PDA

View Full Version : Regime demonstrates it's support for our troops!



LWW
05-10-2010, 11:04 AM
NYET! (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/07/AR2010050703054_2.html?wpisrc=nl_headline)

Dearest leader has spoken. The warriors members of the proletariat class must do with lower raises, and less health care and educational benefits.

How else can the regime afford to dine on $100.00 per lb beef and also reward the truly valuable members of society such as SEIU members.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The Pentagon, not usually known for its frugality, is pleading with Congress to stop spending so much money on the troops. ...

Now, Pentagon officials see fiscal calamity.

In the midst of two long-running wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, defense officials are increasingly worried that the government's generosity is unsustainable and that it will leave them with less money to buy weapons and take care of equipment.

With Washington confronting record deficits, the Pentagon is bracing for an end to the huge increases in defense spending of the past decade. On Saturday, Gates is scheduled to give a "hard-hitting" speech in Kansas on fiscal discipline, in which he will warn military leaders that "we'll have to take some dramatic measures ourselves to sustain the force we have," his press secretary, Geoff Morrell, told reporters. ...

The Pentagon's attempts to rein in personnel costs have also run into opposition from powerful lobbying groups. "Any attempt to link rising military personnel costs with shrinking military readiness is total nonsense," Thomas J. Tradewell Sr., leader of the Veterans of Foreign Wars, said in response to Stanley's comments in March.

Advocates for troops and retirees say the main reason for the increase in wages is that they were way too low to begin with. In the late 1990s, after the military had been whittled down in size from its Cold War peak, studies found that service members earned about 13 percent less than workers in the private sector with similar experience and education levels. ...

In February, the Pentagon abruptly shut down a new tuition-assistance program for military spouses after it was overwhelmed with applicants. </div></div>

LWW

Qtec
05-11-2010, 03:29 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
The CPA handed over $8.8bn in cash to the Iraqi government even though that new government had no security or accounting system. <span style='font-size: 20pt'>No one can account for it</span>
Henry Waxman
Democratic congressman
</div></div> link (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6129612.stm)

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">KBR, the Army's largest contractor in Iraq and Afghanistan, is linked to "the vast majority" of suspected combat-zone fraud cases that have been referred to investigators, as well as a majority of the <span style='font-size: 17pt'>$13 billion in "questioned" or "unsupported" costs,</span> the Pentagon's top auditor said yesterday. In testimony before the bipartisan Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan, April G. Stephenson, director of the Defense Contract Audit Agency, said investigators have sent to the inspector general a total of 32 cases of suspected overbilling, bribery and other violations since 2004. </div></div>

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> the Houston-based conglomerate once headed by Vice President Dick Cheney is neck-deep in allegations of waste and fraud involving millions of taxpayer dollars, reports CBS News Correspondent Sharyl Attkisson.

The U.S. Army is threatening to partially withhold payments to Halliburton for the logistical support the company provides for troops in Iraq. The reason: allegations of millions of dollars in over-charges for food, shelter and services.

"There was no regard for spending limits," says former employee Marie DeYoung.

Some of the most compelling accusations come from people like DeYoung, who worked for Halliburton subsidiary KBR.

She recently told Congress that while troops rough it in tents, hundreds of preferred Halliburton KBR employees reside in five-star hotels like the Kempinski in Kuwait with fruit baskets and pressed laundry delivered daily.

<span style='font-size: 14pt'>"It costs $110 to house one KBR employee per day at the Kempinski, while it costs the Army $1.39 per day to bunk a soldier in a leased tent," </span>DeYoung said.

"The military requested that Halliburton move into tents, but Halliburton refused."</div></div>

Need I go on?

If Bush had not mismanaged the wars and the economy so BADLY, maybe there would be no need for cuts.

Q

LWW
05-11-2010, 04:50 AM
Please ... and I know it's hard for you, but try ... stay on topic.

Perhaps your internets don't use the google ... but in the USA we have had an election and B-B-B-BOOOOSH!!!! is no longer in office.

I could make the argument, quite well in fact, that had Clinton not gutted the military and ignored rising threats the entire war on terrorism thing could have been avoided.

But ... the left demands accountability in our chief executive and that it is wrong to hold past regimes up as an excuse, so I won't.

What's that?

You have no issue with the current regime doing that?

I already knew that.

LWW

hondo
05-11-2010, 05:20 AM
2 forums.
Q, Stretch, Andrew Manning, gromulan, Tx Poolnut,
and , at times, Secaucus Fats and Chefjeff.
That's it. Nobody left to argue with.

You and Sev talk about how great AZ is.
There is no debate on there.

So you better be nice to ole Q. He's about all you have left.
What happens when you run those 5 off?

Qtec
05-11-2010, 05:51 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I could make the argument, quite well in fact, that had Clinton not gutted the military </div></div>

1. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,but Clinton.....WAAAAAAAAAAAA

2. Did you suffer when Bill was fiscally responsible?

Q

LWW
05-11-2010, 05:56 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Did you suffer when Bill was fiscally responsible?

Q </div></div>

He never actually was, it was forced upon him by congress.

How do I know that?

I paid attention as it happened.

LWW

Qtec
05-11-2010, 05:58 AM
LWW has been on the ropes now for quite some time. He is the only one that doesn't know/accept it.



<span style='font-size: 14pt'>The Iranian hostages feared for their life every day</span>.

Call me old fashioned but I think its despicable to prolong their suffering in order to win an election, which is exactly what Reagan did, don't you?

Then again.......but CLINTON......Waaaaaaaaaaaa...... /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif

Q

LWW
05-11-2010, 06:10 AM
For those who didn't pay attention:

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">WASHINGTON, Dec. 19, 1995 In the first sign of a break in the budget impasse, President Clinton and the Republican leaders of Congress agreed today that they would personally negotiate an agreement to balance the Federal budget in seven years. After the White House made a concession the Republicans had sought ...

Mr. Gingrich said that if further progress occurred in Wednesday's meeting, Congress would consider a temporary spending bill to end the partial Government shutdown that left 260,000 Federal workers idled for a second day today. And the White House chief of staff, Leon E. Panetta, made clear tonight that negotiators were trying to pave the way for such a bill to be passed on Wednesday.

Mr. Dole said that such a measure could finance the Government through Dec. 27 or 28, putting off the possibility of any further upheaval at least until after Christmas.

The Republican leaders painted Mr. Clinton's pledge of personal involvement as an important turn in the yearlong budget dispute. "We know there are some major decisions that the President, the Speaker, the majority leader are going to have to make," Mr. Dole said. ...

Mr. Gingrich said the President had agreed to use the economic assumptions of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office in the negotiations, a concession that the Republicans had been seeking. Those forecasts are less optimistic than the White House projections and would require deeper cuts to reach a balanced budget. Mr. Gingrich also said that the two sides had pledged to try to conclude a budget agreement by New Year's Day.

But Vice President Al Gore, who attended the Oval Office session, said that there was a "slight misunderstanding" and that there had been no pledge to use the Congressional Budget Office's assumptions. He also said no timetable had been set for an agreement.

"If it is possible to do that by the end of the year, we'll do that," he said. But minutes later, Michael D. McCurry, the White House press secretary, amended Mr. Gore's remarks and said that the President had agreed that when any individual part of the budget was discussed, the parties would use Congressional Budget Office estimates of how much it would save or cost. ...

Mr. Panetta said the President would not put forth a new budget proposal to Congressional leaders on Wednesday, but that a range of proposals would be examined. ...

The Democrats also want $80 billion less in other domestic spending cuts than the Republicans ...

Showing how skeptical some Republicans would be to any plan that stuck to Mr. Clinton's own Medicare and Medicaid numbers, Senator Trent Lott of Mississippi, the majority whip, said that a seven-year balanced-budget plan containing those figures would be "no deal at all," even if it used Congress's preferred economic assumptions.

In November, to end an impasse that left the Government partly shut for six days, Mr. Clinton agreed to embrace the Republican goal of balancing the budget in seven years, and to use updated assumptions about national economic performance made by the Congressional Budget Office, in consultation with his own budget advisers. ...

Since then the talks have foundered on several points. One has been on what assumptions to make about national economic performance. The Republicans have insisted on using the predictions of the Congressional Budget Office, which are slightly more conservative than the White House budget office. The conservative assumptions mean that millions of dollars more in budget cuts have to be made to reach a balanced budget by 2002. ...

House Republicans forced a floor vote on Mr. Clinton's most recent budget offer -- sending it to bipartisan defeat by a vote of 412 to 0.

Representative Gerald B. H. Solomon, a Republican from upstate New York, argued that Mr. Clinton was trying to pawn off an unbalanced budget as a balanced one. ...

In a fiery speech, Representative Harold L. Volkmer, Democrat of Missouri, denounced the Republicans for allowing the partial Government shutdown to continue. ...</div></div>

&gt;&gt;&gt;AND THERE YOU HAVE IT&lt;&lt;&lt; (http://www.nytimes.com/1995/12/20/us/clinton-gingrich-and-dole-pledge-a-deal-on-budget.html?pagewanted=2)

Clinton fought tooth and nail to stop fiscal responsibility from ever happening.

Of course, since the party tells the members to believe a different "TRUTH" they nod their collectivist heads in unison and obey.

LWW

Gayle in MD
05-11-2010, 06:59 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Please ... and I know it's hard for you, but try ... stay on topic.

Perhaps your internets don't use the google ... but in the USA we have had an election and B-B-B-BOOOOSH!!!! is no longer in office.

I could make the argument, quite well in fact, that had Clinton not gutted the military and ignored rising threats the entire war on terrorism thing could have been avoided.

But ... the left demands accountability in our chief executive and that it is wrong to hold past regimes up as an excuse, so I won't.

What's that?

You have no issue with the current regime doing that?

I already knew that.

LWW </div></div>


AS long as our country is struggling to overcome the multi-disasters of Republican/Bush extravagant spending, growing the size of government, F-ing up two wars, one of them illegal, which we were lied into, ruined limits on corporate destruction of the environment, Republican REagan's broad invitation for more illegal aliens to cross our borders with his message of amnesty, "But Bush" as you love to use in your on-going effort to escape the facts of our circumstances, and your denials of the disastrous results of Republican control of government, is entirely inappropriate.


Bill Clinton surely left this country far better off then Bush. He was the first president to create an agency to focus entirely on the real threats, Al Qaeda, and terrorism in generall, which according to Rice,, Bush viewed, as not important, "The president wasn't going to swat at flies" as her justification for blocking emergency meetings with Bush, when she was his National SEcurity Advisor, meetings requested by atleast four of our top National SEcurity officials, from not only the Pentagon, AND the CIA, but from Richard Clarke, our counter terrorist Czar.

Those who ignored al Qaeda and terrorist attacks in general, were Reagan, Bush one, and Bush Two...

Reagan, 240 marines murdered in their sleep in Beruit. REAGAN DID NOTHING!

No Response whatsoever.

Pan Am blown out of the sky during Bush One. HE DIOD NOTHING TO RESPOND TO THAT TERRORIST ATTACK.

No response whatsoever.

Clinton, wiped out what was left of Saddam's arsenal during Desert Fox. Formed the first counter terrorism agency, directed it to get bin Laden, top priority, which he told Bush after Bush was appointed by Republican Ativist Supreme Court, "Make al Qaeda your top priotity.

"Cheney said to our National SEcurity Agencies: We're not interested in anything about al Qaeda, bring us everything you have on Saddm,. BEFORE 9/11! AND AFTER 9/11.

No one who has studied our presidents and their policies could possibly say that Bill Clinton ignored rising threats. What he did do was cut all the fat and waste our of the Department of Defense, and the Pentagon, balanced the budget, put millions of people off welfare rolls, into jobs. Created more jobs than REagan, Bush and Bush combined. Targeted the main threat to our safety, al Qaeda, and bin LAden, and kept us out of combat war, and far, far safer then George Bush kept us, obviously, who refused to act AT ALL after months of unprecedented warnings, including the awrning that al Qaeda might be planning FLYING PLANES INTO BUILDINGS. LIKELY IN NY. LIKELY THE WTC, which everyone in the intelligence agencies knew would be bin Laden's target,...WHY? BECAUSE HE TOLD US HE WOULD COME BACK AND TAKE DOWN THOSE BUILDINGS.

Your ignorance of the facts is stunning.

Your little c hildish repetitions of B-U-T- BUUUUUSH...are nothing but your continued skewing of facts, and refusal to admit all the damage done to this country by Republican policies, and your own ignorance and inability to prove with any documentation the onslaught of incorrected undocumented "personal opinions" which is all you have, ever, ridiculous assertions, which never stand up to scrutiny.

You really should return to your blind supporters over on the other site...they don't document anything either.

G.


Gayle in Md. has already documented everything written in this post, using official statements from Senate investigations, government sites, and award winning reportors and journalists.

LWW
05-11-2010, 07:41 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Your ignorance of the facts is stunning.

G.

</div></div>

Yet you have never made a cogent argument against any of them, instead relying solely on leftist blogs which ... more often than not ... dispute what you are claiming in the first place.

You have your little fan club which clings to your myopic world view ... but it grows smaller as time marches on.

LWW

pooltchr
05-11-2010, 08:03 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
AS long as our country is struggling to overcome the multi-disasters of Republican/Bush extravagant spending, growing the size of government,
</div></div>

And yet you continue to support Obama and his even more extravagant spending and growing the size of government.

/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif

If it was bad when Bush did it, how can you pretend it's good when Obama does it??

Steve

Gayle in MD
05-11-2010, 08:28 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Your ignorance of the facts is stunning.

G.

</div></div>

Yet you have never made a cogent argument against any of them, instead relying solely on leftist blogs which ... more often than not ... dispute what you are claiming in the first place.

You have your little fan club which clings to your myopic world view ... but it grows smaller as time marches on.

LWW </div></div>


Your version of my posts is about as accurate as you version of your own behavior.

I have a history here of providing government links, excerpts of books written by award winning reporters and vormer generals, and former agency heads of counter terrorism operations.

You are of the mistaken conclusion that you are in touch with reality.

I do not depend on the web, nor on news corporations, I read the books written by those who were on the scene....

You are just another internet googler, who googles intil you can find the same uninformed opinions which you select according to your biases.

I have posted links from everywhere, The Financial Times, The Wall Street Journal, the NY Times, Factcheck.org, and countless government sites....and nearly every political book that has been in the top ten over the last twelve years.

BTW, when will you address your "Tombstone" behavior?

What's that, you refuse to admit to it?

But we knew that didn't we?

B-B-B-But I Didn't Do It!!!

Oh yeah, you did it alright.



G.

Gayle in MD
05-11-2010, 08:45 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: pooltchr</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
AS long as our country is struggling to overcome the multi-disasters of Republican/Bush extravagant spending, growing the size of government,
</div></div>

And yet you continue to support Obama and his even more extravagant spending and growing the size of government.

/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif

If it was bad when Bush did it, how can you pretend it's good when Obama does it??

Steve </div></div>

As I have told you before, if you know a way that (we) The Democratics and President Obama, could have avoided the disastrous results of Bush's Appointees failing to oversee the financial Industry to the point where we nearly ended up in another Depression, Bush spending all of Clinton's surplus, wasting it on failure after failure, blowing the budget surplus, spending like a drunken sailor, as did the Republican Majority he inherited, for over eight years, BUSH FOR EIGHT, REPUBS FOR EVEN LONGER, and paying for none of it, but without having to spend money to divert what Bush told us would be as long as a decade long Depression, then please let us know how it could have been done. I'm all ears.

But just remember, every respected economist thought Obama didn't spend enough to turn the economy around, but he did turn it around, and it is coming out of the disaster left to us by BUSH, Remember him, the guy YOU voted for twice????

Before you do so, however, you might want to acknowledge that you wouldn't have firemen, policemen, and loads of teachers still in schools in your state over the last several years, without that spending, and we'd likely all be standing in soup lines.

Stop misrepresenting me as someone who doesn't care about spending, while you were the one who wrote that debts didn't matter, while your party was spending us into oblivion. Bush never vetoed a single spending bill for the entire six years of Republican majority. He just charged everything to foreign countries....during which time I was bashing his policies right and left, and you were attacking me for doing so, and sying that the debts didn't matter.

The economy is recovering, BTW, jobs have been created, oh, and Clinton created more jobs than all three of your last Republican Presidents, combined, Reagan raised taxes six times, Bush Sr. did, who called Reagan's policies VOODOO Economics, but they all left us in a recession.

AND, IRAQ IS STILL FIGHTING A CIVIL WAR, WHICH I PREDICTED WOULD BE THE RESULT OF THE ILLEGAL BUSH INVASION, MANY YEARS AGO. A CIVIL WAR, AS IN VIETNAM.

You just apparently don't know the difference between having to spend, and choosing to spend. That's the difference between Republican people, and those who read BOOKS.

G.

pooltchr
05-11-2010, 09:28 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
As I have told you before, if you know a way I'm all ears.

</div></div>

I went ahead and edited out all of the bs, heard it all before, rant, to get this down to the basic question.

And, I have answered this particular question numerous times before, right here, and you choose to ignore it. You are NOT all ears. You just keep repeating the party line, blaming Bush, and spewing the "spend out way out of it" rhetoric. You really don't want the answer, because it goes against the teachings of Obamasaiah.

You have made up your mind, and no matter how many times someone shows you why it is wrong, you are not going to even consider the alternatives.

It's ok to be a self admitted partisan...but don't pretend that you are open minded. You're not.

Steve

Gayle in MD
05-11-2010, 09:45 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: pooltchr</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
As I have told you before, if you know a way I'm all ears.

</div></div>

I went ahead and edited out all of the bs, heard it all before, rant, to get this down to the basic question.

And, I have answered this particular question numerous times before, right here, and you choose to ignore it. You are NOT all ears. You just keep repeating the party line, blaming Bush, and spewing the "spend out way out of it" rhetoric. You really don't want the answer, because it goes against the teachings of Obamasaiah.

You have made up your mind, and no matter how many times someone shows you why it is wrong, you are not going to even consider the alternatives.

It's ok to be a self admitted partisan...but don't pretend that you are open minded. You're not.

Steve </div></div>


<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">but without having to spend money to divert what Bush told us would be as long as a decade long Depression, then please let us know how it could have been done. I'm all ears.
</div></div>

That's what I thought, you don't have a solution yourself, which would have avoided Bush's coming Depression, and shortened the predicted decade long deep recession, without spending money.

Just cut all your irrelevent insults, and answer the question.

What's that? You Can't? But we knew that.(see, now that LWW has rel;entlessly copied so many of my own coined words, I am giving it back to him for a while...)

Since you can't, I will tell you, there was no way we could have diverted the disastrous event of a toppling financial market, domino crashing of Banks all over the world, and attempt to maintain homeland safety, education, police, firemen, teachers, and first responders, in the aftermath of the Bush Financial crises, without spending more money.

Why did you write that debts didn't matter while Bush was running our country into a debt pit????

How about an answer for that one, instead of just ignoreing it over and over again, and also, don't ever write again that you've never whined to the administration about anyone...that's a lie.

G.

pooltchr
05-11-2010, 09:52 AM
Pay attention.

The best thing the administration could have done was create an environment where business could prosper, not burden them with more taxes and expenses. The entire first year of Obama's regime has been spent pushing through healthcare while ignoring the economy.

There is no such thing as government stimulus. The government has nothing to use to stimulate the economy, unless it first takes it from the economy.

And I have never tried to get anyone banned from this forum. That is a fact that you seem unable to grasp.

Steve

Gayle in MD
05-11-2010, 10:01 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: pooltchr</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Pay attention.

The best thing the administration could have done was create an environment where business could prosper, not burden them with more taxes and expenses.

<span style="color: #000066">L&lt;AO! that's pretty good, how does one create an environment in the midst of the worst financial disaster since The Great Depression? there were less taxes paid this year, not more, and businesses were not burdened with new taxes, either....

Oh and BTW, last week scientists and doctors from all over the world came together to address the fact that cancer, and birth defects, including the huge increase in children born with autism, is increasing at an alarming rate. Their finding? Too many chemicals and toio much polution in our environment.

But you don't care about that, right? Just the bottom line profit for the corporate pigs who are killing all of us with the help of Republicans who believe in no limitations on business. </span>


The entire first year of Obama's regime has been spent pushing through healthcare while ignoring the economy.

<span style="color: #000066">That's a lie. </span>

There is no such thing as government stimulus.

<span style="color: #000066">That, too, is a lie. </span>


The government has nothing to use to stimulate the economy, unless it first takes it from the economy.

<span style="color: #000066">Another lie. </span>

And I have never tried to get anyone banned from this forum. That is a fact that you seem unable to grasp.

<span style="color: #000066">And of course, we all iknow this is a lie... </span> /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif

Steve </div></div>

You notified the moderator because I quoted something YOU WROTE that you didn't want shown again on this site! IT worked, and I was banned. Admit it for once.
Sotp lying about it.
G.

Gayle in MD
05-11-2010, 10:05 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body">LWW has been on the ropes now for quite some time. He is the only one that doesn't know/accept it.



<span style='font-size: 14pt'>The Iranian hostages feared for their life every day</span>.

Call me old fashioned but I think its despicable to prolong their suffering in order to win an election, which is exactly what Reagan did, don't you?

Then again.......but CLINTON......Waaaaaaaaaaaa...... /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif

Q </div></div>


Right! Exactly how that all happened, Reagan was the worst president, until little Bushy arrived. He, too, committed treason, but Republicans treason isn't half as bad as a BJ. Now THAT's Republican Impeachable!!!! (if he got it from a woman, that is)
JK....
/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif

LWW
05-11-2010, 10:17 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style='font-size: 14pt'>The Iranian hostages feared for their life every day</span>.

Q </div></div>

Sorry ... Reagan isn't POTUS either. The topic is Obama. Your ever more desperate deflections seem to get lamer with each passing day.

LWW

LWW
05-11-2010, 10:21 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">BTW, when will you address your "Tombstone" behavior?

G. </div></div>

I already did. Wolfie lied.

If you say you saw it, then you lied.

Wolfie "SAW" it ... but didn't link to it like he did other pics from my hacked account. Neither of you made a copy either. How astounding from a self proclaimed web guru who is so adept at getting the "TRUTH" for us proletariat.

Repeating the myth doesn't make the myth true. Hypnotizing yourself doesn't make the myth true. Stating the myth louder doesn't make the myth true. Myths are, by definition, myths.

LWW

Gayle in MD
05-11-2010, 10:22 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">BTW, when will you address your "Tombstone" behavior?

G. </div></div>

I already did. Wolfie lied.

If you say you saw it, then you lied.

Wolfie "SAW" it ... but didn't link to it like he did other pics from my hacked account. Neither of you made a copy either. How astounding from a self proclaimed web guru who is so adept at getting the "TRUTH" for us proletariat.

Repeating the myth doesn't make the myth true. Hypnotizing yourself doesn't make the myth true. Stating the myth louder doesn't make the myth true. Myths are, by definition, myths.

LWW </div></div>

You are lying, and you know you are lying. My attorney has my copy.

G.

LWW
05-11-2010, 10:36 AM
Yet you can't post it here?

How amazing.

Now, can we set aside these petty and baseless allegations and have an adult conversation on the topic at hand?

LWW

Gayle in MD
05-11-2010, 10:37 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Yet you can't post it here?

How amazing.

LWW </div></div>

Do you ever own up to anything that you do? What's that? Never? That's what we all already knew.

G.

LWW
05-11-2010, 10:42 AM
More flattery by imitation ... thank you

LWW

Gayle in MD
05-11-2010, 10:48 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">More flattery by imitation ... thank you

LWW </div></div>

You've copied my stuff for years. Guess you won't admit to that, either?

G.

LWW
05-11-2010, 10:53 AM
Oh, I have ... I admit it.

I had hoped that seeing the lame arguments you used being applied in another situation might wake you up.

Sadly, I failed.

The party's grip on you is quite strong.

LWW

Gayle in MD
05-11-2010, 10:55 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Oh, I have ... I admit it.

I had hoped that seeing the lame arguments you used being applied in another situation might wake you up.

Sadly, I failed.

The party's grip on you is quite strong.

LWW </div></div>

Another completely irrelevant post. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/tired.gifZZZZZZZZZZZZ

LWW
05-11-2010, 10:58 AM
Yet you can't resist lavishing it with your responses.

Isn't being in the open about your infatuation a relief.

LWW

pooltchr
05-11-2010, 11:14 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

The entire first year of Obama's regime has been spent pushing through healthcare while ignoring the economy.

<span style="color: #000066">That's a lie. </span>

There is no such thing as government stimulus.

<span style="color: #000066">That, too, is a lie. </span>


The government has nothing to use to stimulate the economy, unless it first takes it from the economy.

<span style="color: #000066">Another lie. </span>

And I have never tried to get anyone banned from this forum. That is a fact that you seem unable to grasp.

<span style="color: #000066">And of course, we all iknow this is a lie... </span> /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif

Steve </div></div>


G. [/quote]

Denying the facts just isn't enough to make them go away.

Steve

Gayle in MD
05-11-2010, 11:23 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: pooltchr</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

The entire first year of Obama's regime has been spent pushing through healthcare while ignoring the economy.

<span style="color: #000066">That's a lie. </span>

There is no such thing as government stimulus.

<span style="color: #000066">That, too, is a lie. </span>


The government has nothing to use to stimulate the economy, unless it first takes it from the economy.

<span style="color: #000066">Another lie. </span>

And I have never tried to get anyone banned from this forum. That is a fact that you seem unable to grasp.

<span style="color: #000066">And of course, we all iknow this is a lie... </span> /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif

Steve </div></div>


G. </div></div>

Denying the facts just isn't enough to make them go away.

Steve [/quote]

Steve, the fact is that you complained to the moderator when I quoted your famous anti-female quote. I was then banned. Are you actually denying that? Let's get this quite clear right now.

G.

Gayle in MD
05-11-2010, 11:25 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Yet you can't resist lavishing it with your responses.

Isn't being in the open about your infatuation a relief.

LWW </div></div>

Dream on, Sherlock, I didn't respond to you for years, while you were bashing me on not one, but two sites.

I simply find you repuslive. I have a habit of ignoring people whom I find repuslive.

I have a copy of that drawing. You know what you did...and you THINK, I can't prove it. You're wrong, I can.

G.

pooltchr
05-11-2010, 11:31 AM
She starts a new thread to tell us all she is bored and taking a break.....and less than 5 minutes later...she's posting again!

LMAO!!

Steve

LWW
05-11-2010, 11:35 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Yet you can't resist lavishing it with your responses.

Isn't being in the open about your infatuation a relief.

LWW </div></div>

Dream on, Sherlock, I didn't respond to you for years, while you were bashing me on not one, but two sites.

I simply find you repuslive. I have a habit of ignoring people whom I find repuslive.

I have a copy of that drawing. You know what you did...and you THINK, I can't prove it. You're wrong, I can.

G. </div></div>

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">When I return, I'll be restoring the usual suspects to ignore.

The flaming gets old, fast, and that's all they know how to do. They demand answers from everyone else, but fail to provide factual information for thier own opinions, presented as facts.

Post BS, deny reaity, accuse everyone else of what they themselves are famous for doing, and destroy every thread.

Steve refuses to admit that he reported me to the administrator, or that he wrote that the Debts didn't matter, during the time that Bush was running them up, and LWW, still won't admit to his truly repulsive drawing of the tombstone, with his alias for Gayle in Md. on the front of it.

I'd say, there is no shortage of wingnuts who refuse to take responsibility for their own statements and actions.

Hope you all enjoy the summer.

Love to most.... /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/wink.gif /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif

Gayle

</div></div>

How can anyone believe you when you swear to be leaving for the summer and then lack the self discipline to stay gone for THREE minutes?

My 3 year old niece has more discipline than that.

LWW

JohnnyD
05-11-2010, 04:10 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: pooltchr</div><div class="ubbcode-body">She starts a new thread to tell us all she is bored and taking a break.....and less than 5 minutes later...she's posting again!

LMAO!!

Steve </div></div> Lies,always lies.

JohnnyD
05-11-2010, 04:11 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Yet you can't resist lavishing it with your responses.

Isn't being in the open about your infatuation a relief.

LWW </div></div>

Dream on, Sherlock, I didn't respond to you for years, while you were bashing me on not one, but two sites.

I simply find you repuslive. I have a habit of ignoring people whom I find repuslive.

I have a copy of that drawing. You know what you did...and you THINK, I can't prove it. You're wrong, I can.

G. </div></div>

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">When I return, I'll be restoring the usual suspects to ignore.

The flaming gets old, fast, and that's all they know how to do. They demand answers from everyone else, but fail to provide factual information for thier own opinions, presented as facts.

Post BS, deny reaity, accuse everyone else of what they themselves are famous for doing, and destroy every thread.

Steve refuses to admit that he reported me to the administrator, or that he wrote that the Debts didn't matter, during the time that Bush was running them up, and LWW, still won't admit to his truly repulsive drawing of the tombstone, with his alias for Gayle in Md. on the front of it.

I'd say, there is no shortage of wingnuts who refuse to take responsibility for their own statements and actions.

Hope you all enjoy the summer.

Love to most.... /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/wink.gif /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif

Gayle

</div></div>

How can anyone believe you when you swear to be leaving for the summer and then lack the self discipline to stay gone for THREE minutes?

My 3 year old niece has more discipline than that.

LWW </div></div>Once again LWW you are right.Jesus loves you.

LWW
05-11-2010, 04:39 PM
I do my best.

LWW