PDA

View Full Version : Jon Stewart................lol



Qtec
07-31-2010, 03:10 AM
watch (http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0730/stewart-fox-nothing-obama-fcking-happy/)

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">It was Fox News that offered the sharpest criticism of the President. Pundits on the conservative network claimed that Obama had snubbed the Boy Scouts of America to go on "The View."

<span style='font-size: 14pt'>"It's the 100 year anniversary of the Boy Scouts but instead of honoring the future leaders of our country President Obama sat down with the ladies of 'The View,'" Fox News' Gretchen Carlson announced Thursday.</span><span style="color: #CC0000">LMFAO</span>

"Nothing Obama does will ever make you f*cking happy," observed Stewart. </div></div>

Qtec
08-01-2010, 03:21 AM
bump

LWW
08-01-2010, 04:56 AM
Was your point that Obama is more concerned with pandering to his base of semi literate daytime TV viewers at the expense of honoring American traditions?

If so then I agree.

LWW

Stretch
08-01-2010, 10:01 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Was your point that Obama is more concerned with pandering to his base of semi literate daytime TV viewers at the expense of honoring American traditions?

If so then I agree.

LWW </div></div>

So you agree with what you make up. Astonishing! St.

LWW
08-01-2010, 10:18 AM
So you are saying that I made up what Q posted?

LWW

cushioncrawler
08-01-2010, 05:08 PM
There shood not be any Government support.
mac.

Wiki ------ Though the non-traditional program, Learning for Life, does not restrict participation other than by age, membership in the traditional BSA programs is more restricted and controversial.

Girls can only join Venturing though women can be adult volunteers in all programs.

BSA membership policy also excludes known or avowed atheists or agnostics from all traditional programs.

"Known or avowed homosexuals" are not employed or allowed to be adult volunteers; no current formal policy forbids them from being youth members but they cannot hold youth leadership positions.[24]

The BSA contends that these policies are essential in its mission in the traditional programs to instill in young people the values of the Scout Oath and Law. These policies have been called unjust by critics and legally challenged at the state and federal level. In Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, the Supreme Court has affirmed that, as a private, expressive association, the BSA can set its own membership standards under the Constitutional right to freedom of association.

However non-discrimination laws may prohibit certain types of government support and other lawsuits have been filed to determine what is and is not permitted or required.

cushioncrawler
08-01-2010, 05:16 PM
There are 100's of scout leaders fucking scouts in Ozz and elsewhere.
There are 100's of priests fucking alter boys in Ozz and elsewhere.
mac.

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) The Boy Scouts of America call them "perversion files," internal documents used to track Scout leaders suspected of sexually abusing young boys.

A judge who had ordered the Scouts to release them received 1,247 files into evidence near the end of the day Friday the third day of trial that began with a lawyer saying "you will be the first jury to see them."

Attorneys Paul Mones and Kelly Clark won the release of files from 1965-85 to help them make the case in a $14 million lawsuit against the Boy Scouts filed by a 37-year-old Oregon man. He was sexually molested in the early 1980s by assistant Scoutmaster Timur Dykes, who was convicted three times between 1983 and 1994 of sexually abusing boys, most of them Scouts.

Although there have been dozens of lawsuits against the Boy Scouts over sex abuse allegations, judges for the most part have either denied requests for the files or the cases have been settled. The only other time the documents are believed to have been presented at a trial was in the 1980s in Virginia.

On Friday, Mones showed a Multnomah County Circuit Court jury a 1935 New York Times article that said the Scouts had 2,910 "cards" on men who were unfit to supervise young boys.

The display came as he questioned Nate Marshall, a Scouts executive from headquarters in Irving, Texas, now in charge of those files. Marshall estimated about 30 percent of the men flagged between 1920 and 1935 had sexually abused Scouts.

Mones also showed the jury a table Marshall prepared that showed the Boy Scouts amassed 1,123 "perversion" files from 1965-85, which Marshall said were simply a tool to track child molesters and remove them or prevent them from moving to another city and trying to join another Scout troop.

The files were among a total of 1,587 files divided into categories considered grounds for suspension or rejection as a Scout leader, Marshall said.

Besides perversion, the categories listed were criminal, financial, theft, leadership, moral including homosexuality and religious reasons, including being an atheist or an agnostic.

But the bulk of the files were in the perversion category, which includes sexual misconduct besides molesting children, such as soliciting prostitutes or possessing child pornography.

During questioning by Mones, Marshall acknowledged there was no system in place to warn Scouts or their parents about potential sex abuse, and no procedure for them to report it.

Scout executives had no written guidelines until a 1972 memo on the subject that also urged them to keep its contents confidential "because of misunderstandings which could develop if it were widely distributed."

Earlier Friday, testimony from a bishop for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints responsible for a Scout troop of church members suggested the Scouts never provided leaders with training about spotting abuse or preventing it.

In a video deposition, Gordon McEwen said he tended mostly to his church duties and was rarely involved with the Scouts. He was also vague about his recollections of conversations with Scoutmaster Earl Wiest about Dykes.

McEwen said he stepped up his involvement when the mother of a scout complained in January 1983 her son may have been abused. McEwen said he confronted Dykes, who admitted abusing 17 boys and provided a written list of names.

But a retired police officer who investigated the abuse report testified Friday that McEwen never told police about the list.

Charles Shipley, who was a Multnomah County sheriff's detective at the time, said he interviewed a pair of victims before calling Dykes in for questioning.

Shipley said Dykes admitted molesting the two boys and was arrested. Shipley was concerned there were additional victims and asked McEwen to talk to other parents of about 30 Scouts in the troop.

Two other potential victims were identified but Shipley said their parents did not want their sons involved with the investigation.

McEwen admitted he never turned over the list to police. But he said he personally contacted the parents of all 17 boys on the list before calling a state meeting of the church to "disfellowship" Dykes, or limit his church involvement, and counseled him to "repent of his errors."

Dykes pleaded guilty to attempted sexual abuse, received probation and was ordered to stay away from children.

Clark told the jury Dykes continued with his scouting activities until he was arrested again in July 1984 during a routine traffic stop while he was driving a van full of Scouts on a camping trip.

Clark said the victim who filed the lawsuit was on that trip, and the trauma he suffered from the incident and the abuse by Dykes led to mental health problems, bad grades in school, drug use, anxiety, difficulty maintaining relationships and the loss of several jobs as an adult.

The lawsuit also named the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints but the church has settled its portion of the case.

cushioncrawler
08-01-2010, 05:22 PM
I'll wager that Robert Baden-Powell (1857-1941), founder of the Scouting movement, never imagined that a Girl Scout troop in the United States would be celebrating little girls donning the headscarf but that's what happened at a recent event held by the Muslim Scouts of Michigan at the Islamic House of Wisdom in Dearborn Heights, Michigan. Tarek El-Tablawy of The Associated Press describes the scene when 43 girls, ages 8 to 11, attended a Takleef Festival, described by the Arab-American News as "a celebration of girls committing to hijab."

the girls line up in two groups one dressed in white, the other in pink gowns and hijabs. On stage, they approach a copy of the Quran held by another girl. Gently kissing its spine, they pass underneath as parents in the audience snap away with digital cameras. "That's my baby," beams one father.

Organizers of the Takleef celebration are well aware of the spiritual and cultural challenges these girls face in deciding to wear the hijab. "A couple of these girls are taking the veil before their mothers are," says 38-year-old Ali Ibrahim, one of the scout volunteers organizing the celebration. "We even have one girl whose parents are not convinced and are trying to get her to take off the veil. May God guide her."

A song airs over the loudspeakers during the play, summing up, in Simon and Garfunkel-like acoustical melodies, a Muslim girl's answer to criticism: The hijab "is a simple cloth to preserve her dignity/So lift the veil from your heart/And see the heart of purity."

Comments: (1) This is the Girl Scouts. In the United States. A new era is upon us. (2) Note the confidence subtly expressed in the middle paragraph quoted above, that those Muslim women not already with hijab will soon make the necessary adjustment. (May 21, 2004)

June 2, 2004 update: Beila Rabinowitz, the researcher on militant Islam, points out that the logo of the Islamic Committee on Scouting, an official part of the scouting movement, has a format of note: the Islamic crescent and star surround the Boy Scout fleur de lys, as though gobbling it up, while the boy pictured by it has his hands extended out as Muslims do when praying.

Stretch
08-01-2010, 07:17 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So you are saying that I made up what Q posted?

LWW </div></div>

Q just past along what Fox claimed, but since fox spoonfeeds you thier views then i'm not surprised you'd go along with it. What you made up was the part about the views audience being semi literate. Do you have proof of this? Or does this just fit nicely as a contrast to Obama somehow snubing Boy Scouts. Dosn't Obama have a whole year to honour the Scouts on thier aniversary? Or is every public appearence this year going to be a snub of the Scouts. This argument that your defending is so lame as to be laughable. But we've come to expect this of you. Ever concider a career in Comedy? St.

hondo
08-01-2010, 09:25 PM
Larry swears he used to do stand up, but now he never stands up. Go figure. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/laugh.gif

LWW
08-02-2010, 05:04 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Stretch</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Q just past along what Fox claimed </div></div>

So what part of the story are you disputing exactly?

LWW

hondo
08-02-2010, 05:22 AM
What's the big deal here?
SSDD.
The Right attacks eveything he does.
You either agree or dis-agree.

You folks hate Obama the way we hated Bush.
Life in America.

LWW
08-02-2010, 05:41 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: hondo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">we hated Bush.</div></div>

How many times did you swear you didn't hate Bush?

Doesn't confession make you feel better?

LWW

Stretch
08-02-2010, 06:24 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Stretch</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Q just past along what Fox claimed </div></div>

So what part of the story are you disputing exactly?

LWW </div></div>

Read it again and try and figure it out, i know you can, when it suits you. Guess this is not one of those times? Not surprised. St.

LWW
08-02-2010, 07:43 AM
Are you fluent at all in English?

If your argument is that Fox "CLAIMED" it to be true then the implication is that you are denting that it is true.

Now we are at the crux of the real problem ... smart people examine evidence and accept something as either true or as false based on a preponderance of the evidence. Leftists view something as true or as false based on either the party telling them that it is true or that it is false, or on whether they wish that it were true or that it were false.

You have, again, made my case with astounding eloquence.

LWW

bobroberts
08-02-2010, 12:37 PM
LWW
You can't discuss politics with closed minded people.
Poor Gayle looks like she is gone. Too Bad,.

LWW
08-02-2010, 03:08 PM
Apparently it was suicide by mod ... woofie is gone as well, and is sending e-mails that will curl your hair.

LWW

hondo
08-02-2010, 03:44 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: hondo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">we hated Bush.</div></div>

How many times did you swear you didn't hate Bush?

Doesn't confession make you feel better?

LWW </div></div>

I never hated Bush like you hate Obama. Admit THAT. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/cool.gif

Besides, "we" was used collectively, not necessarily meaning "me."
Steve, explain this to him. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/laugh.gif

hondo
08-02-2010, 03:48 PM
Why do you always attack folks' language skills?
You make mistake after mistake that I let pass because I'm not a ahole like some I know.

hondo
08-02-2010, 03:50 PM
Why don't you just go and post another picture of 9/11 and pretend it's pot?

Begone, troll.

hondo
08-02-2010, 03:52 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Apparently it was suicide by mod ... woofie is gone as well, and is sending e-mails that will curl your hair.

LWW </div></div>

Yep, you "win" again, podnah. You da man!

Stretch
08-02-2010, 05:26 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Are you fluent at all in English?

If your argument is that Fox "CLAIMED" it to be true then the implication is that you are denting that it is true.

Now we are at the crux of the real problem ... smart people examine evidence and accept something as either true or as false based on a preponderance of the evidence. Leftists view something as true or as false based on either the party telling them that it is true or that it is false, or on whether they wish that it were true or that it were false.

You have, again, made my case with astounding eloquence.

LWW </div></div>

Blah blah fluent in english, blah blah, implications and denting blah blah, preponderance of evidence, blah blah blah whether it's true or false, wishing it was true or false, blah blah.......

What a hot pile of crap you twist. Do you actualy talk that way to people? Does it make you sound smart? Do you find people just zoneing out on you after 5 min. or just kicking your ass for being a loud mouthed pompus a-hole with a massive chip on his shoulder? You must have a lot of very short conversations with real people. Stick to the web sites where you can operate with impunity. St.

hondo
08-02-2010, 08:24 PM
You know I've wondered about that.
He's had that hateful arrogance since he materialized
on AZ a few years back.
I kept thinking: Does he have any friends? Is this
how he treats people he knows?

I've always been curious. Most of us mention our friends
on here. I've never seen him mention one friend.
I'm not surprised.
I also keep asking myself: Would you want to even know this guy?
Can he possibly be this full of himself in person?

Qtec
08-03-2010, 04:47 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If your argument is that Fox "CLAIMED" it to be true <u>then the implication is that you are denting that it is true. </u></div></div>

No you idiot. By using 'claimed', he is just saying that what Fox says is not yet an established fact. <span style='font-size: 20pt'>ie a claim is not a fact.</span>

Get it?

Q

Qtec
08-03-2010, 04:50 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Was your point that Obama is more concerned with pandering to his base of semi literate daytime TV viewers at the expense of honoring American traditions?

If so then I agree.

LWW </div></div>
No

Q..that is your faulty logic at work.

Qtec
08-03-2010, 04:52 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So you are saying that I made up what Q posted?

LWW </div></div>

You did. You put your own idiotic interpretation on my post because you can't dispute it.

Q

Qtec
08-03-2010, 04:57 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Stretch</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Was your point that Obama is more concerned with pandering to his base of semi literate daytime TV viewers at the expense of honoring American traditions?

If so then I agree.

LWW </div></div>

So you agree with what you make up. Astonishing! St. </div></div>


Come on St, you know that's not true. LWW always agrees with himself because he is always right and the Marxists- the other 51% of the population- are wrong.
Its not complicated. If you disagree with me[ LWW] then you are an anti-Semitic, share the wealth, tree hugging Liberal who wants to turn the USA into a new North Korea and destroy the US Con.

Q /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif

Open your eyes! LOL