PDA

View Full Version : Anti-Gay Activist, Caught With Male Escort



Qtec
05-06-2010, 12:34 AM
Why doesn't this surprise me? /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style='font-size: 20pt'>George Rekers, Anti-Gay Activist, Caught With Male Escort 'Rentboy'</span>

George Alan Rekers, a prominent anti-gay activist who co-founded the conservative Family Research Council, was caught returning from a 10-day trip to Europe with a male escort he found on Rentboy.com, which is exactly what it sounds like.

Not to worry, Rekers told the Miami New Times, which broke the story: He claims he learned his 20-year-old companion was a prostitute only midway through their trip, they had no intimate contact, and he hired the young man only because recent surgery means "I can't lift luggage."

This seems highly dubious, not least because the New Times reporters spotted the retired professor pushing his baggage cart through Miami International Airport. <span style='font-size: 14pt'>It would be extremely difficult to stumble upon the Rentboy.com homepage,</span> which features young well-muscled men rubbing each other's crotches on grainy video loops, and not figure out what </div></div>

LOL. link (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/05/george-rekers-anti-gay-ac_n_565142.html)

Q

Gayle in MD
05-06-2010, 06:54 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Why doesn't this surprise me? /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style='font-size: 20pt'>George Rekers, Anti-Gay Activist, Caught With Male Escort 'Rentboy'</span>

George Alan Rekers, a prominent anti-gay activist who co-founded the conservative Family Research Council, was caught returning from a 10-day trip to Europe with a male escort he found on Rentboy.com, which is exactly what it sounds like.

Not to worry, Rekers told the Miami New Times, which broke the story: He claims he learned his 20-year-old companion was a prostitute only midway through their trip, they had no intimate contact, and he hired the young man only because recent surgery means "I can't lift luggage."

This seems highly dubious, not least because the New Times reporters spotted the retired professor pushing his baggage cart through Miami International Airport. <span style='font-size: 14pt'>It would be extremely difficult to stumble upon the Rentboy.com homepage,</span> which features young well-muscled men rubbing each other's crotches on grainy video loops, and not figure out what </div></div>

LOL. link (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/05/george-rekers-anti-gay-ac_n_565142.html)

Q </div></div>

The excuse he made was just too hilarious. The sad part is that we live in a society which is so homophobic, and exclusionary, that they feel they must ridicule gay people for being what they were born to be. An excellent example of what is so wrong in america, a country which supposedly was founded on a principle of equal rights for all.

Very sad indeed.

G.

LWW
05-06-2010, 07:32 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The sad part is that we live in a society which is so homophobic, and exclusionary, that they feel they must ridicule gay people for being what they were born to be.

G. </div></div>

You mean like you and Q do incessantly?

LWW

Stretch
05-06-2010, 08:23 AM
Perhaps you'd like to give some examples of Gayle and Wolfs "incessant" homophobia? Or is tossing baseless acusations just part of you daily pot stirring regimen. St.

LWW
05-06-2010, 12:38 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Stretch</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Perhaps you'd like to give some examples of Gayle and Wolfs "incessant" homophobia? Or is tossing baseless acusations just part of you daily pot stirring regimen. St. </div></div>

Please read what I posted before you comment.

LWW

Qtec
05-07-2010, 04:56 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The sad part is that we live in a society which is so homophobic, and exclusionary, that they feel they must ridicule gay people for being what they were born to be.

G. </div></div>

You mean like you and Q do incessantly?

LWW </div></div>

BS. Are you saying that George Rekers is gay?
Do you have any proof?

LOL

Just because,
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The male escort hired by anti-gay activist George Alan Rekers has told Miami New Times the Baptist minister is a homosexual who paid him to provide body rubs once a day in the nude, during their ten-day vacation in Europe.

Rekers allegedly named his favorite maneuver the "long stroke" -- a complicated caress "across his penis, thigh... and his anus over the butt cheeks," as the escort puts it. "Rekers liked to be rubbed down there," he says. </div></div>

...isn't proof that one is homosexual.

Lets not judge before we know all the facts....LOL
Q

LWW
05-07-2010, 05:18 AM
Uncomfortable in your own trap?

LWW

Qtec
05-07-2010, 05:45 AM
Are you saying he is a homosexual?

Q

Sev
05-07-2010, 06:11 AM
Well he could be coming out of the closet. Or perhaps he just wanted someone to cum in his closet.

Its all very mysterious and of such high national importance when we have such minor things as Muslims making car bombs and Middle TN being destroyed by mother nature.

Some guy possibly being disingenuous about taking a rectal probe might be better suited to the National Inquirer.

Gayle in MD
05-07-2010, 06:24 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Stretch</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Perhaps you'd like to give some examples of Gayle and Wolfs "incessant" homophobia? Or is tossing baseless acusations just part of you daily pot stirring regimen. St. </div></div>

This is why I don't have to read what the real pot stirrer. LWW, writes, because it's easy to tell, just reading the responses he gets from the reasonable folks, like you, my friend, who frequent this site.

He can't find any examples of either Wolf, or Q., nor I, engaging in gay bashing anyone, ever.

This is just another one of his ridiculous lies, which he spouts non stop.

I am, and always have been, for gay rights. I am, and always have been against any representatives who vote against gay rights, while hiding in the closet themselves, denying the fact that they are themselves, gay. Lindsey Graham, is just one example, one of many Republicans, I might add, who are hypocrites about their own homosexuality, and vote against every single bill that would protect homosexuals from being discriminated against. Likewise, religious leaders, spouting off against homosexuality, while hiding their own homosexuality.

Hence, this is just one more example of LWW stirring the pot, with lies, about others who post on this site.

Nothing new about that.

G.

Qtec
05-07-2010, 06:29 AM
I couldn't care less if he is gay or not.......but the guy he been anti-gay his whole life. He has written books on the subject and his theories have been taken on board by the religious right.
He is a hypocrite of the first order and deserves all and any abuse.

Q

Qtec
05-07-2010, 06:35 AM
the Real Gay Agenda (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckGaShCWbcE)
Q /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif

Sev
05-07-2010, 06:35 AM
Perhaps.

Or perhaps he is like an alcoholic and knows something is wrong but cant control himself.

Not all gays are happy or comfortable with what life has dealt them. Nor do they feel it is a natural state to be in.

Qtec
05-07-2010, 06:47 AM
.but they ARE GAY.

Q

Sev
05-07-2010, 07:14 AM
True.

However if one is not comfortable with ones nature and is railing against it are they hypocrites, in denial or some other category?

I find it intriguing that many people that spend their life railing against a certain nature are often victims of that very nature.
Is it guilt that drives them? Or some other reason.

I cant imagine being in a position where you feel or know for yourself personally that something in your nature is wrong and there is nothing you can do to alter it. That you have to spend a lifetime consciously controlling yourself from doing something that you believe is against the general nature of things.

It has to be unimaginably hard and stressful.

Gayle in MD
05-07-2010, 07:47 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Sev</div><div class="ubbcode-body">True.

However if one is not comfortable with ones nature and is railing against it are they hypocrites, in denial or some other category?

I find it intriguing that many people that spend their life railing against a certain nature are often victims of that very nature.
Is it guilt that drives them? Or some other reason.

I cant imagine being in a position where you feel or know for yourself personally that something in your nature is wrong and there is nothing you can do to alter it. That you have to spend a lifetime consciously controlling yourself from doing something that you believe is against the general nature of things.

It has to be unimaginably hard and stressful. </div></div>

Apparently you don't understand the "Nature" of being a homosexual. The "Nature" of being a homosexual, is being attracted sexually to the same sex as oneself.

The hypocracy comes in when people hide their homosexuality, while railing against other homosexuals, and the height of that hypocracy, is to be in a position to defend homosexual rights, by being a Representative on the hill, and not only lying about one's own state of homosexuality, by staying in the closet, but by voting consistantly against homosexual rights and protections from being beaten or murdered by so called, Christians, and others, for being what you were born to be, a homosexual.

Lindsay Graham, for example, votes consistantly against homosexual rights, As did the toe tapper, can't recall his name at the moment, although they are both homosexuals.

The vast majority of homosexual representatives, although they stay in the closet, ARE Republicans. They consistantly vote against gay rights, against earmarking any money to fight aids, and against supporting legal rights for the protection of gays.

That is hypocracy at it's worst.

G.

Sev
05-07-2010, 08:09 AM
I do understand Gayle.

Politics and religion aside. There is more to it than that.

I find peoples actions intriguing though.
What causes people to rail against their inner nature and go to such lengths as to hide it or fight against it?

Granted that some compulsions or desires such as pedophilia are much better to be railed against as that is generally socially unacceptable in most countries.

Not all actions by gays who are uncomfortable with there programming can be psychological conditioning caused by the various societies on the planet.

Deeman3
05-07-2010, 08:11 AM
It's in tofu. Avoid the tofu. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/smile.gif

pooltchr
05-07-2010, 08:28 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

The vast majority of homosexual representatives, although they stay in the closet, ARE Republicans.
G. </div></div>

Do you have something concrete to base that statement on, or is it just your opinion?

If they are in the closet, how do you know? Perhaps the Dems have a stronger closet door.

Steve

Gayle in MD
05-07-2010, 08:43 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Sev</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I do understand Gayle.

Politics and religion aside. There is more to it than that.

I find peoples actions intriguing though.
What causes people to rail against their inner nature and go to such lengths as to hide it or fight against it?

Granted that some compulsions or desires such as pedophilia are much better to be railed against as that is generally socially unacceptable in most countries.

Not all actions by gays who are uncomfortable with there programming can be psychological conditioning caused by the various societies on the planet.



</div></div>

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
I find peoples actions intriguing though.
What causes people to rail against their inner nature and go to such lengths as to hide it or fight against it?
</div></div>

Do you not find those actions most prevalent among politicians and religious leaders?

On a broader level, one could rightly say, all evil and/or aggressively ill intended actions, aside for sexuality, come from self hate.

In the case of homosexuality, religious teachings are or were originally the source of demonizing homosexuality.

In our country our youth, and this is a general statement, have grown beyond demonizing homosexuals.

Having studied both homosexuality, and pedophilia, homosexuals are no more likely to be edophiiles than heterosexuals.

I think if one is to be fair in their thinking, one should realize that as a heterosexual, sex with the same sex, is as repulsive to imagine, as homosexuals experience the idea of sex with the opposite sex.

Why in the world would anyone chose to be homosexual, given the social complications involved, if they had a choice in the matter?

I believe people should be accepted for who they are, and not judged for being homosexual. Most of what I have read about the subject, suggests that those who rail the most over homosexuality, are themselves insecure in their own sexual preference. That is called homophobia.

If, as the religious believe, God created all of us, then why did he create homosexuals? Even in the animal universe, there is homosexuality, transexuality, and even gender changes among a single species.

It would seem to me the world would be a far better place altogether, if human beings would just learn to live and let live, and end the demonizing of others, simply because they are "Different."

This of course, does not include pedophelia, which, IMO, should require a life sentence.

G.

Deeman3
05-07-2010, 09:47 AM
It was only a matter of time. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/smile.gif





By: Susan Harris
Published: May 3, 2010
Updated: May 7, 2010

German marries cat with a complete wedding ceremony. It's a bizarre story about a 39-year-old postman who got married to his pet. Actually, the story isn't that crazy once you read what the real reason was.

"Cecilia is such a trusting creature. We cuddle all the time, and she has always slept in my bed," Uwe Mitzscherlich, 39, said in a statement. "Our hearts beat as one - it's unique!"

Uwe Mitzscherlich wanted to tie the knot before his 15-year-old pet died. The bride is an obese and asthmatic feline which has health problems. The groom is a single postman who lives in Possendorf, Germany.

LWW
05-07-2010, 05:14 PM
On a similar note ... I've noticed that those who rail the most about the evils of capitalism and how the state should handle everything are themselves the greediest, most self centered, and least charitable people around.

LWW

Sev
05-07-2010, 06:09 PM
I think the prevalence among politicians and religious leaders is misleading due to the amount of attention it receives in the news media.

I agree on the demonetization of homosexuality in many cultures. Folks are folks and as long as they are doing no harm should be treated with the respect due them.

It is unfortunate that there is no way to study a population that is untainted by religion, government and technology. It would have to be a group of the very young put into a primal setting and let develop without interference.
If it developed in that same mold that has been seen historically then certain conclusions could be drawn about the innate nature of humans.

I am of the opinion that homosexuality is a genetic safety valve created by nature to stem over population and not a by product of a traumatic experience.

I am generally met with resistance to that idea. However the genome of higher creatures is vastly more complex than we currently understand. So the idea is a viable one.

Gayle in MD
05-08-2010, 10:55 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">On a similar note ... I've noticed that those who rail the most about the evils of capitalism and how the state should handle everything are themselves the greediest, most self centered, and least charitable people around.

LWW </div></div>

Neither your opinions, nor your conclusions, nor the methods from which you arrive at them, are of any interest to me.

G.

Gayle in MD
05-08-2010, 10:57 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> the Real Gay Agenda (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckGaShCWbcE)
Q /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif </div></div> /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/laugh.gif

Qtec
05-09-2010, 04:50 AM
Rachel Maddow explains why this is a big deal. video (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/37031183#37031183)

Q .......rentboy speaks...... link (http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/scarce/rekers-rent-boy-ac360)

LWW
05-09-2010, 06:02 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">On a similar note ... I've noticed that those who rail the most about the evils of capitalism and how the state should handle everything are themselves the greediest, most self centered, and least charitable people around.

LWW </div></div>

Neither your opinions, nor your conclusions, nor the methods from which you arrive at them, are of any interest to me.

G. </div></div>

Then why do you keep posting behind me, commenting on what I post, and even following me on another forum, and quoting me from both?

I apologize if my analysis struck a little too close for your comfort ... but the truth is what it is.

LWW

Gayle in MD
05-09-2010, 11:15 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: pooltchr</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

The vast majority of homosexual representatives, although they stay in the closet, ARE Republicans.
G. </div></div>

Do you have something concrete to base that statement on, or is it just your opinion?

If they are in the closet, how do you know? Perhaps the Dems have a stronger closet door.

Steve </div></div>

Yes, in fact, I do have plenty of concrete information, which I have already posted on here.

There is a documentary, produced by Gay Journalists and Reporters, who got disgusted with all of the closeted Republican Gays voting against gay rights, after being in bed with them.

It is called, "Outrage" is is full of proof about what I have written here, including Lindsey Graham refusing to answer the uqestion, "ARE YOU A HOMOSEXUAL."

Washington D. C. was infiltrated by gay young men who worked on the Hill as Aides for Republicans, when REagan came into office.

Anyone who lives here can attest to that, but in my case, having worked on the Hill myself, I had many acquaintances there who noticed it, including the Capital Police, many fo whom I grew up with.

There has been an on-going journalistic outing of Gay Republicans....they don't show it on Fox....Rush doesn't talk about it, nor does Hannity, or O'Reilly.

Hence, you know nothing about it.

G.

Gayle in MD
05-09-2010, 11:23 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">On a similar note ... I've noticed that those who rail the most about the evils of capitalism and how the state should handle everything are themselves the greediest, most self centered, and least charitable people around.

LWW </div></div>

Neither your opinions, nor your conclusions, nor the methods from which you arrive at them, are of any interest to me.

G. </div></div>

Then why do you keep posting behind me, commenting on what I post, and even following me on another forum, and quoting me from both?

I apologize if my analysis struck a little too close for your comfort ... but the truth is what it is.

LWW </div></div>

I know you to be a liar. You have written a number of lies about me, here and over there.

ARe you actually going to try to suggest that I have stalked your posts?

I am taking a short few days, after returning, to blow away all of the lies you have written about me, and to point out your own nasty posting style, and then, you will be right back on total ignore, for the rest of your life. You even lie about that picture of the tombstone, with "Wail in Md." on it, You're denying that you had that on the internet?

While at the same time, you're suggesting you are important to me, after I have ignored you on here for years?

Just more proof of your own complete lack of self awareness.

Both you, and Steve, have stalked my posts incessantly. EVERYONE here has seen it. You BOTH write consinuous insults to and about me, and my history has been to ignore them, and not respond.

I don't have to read them. I read enough of them long ago to know what is in every one of them.

So again, I say to you, go your own way, for the sake of others here, both you and Steve, go your own way.

I will be ignoring you both again very shortly, as soon as I blow away the lies you have both told in my absence. Neither of you posts anything of value here.

But whatever you do, don't even try to deny that tombstone picture...don't dar deny it, just own up to it, like a "man" should.

G.

G.

LWW
05-09-2010, 11:46 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">ARe you actually going to try to suggest that I have stalked your posts?

G. </div></div>

Not at all ... it's a matter of record.

LWW

Qtec
05-13-2010, 03:13 AM
Update.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Anti-gay rights activist resigns after trip with male escort
By the CNN Wire Staff
STORY HIGHLIGHTS

* Anti-gay rights activist resigns from group that promotes counseling for homosexuals
* Baptist minister George Rekers insists he is not gay
* Rekers says he has hired lawyer to fight "false media reports"
* Rekers has been prominent, effective foe of gay rights legislation across country

(CNN) -- The anti-gay rights activist who recently toured Europe with a male escort has resigned from a group <u>that promotes counseling for people who "struggle with unwanted homosexuality,"</u> <span style='font-size: 14pt'>though the man insists that he is not gay.</span></div></div>

LOL.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

George Rekers resigned from the board of the National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality, the group's website said Tuesday.

"I am immediately resigning my membership in NARTH to allow myself the time necessary to fight the false media reports that have been made against me," Rekers said in a statement posted on the group's website. "With the assistance of a defamation attorney, I will fight these false reports because I have not engaged in any homosexual behavior whatsoever.

<span style='font-size: 20pt'>"I am not gay and never have been," </span>the statement said.</div></div>

LMAO.
Sure, you have a back problem and you need help with your luggage[?], so what do you do?
Its a no brainer guys. Any man worth his salt would be logging into<span style='font-size: 17pt'> RentGirl.com</span>. Geez, the GOP have an account there!
What does George do? he hires someone from Rentboy.com <u>who lists his qualifications as,</u>

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">his "smooth, sweet, tight ass" and "perfectly built 8 inch c==k (uncut)" and explains he is "sensual," "wild," and "up for anything" </div></div>

LOL.............Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa........


Q



<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> The association accepted the resignation, saying on its website Tuesday that it "would hope that the legal process will sufficiently clarify the questions that have arisen in this unfortunate situation."

The group has scrubbed Rekers' writings from its site, with a page that formerly featured his work now bearing the message, "Sorry, you've reached a page that doesn't exist."

Rekers, <u>a Baptist minister,</u> has been a prominent and effective foe of gay rights legislation across the country. He is a co-founder of the Family Research Council, one of Washington's most powerful conservative Christian advocacy groups, and has weighed in on anti-gay rights legislation across the country.

He received about $120,000 to appear as an expert witness in a 2008 case challenging Florida's ban on gays and lesbians adopting.

Rekers has written that gays are a "deviant segment of society." </div></div>







<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">According to a contract Lucien showed CNN, he was hired to carry Rekers' bags and to provide at least one hour's worth of massage every day in their shared room, at a cost of $75 a day.<span style="color: #990000">Cheap slut............LOL</span>

The contract also stipulated that Lucien spend at least eight hours a day with Rekers, including sharing two meals. </div></div>