PDA

View Full Version : ANN COULTER KNOCKS IT OUT OF THE PARK



bamadog
10-26-2007, 11:44 PM
Beauty, brains, and she makes little liberal girlie-men wet their pants.
It doesn't get much better than Ann!

http://www.anncoulter.com/

TomBrooklyn
10-27-2007, 01:29 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr> brains <hr /></blockquote>
Brains?

Ann Coulter seems to think Christianity is superior to any or all of the other religions of the world, as she denounces Fascism while advocating a Christian-Fascist position herself.

Psuedo-brains maybe. But not brains.

S0Noma
10-27-2007, 02:19 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr> Beauty, brains, and she makes little liberal girlie-men wet their pants.
It doesn't get much better than Ann!

http://www.anncoulter.com/ <hr /></blockquote>

As a female mouthpiece for right-wing bigots and Republican xtian fundamentalists? Her audience consists largely of people who put their faith in an Evangelist President. A man who seriously believes he gets messages from an invisible sky fairy? - A man who also believes that 'the end times' are coming - and so is something called 'The Rapture' where only the true believers will ascend to an imaginary place called heaven leaving the rest of us poor souls behind to fend for ourselves.

I think she's hilarious. Right now, the only end-times I'm looking forward to is the end of eight years of Republican screw-ups. Hope we can all survive until then.

For anyone here who isn't familiar with 'The Rapture' please check out this link: http://www.raptureready.com/

Apparently, if you believe in that whacky $hit you can never be too prepared.

bamadog
10-27-2007, 04:38 PM
Do you have any comments on her article, or is what Ann actually writes irrelevant to your opinion of her?

bamadog
10-27-2007, 07:31 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote TomBrooklyn:</font><hr> <blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr> brains <hr /></blockquote>
Brains?

Ann Coulter seems to think Christianity is superior to any or all of the other religions of the world, as she denounces Fascism while advocating a Christian-Fascist position herself.

Psuedo-brains maybe. But not brains. <hr /></blockquote>

Are you a Christian?

bamadog
10-29-2007, 10:33 AM
Still waiting. Step up to the plate and take your best swing.

S0Noma
10-29-2007, 10:42 AM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr> Still waiting. Step up to the plate and take your best swing. <hr /></blockquote>

Sorry, game's over and everyone's gone home. You struck out when you headlined your OP in ALL CAPS (considered screaming and extremely rude in Net-talk terms). If you want to keep standing here with your thumb in your a$$ waiting for someone to tell you something that you should already know (Ann Coulter's a hate mongering ditz)? You go right ahead bro.

Or maybe you should take it down to the beer hall and share it with the rest of your Coulter Loving pals? It's pretty far reaching but perhaps still within the realm of possibilities that a putz like you could start another putsch.

Sonoma

DeadCrab
10-29-2007, 12:11 PM
Coulter used to be a guy.

Check the adam's apple. Dead give away.

bamadog
10-29-2007, 12:12 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote S0Noma:</font><hr> <blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr> Still waiting. Step up to the plate and take your best swing. <hr /></blockquote>

Sorry, game's over and everyone's gone home. You struck out when you headlined your OP in ALL CAPS (considered screaming and extremely rude in Net-talk terms). If you want to keep standing here with your thumb in your a$$ waiting for someone to tell you something that you should already know (Ann Coulter's a hate mongering ditz)? You go right ahead bro.

Or maybe you should take it down to the beer hall and share it with the rest of your Coulter Loving pals? It's pretty far reaching but perhaps still within the realm of possibilities that a putz like you could start another putsch.

Sonoma <hr /></blockquote>

That's about what I expected from you after seeing some of your other pathetic efforts here. Since you can't intelligently comment on the article, you choose the easy way out, you attack the author and the poster.
Pretty sad.
I'll let the other posters here make up their minds about who was rude.

Gayle in MD
10-29-2007, 12:55 PM
She's one nasty something or other. Did you see the clip from a recent interview, when she said that the mission of Christians, is to perfect Jews. /ccboard/images/graemlins/shocked.gif

She must have the shrillest voice I've ever heard, and only Bilge O'Reilly is as good at insultous interruptous. Her books have been proven full of plagiary. What ever happened to her taking the hurricane money, illegally, and intentionally voting in the wrong district, in Fla.? /ccboard/images/graemlins/grin.gif

She's not a journalist, by any stretch.

Gayle in Md.

bamadog
10-29-2007, 01:34 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote Gayle in MD:</font><hr> She's one nasty something or other. Did you see the clip from a recent interview, when she said that the mission of Christians, is to perfect Jews. /ccboard/images/graemlins/shocked.gif

She must have the shrillest voice I've ever heard, and only Bilge O'Reilly is as good at insultous interruptous. Her books have been proven full of plagiary. What ever happened to her taking the hurricane money, illegally, and intentionally voting in the wrong district, in Fla.? /ccboard/images/graemlins/grin.gif

She's not a journalist, by any stretch.

Gayle in Md.


<hr /></blockquote>

Pretty funny to hear YOU call someone "shrill".
In the time-honored liberal tradition, when you can't deal with the message, you attack the messenger.
btw, Ann has never called herself a Journalist.

Qtec
10-29-2007, 10:09 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr> Do you have any comments on her article, or is what Ann actually writes irrelevant to your opinion of her? <hr /></blockquote>

Do you actually have a point?








[ QUOTE ]
HAVE YOU HUGGED AN ISLAMO-FASCIST TODAY?
October 24, 2007

College liberals are in a fit of pique because various speakers are coming to their campuses this week as part of David Horowitz's Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week -- not to be confused with Islamo-Fascism Appreciation Week, which I believe is in April.

Apparently liberals support Islamo-fascism.
<hr /></blockquote>

So, because people who think for themselves don't want to hear the racist BS being spouted by DH and they protest, they must support the terrorists?????????????????
Do you call that logic?

AC is totally white trash. She is the worst of the worst. She speards hate and lies. She makes many claims but does she EVER back anything up?

Anne at her best/worst.
"College campuses across the nation are installing foot baths to accommodate Muslims' daily bathing ritual,[ are they? Examples? Links} while surgically removing the Ten Commandments from every public space in America.[ the friggin ten Cs were never there in the first place!!!!!!!!!!!!Liar!] Maybe the Ten Commandments could be printed on towels and kept next to the foot baths."

Do Jews get served Kosher food on Campus? Is providing a friggin footbath such a big deal?
is it the end of the USA as we know it?

get a grip for cripes sake.

I will do you a favour. here is the actual video.

Q................do I have to do everything for you guys?


web page (http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/10/26/david-horowitz-gets-booed-off-the-stage-at-emory/) /ccboard/images/graemlins/grin.gif

bamadog
10-29-2007, 11:29 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote Qtec:</font><hr> <blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr> Do you have any comments on her article, or is what Ann actually writes irrelevant to your opinion of her? <hr /></blockquote>

Do you actually have a point?








&lt;/font&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;font class="small"&gt;Quote:&lt;/font&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;
HAVE YOU HUGGED AN ISLAMO-FASCIST TODAY?
October 24, 2007

College liberals are in a fit of pique because various speakers are coming to their campuses this week as part of David Horowitz's Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week -- not to be confused with Islamo-Fascism Appreciation Week, which I believe is in April.

Apparently liberals support Islamo-fascism.
<hr /></blockquote>

So, because people who think for themselves don't want to hear the racist BS being spouted by DH and they protest, they must support the terrorists?????????????????
Do you call that logic?

AC is totally white trash. She is the worst of the worst. She speards hate and lies. She makes many claims but does she EVER back anything up?

Anne at her best/worst.
"College campuses across the nation are installing foot baths to accommodate Muslims' daily bathing ritual,[ are they? Examples? Links} while surgically removing the Ten Commandments from every public space in America.[ the friggin ten Cs were never there in the first place!!!!!!!!!!!!Liar!] Maybe the Ten Commandments could be printed on towels and kept next to the foot baths."

Do Jews get served Kosher food on Campus? Is providing a friggin footbath such a big deal?
is it the end of the USA as we know it?

get a grip for cripes sake.

I will do you a favour. here is the actual video.

Q................do I have to do everything for you guys?


web page (http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/10/26/david-horowitz-gets-booed-off-the-stage-at-emory/) /ccboard/images/graemlins/grin.gif <hr /></blockquote>

In what way is David Horowitz a racist?

S0Noma
10-29-2007, 11:33 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr> Do you have any comments on her article, or is what Ann actually writes irrelevant to your opinion of her? <hr /></blockquote>

Rebuttal to this crap begins and ends with a simple statement: David Horowitz is a goddamned liar, full of:

Cooked statistics http://aaup-ca.org/Larkin_abor.html

Blatant bigotry http://www.mediatransparency.org/reprints/horowitz_bigot.htm

Guilt by association http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/

Editorial cheating http://www.michaelberube.com/index.php/weblog/why_horowitz_hates_professors/

A "contradictory mess of unfounded allegations, retractions, corrections of retractions, retractions of corrections, and corrected retracting allegories" http://mediamatters.org/items/200503180008#5

And a neverending stream of unmitigated bull$hit http://aaup-ca.org/larkin_morethanastretch.html

http://uspolitics.tribe.net/thread/601fe48e-c2c7-435c-a8f7-d2bf5e6f9929#916dcd01-b0a8-42cf-a334-ed010ca31e3e

bamadog
10-29-2007, 11:46 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote S0Noma:</font><hr> <blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr> Do you have any comments on her article, or is what Ann actually writes irrelevant to your opinion of her? <hr /></blockquote>

Rebuttal to this crap begins and ends with a simple statement: David Horowitz is a goddamned liar, full of:

Cooked statistics http://aaup-ca.org/Larkin_abor.html

Blatant bigotry http://www.mediatransparency.org/reprints/horowitz_bigot.htm

Guilt by association http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/

Editorial cheating http://www.michaelberube.com/index.php/weblog/why_horowitz_hates_professors/

A "contradictory mess of unfounded allegations, retractions, corrections of retractions, retractions of corrections, and corrected retracting allegories" http://mediamatters.org/items/200503180008#5

And a neverending stream of unmitigated bull$hit http://aaup-ca.org/larkin_morethanastretch.html

http://uspolitics.tribe.net/thread/601fe48e-c2c7-435c-a8f7-d2bf5e6f9929#916dcd01-b0a8-42cf-a334-ed010ca31e3e <hr /></blockquote>

Oh, that took some real effort on your part. You just googled David Horowitz, and wherever you found a critical article you linked it.
Pretty sad.

S0Noma
10-30-2007, 12:02 AM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr>
Oh, that took some real effort on your part. You just googled David Horowitz, and wherever you found a critical article you linked it.
Pretty sad.
<hr /></blockquote>

Oh my, bama - it's called research - you know the kind of research that rebuts the Coulter tripe that you so happily swallowed hook, line and sinker. Not surprising - simple minds love simple answers.

Read the links, jerk-off - I read your sicko Coulter claptrap. Then rebut them - if you can. I'm thinking two things we can take to the bank here - one you aren't going to follow those links and read what they have to say because you can't handle the truth and two - you couldn't offer a genuine analytical response to them if you did.

Prove me wrong Bamadog - you can sit and howl 'sad' until the cows come home and it still won't change the fact that you're a simple minded right wing coward and a hater with an extremist agenda.

Prove me wrong - come on - you can do it - or maybe you can't? FYI: My money's on 'can't'.

nAz
10-30-2007, 01:44 AM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote S0Noma:</font><hr>
Oh my, bama - it's called research - you know the kind of research that rebuts the Coulter tripe that you so happily swallowed hook, line and sinker. Not surprising - simple minds love simple answers.

Read the links, jerk-off - I read your sicko Coulter claptrap. Then rebut them - if you can. I'm thinking two things we can take to the bank here - one you aren't going to follow those links and read what they have to say because you can't handle the truth and two - you couldn't offer a genuine analytical response to them if you did.

Prove me wrong Bamadog - you can sit and howl 'sad' until the cows come home and it still won't change the fact that you're a simple minded right wing coward and a hater with an extremist agenda.

Prove me wrong - come on - you can do it - or maybe you can't? FYI: My money's on 'can't'. <hr /></blockquote>

DAMN!! /ccboard/images/graemlins/ooo.gif

Qtec
10-30-2007, 07:58 AM
[ QUOTE ]
DAMN!! <hr /></blockquote>
Nice one nAz. I couldn't have put it better. Somebody got owned big time.
LMAO

Q...... /ccboard/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ccboard/images/graemlins/laugh.gif..............LOL

Gayle in MD
10-30-2007, 09:05 AM
Each and every one of those apply to coulter, as well. /ccboard/images/graemlins/smirk.gif

Chopstick
10-30-2007, 10:11 AM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote S0Noma:</font><hr> <font color="blue">I have never heard of this guy but for the sake of discussion I will have a look at this material. </font color>

Rebuttal to this crap begins and ends with a simple statement: David Horowitz is a goddamned liar, full of:

Cooked statistics http://aaup-ca.org/Larkin_abor.html

<font color="blue">I read the Academic Bill of Rights and it looks like a pretty good policy to me.

"Students will be graded solely on the basis of their reasoned answers and appropriate knowledge of the subjects and disciplines they study, not on the basis of their political or religious beliefs."

"Faculty will not use their courses for the purpose of political, ideological, religious or anti-religious indoctrination."

Seems to me that the only people that would have a problem with this are the teachers that are violating these rules using their position as a pulpit to advance their personal agendas. This is not the job they were hired for. These professors are out of line and need to be corrected or fired. If I paid for a course in mathematics then I want to learn mathematics. I don't want to hear about saving the whales.

The rest of this article is filled with dead end links and seems just to be a rant about how this guy doesn't like DH.</font color>

Blatant bigotry http://www.mediatransparency.org/reprints/horowitz_bigot.htm
<font color="blue">
"The fact is that while blacks make up only 12 percent of the population, they account for 46 percent of total violent crime and 90 percent of the murders of other blacks."

DH may, in fact, be a racist, but I don't think suggesting that black males, between the ages of 15 and 24, stop shooting at each other makes him one.</font color>

Guilt by association http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/

<font color="blue"> "the radical left has forged an alliance with radical Islam,"

I am going to agree with you here. This is out of line. I do not believe the left wants anything to do with radical Islam. I do believe that radical Islam will take advantage of the left to hurt this country and others.
</font color>

Editorial cheating http://www.michaelberube.com/index.php/weblog/why_horowitz_hates_professors/
<font color="blue">I am not sure what to think of this debate. I enjoyed reading it though. Neither one of them responded to any specific points or resolved any issues. Maybe that is how debates are done now days. I do like MBs attitude though. I will read some more of his stuff. </font color>

A "contradictory mess of unfounded allegations, retractions, corrections of retractions, retractions of corrections, and corrected retracting allegories"
http://mediamatters.org/items/200503180008#5

<font color="blue">"David Horowitz has repeatedly cited an incident in which he claims that a criminology professor at the University of Northern Colorado asked students to explain "why President Bush was a war criminal" for a mid-term exam essay, then failed a student who chose instead to explain why Saddam Hussein is a war criminal. Horowitz claimed that this student testified about her experience at a special hearing before the Colorado state legislature in December 2003. But Horowitz has never provided the names of the professor or the student, and transcripts of the hearing to which Horowitz himself linked do not mention the incident. Nonetheless, accounts of the alleged incident have been repeated in several national media outlets."

Well...

University of Northern Colorado Story Confirmed
By Ryan Call--SAF Central Regional Coordinator--03/14/05

The student was a sophomore at the University of Northern Colorado in Greeley, enrolled in a three-credit Criminology course in the Sociology Department during the spring semester of 2003. The course was required for the "Criminal Justice Emphasis" for the Sociology B.A. degree. The course was taught by Assistant Professor Robert Dunkley, who is still with UNC as an Assistant Professor in the newly-formed Criminal Justice Department. The course is now offered through the Criminal Justice Department, as opposed to Sociology, which may explain why some members of the media failed to find it listed among the current course offerings in the Sociology Department at UNC.

Taken from the 2002-2003 UNC Course Catalog, the course description is as follows: "SOC 346 - Criminology. Prerequisite: SOC 100 or equivalent. Survey criminal behavior generally, including theories of causation, types of crime, extent of crime, law enforcement, criminal justice, punishment and treatment."

The final exam format was a four-question essay exam. The student recalls that the fourth exam question was phrased: "Explain why President Bush is a war criminal." The student instead answered the question by discussing why Saddam Hussein was a war criminal, and received a failing grade. The student, deeply upset by both the unfair and politically-loaded question, as well as her failing grade, contacted the department chair and filed a complaint to begin the official appeals process.

During the appeals process, the professor claimed the exam question read: "Explain why President Bush could be considered a war criminal." During the appeals process, however, the professor was unable to produce copies of either the final exam or the student's final exam essay, for which she had received a failing grade. The student reported that the reason given by the department chair and the dean was that it was Professor Dunkley's first semester teaching at UNC, and he didn't know he should have kept copies of the exam.

UNC President Kay Norton was both aware of and involved with the appeals process as it unfolded regarding this incident. In fact, when President Norton appeared along with the presidents from other top Colorado universities before a legislative hearing of the Joint Education Committee on September 9, 2004, not only did she acknowledge that she was aware of the situation, but she was able to describe to the members of the committee what steps the university had taken to deal with the student's complaints.

This kind of crap is going on in college classrooms all across this country and it extends into the scientific community which is far more dangerous.

I am going to take a break now. I have to go do some work. These are just my thoughts giving this a quick read through. If I am misunderstanding this material, feel free to let me know. I am never opposed to changing my point of view based on new information.

</font color>

And a neverending stream of unmitigated bull$hit http://aaup-ca.org/larkin_morethanastretch.html

http://uspolitics.tribe.net/thread/601fe48e-c2c7-435c-a8f7-d2bf5e6f9929#916dcd01-b0a8-42cf-a334-ed010ca31e3e <hr /></blockquote>

bamadog
10-30-2007, 11:20 AM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote nAz:</font><hr> <blockquote><font class="small">Quote S0Noma:</font><hr>
Oh my, bama - it's called research - you know the kind of research that rebuts the Coulter tripe that you so happily swallowed hook, line and sinker. Not surprising - simple minds love simple answers.

Read the links, jerk-off - I read your sicko Coulter claptrap. Then rebut them - if you can. I'm thinking two things we can take to the bank here - one you aren't going to follow those links and read what they have to say because you can't handle the truth and two - you couldn't offer a genuine analytical response to them if you did.

Prove me wrong Bamadog - you can sit and howl 'sad' until the cows come home and it still won't change the fact that you're a simple minded right wing coward and a hater with an extremist agenda.

Prove me wrong - come on - you can do it - or maybe you can't? FYI: My money's on 'can't'. <hr /></blockquote>

DAMN!! /ccboard/images/graemlins/ooo.gif <hr /></blockquote>


If you think that your little copy and paste job rises to the level of research, then you are even more pathetic than I thought you were.
You couldn't even add your own editorial comments. You plagiarized them as well.
Funny thing I found on "Tribe"

-------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Ann sticks it straight in your face!

Thu, October 25, 2007 - 5:46 AM
Rebuttal to this crap begins and ends with a simple statement: David Horowitz is a goddamned liar, full of:

Cooked statistics aaup-ca.org/Larkin_abor.html

Blatant bigotry www.mediatransparency.org/repri...ot.htm (http://www.mediatransparency.org/repri...ot.htm)

Guilt by association www.discoverthenetworks.org/ (http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/)

Editorial cheating www.michaelberube.com/index.p...fessors/ (http://www.michaelberube.com/index.p...fessors/)

A "contradictory mess of unfounded allegations, retractions, corrections of retractions, retractions of corrections, and corrected retracting allegories" mediamatters.org/items/200503180008#5

And a neverending stream of unmitigated bullshit aaup-ca.org/larkin_morethanastretch.html
--------------------------------------------------------------
Do you recognize it?
It was posted by a guy named Jimi 5 days ago!

Finally, the fact that you are so intellectually crippled that you think that copying other peoples' comments and presenting them as your own "research", is by definition, SAD!

BTW, Your childish name-calling only makes you look more foolish.

LAMas
10-30-2007, 11:31 AM
Touche. Tap Tap Tap.

S0Noma
10-30-2007, 12:44 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr>

<blockquote><font class="small">Quote S0Noma:</font><hr> <blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr> Do you have any comments on her article, or is what Ann actually writes irrelevant to your opinion of her? <hr /></blockquote>

Rebuttal to this crap begins and ends with a simple statement: David Horowitz is a goddamned liar, full of:

Cooked statistics http://aaup-ca.org/Larkin_abor.html

Blatant bigotry http://www.mediatransparency.org/reprints/horowitz_bigot.htm

Guilt by association http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/

Editorial cheating http://www.michaelberube.com/index.php/weblog/why_horowitz_hates_professors/

A "contradictory mess of unfounded allegations, retractions, corrections of retractions, retractions of corrections, and corrected retracting allegories" http://mediamatters.org/items/200503180008#5

And a neverending stream of unmitigated bull$hit http://aaup-ca.org/larkin_morethanastretch.html

<hr /></blockquote>

If you think that your little copy and paste job rises to the level of research, then you are even more pathetic than I thought you were.
You couldn't even add your own editorial comments. You plagiarized them as well.
Funny thing I found on "Tribe"

-------------------------------------------------------------
HEY BAMADORK! CHECK THIS OUT! YEP! IT'S A COPY OF MY ORIGINAL POST IN IT'S ENTIRETY - NOT THE ONE WITH THE 'SPECIAL' MANICURE JOB YOU'VE INCLUDED ABOVE. BE SURE TO PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO THE LINK AT THE BOTTOM (I'VE HIGHLIGHTED IT IN RED JUST FOR YOU - SORRY - ALL OUT OF WHITE AND BLUE)

Re: Ann sticks it straight in your face!

Thu, October 25, 2007 - 5:46 AM
Rebuttal to this crap begins and ends with a simple statement: David Horowitz is a goddamned liar, full of:

Cooked statistics aaup-ca.org/Larkin_abor.html

Blatant bigotry www.mediatransparency.org/repri...ot.htm (http://www.mediatransparency.org/repri...ot.htm)

Guilt by association www.discoverthenetworks.org/ (http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/)

Editorial cheating www.michaelberube.com/index.p...fessors/ (http://www.michaelberube.com/index.p...fessors/)

A "contradictory mess of unfounded allegations, retractions, corrections of retractions, retractions of corrections, and corrected retracting allegories" mediamatters.org/items/200503180008#5

And a neverending stream of unmitigated bullshit aaup-ca.org/larkin_morethanastretch.html

---&gt;<font color="red">http://uspolitics.tribe.net/thread/601fe48e-c2c7-435c-a8f7-d2bf5e6f9929#916dcd01-b0a8-42cf-a334-ed010ca31e3e </font color>

[b]Look up BamaDork - can you SEE IT NOW?!?!? UMMM... YEP, It's the missing element in your great EXPOSURE post below - I mean, it's the very link that I included at the end of my original post to give credit to the proper source. You know, the one that I left there for you to follow. You had to have followed it to 'uncover' my crime but for personal reasons (total lack of integrity ring a bell?) you chose to leave it off when you copy/pasted the 'indictment' quote from my post above?

So... brianiac, 'a guy named jimi' made this post and YOU discovered it! Wow! You CAN click on a link (if I provide it for you first) and follow it (if I provide it for you first)! But you'd prefer to come here and imply in front of god and everyone that 'you found it all on your lonesome' and that I was trying to pass off the whole thing as my own?

Darn, that sure would have been tougher to do if you'd included the reference link from my original post - now wouldn't it?

Liar, liar, pants on fire - hanging from a telephone wire!

FWIW: I'm still waiting for you to respond to the contents of those links, dorkus. Because, your blatant attempt to distort the truth for your own benefit notwithstanding - you have yet to manage a single coherent rebuttal.

But I'm not holding my breath. Coherent and Bamadork = oxymoron.&lt;/b&gt;
--------------------------------------------------------------
<font color="blue">Do you recognize it? </font color>

<font color="red">Of course I do you farging idiot! - I included the link to it in my post) </font color>

<font color="blue">It was posted by a guy named Jimi 5 days ago! </font color>

<font color="red">NO KIDDING?!?!? How'd you figure that out?! </font color>

<font color="blue">Finally, the fact that you are so intellectually crippled that you think that copying other peoples' comments and presenting them as your own "research", is by definition, SAD!

BTW, Your childish name-calling only makes you look more foolish. </font color> <hr /></blockquote>

bamadog
10-30-2007, 01:06 PM
Sorry Buddy, but that doesn't fly. Because when you copy someones' editorial comments and don't put them in quotes and only link a site at the bottom of your post with no citation, that is plagiarism. I made no attempt to deny that the link was at the bottom of your post, as I copied Jimi's comments directly from "Tribe", not from your post . But those were HIS editorial comments not yours. You even copied Jimi's links. You are apparently too lazy to read and analyze your own links.
Now are you still trying to call what you presented as research?
Again, that is pretty sad.
Let me tell you why that doesn't work.
I can easily google DH and get 10 complimentary articles about him and post them here. Then I can call that "research" and demand, as you did, that you read and answer each and every article. Is that the way you want to debate?
Further, if you would like to discuss Horowitz's position on a specific issue, why not start a thread? I am an admirer of DH and will probably weigh in. But this thread is about the Coulter piece.
Finally, you just can't get over the name-calling thing can you? Do you think that makes you look intelligent? On the contrary.

wolfdancer
10-30-2007, 01:27 PM
Damnation...even my monitor got hot,displaying that reply.
There has to be some shock setting in about now...
That kind of "biting commentary" they been throwing at you, silenced all opposition over in the Majors, yet you just keep
hitting their best stuff out of the ball park....
Well don't let 'em spoil yer lunch....as Satchel Paige noted
"Anger makes the blood boil"....an I thinks I see a little steam coming out their ears 'bout now.

eg8r
10-30-2007, 01:35 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Sorry Buddy, but that doesn't fly. Because when you copy someones' editorial comments and don't put them in quotes and only link a site at the bottom of your post with no citation, that is plagiarism. <hr /></blockquote> You really do look foolish bama(puppy)dog.

eg8r

wolfdancer
10-30-2007, 01:53 PM
if I was a dyed-in-the-wool, Christian, Conservative, ultra right wing (that means border line Fascist)Republican.....the last person I'd want to be quoting as a true representative of the ideals of my party....would be the total pos
Ann ***** Coulter.
I'd take it a step farther, and pay her to speak out for the people's party...the Democrats...
There's vaginae, and there are c-words...and when I see or hear Ann...one word comes to mind....
Hope this doesn't offend...

wolfdancer
10-30-2007, 04:24 PM
I have new found respect for the good folks over on AZB.
This AC post went across about as well over there, as it did here.

http://www.splcenter.org/images/dynamic/intel/report/0/ir110_100x131.jpg

wolfdancer
10-30-2007, 04:41 PM
I show 27 replies to this "dynamic" thread...and only 3 positive responses, discounting of course the nine he added to his own thread....so the official count is
yeas 3
nays 15
now I skipped school the day we got to this here advanced math...but it looks like a 5/1 ratio...and an approval rating of *&amp;^%$#^&amp;* (Xz3)-41.....= 17% (rounded off)..them's
matches Bush's numbers....WTF? talk about a coincidence..

bamadog
10-30-2007, 05:42 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote wolfdancer:</font><hr> I show 27 replies to this "dynamic" thread...and only 3 positive responses, discounting of course the nine he added to his own thread....so the official count is
yeas 3
nays 15
now I skipped school the day we got to this here advanced math...but it looks like a 5/1 ratio...and an approval rating of *&amp;^%$#^&amp;* (Xz3)-41.....= 17% (rounded off)..them's
matches Bush's numbers....WTF? talk about a coincidence.. <hr /></blockquote>

Pretty funny what a toothless cheerleader you've become, since you don't have what it takes to step up to bat yourself.

bamadog
10-30-2007, 06:48 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote eg8r:</font><hr> &lt;/font&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;font class="small"&gt;Quote:&lt;/font&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;
Sorry Buddy, but that doesn't fly. Because when you copy someones' editorial comments and don't put them in quotes and only link a site at the bottom of your post with no citation, that is plagiarism. <hr /></blockquote> You really do look foolish bama(puppy)dog.

eg8r <hr /></blockquote>

So you think that copying someone else's post from another forum including their links and comments and then saying this:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
(quote,SONoma)
Read the links, jerk-off - I read your sicko Coulter claptrap. Then rebut them - if you can. I'm thinking two things we can take to the bank here - one you aren't going to follow those links and read what they have to say because you can't handle the truth and two - you couldn't offer a genuine analytical response to them if you did.

Prove me wrong Bamadog - you can sit and howl 'sad' until the cows come home and it still won't change the fact that you're a simple minded right wing coward and a hater with an extremist agenda. (Quote,SONoma)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
is fine, and a decent way to debate? While I say it is intellectual laziness at best, and intellectual dishonesty at worst.

But you say I look foolish.
Have I entered some kind of alternate universe over here?

eg8r
10-30-2007, 07:13 PM
[ QUOTE ]
So you think that copying someone else's post from another forum including their links and comments and then saying this: <hr /></blockquote> I think your attempt to label him as a plairgarist (sp?) is the most foolish thing on earth. You don't have anything to say about his content you are just trying to shoot him down for giving you something to read. You should practice what you preach and step up to bat.

eg8r

bamadog
10-30-2007, 07:18 PM
He didn't make any comment. Did you see one? His linking half a dozen articles critical of Horowitz and demanding that I answer every contention was spurious. I am surprised you can't see that. If you notice I have answered every reasonable post about Ann's column. That IS stepping up to the plate.

S0Noma
10-30-2007, 08:50 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr> He didn't make any comment. Did you see one? His linking half a dozen articles critical of Horowitz and demanding that I answer every contention was spurious. I am surprised you can't see that. If you notice I have answered every reasonable post about Ann's column. That IS stepping up to the plate. <hr /></blockquote>

Oh, Bambi, why do you insist on opening your trap and proving what an idiot you are over and over again?

Here - let me help. Here's your very first post in the thread:

http://i21.tinypic.com/qx6q10.jpg

After typing out your header using all caps - tantamount to screaming on the Net as you MUST KNOW by now (do the soapbox thing much Bambi?) You made these pithy comments about the garbage Coulter tries to pass off as writing:

[ QUOTE ]
Beauty, brains, and she makes little liberal girlie-men wet their pants.
It doesn't get much better than Ann! <hr /></blockquote>

So we are to conclude that you feel she's really smart (not hard - compared to you almost everyone is really smart - except maybe some of those poor kids we see in the Special Olympics - but hey, you gotta be smarter than someone, right? Might as well be them.) and really beautiful (although as has been pointed out by more than one observant bystander she DOES appear to have an Adam's Apple and if it turns out to be true? Maybe it won't matter to you?).

Furthermore she apparently has the magically capacity to make so-called 'liberals' lose control of their bladders while still fully clothed. This is her claim to fame? Or is it just wishful thinking on your part?

What I'm gingerly trying to point out to you, Bambi - is that you offered jack $hit in the way of commentary in your OP - nothing really there BUT A LINK!?!?! Whodathunkit? But, you're fully prepared to expect the rest of us to do so. How does that work for you? I mean the double-standard?

Your second post in the thread:
http://i21.tinypic.com/2ir517c.jpg

[ QUOTE ]
Do you have any comments on her article, or is what Ann actually writes irrelevant to your opinion of her?
<hr /></blockquote>

Her 'article' is little more than a hit piece filled with unsubstantiated innuendo and broadbrush pandering to a faithful choir - oh yeah, and let's not forget her plagiarizing of a well known poem about the jews - and mangling it to make herself look heroic (her and that other icon of hate mongering 'Rush - the Oxycontin addict - Limbaugh') - oh and not to forget the comment on the apparently nationwide plague of 'kindergarteners being tossed out of school for writing the word 'God'? You know - a single incident involving what was apparently a pre-schooler - gets extrapolated into ALL KINDERGARTEN AGED CHILDREN EVERYWHERE IN THE USA. (how does she manage to do that kind of crap and you not notice? - Oh, I remember - you're not the sharpest knife in the drawer are you?)

Now we move on to post #3 of yours:

http://i21.tinypic.com/9v8l6a.jpg

Edited for content it reads very simply:

[ QUOTE ]
Are you a Christian? <hr /></blockquote>

WTF, Bambi - where you going with that? What difference does it make if he is or he isn't? Either way - we're three of your posts into the thread now and you've not offered jack $hit in the way of anything worth reading. No analysis of your own - just pure blather. Why would think that your presentation and your contributions to the thread merit anything at all in the way of a response?

Well, be that as it may, you insist on demanding more attention and that everyone else do the hard work of A. reading Ann C's garbage without throwing up a little bit in their mouth and B. Talking to you about how cool it was or uncool or whatever. Either way - your lazy ass, smirking, pee your pants - girlie man - comments weren't worthy of a second glance much less the time and energy it takes to rebut Ann the well know hate mongers modern day version of Mein Kemph - Chapter 222.

What surprises me about you goofballs who preen and strut when you read that garbage is just how awful, ugly it is - uglier still that you can't see yourself for who you really are - a weak little man with no real power and a big bag of hate.

Onward and upward we come to post #4
http://i21.tinypic.com/2gwruvb.jpg

[ QUOTE ]
Still waiting. Step up to the plate and take your best swing. <hr /></blockquote>

Waiting for what, Bambi? For everyone else to do the hard work that you aren't willing to do? Want us to think for you because you can't? You may not know enough about baseball to get this part but - before someone can 'step up to the plate and take a swing' someone else has to throw a fricking ball.

It's clear from reading what passes for your posting skills that you not only don't have a ball to throw - you don't have any balls at all.

Hope this helps.

Sonoma

bamadog
10-30-2007, 09:31 PM
My headline SCREAMS that I approve of the article, and am ready to debate it. How could I be any more clear? If you want to have a debate about the article I posted, fine. All you have to do is ask me my opinion or state your opinion about one of the issues in the article. For instance, why are these conservative thinkers who are giving talks on campuses about islamofascism so reviled by the left? State your opinion. Then perhaps back up your opinion with a link to an article that deals with that subject.
The way to avoid a discussion is to do as you did before. Which is to link half a dozen articles and demand that I read them and answer their objections. That was purely ridiculous. That showed me that you don't really want to have a discussion-which is fine. But don't pretend that you do.

BTW, I notice you just can't get beyond the ad hominems. That shows, more than any of your other antics, that you are really not here to debate.
Do you think your childish name-calling enhances or diminishes your image here? You know it is so easy to be the brave tough guy when you are hiding behind the anonymity of a user name. You might want to give that some thought.
I hope this little suggestion helps.

wolfdancer
10-30-2007, 10:53 PM
I didn't read what Ann wrote...but who gives a **** what that stupid b***h has to write anyway?. Speaking of writing, many Republicans have already written her off.
If anybody has to use something she says to make a point....they've lost both the argument, and the audience before the ink is dry.
I'd be more inclined to send Bill O'Reilly a fan letter, then even discuss that sicko, with whomever brought her name up. Ann Coulter????? folks must be getting desperate

bamadog
10-30-2007, 11:19 PM
Which brings up the question, how do you know what Ann thinks if you don't read her?

wolfdancer
10-31-2007, 12:11 AM
nAz, now you too can have a direct line to Ann, have her weekly column delivered straight to your email address.
I took the liberty of subscribing for you...no, don't thank me...just wanted to make sure you didn't miss a single issue.
web page (http://www.humanevents.com/offers/customoffer.php?id=ANN111)

bamadog
10-31-2007, 03:09 AM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote S0Noma:</font><hr> <blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr> Beauty, brains, and she makes little liberal girlie-men wet their pants.
It doesn't get much better than Ann!

http://www.anncoulter.com/ <hr /></blockquote>

As a female mouthpiece for right-wing bigots and Republican xtian fundamentalists? Her audience consists largely of people who put their faith in an Evangelist President. A man who seriously believes he gets messages from an invisible sky fairy? - A man who also believes that 'the end times' are coming - and so is something called 'The Rapture' where only the true believers will ascend to an imaginary place called heaven leaving the rest of us poor souls behind to fend for ourselves.

I think she's hilarious. Right now, the only end-times I'm looking forward to is the end of eight years of Republican screw-ups. Hope we can all survive until then.

For anyone here who isn't familiar with 'The Rapture' please check out this link: http://www.raptureready.com/

Apparently, if you believe in that whacky $hit you can never be too prepared. <hr /></blockquote>

Since you posted this reply, I will answer it.
It is off the topic of the thread. If you would like to discuss Ann's or other "right wing bigots" religious beliefs, we could do that on another thread sometime.
But since you said you wanted me to serve you up a pitch, how about this.
Conservative thinkers are routinely shouted down on college campuses by the tolerant, first amendment-loving, lefty academic elite there. This routinely happens to both Ann Coulter and David Horowitz. Do you see any hypocrisy in this? Why is the "tolerant" left so quick to deny free speech to those with whom they disagree? David Horowitz was recently shouted down at Emory University.
OK, there's your big fat hangin' curve ball right over the fat part of the plate. And it's on topic.
Give me your best swing.

LWW
10-31-2007, 05:03 AM
Where's "The Riddler" to comment when we need him Dawg?

You are right though, too many people here remind me of the Pope who was scared Satan would enter his soul through his eye if he looked through Galileo's telescope at the truth surrounding him in every direction.

LWW

LWW

eg8r
10-31-2007, 06:55 AM
[ QUOTE ]
He didn't make any comment. Did you see one? <hr /></blockquote> You continue to leave your head in the sand.

eg8r

eg8r
10-31-2007, 07:03 AM
[ QUOTE ]
If you want to have a debate about the article I posted, fine. All you have to do is ask me my opinion or state your opinion about one of the issues in the article. <hr /></blockquote> You really do look foolish. The issue here is that you are the one that wanted the debate, there would be no other reason for you to post it. So, given that, you should be posting your opinion, not waiting for someone to ask for it.

This beatdown by Sonoma is really entertaining to watch. I cannot wait for your next foolish reply to him. /ccboard/images/graemlins/smile.gif

eg8r

Gayle in MD
10-31-2007, 07:44 AM
If Republicans can make money off making people hate them, they have no problem with it at all. It's all, always, about how much money they can get for selling their souls, all about their greed, and their own self-hate.

Dean had them pegged, "Without Conscience" and that has been their M.O., from the White House, to the Senate and Congress, right down to their tax structure, and their no bid contracts. Sleezy people, portraying themselves as Christians, with the lowest of moral fiber, and the filthiest methods.

But then, that is the entire history of the Bush Dynasty, from Prescott, to the wincing chimp. It's a Top to Bottom, phenomena, the corruption policy of the president, has sent the red flag to the Corporate Fascists who put him in the White House. It's just a coincidence, of course, that it is the same Corporations who contributed to the American Enterprise Institute, the organization which pushed for thei idiotic occupation in Iraq, who are making the most money off our soldiers blood.

"When fascism comes, it comes with a smile, carrying a cross." /ccboard/images/graemlins/smirk.gif


Gayle in Md.

bamadog
10-31-2007, 09:28 AM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote eg8r:</font><hr> &lt;/font&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;font class="small"&gt;Quote:&lt;/font&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;
If you want to have a debate about the article I posted, fine. All you have to do is ask me my opinion or state your opinion about one of the issues in the article. <hr /></blockquote> You really do look foolish. The issue here is that you are the one that wanted the debate, there would be no other reason for you to post it. So, given that, you should be posting your opinion, not waiting for someone to ask for it.

This beatdown by Sonoma is really entertaining to watch. I cannot wait for your next foolish reply to him. /ccboard/images/graemlins/smile.gif

eg8r <hr /></blockquote>

Are you so dense that you can't see that the article is consonant with my opinion? I think I have made that perfectly clear. Or are you still smarting from the beat down I gave you? No hard feelings, I hope.
I'll bet sonoma is furiously googling to gather info for his reply. He doesn't seem like a guy who feels comfortable without a search engine to rely on.
Nowadays, anyone with google is a scholar.

eg8r
10-31-2007, 10:49 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Are you so dense that you can't see that the article is consonant with my opinion? I think I have made that perfectly clear. Or are you still smarting from the beat down I gave you? <hr /></blockquote> Keep your head in the sand puppy dog. Your owner lww still likes you.

eg8r

LAMas
10-31-2007, 10:53 AM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote wolfdancer:</font><hr> I have new found respect for the good folks over on AZB.
This AC post went across about as well over there, as it did here.


Wolf',
Thanks for the praise.
Where did you get your sense of balance? I counted 76 replies to "this AC post" over there (AZ NPR).

Of which our Gayle, AZ's own Hippiepool , posted 10 inane comments and another 17 posts on aesthetics by others.

bamadog
10-31-2007, 10:57 AM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote eg8r:</font><hr> &lt;/font&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;font class="small"&gt;Quote:&lt;/font&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;
Are you so dense that you can't see that the article is consonant with my opinion? I think I have made that perfectly clear. Or are you still smarting from the beat down I gave you? <hr /></blockquote> Keep your head in the sand puppy dog. Your owner lww still likes you.

eg8r <hr /></blockquote>

You know, for all your preaching and pushing your unwanted help, you don't seem to get much play on this forum either. I see a little sniping coming from you, nothing of substance really. And there are very few replies to YOUR posts.
In fact, El Dub and I are amoung the 3 or 4 who bother to engage you.
Why do you suppose that is?

wolfdancer
10-31-2007, 01:43 PM
What can I say,...I left before the polls were closed?
So, you have dismissed 27 of them as non-conforming, and I
take it then, that some 49 are big fans of Ann's?, and by implication, solidly behind "Bama"?
Isn't this a great country, or what? Anybody with a typewriter and one free hand, can make their opinions be counted.
The board over here was dying of ennui, just a few short weeks ago....we prayed for more "cooks" to stir the pot, but
the good Lord sent us more Kooks instead...He does indeed work in mysterious ways.
I know they haven't quite taken the populace (here)by storm,
as they predicted...seems they are an acquired taste. But I have to give them some credit, one is tenacious, the other rabid...like the Eveready Bunny, they just keep on going.
The posters that don't buy into crap like this **** Ann C*** post,and other hate provoking crapola, will soon, just give up in disgust, and find a more reasonable posting site, where info can be freely exchanged, and 3 or 4 people are not trying to control the zeitgeist of the board.
All this ***** crap....and on a pool site????
What was the lure that got them here?...maybe Googling the definition of "balls"?
Don't worry about me adding to your proselytizing problems.
I'll soon be leaving for Haij,my annual pilgrimage to our spiritual leader's "Let's make a deal" ranch in Texas...and hope to remind the great man about Zakah, which has been sadly ended since his anointment to office.

LWW
10-31-2007, 01:57 PM
Gayle tells him obviously.

LWW

bamadog
10-31-2007, 01:59 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote Chopstick:</font><hr> <blockquote><font class="small">Quote S0Noma:</font><hr> <font color="blue">I have never heard of this guy but for the sake of discussion I will have a look at this material. </font color>




"Students will be graded solely on the basis of their reasoned answers and appropriate knowledge of the subjects and disciplines they study, not on the basis of their political or religious beliefs."

"Faculty will not use their courses for the purpose of political, ideological, religious or anti-religious indoctrination."

Seems to me that the only people that would have a problem with this are the teachers that are violating these rules using their position as a pulpit to advance their personal agendas. This is not the job they were hired for. These professors are out of line and need to be corrected or fired. If I paid for a course in mathematics then I want to learn mathematics. I don't want to hear about saving the whales.




This kind of crap is going on in college classrooms all across this country and it extends into the scientific community which is far more dangerous.

I am going to take a break now. I have to go do some work. These are just my thoughts giving this a quick read through. If I am misunderstanding this material, feel free to let me know. I am never opposed to changing my point of view based on new information.

<hr /></blockquote>
------------------------------------------------------------------

The left was apoplectic when Horowitz proposed his ABOR a few years ago. There was a veritable firestorm of protest from college professors and teachers unions across the country. One has to ask, why were they so threatened? And I think the answer is that for several decades they've had a captive audience of our children to politically indoctrinate and mold into their own image. And few have questioned the wisdom of what goes on in these enclaves of leftist/Marxist thought. Some of the evidence started to emerge after 9/11 when professors like Ward Churchill were exposed as propagandists and America haters. All the while enjoying the support and protection of the university. And some students started coming forth with tales of blatant political indoctrination that they were forced to endure in the classroom. (as you documented in your post)
But the light may have gone on for Horowitz when he started experiencing this University endorsed intolerance first hand. As a prominent Conservative thinker and writer, he is often invited to speak on campuses. But in the last decade or so he started to notice a level of hatred and aggression towards him that was shocking. He was routinely heckled, shouted down or physically assaulted on college campuses across the country. And sometimes these assaults on his person or rights were completely ignored by the college administrations. He noticed that this phenomenom was occurring with regularity to other conservatve speakers as well, while liberal firebrands like Michael Moore were speaking to rapt and worshipping audiences on the very same campuses. He came to recognize that although the University proclaims its love of diversity, it is actually one of the most intolerant venues in the country. The "diversity" that the University worships is only the shallow diversity of race, ethnicity and gender. In fact, diversity of thought is rejected, reviled, and ultimately shouted down.
I would love to see Horowitz prevail in his attempt to get political propagandizing out of the classrooms. The university should, be returned to and, remain a free marketplace for all ideas. But he is up against powerful and entrenched interests.

LWW
10-31-2007, 02:04 PM
Well, you just lost some cred.

The Dawg and I disagree on several points...but we can both appreciate talking to people who sort thru facts to form opinions as opposed to the typical fashio here of forming an opinion and then invent facts as they go.

I find AC entertaining in that she makes neoleftists heads spin. I also find her often to be just another hate monger.

The things that aggravate libs about AC ring hollow to me however because they are merely neoleftist tactics used back on them.

LWW

eg8r
10-31-2007, 02:43 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Well, you just lost some cred. <hr /></blockquote> Well, that ankle-biting poodle has been following you around, I just thought you had the leash pulled tight.

[ QUOTE ]
I find AC entertaining in that she makes neoleftists heads spin. I also find her often to be just another hate monger. <hr /></blockquote> I agree with you exactly here. Unlike bama(ankle-biting poddle)dog I absolutely do not find anything attractive about the woman and she always goes over the top in her comments. I wish AC would act less like Gayle and just say what she has to say.

eg8r

LAMas
10-31-2007, 02:56 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote wolfdancer:</font><hr> The board over here was dying of ennui, just a few short weeks ago....we prayed for more "cooks" to stir the pot, but
the good Lord sent us more Kooks <font color="green">sic, (cooks) </font color> instead...He does indeed work in mysterious ways.
Don't worry about me adding to your proselytizing problems.
I'll soon be leaving for Haij,my annual pilgrimage to our spiritual leader's "Let's make a deal" ranch in Texas...and hope to remind the great man about Zakah, which has been sadly ended since his anointment to office.

Leaving 'for' Haij or 'on' a Haij to Texas? What does the great man need to know about Alms (Zakah)?

I don't get the syntax of the Qur'an. Are you a muslim?


<hr /></blockquote>

eg8r
10-31-2007, 02:57 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Why do you suppose that is? <hr /></blockquote> You have nothing better to do?

eg8r

wolfdancer
10-31-2007, 03:25 PM
Are you a Muslim?
Isn't everybody that is not an Evangelical Christian Conservative? That seems to be the charge leveled against us.
As for the giving away of alms by those that could afford it,
I think the tax breaks for the rich...does exactly the opposite.
How many Irish Catholic...Muslims have you heard of?
Looking into, reading up on, the Islamic religion might be against some right wing doctrine.....but it will be a long time before I have some Saudi friends over for Bar B Q on my ranch.

S0Noma
10-31-2007, 03:32 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote wolfdancer:</font><hr> Are you a Muslim?
Isn't everybody that is not an Evangelical Christian Conservative? That seems to be the charge leveled against us.
As for the giving away of alms by those that could afford it,
I think the tax breaks for the rich...does exactly the opposite.
How many Irish Catholic...Muslims have you heard of?
Looking into, reading up on, the Islamic religion might be against some right wing doctrine.....but it will be a long time before I have some Saudi friends over for Bar B Q on my ranch. <hr /></blockquote>

I've always found it interesting how many of those Evangelical Christian Conservatives love to cherry-pick the bible - keep the stuff that makes em feel good and ignore the parts that don't. Funny how that works.

http://i2.tinypic.com/4hi44xu.gif

wolfdancer
10-31-2007, 03:45 PM
As you probably know by now, Ann has been selected Miss December 2007,in the annual GOP "Great American Conservative Women" Calendar (available now at 60% discount)
Missy Ann has also made the feature story on another site:
"Perhaps most Washingtonians have gotten used to the yakety-yak of political pundits that passes as political dialogue in this town. But Maxim magazine — the guy’s mag for partying lads, not hanging chads — thinks that most prattling prognosticators are, well, downright annoying ... and now they’ve got the list to prove it.

Maxim.com has ranked the top 12 “most appalling political pundits.” The list tackles such usual suspects as Arianna Huffington (“She sounds like a Gabor and primps like a Hilton”) to Chris Matthews (“HE TALKS VERY LOUD. VERY VERY LOUD. HIS VOICE IS AN ANVIL. A LOUD ANVIL.”) to Wolf Blitzer (“boasts the same narcotic effect of GHB”) to Rush Limbaugh (“He is to syndicated talk radio what Sirhan Sirhan is to redundantly named assassins.”).

The No. 1 slot, however, is reserved for Ann Coulter. Not one to mince words, Maxim declares, “There are few people on the planet more richly deserving of being set aflame.”"

As a public service to those who didn't get the 2007 calendar, or are breathlessly waiting for the December calendar to arrive:

web page (http://www.wikiality.com/GOP_Pinup_Calendar#Calendar_Sneaks)

http://images.wikia.com/wikiality/images/thumb/80px-AnnCoulter3.jpg

LWW
10-31-2007, 03:51 PM
Out of curiousity, what is your opinion of Islam and ity's history?

How much do you actually know?

LWW

bamadog
10-31-2007, 04:24 PM
I absolutely do not find anything attractive about the woman and she always goes over the top in her comments. I wish AC would act less like Gayle and just say what she has to say.

eg8r <hr /></blockquote>

You may not have noticed, but Ann is a satirist. She is, by definition, over the top. She is also brilliant, funny and a keen observer of liberal hypocrisy, which drives them into foaming at the mouth rages.
As a lady yourself, you should delight in her power to provoke.

S0Noma
10-31-2007, 04:30 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr>... a keen observer of liberal hypocrisy, which drives them into foaming at the mouth rages.
As a lady yourself, you should delight in her power to provoke. <hr /></blockquote>

foaming at the mouth or peeing in their pants? - is it one or the other or both at the same time? do you have any links with pictures that you can share to confirm this?

just wondering

Bobbyrx
10-31-2007, 04:48 PM
Careful Wolf, when I put a link to this <font color="blue"> web page (http://feministing.com/GOP_Dem_Women.JPG) </font color> a certain someone labeled me sexist, or was it sexiest /ccboard/images/graemlins/blush.gif

bamadog
10-31-2007, 04:56 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote S0Noma:</font><hr> <blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr>... a keen observer of liberal hypocrisy, which drives them into foaming at the mouth rages.
As a lady yourself, you should delight in her power to provoke. <hr /></blockquote>

foaming at the mouth or peeing in their pants? - is it one or the other or both at the same time? do you have any links with pictures that you can share to confirm this?

just wondering


<hr /></blockquote>

Good question, see if you can find the Colmes interview with her after "godless" came out. It may be on youtube. Pretty funny to watch Colmes barely able to control his hatred. Or just read some of the liberal posters here. She gets a RISE!

wolfdancer
10-31-2007, 06:32 PM
looks like there might be a bit of "Dorian Gray" stuff happening on the Dems side?

eg8r
10-31-2007, 07:15 PM
[ QUOTE ]
You may not have noticed, but Ann is a satirist. <hr /></blockquote> I don't care, this does not contradict or support anything that I said. She goes over the top, satire or not, many times and usually needs to be reeled in.

[ QUOTE ]
As a lady yourself, you should delight in her power to provoke. <hr /></blockquote> This just cracks me up. I guess being called a lady is better than being an ankle-biting poodle. /ccboard/images/graemlins/smile.gif

eg8r &lt;~~~just don't call me Hillary /ccboard/images/graemlins/tongue.gif

bamadog
10-31-2007, 07:28 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote eg8r:</font><hr> &lt;/font&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;font class="small"&gt;Quote:&lt;/font&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;
You may not have noticed, but Ann is a satirist. <hr /></blockquote> I don't care, this does not contradict or support anything that I said. She goes over the top, satire or not, many times and usually needs to be reeled in.

&lt;/font&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;font class="small"&gt;Quote:&lt;/font&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;
As a lady yourself, you should delight in her power to provoke. <hr /></blockquote> This just cracks me up. I guess being called a lady is better than being an ankle-biting poodle. /ccboard/images/graemlins/smile.gif

eg8r &lt;~~~just don't call me Hillary /ccboard/images/graemlins/tongue.gif <hr /></blockquote>

Well according to you little miss manners, many folk "need to be reeled in".
Are you some kinda control freak? Either buy her books, read her columns or don't. That's the beauty of the free marketplace. We all vote with our eyes and our wallets, but controlling what a person says, thankfully, is not an option yet.

wolfdancer
10-31-2007, 07:36 PM
I'd like to knock Ann out of the ***** park
Another poster on this thread has mixed satirist up with Satanist.....
I guess she was just being funny then, joking about the 9/11 victim's wives, and funnier still, kidding about Cindy Sheehan
If there is a "Devil in disguise"....it's got to be Ann.

bamadog
10-31-2007, 07:38 PM
Have you soiled your trou, or do you need a bib?

eg8r
10-31-2007, 07:55 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Are you some kinda control freak? <hr /></blockquote> Am I?

[ QUOTE ]
Either buy her books, read her columns or don't. That's the beauty of the free marketplace. <hr /></blockquote> Strawman. This has nothing to do with my post.

[ QUOTE ]
We all vote with our eyes and our wallets, but controlling what a person says, thankfully, is not an option yet. <hr /></blockquote> Strawman again. I am not advocating controlling what she says. I definitely am an advocate of her taking a step back and thinking before she says some of the things she says.

As far as controlling someone's speech is not an option yet, you are very very wrong. There are many things you cannot do in the name of free speech. There are failed lawsuits every day of which someone claimed free speech and were still found guilty. Try standing somewhere and threaten the POTUS in a public place. Try standing in a packed room and yelling fire. There are many examples that refute your gross generalizations.

eg8r

bamadog
10-31-2007, 08:04 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote eg8r:</font><hr> &lt;/font&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;font class="small"&gt;Quote:&lt;/font&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;
Are you some kinda control freak? <hr /></blockquote> Am I?

&lt;/font&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;font class="small"&gt;Quote:&lt;/font&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;
Either buy her books, read her columns or don't. That's the beauty of the free marketplace. <hr /></blockquote> Strawman. This has nothing to do with my post.

&lt;/font&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;font class="small"&gt;Quote:&lt;/font&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;
We all vote with our eyes and our wallets, but controlling what a person says, thankfully, is not an option yet. <hr /></blockquote> Strawman again. I am not advocating controlling what she says. I definitely am an advocate of her taking a step back and thinking before she says some of the things she says.

As far as controlling someone's speech is not an option yet, you are very very wrong. There are many things you cannot do in the name of free speech. There are failed lawsuits every day of which someone claimed free speech and were still found guilty. Try standing somewhere and threaten the POTUS in a public place. Try standing in a packed room and yelling fire. There are many examples that refute your gross generalizations.

eg8r <hr /></blockquote>
This is a perfect example of why you get so few answers to your posts:
you are pedantic, but worse, you are boring.
Try informing and entertaining your audience.

eg8r
10-31-2007, 08:07 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Try informing and entertaining your audience. <hr /></blockquote> Why you are not interested in being informed, I tried that already and your head was stuck in the sand. Now you are asking to informed, make up your mind.

As far as entertaining, you are not worth it.

eg8r

bamadog
10-31-2007, 09:58 PM
Nothing to say?

LAMas
10-31-2007, 11:21 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote Bobbyrx:</font><hr> Careful Wolf, when I put a link to this <font color="blue"> web page (http://feministing.com/GOP_Dem_Women.JPG) </font color> a certain someone labeled me sexist, or was it sexiest /ccboard/images/graemlins/blush.gif <hr /></blockquote>

Nice poster poster. Is one Hot Babe in MD?

S0Noma
10-31-2007, 11:42 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr> Nothing to say? <hr /></blockquote>

Truthfully? Right now you're boring me to tears.

It's pretty obvious that you'd have trouble thinking your way out of a wet paper bag. Meanwhile? I'll still be floating like a butterfly and stinging like a bee.

http://i5.tinypic.com/4zn9wmu.jpg

bamadog
11-01-2007, 10:39 AM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote S0Noma:</font><hr> <blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr> Nothing to say? <hr /></blockquote>

Truthfully? Right now you're boring me to tears.

It's pretty obvious that you'd have trouble thinking your way out of a wet paper bag. Meanwhile? I'll still be floating like a butterfly and stinging like a bee.

http://i5.tinypic.com/4zn9wmu.jpg <hr /></blockquote>

Really, you are more delusional than I thought.
Slinging trash and running from discussions that will surely expose your lack of depth is hardly something to be crowing about.
I suspect, that if you refrained from your childish and embarrassing tirades of name-calling you would be seriously at a loss in a debate. And you would be exposed for what you are, which is a high school educated far lefty sloganeerer with google.

Your knowledge of the world is so limited, you cannot even state the difference between "agnosticism" and "atheism"! That is something every high schooler knows.

You seem to be woefully deficient in your understanding of history, as your rambling post about Soviet POWS demonstrated.

So it is painfully obvious that your volumn and your unrelenting courseness are your only weapons.

If there is a junior college in your neighborhood, you may want to enroll in some history courses. Exposure to the world beyond your screen should add some much needed content to your intellect.

Volumn without content is merely noise.

Review your posts, and let the embarrassment wash over you.

I hope this helps. We would all like to see you grow up.

LWW
11-01-2007, 10:47 AM
I wasn't aware Sonoma County had a bridge big enough to live under.

LWW

Chopstick
11-01-2007, 02:02 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote Bobbyrx:</font><hr> Careful Wolf, when I put a link to this <font color="blue"> web page (http://feministing.com/GOP_Dem_Women.JPG) </font color> a certain someone labeled me sexist, or was it sexiest /ccboard/images/graemlins/blush.gif <hr /></blockquote>
<font color="blue">
So it's sexist. Heeello...mannn here. And Wolf, as far as "Miss December 2007,in the annual GOP "Great American Conservative Women" Calendar" goes, you need to stop missing meetings.

Now that's what I call Dixie cups. /ccboard/images/graemlins/laugh.gif
</font color>
http://www.americanbikinishop.com/photoshoots/6_28_06/6_28_06_099.jpg

wolfdancer
11-01-2007, 03:05 PM
I thought I was doing a pubic service, after reading all the nice commentary about Miss Congeniality.....
I've gone to "meetings" before, but not lately. They do a good job, and work for many people, but it wasn't for me.Bill Wilson has done more for folks with addictions then all the mental health people combined.
I didn't need help giving up Alcohol, I had done it many times on my own. I'm even thinking of doing it again!! I tried G.A.....I lived in Reno, and liked gambling more then it liked me...but I wasn't forging checks, or robbing from my relatives....I now confine my gambling to the biggest Casino we got here in the USA...the stock market. Even tried N.A., but just to support a friend...I was as out of sorts there as I'd be at a young Republican's convention. Them folks have serious issues to deal with, ........................just like the drug addicts.

wolfdancer
11-01-2007, 03:22 PM
Say, while you is dispensing all this here advice....have you ever stopped and looked inward? Have you ever asked yourself?

web page (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYbUCvz1LYE)

hondo
11-01-2007, 04:06 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr>

That's about what I expected from you after seeing some of your other pathetic efforts here. Since you can't intelligently comment on the article, you choose the easy way out, you attack the author and the poster.
Pretty sad.
<hr /></blockquote>
LOL1 Kinda reminds me of that poster who would attack Byrd &amp; West Virginians every time I would bring up Bush, doesn't
it, Dog?
It's hilarious the way you constantly put your foot in your mouth.
You really should check with LWW before you post. /ccboard/images/graemlins/grin.gif

hondo
11-01-2007, 04:11 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote nAz:</font><hr> <blockquote><font class="small">Quote S0Noma:</font><hr>
Oh my, bama - it's called research - you know the kind of research that rebuts the Coulter tripe that you so happily swallowed hook, line and sinker. Not surprising - simple minds love simple answers.

Read the links, jerk-off - I read your sicko Coulter claptrap. Then rebut them - if you can. I'm thinking two things we can take to the bank here - one you aren't going to follow those links and read what they have to say because you can't handle the truth and two - you couldn't offer a genuine analytical response to them if you did.

Prove me wrong Bamadog - you can sit and howl 'sad' until the cows come home and it still won't change the fact that you're a simple minded right wing coward and a hater with an extremist agenda.

Prove me wrong - come on - you can do it - or maybe you can't? FYI: My money's on 'can't'. <hr /></blockquote>

DAMN!! /ccboard/images/graemlins/ooo.gif <hr /></blockquote>

Hey! When a fighter comes in with his hands down the way Dog did, you have to expect to get knocked out!

hondo
11-01-2007, 04:15 PM
Lots of great people on AZ, Wolfie.

hondo
11-01-2007, 04:22 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote eg8r:</font><hr> &lt;/font&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;font class="small"&gt;Quote:&lt;/font&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;
If you want to have a debate about the article I posted, fine. All you have to do is ask me my opinion or state your opinion about one of the issues in the article. <hr /></blockquote> You really do look foolish. The issue here is that you are the one that wanted the debate, there would be no other reason for you to post it. So, given that, you should be posting your opinion, not waiting for someone to ask for it.

This beatdown by Sonoma is really entertaining to watch. I cannot wait for your next foolish reply to him. /ccboard/images/graemlins/smile.gif

eg8r <hr /></blockquote>

The final round of the Griffith/Paret fight was an apt description.

hondo
11-01-2007, 04:30 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr> <blockquote><font class="small">Quote eg8r:</font><hr> &lt;/font&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;font class="small"&gt;Quote:&lt;/font&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;
Are you so dense that you can't see that the article is consonant with my opinion? I think I have made that perfectly clear. Or are you still smarting from the beat down I gave you? <hr /></blockquote> Keep your head in the sand puppy dog. Your owner lww still likes you.

eg8r <hr /></blockquote>

You know, for all your preaching and pushing your unwanted help, you don't seem to get much play on this forum either. I see a little sniping coming from you, nothing of substance really. And there are very few replies to YOUR posts.
In fact, El Dub and I are amoung the 3 or 4 who bother to engage you.
Why do you suppose that is? <hr /></blockquote>

Not true. Since you 2 have come on here, We all have
a healthy respect for Eg.
I've gotten pretty annoyed with Eg over the years but
he certainly has debated circles around you.
And to be honest, he has tried, to no avail, to explain
to you how you could be accepted on this forum.

hondo
11-01-2007, 04:36 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr>
I absolutely do not find anything attractive about the woman and she always goes over the top in her comments. I wish AC would act less like Gayle and just say what she has to say.

eg8r <hr /></blockquote>

You may not have noticed, but Ann is a satirist. She is, by definition, over the top. She is also brilliant, funny and a keen observer of liberal hypocrisy, which drives them into foaming at the mouth rages.
As a lady yourself, you should delight in her power to provoke. <hr /></blockquote>

Trust me, Eg is no lady! Sometimes he's not even a gentleman! ( Sorry, Eg, couldn't resist that one)

eg8r
11-01-2007, 04:38 PM
After reading the posts by these two goons I have decided to try a little harder to soften my sharpness. /ccboard/images/graemlins/smile.gif

eg8r

hondo
11-01-2007, 04:41 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote eg8r:</font><hr> After reading the posts by these two goons I have decided to try a little harder to soften my sharpness. /ccboard/images/graemlins/smile.gif

eg8r <hr /></blockquote>

God bless you, brother.

bamadog
11-01-2007, 05:00 PM
Hondo, why do you continue to embarrass yourself. Really, you look so desperate for someone to acknowledge you.
Retirement must be very boring business.
While you are celebrating yor champion Sonoma, you might consider this:
He has only demonstrated his willingness to be Loud, Aggressive and Extremely Coarse in his posts here. Point me to his posts that show substance and command of a political or cultural issue?
I think that if you admire his debating style then it is a very good thing that you are no longer in the classroom.
It is obvious to all of us that you have a score to settle with LWW, as he made a fool of you for years on AZB, but chasing him around and cackling like a teenage girl whose been jilted is very unbecoming.
Please, for your own good, retire from the field while you have some dignity intact.
I'll give you the breaks and a ball at DCC.

hondo
11-01-2007, 05:04 PM
Well, considering that I have made a fool of you for the last few years, it's no wonder you idolize LWW.
I'll take any spot you want to give me.

bamadog
11-01-2007, 05:20 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote hondo:</font><hr> Well, considering that I have made a fool of you for the last few years, it's no wonder you idolize LWW.
I'll take any spot you want to give me. <hr /></blockquote>

Sorry Buddy, lying doesn't make it so. I stopped replying to you because you were so pitiful. Show me the thread where you think you prevailed and I'll buy you any drink at the bar.

hondo
11-01-2007, 09:16 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr> <blockquote><font class="small">Quote hondo:</font><hr> Well, considering that I have made a fool of you for the last few years, it's no wonder you idolize LWW.
I'll take any spot you want to give me. <hr /></blockquote>

Sorry Buddy, lying doesn't make it so. I stopped replying to you because you were so pitiful. Show me the thread where you think you prevailed and I'll buy you any drink at the bar. <hr /></blockquote>

Why don't you just buy me the drink anyway?
Oh, wait, I forgot. You're a Republican! /ccboard/images/graemlins/grin.gif

LWW
11-02-2007, 04:07 AM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote Qtec:</font><hr>Somebody got owned big time.
LMAO

Q...... /ccboard/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ccboard/images/graemlins/laugh.gif..............LOL <hr /></blockquote>
Dey sho nuffs did, dint dey!

It just wasn't what you thought.

LWW

bamadog
11-02-2007, 01:35 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr> <blockquote><font class="small">Quote S0Noma:</font><hr> <blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr> Nothing to say? <hr /></blockquote>

Truthfully? Right now you're boring me to tears.

It's pretty obvious that you'd have trouble thinking your way out of a wet paper bag. Meanwhile? I'll still be floating like a butterfly and stinging like a bee.

http://i5.tinypic.com/4zn9wmu.jpg <hr /></blockquote>

Really, you are more delusional than I thought.
Slinging trash and running from discussions that will surely expose your lack of depth is hardly something to be crowing about.
I suspect, that if you refrained from your childish and embarrassing tirades of name-calling you would be seriously at a loss in a debate. And you would be exposed for what you are, which is a high school educated far lefty sloganeerer with google.

Your knowledge of the world is so limited, you cannot even state the difference between "agnosticism" and "atheism"! That is something every high schooler knows.

You seem to be woefully deficient in your understanding of history, as your rambling post about Soviet POWS demonstrated.

So it is painfully obvious that your volumn and your unrelenting courseness are your only weapons.

If there is a junior college in your neighborhood, you may want to enroll in some history courses. Exposure to the world beyond your screen should add some much needed content to your intellect.

Because, volumn without content is merely noise.

Review your posts, and let the embarrassment wash over you.

I hope this helps. We would all like to see you grow up. <hr /></blockquote>

Did you get around to Googling "agnosticism" yet Sonoma?

S0Noma
11-02-2007, 03:56 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr> [
Did you get around to Googling "agnosticism" yet Sonoma? <hr /></blockquote>

Oh my Bamalammadingdong! You feeling your oats little buddy? Surprised to see you pull your nose outta LWW's a$$ long enough to come up for some air.

http://i1.tinypic.com/52ozomh.jpg

BTW - LOVED your 'sucker punch' post - was literally rolling on the floor over that one. So, mean old Sonoma 'sucker punched' your pal did he? How's that work Bambi? You mean when you catch some one in a bald faced lie and they have no where to go with it except to flee to their old forum and declare a phony victory - that's 'sucker punching' them?

LOLOLOLOLOL! Saying it over and over again to your devoted followers don't make it so, darling. No matter how loud you bark - or how often.

Hope this helps.

bamadog
11-02-2007, 04:46 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote S0Noma:</font><hr> <blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr> [
Did you get around to Googling "agnosticism" yet Sonoma? <hr /></blockquote>

Oh my Bamalammadingdong! You feeling your oats little buddy? Surprised to see you pull your nose outta LWW's a$$ long enough to come up for some air.

http://i1.tinypic.com/52ozomh.jpg

BTW - LOVED your 'sucker punch' post - was literally rolling on the floor over that one. So, mean old Sonoma 'sucker punched' your pal did he? How's that work Bambi? You mean when you catch some one in a bald faced lie and they have no where to go with it except to flee to their old forum and declare a phony victory - that's 'sucker punching' them?

LOLOLOLOLOL! Saying it over and over again to your devoted followers don't make it so, darling. No matter how loud you bark - or how often.

Hope this helps. <hr /></blockquote>

You continue to make my point for me.

Without going in the gutter and childish ad hominems, you are lost.

Always willing to help with your growth towards maturity.

S0Noma
11-02-2007, 04:53 PM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr>
Always willing to help with your growth towards maturity. <hr /></blockquote>

Well, hunky do re me! How about if you start by giving me a blow by blow of how I 'sucker punched' your butt buddy?

That could prove interesting. I don't mean 'your opinion' because, frankly that's totally worthless. Let me see you build your case point by point from the start of the thread (like I did) - and be sure not to skip any pertinent parts. Then when you get to the part where the 'sucker punch' got thrown? Maybe you can freeze frame it so all the rest of us who missed it can gain the same insight as you.

Looking forward to it, cheesecake.

bamadog
11-03-2007, 11:31 PM
Let me guess, your Mom And Dad are out for the evening, and the baby-sitter is on the couch with her boyfriend, and there's nobody to play with poor little sonoma.

Not interested in re-hashing your pleasantries with LWW.
Too boring.

But tell you what you do Hoss, start a thread on some interesting social or political issue, and I just might offer my opinion.

Little advice though, stay away from subjects like comparative religion or WWII history, not your strong suit.

S0Noma
11-04-2007, 07:18 AM
<blockquote><font class="small">Quote S0Noma:</font><hr>

Well, hunky do re me! How about if you start by giving me a blow by blow of how I 'sucker punched' your butt buddy?

That could prove interesting. I don't mean 'your opinion' because, frankly that's totally worthless. Let me see you build your case point by point from the start of the thread (like I did) - and be sure not to skip any pertinent parts. Then when you get to the part where the 'sucker punch' got thrown? Maybe you can freeze frame it so all the rest of us who missed it can gain the same insight as you.

Looking forward to it, cheesecake. <hr /></blockquote><blockquote><font class="small">Quote bamadog:</font><hr>
Not interested in re-hashing your pleasantries with LWW.
Too boring.

But tell you what you do Hoss, start a thread on some interesting social or political issue, and I just might offer my opinion.
<hr /></blockquote>

In other words you were lying?

That's what I thought.

Now you're all about - 'Hey, why don't we change the subject instead?'

FWIW? Your lie was egregious and your response is pathetic.

You couldn't have done a better job of painting yourself into a corner if you'd tried.

We've all got your number now, Bambi.

Catch you later.