PDA

View Full Version : Looks like Hillary is taking over



bobroberts
07-23-2010, 10:57 AM
I guess the anointed one can't handle the job so Hillary's doing it for him.
She will go against the anointed one in 2012
US slapping more sanctions on NKorea; senior envoy to tour Asia to rally support

By Robert Burns, APJuly 21st, 2010


US to hit NKorea with more sanctions in August


WASHINGTON — Tightening the screws on North Korea, the Obama administration said Wednesday it would expand and strengthen sanctions against the isolated regime and its nuclear weapons program, a tactic which in the past has been undercut by North Korea’s knack for finding loopholes and escape hatches.

The fresh round of sanctions was announced by Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton during a visit to Seoul, but officials in Washington said the moves will not be ready to be put in place for another two weeks.

The State Department announced that Robert Einhorn, charged with overseeing the administration’s implementation of sanctions against North Korea and Iran, will travel to Asia in early August — once sanction details are final — to rally support among U.S. friends and allies.

China, whose role in enforcing North Korea sanctions is considered vital, is a likely stop on Einhorn’s tour. State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley declined to discuss Einhorn’s itinerary.

Clinton is expected to discuss the sanctions with Chinese officials during an Asia security conference in Vietnam this week. North Korean Foreign Minister Pak Ui Chun is expected to attend those meetings, although he and Clinton are not expected to engage in any face-to-face talks.

In Seoul, Clinton said the U.S. moves will target arms deals and other clandestine trade used to finance the communist regime’s nuclear activities, and imports of luxury items for the ruling elite in Pyongyang.

“They are directed at the destabilizing, illicit and provocative policies pursued by that government,” she said. Clinton was referring to North Korea’s nuclear weapons program as well as its alleged large-scale counterfeiting, smuggling, drug trafficking and weapons technology exports.

The U.S. penalties are intended to further isolate the hermit nation and persuade its leaders to return to talks aimed at getting it to abandon atomic weapons. The U.S. is also trying to forestall future provocative acts like the March torpedoing of the Cheonan, a South Korean naval vessel, which killed 46 South Korean sailors. North Korea denies it sank the ship.

Bruce Bennett, a North Korea expert at the RAND Corp., a federally-financed think tank, said the new U.S. actions are a reflection of North Korea’s ability to skirt aspects of earlier sanctions, including two rounds of extensive penalties passed by the U.N. Security Council.

“It’s saying, ‘We haven’t been very effective in imposing the previously enacted sanctions,’ and so this is an effort to try to strengthen the previous sanctions and make them work,” Bennett said.

Crowley acknowledged that North Korea has found ways to evade earlier sanctions.

“North Korean entities are adapting to the existing actions that we have been taking,” Crowley said. “We gain significant intelligence information all the time about what they’re doing.”

The spokesman said North Korea has created foreign front companies to help it get around U.N. sanctions.

“They look to see, you know, which countries have been effectively complying and enforcing, you know, U.N. Security Council resolutions. They look to see if there are seams and gaps in the international effort,” he said.

The most recent round of U.N. sanctions was in June 2009. Those sought to deprive North Korea of financing and material for its weapons program and banned it arms exports, especially missiles. It did not ban normal trade, but called on international financial institutions to halt grants, aid or loans to the North except for humanitarian, development and efforts to dismantle its nuclear programs.

Richard C. Bush III, director of Northeast Asia policy studies at the Brookings Institution, said in an interview that he believes the new U.S. sanctions are more than merely a response to the sinking of the Cheonan in March.

He believes they also are meant as a message to the next set of North Korean leaders, who are believed to be angling for positions of power in anticipation of the passing of the nation’s current leader, Kim Jong Il.

Nicholas Szechenyi, a northeast Asia policy analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, said the key to effective U.S. sanctions is how they are implemented.

“If the U.S. is doing this in isolation, doing this piecemeal, then I don’t think they’ll have much effect,” he said. “But if there’s a unified effort to not only announce these sanctions as an act of solidarity with our South Korean allies but also to apply some pressure on North Korea, then I think over time it might work.”

Associated Press writers Matthew Lee in Seoul and Foster Klug in Washington contributed to this report.

eg8r
07-23-2010, 11:55 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">She will go against the anointed one in 2012</div></div>While I don't think Obama could win another election I definitely think Hillary could beat any of the Reps right now.

eg8r

Deeman3
07-23-2010, 12:35 PM
I don't think she could win unless she further distances herself from the Administration and do so quickly. Now, if she had been elected, she would have been centered enough to almost assure herself of a win in 2012.

I don't think, by the time the 2012 election roles around anyone who has not figured out the problem with the deficit and vowed to 180 the spending will be toast. Problem for her is the credibility of a platform that would say we will elininate waste, a major pledge by Obama that, of course, has not been uttered since the campaign. The full impact of the health care mess will have become apparent to even the centrists that a budget hawk will be seen as required. She could have been that, at least in retoric, but will be taged with the Obama spend and tax to much to escape. Only chance would be if the economy had added real jobs and the wars were to take front burner status but I think even the Dems are saying 9.5% will be the new unemployment norm under this type business environment.

My guess is it will be Mit, despite coming from the Mass. disaster. I like Gingrich but he is probably not going to be the GOP choice.

LWW
07-23-2010, 01:16 PM
Obama trusting Hillary was the first confirmation that he was an idiot.

LWW

bobroberts
07-24-2010, 10:56 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Obama trusting Hillary was the first confirmation that he was an idiot.

LWW </div></div>
Truer words never spoken.

Looks like Newt might be the man but i still don't like what he tried to do to Clinton.