A gift for those who love truth ...

[LWW]

RASMUSSEN nails it ... again.

The New York Times runs a loaded poll in an attempt to turn a tight election ... again.

Quinnipiac runs a loaded poll in an attempt to turn a tight election ... again.

#1 Fox outdraws #2 MSNBC on election night by a 4.15:1 margin.

#1 Fox outdraws #3 HNN on election night by a 4.79:1 margin.

#1 Fox outdraws #4 CNN on election night by a 4.89:1 margin.

#1 Fox outdraws #2 + #3 + #4 combined on election night by a 1.98:1 margin.

Fox out drew them in the 18-24 age group, the 25-54 age group, and the 55+ age group.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The biggest winner election night was pollster Scott Rasmussen, who -- once again -- produced the most accurate poll results. New York Times poll: Corzine 40, Christie 37; Quinnipiac poll: Corzine 43, Christie 38; Rasmussen poll: Christie 46, Corzine 43.</div></div>

OH DEAR! (http://www.anncoulter.com/)

OH MY! (http://www.drudgereport.com/)

LWW

[llotter]

It is no problem for the Left to adjust facts to match the politically correct alternative reality in which they live. The usual way is to dig up some irrelevant dirt to discredit the source and, when there is no dirt, just make it up and leave it to others to disprove. For example, did you know that Rasmussen cheated on his wife and then cheated on his girl friend?

[Qtec]

LMAO....so your two sources are ANNE COULTER....LMAO....and DRUDGE.........BHaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.

WOW. I'm convinced. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif

Only an idiot would put so much faith in polls. The answer you get depends on the question asked.


Q

[pooltchr]

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
Only an idiot would put so much faith in polls. The answer you get depends on the question asked.


Q </div></div>

That isn't a nice thing to say, considering one of your friends on here has a long long history of telling us how the polls tell us that Republicans are dying, or that Obama is the most beloved president in history, or how 130% of Americans want Obamacare.

Steve

[Qtec]

I only speak for myself.

There is a diff between taking one poll and drawing a conculsion and taking a view based on many polls asking the same Q.

Its not science, but it can give you an idea. If you look at multiple sources of how the voter thinks or is going to vote before an election, you can get a better idea of the outcome, but you could be wrong.
One poll doesn't mean anything. To be any the wiser you would have to see the questions.


The most accurate polls are exit polls, that's when you get the most honest answers. Before people actually vote, they can still change their minds.

Q

[eg8r]

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The most accurate polls are exit polls, that's when you get the most honest answers. Before people actually vote, they can still change their minds.</div></div>If you already think people are being dishonest what makes you think they all of a sudden become "honest" after the fact? Don't you think those dishonest people before will continue to be dishonest when replying to the poll you believe in?

eg8r