And then he has the gall to justify it by alluding to the Clinton lie, about a question that should never have been asked. Wasn't the lie well after the investigation had been initiated by the Republicans....not out of concern that the moral standards of the country were being threatened, but solely to embarrass Clinton.

Gayle in MD
03-09-2007, 12:20 PM
When any group sets itself up as some pious, moral barrometer, for an entire society, or the world, they can be nothing else, but hypocrits. The absurdity of the charges against Clinton, resulting from blood thirsty partisan, active spying, using espionage style tactics, into the private sex life of any Citizen, was what I call unamerican activity, and an invasion of privacy, since it had no national connection, nor did it pose any threat to the country, in any way. It was an act, for which our country had to suffer embarrassment, but I saw the investigations, themselves, as even more repugnant, and particularly so, after learning how many other Republicans, were also involved in affairs, and worse.

If we're going to run our country around what men do in private, spur of the moment, we're in big damn trouble, lol.
/ccboard/images/graemlins/grin.gif There are unrealistic expectations, one must avoid, statistically, I mean, .... /ccboard/images/graemlins/wink.gif
Gayle in Md.

03-09-2007, 01:29 PM
I'm thinking that there now should be a Congressional investigation into Newt's dalliances...don't we have the right, and the need, to know who's screwing who....besides Bush and Cheney, screwing the whole country?

03-09-2007, 02:00 PM
I don't believe newt lied to a federal grand jury about it. Thats what the problem was. There's a very large difference.

03-09-2007, 02:37 PM
that's my point...we got to get him up before the grand jury, where they can quiz him about each stroke...the country, esp Congress, needs to know if Newt strayed from the CCRW approved, missionary position.....

03-09-2007, 04:56 PM
I thought you were more concerned with current events than those things that happened in the past.
If you want to talk about hypocracy, let's consider John Kerry's latest comments. He suggests that we must take PRE-EMPTIVE action against Pakistan to prevent any terrorist activity from building up there.
Now why would that be a good strategy to use against one of the countries in the middle east who actually works with the US, but it was a bad strategy in Iraq.
Let me try to understand what he is saying....."Pull out from Iraq, so we can start pre-emptive strategy against one of our alies"??????????????????????????
Sorry, I know this was started as a thread to bash Republicans. But you are the one who says a persons private affairs should be ignored when BC is the subject. Once again, I guess it all comes down to which party you belong to.

Gayle in MD
03-09-2007, 08:17 PM
And just who put Clinton into the position of being asked about his sex life in the first place? If Newt had been investigated, probed and spied on by a left wingnut bunch of sick voyuers, like Clinton was, he would have lied, too. Don't pull that BS. there had been a slew of presidents with mistresses before Clinton,... Eisenhower, Bush Sr., Kennedy, Roosevelt, just to name a few, but there had been a gentleman's agreement in the press, before the Corporate fascist pigs took over the media in this country, and the Rovarian tactics emerged on the scene. There was a right wing conspiracy to tarnish the Clinton's from the moment Clinton beat Bush Sr. Republicans, are not what one would call above the fray, to say the least. They seem to be above the fray on moving their line around, though.


Gayle in MD
03-09-2007, 08:36 PM
No Steve, once again, you righties on here can dish it out, but you can't take it. My position has not changed. I do not think that any person, politician or otherwise, should have their personal sexual privacy invaded, unless their actions endanger a child, or physically endanger another human being. That goes for both Republicans and Democrats. But, as I said, if one party works at setting itself up as the family values party, pious a above it all, with personal conversations with God, and campaigns on cleaning up the White House, they should take a look at their own crooks and lyers, first.

Clinton didn't do anything that Bush Senior didn't do, or Eisenhower, Roosevelt, Kennedy, and on and on. We just didn't have a bunch of dirt slinging, poor losers, with no consciences in Washington, before that, who wouldn't stop at anything to muddy up the Clinton's, and who crippled this country with their sick yoyuerism, and dirty pool tactics, eventho it took our attention away from more pressing issues, like bin Laden, for example.

As for Newt, his hypocracy knows no bounds. He was the ring leader, and I remember his pompus attacks against Clinton at the time, all the while he was doing the same damn thing, along with many other Republicans, as proven by none other than Larry Flynt.

We used to have press people and news people in this country who had some sense of dignity, and decorum about what they reported on, hence, nothing was ever said about Bush Sr, or the rest of the womanizers, all the way back to Jefferson. but alas, that was before the corporate fascist pigs took over our media, low down good for nothings like Rupert Murdoch.

As for Kerry, this thread is about Gingrich, not Kerry.

We have agreements with Pakistan to enter their country to go after the Taliban, and alQaeda. No such agreements existed when we OCCUPIED Iraq, with the intention of REGIME CHANGE. Try to keep up, will ya? /ccboard/images/graemlins/wink.gif

Gayle in Md.

03-10-2007, 07:25 PM
When any group sets itself up as some pious, moral barrometer, for an entire society, or the world, they can be nothing else, but hypocrits. <hr /></blockquote> Well, you do leave yourself (the group being referenced) on a very thin sheet of ice to walk on.


03-10-2007, 07:29 PM
"Well, you do leave yourself (the group being referenced) on a very thin sheet of ice to walk on."

I thought the global warming and polar bears, was the other thread /ccboard/images/graemlins/confused.gif /ccboard/images/graemlins/grin.gif

03-10-2007, 07:31 PM
I am multitasking. /ccboard/images/graemlins/smile.gif


03-11-2007, 04:38 AM

video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0t5e6VMYjnk&amp;eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Ehuffin gtonpost%2Ecom%2Fmax%2Dblumenthal%2Fa%2Dvideo%2Dex clusive%2Dcpac%2D%5Fb%5F43003%2Ehtml)


Things to watch for; Horrowitz on Democrats-also listen to the applause when Coulter insinuates that JE is a ' faggot'.
Gay porn star! LMAO
Q......... /ccboard/images/graemlins/smirk.gif

03-11-2007, 07:14 AM
She later apologized to the gay community for insulting them! /ccboard/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ccboard/images/graemlins/grin.gif

Gayle in MD
03-11-2007, 08:11 AM
Personally, I find her repulsive. Anyone who would say the things she said about the 9/11 widows, is Without Conscience , IMO. In fact, John Dean had the right description of the Neocons.

I hear some pundit say, any woman with an adam's apple the size of Coulters, has no business using a word like F----t.

Gayle in MD
03-11-2007, 08:14 AM
And, I take it you're pleased about the Libby verdict? did you know it is a felony, to lie to Congress, regardless of swearing in on a bible? How many lies has Bush, Cheney and Rice told to our Congress? Too many to count.

Gayle in Md.

03-11-2007, 10:18 AM
Then prove it and prosecute

03-11-2007, 07:12 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote Gayle in MD:</font><hr> And, I take it you're pleased about the Libby verdict? did you know it is a felony, to lie to Congress, regardless of swearing in on a bible? How many lies has Bush, Cheney and Rice told to our Congress? Too many to count.

Gayle in Md. <hr /></blockquote>

At least you finally figured out that lying under oath is a felony...regardless of what the lie is about!
It's a good thing they didn't go after Hillery...I don't believe a convicted felon can run for President.

Gayle in MD
03-11-2007, 08:14 PM
Have you ever made a point in your life without being condescending?

I never said it wasn't a felony to lie under oath.

Also, until you see bin Ladens mushroom cloud, I don't think you will understand why some lies are much worse than others, and some questions fall into the category of poor taste, such as asking people about their private sex life. Now, why don't you tell me what you think about Scooter's lies? Tell me what you think about Gonzales's lies? Rice's lies, Bush's lies, Laura's lies, Cheney's lies, Cunningham's lies, Nay's lies, Reagans's lies, Bush Sr.'s lies, Rumsfeld's lies, Nixon's lies, Delay's lies, Abramoff's Lies, O'Reilly's lies, Lumbaugh's lies, Coulter's lies, get it?

Now let's count up all these lies, and you tell me how many people got slaughtered, displaced, blinded, lost their limbs, their brains, their mental health, their homes, and their country, because of the lies that each one of these people told? You say a lie is a lie, one as bad as the nest. I say BULL***T!

/ccboard/images/graemlins/shocked.gif /ccboard/images/graemlins/smirk.gif