PDA

View Full Version : The White Channel



Qtec
07-29-2010, 01:38 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

Fox News Audience Just 1.38% Black

Fox News may be the undisputed ratings champion in cable news, but not among black viewers.

The New York Times' Brian Stelter tweeted that, according to Nielsen Media Research, Fox News has averaged just 29,000 black viewers in primetime so far this television season (9/09-7/10). That represents just 1.38% of its 2.102 million total viewer audience.

CNN and MSNBC, meanwhile, both have far more black viewers, both in absolute terms and as a proportion of their overall audiences.

MSNBC has averaged 145,000 black viewers, representing 19.3% of its 751,000 total viewer audience.

CNN has averaged 134,000 black viewers, representing 20.7% of its 648,000 total viewer audience. </div></div>

Explains a lot.

Q

LWW
07-29-2010, 05:15 AM
And what do you suppose this "PROVES" to the world?

Are their blocks which prevent blacks from watching Fox?

LWW

hondo
07-29-2010, 06:32 AM
I have to agree with Larry on this one.
Larry has proven time and time again that Right Wing Republicans actually love black folks and are their best friends.

While liberal Democrats secretly hate all blacks and are trying to destroy them.

Republicans know that black folks are incapable of receiving any kind of aid no matter how desperate their plight is, and so
the Repubs show them tough love by offering them nothing.

And Larry has shown time and time again that black folks are just too dumb to recognize who their true friends, the Republicans, are.

SHEESH! Would you guys pay attention????

pooltchr
07-29-2010, 07:36 AM
Another one of our left leaning friends, making another post about race. I guess it is very important to make sure we keep that issue right out in the limelight.

Here's a question for you....Who cares who watches which network? (other than the networks)

One of the really cool things about this country is that everyone has the freedom to choose how they spend their time.

I dare say that if you did a study, you would also find that more African Americans listen to Urban formatted radio stations than country stations. Does that prove anything?????

Steve

Qtec
07-29-2010, 07:38 AM
The Q you should ask yourself is why do so few blacks watch Fox News?

Q

pooltchr
07-29-2010, 07:45 AM
The question I am asking is why you think this is important.

Steve

LWW
07-29-2010, 08:05 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: pooltchr</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The question I am asking is why you think this is important.

Steve </div></div>

Good point ... and if Q was really curious, he should ask black America.

LWW

pooltchr
07-29-2010, 10:48 AM
It just strikes me odd that people can claim they want to see equality between the different races, and then seek out information that isolates and identifies how different races have different ideas and habits.

It is precisely this kind of crap that continues to drive a wedge between the races. As long as we keep focusing on the differences rather than the similarities, we aren't going to ever get past the whole issue.

Steve

LWW
07-29-2010, 11:37 AM
The leadership of the far left's nightmare scenario is that we ever get past race.

LWW

eg8r
07-29-2010, 12:02 PM
Tell us what the explains to you.

eg8r

hondo
07-29-2010, 04:22 PM
Steve, why does the truth about who watches Faux pain you so much?
Obviously black folks haven't yet bought into LWWs theory
about how much Republicans love black folks and how Democrats
have been conspiring to destroy them for decades.

Surely Lww is right. He claims to be blacker than Obama
and he never distorts the truth, does he?

Q was simply pointing out that black folks haven't had their epiphany about the purity and righteousness of Faux News yet.

You and Larry and I know where the love is, brother.

Why, every time Limberger and Hannity sneer and Beck bawls,
I think now THOSE are true Americans.

Heck, many Republicans even prefer the older term Negro just to show black folks how real they are.

Right on, Fauxnews! I can dig where y'all are comin from.
Groovy!

hondo
07-29-2010, 04:24 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: pooltchr</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The question I am asking is why you think this is important.

Steve </div></div>

Good point ... and if Q was really curious, he should ask black America.

LWW </div></div>

Why don't you just go ahead and answer for them, bro?

LWW
07-29-2010, 04:56 PM
That would be quite presumptuous ... although Q and you seem to have no problem answering for others.

LWW

pooltchr
07-29-2010, 05:45 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: hondo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Steve, why does the truth about who watches Faux pain you so much?
</div></div>

I think I made it very clear to anyone who read (and tried to comprehend) my post, that I really don't care who watches FOX. I also find the subject pointless, other than to continue to promote racist thought. What difference does it make what color someone is? Why is it even considered whether someone who watches a certain TV network is black, white, red or green?

Everytime someone compiles this kind of data, or publishes it, it serves only to further segregate the races. And that, in my opinion, is racist in itself.

Steve

hondo
07-29-2010, 07:16 PM
What's clear to me, son, is that you simply pick out one sentence in the other's post that you think you can respond to.
Read the entire post and stop and think before you babble.

Cause and effect, Stevie, cause and effect.

pooltchr
07-29-2010, 08:35 PM
When you start your post with a false prenise, the rest of the post becomes worthless.

Steve

Qtec
07-30-2010, 01:13 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">What's clear to me, son, is that you simply pick out one sentence in the other's post that you think you can respond to. </div></div>.....and IGNORE the rest. Why can you see that and they can't?

Is it so complicated H.
The TP is like 86% white and middle class.
They love Fox and Glenn Beck who have been race baiting before the election.
Remember the "Barak <u>HUSSEIN</u> Obama" was taught in a Madrassa rant from Fox?

link (http://crooksandliars.com/2007/01/22/cnn-debunks-obama-madrassa-smear/)

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style='font-size: 20pt'>CNN Debunks Obama "Madrassa" Smear</span>

Surprise, surprise. Despite the right-wing's irresponsible and baseless rumormongering about Hillary Clinton "exposing" Barack Obama's "covered up" childhood at an Indonesian madrassa (where he was presumably indoctrinated in extremist Muslim teachings), it turns out that none of it is even remotely truthful. After checking out the veracity of the story -- you know, a basic tenet of Journalism 101 -- CNN blows the lid off of what a spokesman for Senator Clinton called "an obvious right-wing hit job."

Insight Magazine, which is owned by the same company as The Washington Times, reported on its Web site last week that associates of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-New York, had unearthed information the Illinois Democrat and likely presidential candidate attended a Muslim religious school known for teaching the most fundamentalist form of Islam. Insight stood by its story in a response posted on its Web site Monday afternoon.
The Insight article was cited several times Friday on Fox News and was also referenced by the New York Post, The Glenn Beck program on CNN Headline News and a number of political blogs.

<span style='font-size: 20pt'>Fox News executive Bill Shine told CNN "Reliable Sources" anchor Howard Kurtz that some of the network's hosts were simply expressing their opinions and repeatedly cited Insight as the source of the allegations</span>. </div></div>

They didn't care if it was true or not, just like they did recently with the Sherrod video.



Imagine, you are black and you switch onto Fox.........

"This morning on Fox and Friends, Fox host Glenn Beck accused President Obama of being "a racist."

The group was discussing the recent Gates controversy, and Beck exclaimed that Obama has "over and over again" exposed himself as "a guy who has a deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture. I don't know what it is..."

When Fox's Brian Kilmeadeon pointed out that many people in Obama's administration are white, so "you can't say he doesn't like white people," Beck pressed on. "I'm not saying he doesn't like white people, I'm saying he has a problem," Beck said. <span style='font-size: 20pt'>"This guy is, I believe, a racist.</span>

So the first ever black POTUS is a racist! The socialist fascist tyrannical Obama is taking over!

I could go on and on and give many more examples but what is clear, and this is the point of the post, is that blacks don't watch Fox because the whole channel demonizes them constantly.

They [ Fox] take an extreme group, play the tapes over and over again and paint all blacks with the same brush. I can imagine blacks don't want to watch that.

If the Devil owned a news station it would be Fox.

Q

LWW
07-30-2010, 05:04 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The TP is like 86% white and middle class.


Q </div></div>

Which is pretty much the breakdown of taxpaying America.

Imagine that.

LWW

LWW
07-30-2010, 05:15 AM
BTW ... your data is unlinked so I took it and googled it and it came from your old standby of deceit, the Huffington Post.

But where did they get it from?

A Twitter tweet.

So, bottom line, is that you are again lapping up spoon fed propaganda which you have no idea as to whether or not it's true ... or any desire to find out.

LWW

hondo
07-30-2010, 05:15 AM
What "false prenise[sic]" ?

Show me.

Qtec
07-30-2010, 05:18 AM
Hondo, do not drop to their level. Spelling mistakes? The n is right next to the m on my keyboard. It can happen. We
need not be so petty.

ITS A DISTRACTION. It gives them an out.



Q

Qtec
07-30-2010, 05:22 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Which is pretty much the breakdown of taxpaying America.

Imagine that.

LWW </div></div>

Are you now saying 86% of Americans pay tax? Geez, I seem to remember you saying something totally different.
Can you prove 86% of Americans pay tax?


HaHaHa.....Can't wait.

Q...this should be good.......or you can just admit you are talking out of another orifice that is not your mouth!

hondo
07-30-2010, 05:32 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Hondo, do not drop to their level. Spelling mistakes? The n is right next to the m on my keyboard. It can happen. We
need not be so petty.

ITS A DISTRACTION. It gives them an out.



Q </div></div>

The point was what false premise was he talking about. I simply quoted him.

pooltchr
07-30-2010, 06:06 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: hondo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

The point was what false premise was he talking about. I simply quoted him. </div></div>

The first line in your post!

Steve

pooltchr
07-30-2010, 06:11 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Which is pretty much the breakdown of taxpaying America.

Imagine that.

LWW </div></div>

Are you now saying 86% of Americans pay tax? Geez, I seem to remember you saying something totally different.
Can you prove 86% of Americans pay tax?


HaHaHa.....Can't wait.

Q...this should be good.......or you can just admit you are talking out of another orifice that is not your mouth! </div></div>

How did you manage to come to that conclusion from his comment? We already know that the percentage of people who actually pay income taxes is well below 86%. That isn't what he said.

Read it again. He said that when you look at the people who actually pay income taxes, the breakdown would be 86% white middle class. (I am neither agreeing nor disagreeing with the statement, as I have not researched the figures. I'm just pointing out how you too something he said, and tried to make it seem as if he said something else.)

Steve

LWW
07-30-2010, 06:29 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: pooltchr</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Which is pretty much the breakdown of taxpaying America.

Imagine that.

LWW </div></div>

Are you now saying 86% of Americans pay tax? Geez, I seem to remember you saying something totally different.
Can you prove 86% of Americans pay tax?


HaHaHa.....Can't wait.

Q...this should be good.......or you can just admit you are talking out of another orifice that is not your mouth! </div></div>

How did you manage to come to that conclusion from his comment?

Steve </div></div>

It's an Alinsky tactic ... challenge people to defend positions they never took.

LWW

Qtec
07-30-2010, 06:55 AM
What he is saying is that blacks don't pay tax.

Q

LWW
07-30-2010, 07:08 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body">What he is saying is that blacks don't pay tax.

Q </div></div>

http://weaselzippers.us/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/obama-laughing.jpg
<span style='font-size: 14pt'>I knew you had my back Q!</span>

http://static.open.salon.com/files/bush-laughing1223057795.jpg
<span style='font-size: 14pt'>That's pandelirious!!!</span>

http://reason.com/assets/mc/mwelch/2009_11/clinton_laughing.jpg
<span style='font-size: 14pt'>I laughed so hard I left another stain!!!</span>

LWW

pooltchr
07-30-2010, 08:18 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body">What he is saying is that blacks don't pay tax.

Q </div></div>

Are you disputing the information in his post?
Or are you just going to keep trying to put words in his mouth?

Steve

LWW
07-30-2010, 11:29 AM
He is simply defending dearest leader with every means available to him.

LWW

LWW
07-31-2010, 05:56 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

Fox News Audience blah-blah-blah-blah</div></div>

Explains a lot.

Q</div></div>

How's about we put Q's source to the same standard, HMMMMM?

http://www.bolgernow.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/glenn-beck-pointing.jpghttp://www.bolgernow.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/glenn-beck-pointing.jpghttp://www.bolgernow.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/glenn-beck-pointing.jpg

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Brian Stelter, who reports on TV and digital media for The New York Times, sent out a tweet the other day that drew lots of attention.

As Stelter tweeted,
"Fox, as we all know, has biggest audience in prime time. But among African Americans, it's smallest -- 29k vs. 134k for CNN, 145k for MSNBC."
This of course, played into the "Fox is racist" meme, and, not surprisingly, Stelter's words were retweeted many times (and also inspired several media blogs to further discuss Fox News' lack of diversity).

<span style='font-size: 11pt'>Interestingly, though, the media site where Stelter primarily blogs (New York Times' Media Decoder) suffers from the lowest percentage of African-American readers (4.6%) when compared to comparable media sites like Mediaite (5.8%), Gawker (6.4%), Mediabistro (9.2%), etc., according to Nielsen Media Research.

Maybe he should have checked that first?</span>

(In case you're worried that I might be making the same mistake, according to Nielsen, Politics Daily has a larger percentage of African-American readership (7.7%) than Stelter's blog -- and also has a larger share of the African-American readership than other prominent, comparable political sites). </div></div>

http://www.bolgernow.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/glenn-beck-pointing.jpghttp://www.bolgernow.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/glenn-beck-pointing.jpghttp://www.bolgernow.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/glenn-beck-pointing.jpg

How Q reacts to the facts will certainly explain a lot.

&gt;&gt;&gt;PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN GLASS HOUSES SHOULDN'T THROW STONES&lt;&lt;&lt; (http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/07/29/nyt-reporter-who-criticized-fox-news-audience-diversity-writes/)

LWW

Qtec
07-31-2010, 11:22 PM
What facts? This is not about some obscure blogger than most people have never heard of. He is irrelevant.

The fact is that very few blacks watch Fox and I say that's because of their constant race baiting and the endless fictitious attacks on Obama.

Q

LWW
08-01-2010, 04:39 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body">What facts? This is not about some obscure blogger than most people have never heard of. He is irrelevant.

The fact is that very few blacks watch Fox and I say that's because of their constant race baiting and the endless fictitious attacks on Obama.

Q

</div></div>

<span style='font-size: 26pt'><u>HOLD THE PRESSES!!!!</u></span>

When his blather advanced your agenda of racial division he was an unimpeachable source ... now that he has been exposed he is irrelevant?

Doublethink of the first order is required to reach that conclusion.

BTW ... when did the New York Times become obscure? When they were exposed?

Oh, BTW, I've looked for a source to this story other than your now obscure blogger ... and we both now you didn't ... and he seems to be it. Period.

What a piece of work you are.

LWW

hondo
08-01-2010, 09:48 AM
Why do you constantly attack the intelligence of black folks , Larry?

You know what? I don't think you're black at all. I think you made that up so people will think you couldn't possibly be a racist. JMHO.

LWW
08-01-2010, 10:20 AM
Well, I would attack your intelligence ... but ...

LWW

hondo
08-01-2010, 06:06 PM
I noticed that wasn't a denial. Very telling.

Rant on, "bro".

pooltchr
08-01-2010, 09:59 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: hondo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Why do you constantly attack the intelligence of black folks , Larry?

You know what? I don't think you're black at all. I think you made that up so people will think you couldn't possibly be a racist. JMHO. </div></div>

Are you suggesting that blacks can't possibly be racist????????????


Steve

Qtec
08-02-2010, 03:01 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body">What facts? This is not about some obscure blogger than most people have never heard of. He is irrelevant.

The fact is that very few blacks watch Fox and I say that's because of their constant race baiting and the endless fictitious attacks on Obama.

Q

</div></div>

<span style='font-size: 26pt'><u>HOLD THE PRESSES!!!!</u></span>

When <u>his blather advanced your agenda of racial division he was an unimpeachable source</u> ... now that<u> he has been exposed</u> he is irrelevant?

What a piece of work you are.

LWW </div></div>


You can't read.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The New York Times' Brian Stelter tweeted that, <span style='font-size: 20pt'>according to Nielsen Media Research,</span> Fox News has averaged just 29,000 black viewers in primetime so far this television season (9/09-7/10). That represents just 1.38% of its 2.102 million total viewer audience. </div></div>

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style='font-size: 20pt'>Nielsen Media Research (NMR) is an American firm that measures media audiences, including television, radio, theatre films</span> (via the AMC MAP program[citation needed]) and newspapers. NMR, headquartered in New York City and operating primarily from Chicago, is best-known for the Nielsen ratings, a measurement of television viewership <span style='font-size: 20pt'>which for years has been the deciding factor in canceling or renewing TV shows by networks. </span></div></div>

I did not make the numbers up, nor did the blogger,<span style='font-size: 20pt'> Nielsen Media Research did!</span>

Q

hondo
08-02-2010, 05:08 AM
Are you suggesting that Larry is racist?!?!?!?!?! /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/shocked.gif

LWW
08-02-2010, 05:09 AM
I never said you made the numbers up. I'm saying that when the blogger made a completely unsupported claim you licked it off the spoon and deemed him credible ... and when it turns out he is guilty of the very sin he accuses others of he is instantly an obscure irrelevant blogger.

If you can't see your own hypocrisy you are most certainly blind.

Now, for the next question ... why do so few blacks read the New York Times? Does that explain a lot?

LWW

LWW
08-02-2010, 05:10 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: pooltchr</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: hondo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Why do you constantly attack the intelligence of black folks , Larry?

You know what? I don't think you're black at all. I think you made that up so people will think you couldn't possibly be a racist. JMHO. </div></div>

Are you suggesting that blacks can't possibly be racist????????????


Steve </div></div>

He is simply ... and quite pathetically ... using an Alinsky tactic in attempting to get me to defend a statement that I have never made.

H is a poor, lonely, and desperate troll who needs a victory in the worst way ... yet never gets one.

LWW

hondo
08-02-2010, 05:27 AM
I'll read it if it's in front of me, but I don't buy it. Too expensive. Too New York.
I have different reasons for not watching Faux.

hondo
08-02-2010, 05:31 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: pooltchr</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: hondo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Why do you constantly attack the intelligence of black folks , Larry?

You know what? I don't think you're black at all. I think you made that up so people will think you couldn't possibly be a racist. JMHO. </div></div>

Are you suggesting that blacks can't possibly be racist????????????


Steve </div></div>

He is simply ... and quite pathetically ... using an Alinsky tactic in attempting to get me to defend a statement that I have never made.

H is a poor, lonely, and desperate troll who needs a victory in the worst way ... yet never gets one.

LWW </div></div>

Sweetie, I am neither poor(not rich, though), lonely, desperate,
nor do I care about victory.
You could be talking about yourself, certainly not me.

hondo
08-02-2010, 05:35 AM
Your problem is lackanookie.
If the misses actually does exist, why not take her out once in a while rather than posting your crap 24/7?

New worlds might open up for you and you wouldn't be so anal retentive.

Stretch
08-02-2010, 06:34 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: hondo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Your problem is lackanookie.
If the misses actually does exist, why not take her out once in a while rather than posting your crap 24/7?

New worlds might open up for you and you wouldn't be so anal retentive. </div></div>

H, it's more fun for LWW to enguage in imagined victory's. It's all that's left for him. St.

bobroberts
08-02-2010, 12:34 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Stretch</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: hondo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Your problem is lackanookie.
If the misses actually does exist, why not take her out once in a while rather than posting your crap 24/7?

New worlds might open up for you and you wouldn't be so anal retentive. </div></div>

H, it's more fun for LWW to enguage in imagined victory's. It's all that's left for him. St. </div></div>

First off you don't even realize that your thread title is racist.
Imagined?? Fox is the #1 station out there for fair news.That;s why the others are losing their rating so bad.Just check the post where LWW puts up comments from the Dems. saying that they are the best.

LWW
08-02-2010, 03:06 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: hondo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Sweetie, I am neither poor(not rich, though), lonely, desperate,
nor do I care about victory.
You could be talking about yourself, certainly not me. </div></div>

1 - I'm not your "SWEETIE" and I've asked you repeatedly to keep you homoerotic thoughts about by virile masculine person to yourself. I'm not gay ... not that there's anything wrong it ... and if I was I could do better than you.

2 - You "ARE" ... or at least claim to be ... whatever you need to "BE" at the moment to sell your line of bravo sierra. When you need to be you lament the poverty level existence of a poor West Virginia school teacher. Other times you yack about being able to retire before age 60, how you drive top of the line cars, and have house servants ... which you also admittedly do not supply health care benefits for or contribute the required FICA funds for their retirement or pay a living wage to.

LWW

hondo
08-02-2010, 04:02 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: bobroberts</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Stretch</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: hondo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Your problem is lackanookie.
If the misses actually does exist, why not take her out once in a while rather than posting your crap 24/7?

New worlds might open up for you and you wouldn't be so anal retentive. </div></div>

H, it's more fun for LWW to enguage in imagined victory's. It's all that's left for him. St. </div></div>

First off you don't even realize that your thread title is racist.
Imagined?? Fox is the #1 station out there for fair news.That;s why the others are losing their rating so bad.Just check the post where LWW puts up comments from the Dems. saying that they are the best. </div></div>

First off, neither Stretch nor I started that thread.
Secondly, anybody who posts a picture of 9/11 saying it's pot, and then swears he didn't know it was a picture of 9/11 is obviously dis-honest and beneath my contempt.

Why are you here now? Did they run you off AZ?
Begone, troll.

hondo
08-02-2010, 04:24 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: hondo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Sweetie, I am neither poor(not rich, though), lonely, desperate,
nor do I care about victory.
You could be talking about yourself, certainly not me. </div></div>

1 - I'm not your "SWEETIE" and I've asked you repeatedly to keep you homoerotic thoughts about by virile masculine person to yourself. I'm not gay ... not that there's anything wrong it ... and if I was I could do better than you.

2 - You "ARE" ... or at least claim to be ... whatever you need to "BE" at the moment to sell your line of bravo sierra. When you need to be you lament the poverty level existence of a poor West Virginia school teacher. Other times you yack about being able to retire before age 60, how you drive top of the line cars, and have house servants ... which you also admittedly do not supply health care benefits for or contribute the required FICA funds for their retirement or pay a living wage to.

LWW </div></div>

That was very eloquent, lamb chops, but what does any of that have to do with your claims that I am poor,lonely, desperate, and crave victory?
West Virginia teachers are sorely underpaid.
I retired at 59.
I drive an '04 Camry XLE. My wife drives an '04 Suburu Outback.
My housekeeper is a beautiful young lady who is an intimate friend of mine. She works about 4-5 hours a week for me and
I drive about 36 miles round trip taking her to and from work.
She does it to get out of the house and I do it cause she's my best friend.
Plus, lunch. Plus, we party.
Insurance? 4 hours a week? Wow! I'll move to Dayton and clean house. And she is paid an excellent wage.

I gave up trying to "win" an argument with you long ago.
You are delusional and simply twist the truth.

Now, let's look at you.
Poor? You are on either welfare or SSD.
Lonely? You have no life. This is IT. Pathetic.
And, I don't believe you're married or have kids.
You probably live with your mother.
Desperate? You have 3 times as many posts as me and have been on here 4 years less than me. Yet you count all my posts and gush about how prolific I am.
Only YOU want to win on here. The rest of us just want to be entertained.

Talk all the smack you want, honey bunch. The truth is out there.

BTW, when you said you could do better, we all knew who you were talking about, didn't we, Steve? LOL!

Stretch
08-02-2010, 05:00 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: hondo</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: hondo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Sweetie, I am neither poor(not rich, though), lonely, desperate,
nor do I care about victory.
You could be talking about yourself, certainly not me. </div></div>

1 - I'm not your "SWEETIE" and I've asked you repeatedly to keep you homoerotic thoughts about by virile masculine person to yourself. I'm not gay ... not that there's anything wrong it ... and if I was I could do better than you.

2 - You "ARE" ... or at least claim to be ... whatever you need to "BE" at the moment to sell your line of bravo sierra. When you need to be you lament the poverty level existence of a poor West Virginia school teacher. Other times you yack about being able to retire before age 60, how you drive top of the line cars, and have house servants ... which you also admittedly do not supply health care benefits for or contribute the required FICA funds for their retirement or pay a living wage to.

LWW </div></div>

That was very eloquent, lamb chops, but what does any of that have to do with your claims that I am poor,lonely, desperate, and crave victory?
West Virginia teachers are sorely underpaid.
I retired at 59.
I drive an '04 Camry XLE. My wife drives an '04 Suburu Outback.
My housekeeper is a beautiful young lady who is an intimate friend of mine. She works about 4-5 hours a week for me and
I drive about 36 miles round trip taking her to and from work.
She does it to get out of the house and I do it cause she's my best friend.
Plus, lunch. Plus, we party.
Insurance? 4 hours a week? Wow! I'll move to Dayton and clean house. And she is paid an excellent wage.

I gave up trying to "win" an argument with you long ago.
You are delusional and simply twist the truth.

Now, let's look at you.
Poor? You are on either welfare or SSD.
Lonely? You have no life. This is IT. Pathetic.
And, I don't believe you're married or have kids.
You probably live with your mother.
Desperate? You have 3 times as many posts as me and have been on here 4 years less than me. Yet you count all my posts and gush about how prolific I am.
Only YOU want to win on here. The rest of us just want to be entertained.

Talk all the smack you want, honey bunch. The truth is out there.

BTW, when you said you could do better, we all knew who you were talking about, didn't we, Steve? LOL!
</div></div>

Hono doth smacketh down the LWW like a red headed stepchild. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif St.

hondo
08-02-2010, 05:19 PM
Believe it or not, Stretch, I feel bad when I do that.
if he would just be civil , I would stop in a New York minute.

pooltchr
08-02-2010, 06:49 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: hondo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

BTW, when you said you could do better, we all knew who you were talking about, didn't we, Steve? LOL!
</div></div>

Kindly leave me out of your little homosexual discourse....You may swing that way, and that is fine.

I don''t!

Steve

Stretch
08-02-2010, 07:55 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: hondo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Believe it or not, Stretch, I feel bad when I do that.
if he would just be civil , I would stop in a New York minute. </div></div>

Larry is just a bitter man. Without an enemy his self worth is 0. So he cultivates and sustains enemies to feed his ego and imagined victories. Our disgust at his tactics and hyper partisan extremism along with holier than thow fake intellectual mumbo jumbo just fuels his fire. He should be thanking us. He needs us. St.

hondo
08-02-2010, 08:28 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: pooltchr</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: hondo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

BTW, when you said you could do better, we all knew who you were talking about, didn't we, Steve? LOL!
</div></div>

Kindly leave me out of your little homosexual discourse....You may swing that way, and that is fine.

I don''t!

Steve </div></div>

Oh, I was just kidding. Sorry. That was a little out of line.
Larry keeps swearing over and over that he's not gay, and
he tends to veer a lot of threads that way so it's hard for me to resist.
I shouldn't have used you to get to him and, again, I sincerely apologize, and I'll stop.

hondo
08-02-2010, 08:30 PM
I have to agree. The worse thing we could do to him would be to ignore him.

LWW
08-03-2010, 05:41 AM
I see the korn likker is ripe.

LWW

hondo
08-03-2010, 06:42 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I see the korn likker is ripe.

LWW </div></div>

The best shine I ever had came from Eastern Ohio.
Wish I could find some more.