PDA

View Full Version : Bravo! Rice Must Answer To Her Lies To America



Gayle in MD
04-10-2007, 09:56 AM
[ QUOTE ]

April 09, 2007

Waxman Still Wants Rice To Answer Question On Niger Uranium Claims


After receiving what he deemed an insufficient response from the State Department, House Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.) is reiterating his request for Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to appear before the panel on April 18 to answer questions about administration claims that Iraq tried to buy enriched uranium from Niger.

Waxman wants Rice to answer questions about what she knew about the assertion that Iraq tried to buy uranium before the U.S. invasion, according to a letter the chairman sent Rice on Monday.

The claims, which have since been proved false, were the basis for a now notorious line in President Bush’s State of the Union in 2003 address to justify the invasion of Iraq. That claim eventually led to the outing of Valerie Plame, a covert CIA agent, who has already testified before Waxman’s committee.

In his most recent letter to Rice, Waxman lays out the four questions he would like Rice to answer:

1) Whether she knew if Bush “cited forged evidence about Iraq’s efforts to procure uranium from Niger in the State of the Union Address”;

2) Whether she was aware of doubts raised by CIA and State Department officials questioning the veracity of those claims before Bush delivered his speech;

3) Whether there was any factual basis for Rice’s reference in a 2003 op-ed to “Iraq’s efforts to get uranium from abroad”;

4) Whether Rice “took appropriate steps to investigate how the Niger claim ended up in the State of the Union address after it was revealed to be fraudulent.”

Waxman also criticizes State Department legislative liaison Jeffrey Bergner for failing to address any of the above questions in a letter to the committee earlier this month.

“Rather than address any of these questions, Mr. Bergner forwarded copies of two old State Department letter that have no bearing whatsoever on your knowledge of, your role in, or your statements about the Niger claim,” Waxman wrote.

Waxman also criticized Bergner for failing to answer the committee’s questions about “the seemingly inconsistent way in which the White House has responded to leaks of classified information, such as the disclosure of the identity of cover CIA agent Valerie Plame.”




posted by Patrick O'Connor 12:08 PM | comments (0) | post comment | permalink










<hr /></blockquote>






http://www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/0407/Waxman_Still_Wants_Rice_To_Answer_Question_On_Nige r_Uranium_Claims.html

<font color="red">It's about time this liar be forced to accountability for her lies! I hope they call Richard Clarke in to sit right next to her while she testifies, and the others from the Alex Unit, who beat their heads against the wall trying to get this administration's mind off Iraq, to focus on bin Laden's coming attack on 9/11, which Rice, Bush and Cheney refused to take seriously. We may just be able to impeach these liars yet. April 28th, the word "IMPEACH" will be spelled out all over the country, at the Mall, at airports, in front of Nancy Pelosi's house, there will be Impeachment demonstrations. All I can say is, it's high time this country woke up!

Gayle in Md.
</font color>

eg8r
04-10-2007, 02:05 PM
[ QUOTE ]
It's about time this liar be forced to accountability for her lies! <hr /></blockquote> Didn't you learn anything from the Plame non-issue about acting like judge and jury all before the actual day in court. You want justice for all and all the liars to be punished for their actions yet you are completely throwing "innocent until proven guilty" out the window.

eg8r

Gayle in MD
04-10-2007, 02:18 PM
There is nothing innocent about Rice, Bush, Rumsfeld, Gonzales or Cheney, Ed. They are all guilty of treason, war crimes, and worse.

Gayle in Md.

eg8r
04-10-2007, 02:21 PM
[ QUOTE ]
They are all guilty of treason, war crimes, and worse.
<hr /></blockquote> I am not interested in picking and choosing when I will follow the law or Constitution. They are innocent until proven guilty, like it or not.

eg8r

Gayle in MD
04-10-2007, 02:37 PM
That's good. Now if you could only have convinced this administration of the same modus operendi, we wouldn't be having this conversation, our troops wouldn't be in Iraq, and Rice and Gonzales wouldn't be home burning the midnight oils, practicing for their nex performance! /ccboard/images/graemlins/wink.gif

Gayle in Md....IMO, Guilty!!! All of them!

Qtec
04-10-2007, 07:35 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Didn't you learn anything from the Plame non-issue about acting like judge and jury all before the actual day in court. You want justice for all and all the liars to be punished for their actions yet you are completely throwing "innocent until proven guilty" out the window.

eg8r <hr /></blockquote>

Didn't you say this in a post not so long ago?

[ QUOTE ]

So, the left states they are going to do what is right when they win. They proceed to win the elections, and do nothing right. We have Pelosi out there appeasing the terrorists, she is our new hanoi jane, the pork spending is continuing even though the left thought it was awful when the Reps did it, there are more, however now we are finding out Mrs. Feinstein is a crooked as it gets <hr /></blockquote>

Sounds to me that you already made your mind up!

Q

eg8r
04-10-2007, 10:30 PM
You are right I made my up.

eg8r

eg8r
04-10-2007, 10:31 PM
[ QUOTE ]
That's good. <hr /></blockquote> Is it only good when it suits your purpose?

eg8r

Gayle in MD
04-11-2007, 03:20 AM
Hey Ed, Glad you left "mind" out of that sentence! /ccboard/images/graemlins/grin.gif

eg8r
04-11-2007, 10:55 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Hey Ed, Glad you left "mind" out of that sentence! <hr /></blockquote> Welcome.

eg8r