PDA

View Full Version : Anthropogenic Global Cooling: A Looming Crisis



LWW
12-29-2010, 04:06 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">As I was shoveling my pavement this evening (for the fiftieth or so time this week) it occurred to me that we, in the Party, are faced with a dilemma that is no longer camouflaged well by the euphemism of "Global Climate Change."

After much consideration, I wish to submit before the Central Kommittee the proposal to make another, minor modification the CurrentTruth™ which will better harness the potential powers inherent in the current climate crisis (i.e. make it more palatable considering everyone is freezing their beets off or are stuck in various and sundry international airports due to the unseasonably COLD weather).
~
After two very harsh, gulag-friendly winters and equally mild summers, the proles are no longer <s>hoodwinked</s> by convinced of the <s>junk</s> scientific consensus supporting anthropogenic <s>Global Warming</s> Climate Change. Indeed, their “common sense” is causing them to question PartyWisdom™ , and -- by logical extension -- the self-evident requirement for <s>cap and tax</s> cap and trade schemes that will prove most lucrative to the Party Coffers. Lest we lose international momentum on the global governance of human emissions, we must act <span style='font-size: 11pt'>NOW</span> with all necessary alacrity.

Now, should this trend of downward temperatures continue unabated (which is scientifically provable to be the only logical possibility), we will most assuredly face the very ice age that respected climatologists were <s>hysterical</s> suitably concerned about in the mid-1970s. Indeed, womyn and minorities will be hardest hit by the impending glacialisation and subsequent southerly migration of hungry polar bears. There can be little doubt in the minds of intelligent and sane individuals that this dangerous downturn in the mercury can <span style='font-size: 11pt'>ONLY</span> be attributued to the activity of the homosaipien species.

Fortunately, -- as alluded to earlier -- a substantial body of work already exists to support this ground breaking adjustment to the CurrentTruth. All that is required is to adjust the dates, change a few names and claim that the recent upswing in temperatures was merely a brief spell of normal climate conditions which may never occur again if we do not radically curb our carbon dioxide emissions (aka. Carbon footprint).

Now, I do understand the stresses such an adjustment to the CurrentTruth will lay on the MemoryHoles™ and those stalwart party members in the ProfessionalLeft™ forced to fill them. Fortunately, the proles are short on memory and very malleable to the opinions of mindless film stars and popular musicians. Likewise, the little public school-<s>indoctrinated</s> educated <s>lemmings</s> cherubs are most susceptible to the notion that famished polar bears are trudging across the ever growing, seamless ice sheets to eat them in lieu of cute, cuddly polar bears drowning in melted polar ice water. Indeed, they will believe whatever their teachers tell them to believe and harangue their parents accordingly.

Of gravest concern however is the necessary purge of various PartyElite™ who have become ensconced in long-term public memories to the point that their reputations are inseparable from and forever tarnished by the idiotic notion of anthropogenic “Global Warming.” Such notable greedy “Global Warming” profiteers and fat cats as Al Gore must be brought before the obligatory series of show trials and have all memory of their existence <s>erased</s> rehabilitated <s>from</s> before the collective conscious. The positive aspect of this, of course, is that those of us who were early to recognise the dangers of Global Cooling -- such as yours’ truly -- and press for immediate action will be in the vanguard to <s>profit</s> yield the dividends of a grateful public in the stead of those vanquished fear-mongering traitors of the public good.

There is my motion. Are there any willing to second the motion and get in on the ground floor?

Also, submissions of Global Cooling artwork that will help illustrate the dire straits we are in are most appreciated.

After all, one must never allow a good crisis to go to waste.
</div></div>

LWW

LWW
12-29-2010, 04:07 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Fact: The greedy Americans hog the sunshine for half a day, every day of the year, leaving only half a day of sunshine for the other half of the world.

Why should the western hemisphere enjoy half of the sunshine when most of the world's population is on the other side of the world?

Profound question indeed.

Americans should be ashamed of themselves.

The UN has proposed a Sunshine Tax on America to spread the sunshine around the rest of the world.

Oh, and let us not forget National Geographic of November 1976

http://revolution2.us/content/docs/global_cooling/index.html </div></div>

LWW

Qtec
12-29-2010, 05:35 AM
Only brainless idiots think that if in THEIR local area it snows heavily, this is proof that GW/ Climate Change [ CC] is not occurring.

The most difficult thing to predict is the weather. What we do know is that very small changes in global temp can have major consequences.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Chaos theory is a field of study in applied mathematics, with applications in several disciplines including physics, economics, biology and philosophy. Chaos theory studies the behavior of dynamical systems that are highly sensitive to initial conditions; an effect which is popularly referred to as <span style='font-size: 14pt'>the butterfly effect. </span><span style='font-size: 17pt'>Small differences in initial conditions (such as those due to rounding errors in numerical computation) yield widely diverging outcomes for chaotic systems,</span> rendering long-term prediction impossible in general.[1] This happens even though these systems are deterministic, meaning that their future behavior is fully determined by their initial conditions, with no random elements involved.[2] In other words, the deterministic nature of these systems does not make them predictable.[3] This behavior is known as deterministic chaos, or simply chaos.

<span style='font-size: 17pt'>Chaotic behavior can be observed in many natural systems, such as the weather.</span>[4] Explanation of such behavior may be sought through analysis of a chaotic mathematical model, or through analytical techniques such as recurrence plots and Poincaré maps.
</div></div>


Todays climate models predict extreme weather and that is exactly what we are seeing.

Q

LWW
12-29-2010, 05:42 AM
Today's climnate models have been written and rewritten ad infinitum so they can "PROVE" they are up to date with what's happening now.

All the IPCC models of the past predicted the current weather was a virtual impossibility.

As is woefully typical ... the far left slavishly believed them then and slavishly now believes that their very inaccuracy is prima facie evidence of their accuracy.

While, at the same time, those following actual science ten years back predicted that the cold was coming.

Tis a shame Santa didn't bring you a clue.

LWW

Qtec
12-29-2010, 06:12 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">While, at the same time, those following actual science <span style='font-size: 14pt'>ten years back</span> </div></div>

A clever person accepts facts that are true, even when they conflict with their present opinion.

Its totally stupid to say that in the 1970's scientists said this or that. Things have changed since then. There is a lot more data these days. We now have the computing power that scientists in 1970 could not have even dreamt about.

Q..........IMO........We have caused an imbalance and through deforestation reduced the Earth's ability to reduce co2 levels. It can only get worse.

LWW
12-29-2010, 06:24 AM
Yet just 2 years ago we were told this was impossible by the very people you swear we should believe now.

Here's your choice:

1 - Believe the science backed up by millions of years of data that predicted this based on solar activity ... and has never, not even <u><span style='font-size: 11pt'>ONCE</span></u> ... ever been wrong.

2 - Believe the junk science backed up by models rewritten after the fact to explain why the last infallible model was totally wrong ... and has never, not even <u><span style='font-size: 11pt'>ONCE</span></u> ... ever been right.

LWW

Qtec
12-29-2010, 06:32 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Yet just 2 years ago we were told this was impossible by the very people you swear we should believe now. </div></div>

How many times do you have to be told?
<span style='font-size: 17pt'> When you make a claim, back it up!</span>

NOBODY is interested in your fantasies. <span style='font-size: 20pt'>You saying something over and over doesn't make it true.

GET IT?</span>

Q

LWW
12-29-2010, 06:35 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Yet just 2 years ago we were told this was impossible by the very people you swear we should believe now. </div></div>

How many times do you have to be told?
<span style='font-size: 17pt'> When you make a claim, back it up!</span>

NOBODY is interested in your fantasies. <span style='font-size: 20pt'>You saying something over and over doesn't make it true.

GET IT?</span>

You are doublethinking again.

Q </div></div>

Let me make it simple ... do you or do you not accept the IPCC climate models as accurate?

LWW

Qtec
12-29-2010, 07:43 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">While, at the same time, those following actual science <span style='font-size: 14pt'>ten years back</span> </div></div>

A clever person accepts facts that are true, even when they conflict with their present opinion.

Its totally stupid to say that in the 1970's scientists said this or that. Things have changed since then. There is a lot more data these days. We now have the computing power that scientists in 1970 could not have even dreamt about.

Q..........IMO........We have caused an imbalance and through deforestation reduced the Earth's ability to reduce co2 levels. <span style='font-size: 20pt'>It can only get worse. </span> </div></div>

link (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-12087870)

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Floods force mass evacuations in Queensland, Australia

North-eastern Australia's <span style='font-size: 14pt'>worst flooding in decades</span> is continuing to cause chaos across the region.

About 1,000 people in Queensland have been evacuated, including the entire population of the town of Theodore.

The government has declared Theodore and two other towns in the region to be disaster zones, and forecasters say the floods have not yet peaked.

The cost of the damage is expected to top AU$1bn (£650m), including massive losses of sunflower and cotton crops.

Army Black Hawk helicopters evacuated the 300 residents of Theodore, where every building in the town apart from the police station has been flooded, local media reported. </div></div>



<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Deep snowdrifts have trapped thousands of people in their homes on the Danish island of Bornholm, but extra snowploughs have now arrived by ferry.

There is so much snow that islanders have started dumping it in the sea - a practice normally forbidden for environmental reasons.

Islanders contacted by the BBC said needy people, especially the elderly, were being helped by neighbours bringing them food and medicines.

Snow has been cleared from major roads.

But police have told people to avoid using the roads unless really necessary, because the gap cleared is only wide enough for one vehicle at a time.

The small island, with a population of 42,154, lies in the Baltic Sea between Germany and Sweden.



A helicopter flown in by the Danish air force is helping the relief effort and big snowploughs are now arriving daily by ferry from elsewhere in Denmark.

Gert Johansen, a receptionist at the Bornholm police headquarters, told the BBC that some homes were buried in snow, which was <span style='font-size: 17pt'>generally about 1.5m (5ft) deep, but in places reached a depth of 6m <u>(20ft)</u>.</span> </div></div>

LWW
12-29-2010, 08:12 AM
Why are you ducking the questions snoopy?

LWW

LWW
12-29-2010, 08:13 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">While, at the same time, those following actual science <span style='font-size: 14pt'>ten years back</span> </div></div>

A clever person accepts facts that are true, even when they conflict with their present opinion.

Its totally stupid to say that in the 1970's scientists said this or that. Things have changed since then. There is a lot more data these days. We now have the computing power that scientists in 1970 could not have even dreamt about.

Q..........IMO........We have caused an imbalance and through deforestation reduced the Earth's ability to reduce co2 levels. <span style='font-size: 20pt'>It can only get worse. </span> </div></div>

link (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-12087870)

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Floods force mass evacuations in Queensland, Australia

North-eastern Australia's <span style='font-size: 14pt'>worst flooding in decades</span> is continuing to cause chaos across the region.

About 1,000 people in Queensland have been evacuated, including the entire population of the town of Theodore.

The government has declared Theodore and two other towns in the region to be disaster zones, and forecasters say the floods have not yet peaked.

The cost of the damage is expected to top AU$1bn (£650m), including massive losses of sunflower and cotton crops.

Army Black Hawk helicopters evacuated the 300 residents of Theodore, where every building in the town apart from the police station has been flooded, local media reported. </div></div>



<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Deep snowdrifts have trapped thousands of people in their homes on the Danish island of Bornholm, but extra snowploughs have now arrived by ferry.

There is so much snow that islanders have started dumping it in the sea - a practice normally forbidden for environmental reasons.

Islanders contacted by the BBC said needy people, especially the elderly, were being helped by neighbours bringing them food and medicines.

Snow has been cleared from major roads.

But police have told people to avoid using the roads unless really necessary, because the gap cleared is only wide enough for one vehicle at a time.

The small island, with a population of 42,154, lies in the Baltic Sea between Germany and Sweden.



A helicopter flown in by the Danish air force is helping the relief effort and big snowploughs are now arriving daily by ferry from elsewhere in Denmark.

Gert Johansen, a receptionist at the Bornholm police headquarters, told the BBC that some homes were buried in snow, which was <span style='font-size: 17pt'>generally about 1.5m (5ft) deep, but in places reached a depth of 6m <u>(20ft)</u>.</span> </div></div>
</div></div>

So ... your evidence that the models are accurate is more evidence that they were wrong?

LWW

cushioncrawler
12-29-2010, 05:05 PM
********Floods force mass evacuations in Queensland, Australia.
North-eastern Australia's worst flooding in decades is continuing to cause chaos across the region. About 1,000 people in Queensland have been evacuated, including the entire population of the town of Theodore. The government has declared Theodore and two other towns in the region to be disaster zones, and forecasters say the floods have not yet peaked. The cost of the damage is expected to top AU$1bn (£650m), including massive losses of sunflower and cotton crops. Army Black Hawk helicopters evacuated the 300 residents of Theodore, where every building in the town apart from the police station has been flooded, local media reported**********

My theory iz that the flooding iz due to houses being too low.
Flooding iz uzually good for the land.
mac.

cushioncrawler
12-29-2010, 05:08 PM
Ozzy Klimaxologysts made models of houses and put them on the ground and sprayed them with lots of water, and the model houses floated ok.
Just goze to show that u karnt trust models.
mac.

eg8r
12-29-2010, 06:08 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Only brainless idiots think that if in THEIR local area it snows heavily, this is proof that GW/ Climate Change [ CC] is not occurring.
</div></div>Only brainless idiots attribute this GW/CC to human intervention.

eg8r

Qtec
12-30-2010, 01:38 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Only brainless idiots think that if in THEIR local area it snows heavily, this is proof that GW/ Climate Change [ CC] is not occurring.
</div></div>Only brainless idiots attribute this GW/CC to human intervention.

eg8r </div></div>

You must be right. Only a brainless idiot could imagine that man could have an effect on the environment.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Acid_rain_woods1.JPG/800px-Acid_rain_woods1.JPG

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6e/Waldschaeden_Erzgebirge_3.jpg

Acid rain. Nothing to do with man, right?


Q

LWW
12-30-2010, 04:43 AM
1 - Why are you ducking questions snoopy?

2 - You really should read your own links. If you did, you would know that YOUR link, from which your scary pics came, you would have learned the following:

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The corrosive effect of polluted, acidic city air on limestone and marble was noted in the 17th century by John Evelyn, who remarked upon the poor condition of the Arundel marbles ... The principal natural phenomena that contribute acid-producing gases to the atmosphere are emissions from volcanoes.</div></div>

I can lead you to knowledge ... I can't make you think.

LWW