PDA

View Full Version : Where is Obama's loyalty?



pooltchr
11-09-2009, 12:06 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=tCAffMSWSzY#t=28


Steve

pooltchr
11-09-2009, 04:08 PM
I guess nobody could be bothered to listen to Obama in his own words...

Steve

wolfdancer
11-09-2009, 04:09 PM
nor you

Qtec
11-09-2009, 05:37 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Where is Obama's loyalty? </div></div>

Where is yours?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I guess nobody could be bothered to listen to Obama .

Steve </div></div>

You said it.

Q

pooltchr
11-09-2009, 05:41 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Where is Obama's loyalty? </div></div>

Where is yours?


Q </div></div>

My loyalty is with the USA....not with the leadership who is trying to systematically dismantle the very core of our society!

Steve

LWW
11-10-2009, 05:18 AM
Obama is the second wave.

Let there be no doubt.

LWW

Qtec
11-10-2009, 09:01 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: pooltchr</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Where is Obama's loyalty? </div></div>

Where is yours?


Q </div></div>

My loyalty is with the USA....not with the leadership who is trying to systematically dismantle the very core of our society!

Steve </div></div>

So you don't support the Com in Chief? The President elect? The sworn protector of the USCON?

Where was YOUR outrage when this happened?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style='font-size: 20pt'>On wiretapping, Bush isn't listening to the Constitution</span>

By Edward M. Kennedy | December 22, 2005

THE PRESIDENT is not above the law; he is not King George. Yet, with sorrow, we are now learning that in this great land we have an administration that has refused to follow well-crafted, longstanding procedures that require the president to get a court order before spying on people within the United States. With outrage, we learn that this administration believes that it does not have to follow the law of the land.

<span style='font-size: 20pt'>Not just above the law, this administration seems to be saying that it IS the law. </span><span style="color: #3366FF">Sound like.................Fascism? ......... <span style='font-size: 14pt'>This is good.</span></span> <span style="color: #993399"><span style='font-size: 23pt'><u>It contends that it can decide on its own what the law is, how to interpret it, and whether or not it has to follow it. </u></span></span>I believe that such an arrogant and expansive view of executive power would have sent chills down the spines of our Founding Fathers -- as it does for every American hearing these startling revelations today.

<span style='font-size: 17pt'>The president, the vice president, the secretary of state, and the attorney general tell us that the president can order domestic spying inside this country -- without judicial oversight -- under his power as commander in chief. Really? Where do they find that in the Constitution? Time and time again, this president has used his express, but limited, constitutional power to command the military to justify controversial activities -- after the fact.</span>

The president is the commander in chief of the military. <u>That doesn't give him the power to spy on civilians at home without any judicial oversight whatsoever,</u> without ever revealing those activities to even well-established courts that review these matters in secrecy. Otherwise, every phone and computer in America should now come with a warning label: Warning: the privacy of your communications can no longer be guaranteed, by order of President Bush.

The president has the constitutional obligation to protect and defend the American people. That is obvious -- but he also took an oath of office, to ''preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." With his arrogant usurpation of power and refusal to follow well-established wiretapping laws, I believe that this president is not living up to that oath. By shunning the oversight of the courts and ignoring the express language of the laws passed by Congress, this president is, in my judgment, defiantly and stubbornly ignoring the Constitution and laws passed by Congress.

<span style="color: #CC0000">Our founders did not fight a Revolutionary War to give such expanded, unchecked powers to the executive. Quite the contrary. Their concern was precisely the abuse of executive power.</span>

<span style='font-size: 20pt'>The president has admitted, without any remorse, that he has repeatedly authorized his own advisers at the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on individuals inside the United States, without the prior court approval required under well-established laws.</span> This president is focused on scapegoating The New York Times for breaking the story that brought this questionable spying program into the light of day. Once again, he's telling us -- ''trust us, we are doing whatever we can to protect you." Well, that's just not enough. We want real answers about this program. Why were the courts cut out of the process, when judicial oversight is required by law? Yesterday the vice president cut short his trip to the Middle East to break the tie in a vote on an irresponsible budget proposal that will hurt America's families, yet he couldn't find the time to level with the American people and tell them exactly where the president has the authority to spy on them.
</div></div>

no squeak from tea party people when this happened (http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2005/12/22/on_wiretapping_bush_isnt_listening_to_the_constitu tion/)

This was a REAL attack on the USCON, not an imaginary one.

Q...now that you are aware of these FACTS, I can imagine your outrage............pass it on to GB.

LWW
11-10-2009, 11:07 AM
This is obviously videotape of Bush impersonating Obama.

LWW