PDA

View Full Version : Joe Biden Right! Clarence Thomas WAS Harrassing



Gayle in MD
10-23-2010, 07:01 AM
Thomas, and Roberts and Alito, all committed purgery in their Senate Testimony. Thomas lied about sexually harrassing women, and as this article proves, there were other women who were interviewed at the time, in private, who confirmed what his ex girl friend is now, finally saying, publically, hence, he should be impeached.

Roberts and Alito, testified that they would not be ativist judges, but would follow precedent, and settled Law. Obviously, their recent votes, which completely changed the rules and regulations on Campaign Financing, proves that they, also lied, under oath.

There is talk about impeaching Roberts, around town, right now.

I hope more comes of it in the future, but probably won't, sadly.

Three page story, based on an interview with his ex girlfriend, and including statements from several other women, who were subjected to his sexualol harassment:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con...10102004599?=AR (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/21/AR2010102106645.html?sid=ST2010102004599?=AR)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con...10102004599?=AR (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/21/AR2010102106645.html?sid=ST2010102004599?=AR)

pooltchr
10-23-2010, 07:48 AM
/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif

More of your biased liberal hate filled bashing of conservatives.

Get a life!

Steve

Deeman3
10-23-2010, 08:18 AM
Seems to be not a lot new here. He may have done some inappropriate things in his personal relationships with some of the women but, like back during the hearings, it is a "he said-she said" situation.

I think it would be reasonable to think about impeachment if he had been proven to harrass these women but this does not do that and falls short of saying he has, since then, done any inappropriate stuff.

Now, I think porn is boring myself, like his one time squeeze but it is not illegal, just an indicator of his sexual inadequacies, not in itself a proof of perversion or harrassment.

I didn't see where Biden was right in anything here. In fact, it appears he may have protected Thomas as much as anyone on the right may have.

Of course, you have the additional complication that the woman is now hawking a book. How many times have we seen that? Any controversy increases sales.

Just no good arugments here. Unless you are on the far left! /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/smile.gif

LWW
10-23-2010, 12:03 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
Thomas, and Roberts and Alito, all committed <s>purgery</s> perjury in their Senate Testimony. Thomas lied about sexually harrassing women, and as this article proves, there were other women who were interviewed at the time, in private, who confirmed what his ex girl friend is now, finally saying, <s>publically</s>, publicly hence, he should be impeached.

Roberts and Alito, testified that they would not be <s>ativist</s> activist judges, but would follow precedent, and settled Law. Obviously, their recent votes, which completely changed the rules and regulations on Campaign Financing, proves that they, also lied, under oath.

There is talk about impeaching Roberts, around town, right now.

I hope more comes of it in the future, but probably won't, sadly.

Three page story, based on an interview with his ex girlfriend, and including statements from several other women, who were subjected to his sexualol harassment:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con...10102004599?=AR (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/21/AR2010102106645.html?sid=ST2010102004599?=AR)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con...10102004599?=AR (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/21/AR2010102106645.html?sid=ST2010102004599?=AR) </div></div>

1 - From your rant one can only assume that you now are in favor of the impeachment proceedings brought against William Jefferson Clinton.

2 - The campaign funding decision did not override established law, it established law ... and actually followed the COTUS.

LWW

hondo
10-23-2010, 06:04 PM
Clarence screwed up when he asked if "harrass" was one word or two.

Qtec
10-23-2010, 07:43 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">it is a "he said-she said" situation. </div></div>

Wrong. Its a 'THEY said, he said'.

Are they all lying or is he?




Q

LWW
10-24-2010, 06:36 AM
Was JUANITA BROADDRICK lying?

Or was Clinton?

Was KATHLEEN WILLEY lying?

Or was Clinton?

Was NORMA ROGERS lying?

Or was Clinton?

Was CHRISTINE ZERCHER lying?

Or was Clinton?

Was ELIZABETH WARD GRACEN lying?

Or was Clinton?

Was PAULA JONES lying?

Or was Clinton?

Rape, molestation, kidnapping, sadomasochism, perjury, what will you excuse as long as (D) follows their name on the ballot?

LWW

Gayle in MD
10-24-2010, 08:19 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">it is a "he said-she said" situation. </div></div>

Wrong. Its a 'THEY said, he said'.

Are they all lying or is he?




Q </div></div>

Also, two of the women who testified to his sexism, were surely, well educated, self-made successful women in the law profession.

The very professional Law professor, who testified, has never made a dollar from the situation, and has remained a very private citizen, of utmost respect among her peers, since.

While, as we can easily see, Thomas, married a right-wing nutjob, who has made a complete fool of herself, for years....

The radical right, only sees what they want to see....and always capable of deleting what is obvious, whenever it suits their overall partisan blind support, even for people who have blatant mental and emotional problems....guess they can identify... /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif

Stupid loves stupid.

G.

pooltchr
10-24-2010, 08:41 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">[Also, two of the women who testified to his sexism, were surely, well educated, self-made successful women in the law profession.

G. </div></div>

And Thomas was (is) a well educated, self-made, successful man in the law profession.

Your point???

Steve

Qtec
10-24-2010, 08:08 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Was JUANITA BROADDRICK lying?

Or was Clinton?

Was KATHLEEN WILLEY lying?

Or was Clinton?

Was NORMA ROGERS lying?

Or was Clinton?

Was CHRISTINE ZERCHER lying?

Or was Clinton?

Was ELIZABETH WARD GRACEN lying?

Or was Clinton?

Was PAULA JONES lying?

Or was Clinton?

Rape, molestation, kidnapping, sadomasochism, perjury, what will you excuse as long as (D) follows their name on the ballot?

LWW
</div></div>

The subject is not the actions of Clinton, Daffy Duck or Buffalo Bill. Is that too difficult for you to understand?

This thread is about the actions of Clarence Thomas and what you seem to be suggesting is that CT is a liar and a dirty old man, even when he was younger.

Q

Qtec
10-24-2010, 08:09 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">And Thomas was (is) a well educated, self-made, successful man in the law profession.
</div></div> and he likes to abuse his power to talk dirty to employees.

Q

LWW
10-25-2010, 03:49 AM
Close Snoopy ... what I was pointing out is that you are completely incapable of judging a (D) and an (R) by a single standard.

But ... I already knew that.

LWW

pooltchr
10-25-2010, 08:14 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">And Thomas was (is) a well educated, self-made, successful man in the law profession.
</div></div> and he likes to abuse his power to talk dirty to employees.

Q </div></div>

And how do you know this? Is it from some kind of first hand knowledge? Or did you just decide to believe one person and not another?

Steve

LWW
10-26-2010, 02:11 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Was JUANITA BROADDRICK lying?

Or was Clinton?

Was KATHLEEN WILLEY lying?

Or was Clinton?

Was NORMA ROGERS lying?

Or was Clinton?

Was CHRISTINE ZERCHER lying?

Or was Clinton?

Was ELIZABETH WARD GRACEN lying?

Or was Clinton?

Was PAULA JONES lying?

Or was Clinton?

Rape, molestation, kidnapping, sadomasochism, perjury, what will you excuse as long as (D) follows their name on the ballot?

LWW
</div></div>

Was this too difficult for our tender resident leftists to answer?

LWW

hondo
10-26-2010, 06:48 AM
Who is this thread about?
I thought we were talking about Thomas????

Now we're back to Clinton got a BJ????

Bush screwed an entire nation and didn't even use protection!!!
We might as well talk about that again.

llotter
10-26-2010, 07:17 AM
It is a tactic of the Left to keep retelling some lies till it become truthy. 'Whatever leftie says must be true and whatever a rightie says must be a lie' is the operative definition under which their world can make sense.

Some here is just giddy over the 'presidential kneepads' that they have earned.