PDA

View Full Version : Paul Krugman demands hate speech from O-cultists!



LWW
01-16-2011, 12:35 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <span style='font-size: 14pt'>"A message to progressives: By all means, hang Senator Joe Lieberman in effigy."</span>
<span style='font-size: 11pt'>-Paul Krugman 2009-
-Nobel Prize Winner-
-Hero of moonbats-</span> </div></div>

Where is the outrage from the left? (http://www.timesheraldonline.com/opinion/ci_17112427)

LWW

cushioncrawler
01-16-2011, 02:41 PM
No krappynomicyst haz ever won a Nobel Prize for anything -- certainly not for krappynomix -- koz there aint no such Nobel Prize.
mac.

LWW
01-16-2011, 03:14 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: cushioncrawler</div><div class="ubbcode-body">No krappynomicyst haz ever won a Nobel Prize for anything -- certainly not for krappynomix -- koz there aint no such Nobel Prize.
mac. </div></div>

Perhaps you might inform them about this ... they've went and awarded the prize 42 times.

It's a shame they didn't know. (http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/)

LWW

Sev
01-16-2011, 05:19 PM
That article was a good rant.

cushioncrawler
01-17-2011, 03:18 AM
Dubb -- its simple -- a krappynomix cunt who chaired the real nobel prize thort that it would be a good idea if krappynomicyst cunts kood get a nobel prize -- but this woz impossible -- koz for one thing if they ever managed to bring nobel back to life he would never giv any sort of prize to krappynomicyst cunts -- koz nobel woz aktually a bit of a socialist.
Now where woz i -- oh, yes, cunts -- so, this cunt invented a not nobel prize awarded by a not nobel committee uzing money from a not nobel fund
Dubb -- i hav told u this many times before -- how many times do i havta repeat this.
mac.

wikileaks...................... The Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences, commonly referred to as the Nobel Prize in Economics,[1] is an award for outstanding contributions to the field of economics. It is generally considered one of the most prestigious awards for that science.[2] The official name is the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel (Swedish: Sveriges riksbanks pris i ekonomisk vetenskap till Alfred Nobels minne). It is not one of the Nobel Prizes established by the will of Alfred Nobel in 1895, but is commonly identified with them.[2][3][4][5][6] The Prize in Economics, as it is referred to by the Nobel Foundation, was established and endowed by Sveriges Riksbank, Sweden's central bank, during 1968 on the Bank's 300th anniversary, in memory of Alfred Nobel's 1895 will.[2][7][8][9] Like the Nobel Laureates in Chemistry and Physics, Laureates in Economics are selected by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, and a Prize Committee similar to the Nobel Committees are used.[10][11] It was first awarded in 1969 to the Dutch and Norwegian economists Jan Tinbergen and Ragnar Frisch, "for having developed and applied dynamic models for the analysis of economic processes."

cushioncrawler
01-17-2011, 03:20 AM
The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel,[1] informally called the Nobel Prize in Economics, is a prize awarded each year for outstanding contributions in the field of economics. The prize was not one of the awards set out in the will of Alfred Nobel. The winners of the prize receive their diploma and gold medal from the Swedish monarch at the same December 10 ceremony in Stockholm as the Nobel laureates in physics, chemistry, physiology or medicine, and literature. The amount of money awarded to the economics laureates is also equal to that of the other prizes.

cushioncrawler
01-17-2011, 03:27 AM
Quote from http://www.huppi.com re Friedman & Co......

"The history and award process of the Nobel prize

The Nobel prize for economics is not one of the five original prizes that Alfred Nobel created in his 1895 will. The economics prize was added in 1969, but not by any of the Nobel prize-awarding institutions (such as the Swedish Academy, the Norwegian parliament, etc.). It was actually created by the Bank of Sweden. For this reason, it is not really the "Nobel Prize for Economics." It's real name is "The Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel." The prize money does not come out of the Nobel inheritance, but is paid for by the Bank of Sweden.

The creation of a Nobel prize in economics has raised many criticisms. Some protest that the Bank of Sweden has no legal or moral right to use Nobel's name. Others argue that a radical idealist like Alfred Nobel would have never approved of an award defending capitalist economics. Others claim that the award was created to legitimize capitalism at a time of great social protest against it. These are, to be sure, superficial criticisms, but there are more substantial ones that can be leveled at the Nobel newcomer.

Perhaps the most troubling is that the selection process for economics does not resemble the other five. Although the economics committee boasts that it uses the same procedures, a closer look reveals this to be untrue. In the other five categories, the process starts by gathering nominations from as many as 3,000 scientists, which are then assessed by 15-member prize committees. The committees must then argue their own selections before a Nobel Assembly of 50 scientists before reaching a final decision. Usually the discussion of a prize lasts from 5 to 10 years before the prize is awarded.

There is a potentially weak link in this process: the 15-member prize committee. It is free to select any nominations it wishes -- and with thousands of scientists making the nominations, it basically has its choice. And the committee is more expert in its scientific category than the Nobel Assembly, so whatever case it makes is bound to be persuasive. At any rate, the Nobel Assembly has generally rubber-stamped the committee's recommendations.

Where the economics committee differs from the others is that it does not seat 15 members, but only six -- nearly two-thirds smaller. This greatly increases the possibility of bias. How much so becomes apparent in Assar Lindbeck's own description of his committee's selection process:
"So far, the proposals of the prize committee to the [Swedish] Academy have been unanimous. A consensus has in fact developed quite 'automatically' within the committee, as if by some kind of invisible hand." (6)
This is an astonishing admission, for two reasons. First, the "invisible hand" is one of the most famous and sacred economic concepts of the far right, and to say that an invisible hand guides the committee's consensus is an open taunt to the left. Second, there is probably no field of science as wracked by controversy as economics. For the committee to advance unanimous recommendations year after year is possible only if a perfect bias exists in the committee. And even then, were six libertarians to sit on the committee, it is still implausible that their proposals should be unanimous -- even libertarians have bitter disputes. What is more likely is that the "invisible hand" guiding the committee is the iron hand of Lindbeck himself.

Why would committee members defer to Lindbeck? Because Lindbeck's positions create a conflict of interest. Lindbeck serves in two powerful positions: both as head of the Nobel committee and the prestigious Institute for International Economic Studies. If you are a Swedish economist and are serving either on the Nobel committee or in the Nobel Assembly, you must kowtow to Lindbeck if you want your research funded or your career advanced.

cushioncrawler
01-17-2011, 03:29 AM
The NoNobel Prize.

LWW
01-17-2011, 04:41 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: cushioncrawler</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Dubb -- its simple -- a krappynomix cunt who chaired the real nobel prize thort that it would be a good idea if krappynomicyst cunts kood get a nobel prize -- but this woz impossible -- koz for one thing if they ever managed to bring nobel back to life he would never giv any sort of prize to krappynomicyst cunts -- koz nobel woz aktually a bit of a socialist.
mac.</div></div>

So is Krugman and the majority of the winners.

The rest of your logic would mean that a new Ford isn't really a Ford because Henry didn't design it himself.

LWW

Sev
01-17-2011, 09:44 AM
Anybody got some dynamite???