PDA

View Full Version : Liberals and Jehadists cut from same cloth



llotter
04-24-2010, 11:27 AM
Intolerance backed by force, best describes both those on the Left and the extreme factions of Islam. At least the Jehadists can claim the Koran as an unimpeachable authority to justify their uncompromising position but there is no equivalent authority supporting the Left. So the question comes begging, just what authority do they appeal for their certainty?

It cannot be religion because the Left is over-stocked with atheists.
It cannot be the Constitution because most of what they do is no where to found in that great document.
It cannot be humanity because we are all human and they cannot lay claim to being 'more human'.

So just what give those on the Left the certainty to be both intolerant and so easily resort to force?

llotter
04-27-2010, 07:00 PM
Well, after contemplating it for a while, the 'intolerance backed by force' mode seems to be enslavement to elitism. The stars that they have hooked their wagon to are societies intellectual class, having rejected the firm grounding that our traditions have long provided.

LWW
04-28-2010, 04:52 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: llotter</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Intolerance backed by force, best describes both those on the Left and the extreme factions of Islam. At least the Jehadists can claim the Koran as an unimpeachable authority to justify their uncompromising position but there is no equivalent authority supporting the Left. So the question comes begging, just what authority do they appeal for their certainty?

It cannot be religion because the Left is over-stocked with atheists.
It cannot be the Constitution because most of what they do is no where to found in that great document.
It cannot be humanity because we are all human and they cannot lay claim to being 'more human'.

So just what give those on the Left the certainty to be both intolerant and so easily resort to force? </div></div>

In part I disagree.

1 - Atheism most certainly is a religion, and the left isn't really atheistic anyway. Their "GODS" are the state ... mother Earth ... Marx ... Che ... Mao ... and of course dearest leader.

2 - The COTUS is in fact nothing but a stage prop for the far left, but it is a very iseful tool for them. After decimating our educational system and dominating the traditional media for decades ... most citizens have no clue what is in the COTUS. It has been reduced to mysticism ... and only the supreme council may gaze into it and seek wisdom.

3 - The far left preaches an ideology of the reduction of humanity.

LWW

llotter
04-28-2010, 01:05 PM
I appreciate your response and respect your opinions very much but I don't think you exactly got to the question...what is the 'Bible' to which the Left can refer that provides such unquestionable authority?

LWW
04-28-2010, 01:45 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: llotter</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I appreciate your response and respect your opinions very much but I don't think you exactly got to the question...what is the 'Bible' to which the Left can refer that provides such unquestionable authority? </div></div>
There are several:

http://www.willisms.com/archives/manifesto.gif
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/L%27état_et_la_révolution.jpg/200px-L%27état_et_la_révolution.jpg

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41QEG55PBML._SL160_.jpg

http://meshack737.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/audacity-of-hope.jpg

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/db/LittleRedBook_English.jpg/200px-LittleRedBook_English.jpg

LWW

llotter
04-28-2010, 02:34 PM
You correctly point out their source documents of the hard left, however, we know that the vast majority of their followers have neither read nor know much about the roots of their movement and most would vehemently deny any such ideological connection with what motivates them. Are those followers merely acting like sheep to be herded this way and that with no independent thought of their own or ability to question or lacking any common sense?

LWW
04-28-2010, 03:00 PM
IMHO ... yes.

Most Judeo-Christians haven't read the Bible through either ... and only a very tiny fraction have read the texts in their original form before they were "INTERPRETED" by others.

Human beings are by nature mostly sheep.

The Russian people didn't back Lenin because they knew he wanted to slaughter everyone who disagreed even slightly and persecute the church ... they backed him because of the Barbara Streisand he pimped them with.

The Russian people didn't back Stain because they knew he wanted to create a chain of prison camps and reduce the population through mass murder, starvation, and persecution of the Jews ... they backed him because of the Barbara Streisand he pimped them with.

The German people didn't back Hitler because they knew he wanted to slaughter the Jews, the Poles, the Slovaks, the Gypsies, the gays, the aged, the infirm, the retarded and start a war of aggression which would decimate the nation ... they backed him because of the Barbara Streisand he pimped them with.

The Chinese people didn't back Chairman Mao because they knew he wanted to become the greatest mass murderer in history ... they backed him because of the Barbara Streisand he pimped them with.

The Cambodian people didn't back Pot because they knew he wanted to open the killing fields ... they backed him because of the Barbara Streisand he pimped them with.

The Cuban people didn't back Castro and Che because they knew they wanted to take the most prosperous economy in the Caribbean and make it the most destitute while practicing vicious racism and advocating nuclear warfare against the west ... they backed them because of the Barbara Streisand he pimped them with.

The American people didn't back Obama because they knew he wanted to transform America into a reborn Soviet Union ... they backed him because of the Barbara Streisand he pimped them with.

They were all enabled by a leftist educational system which taught that their madness made sense and lied about history.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style='font-size: 17pt'>"He who controls the present controls the past. He who controls the past controls the future."</span>
<span style='font-size: 14pt'>-Big Brother-</span></div></div>

LWW

cushioncrawler
04-29-2010, 12:40 AM
Pity Hitler didn win.
madMac.

Qtec
04-29-2010, 05:13 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So just what give those on the Left the certainty to be both intolerant and so easily resort to force? </div></div>

When Rove dies and goes to hell, should he be roasted on a spit or be water boarded for eternity?

Considering its an absolute fact that Condi Rice lied when she said,

"these Alu Tubes <span style='font-size: 20pt'>can ONLY </span>be intended for uranium enrichment",

.. should she stand trial for treason or just be deemed an enemy combatant and sent to Gitmo?

Fair questions? Or not?

Q

LWW
04-29-2010, 06:13 AM
Please ... try to stay on topic and not troll this one.

If you wish to start a thread based on your misconceptions, please feel free to do so.

LWW

Sev
04-29-2010, 06:16 AM
Had he not "died" in the bunker we would have had the opportunity to nuke a few bothersome spots in Europe.

Stretch
04-29-2010, 06:38 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So just what give those on the Left the certainty to be both intolerant and so easily resort to force? </div></div>

When Rove dies and goes to hell, should he be roasted on a spit or be water boarded for eternity?

Considering its an absolute fact that Condi Rice lied when she said,

"these Alu Tubes <span style='font-size: 20pt'>can ONLY </span>be intended for uranium enrichment",

.. should she stand trial for treason or just be deemed an enemy combatant and sent to Gitmo?

Fair questions? Or not?

Q </div></div>

Q, they will give him a pass because of the Bubba Sixpack he pimped them with. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif St.

LWW
04-29-2010, 10:15 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Stretch</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So just what give those on the Left the certainty to be both intolerant and so easily resort to force? </div></div>

When Rove dies and goes to hell, should he be roasted on a spit or be water boarded for eternity?

Considering its an absolute fact that Condi Rice lied when she said,

"these Alu Tubes <span style='font-size: 20pt'>can ONLY </span>be intended for uranium enrichment",

.. should she stand trial for treason or just be deemed an enemy combatant and sent to Gitmo?

Fair questions? Or not?

Q </div></div>

Q, they will give him a pass because of the Bubba Sixpack he pimped them with. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif St. </div></div>

If you wish to start a thread on that topic I will ... again ... slay your mythology.

Otherwise ... please ... focus on the thread's topic.

LWW

llotter
04-29-2010, 12:29 PM
In all of those examples you mentioned there was of a charismatic leader that followers could easily defer to and that could happen on the right as well though, other than RR, it doesn't seem to happen very often. It seems to me that those on the left become wedded to an ideology that is intolerant of dissent and prone to use force but that that ideology is not anchored in anything more than power for the leaders and with reference only to whatever seems handy to support that goal. This is why I theorized about the left being enamored with the so-called intellectuals as a savior to replace our traditional Savior.