PDA

View Full Version : SOTU..1944



Qtec
01-25-2011, 04:01 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> President Roosevelt: "As our Nation has grown in size and stature, however—as our industrial economy expanded—<u>these political rights proved inadequate to assure us equality in the pursuit of happiness.</u>

<span style='font-size: 14pt'>We have come to a clear realization of the fact that true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence.</span> "Necessitous men are not free men." People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.

In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all regardless of station, race, or creed.

Among these are:

The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the Nation;

The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;

The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;

The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;

The right of every family to a decent home;

The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;

The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;

The right to a good education.

All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being." </div></div>

Sounds like a lefty socialist to me. He must hate America.

Q /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/smirk.gif

LWW
01-25-2011, 04:52 AM
I agree.

LWW

Gayle in MD
01-26-2011, 10:01 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> President Roosevelt: "As our Nation has grown in size and stature, however—as our industrial economy expanded—<u>these political rights proved inadequate to assure us equality in the pursuit of happiness.</u>

<span style='font-size: 14pt'>We have come to a clear realization of the fact that true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence.</span> "Necessitous men are not free men." People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.

In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all regardless of station, race, or creed.

Among these are:

The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the Nation;

The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;

The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;

The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;

The right of every family to a decent home;

The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;

The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;

The right to a good education.

All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being." </div></div>

Sounds like a lefty socialist to me. He must hate America.

Q /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/smirk.gif </div></div>

LOL, yeah, anyone but a neocon, spending/borrowing, lying POS like Bush, is a socialist.

I see the post bashing Reid, on earmarks, by our residennt genius economist, lol.

Gee, weren't three of the top five earmarkers, Republlicans???? didn't Bush's blank check Republican majority, break the earamark record, lol.

These righties on here are a joke. Some nincompoop on here wrote, over and over, that deficits didn't matter, while Bush and the Republicans were runnning them up, now, thanks to an e-mail i just got, that started out 'Gayle, LMAO! I know you didn't see what the jerk wrote, so I decided to send it to you.'

I see the source of his legendary ignorance and confusion, for one thing, he can't count!

He thinks Democratics had the majority for six years,lol.

That explains everything. I suppose he didn't learn how to count, while he was climbing the corporate ladder, LMAO!
Things have improved greatly, since Bush left, back when we were hemmoraging jobs at 750,000 a month, and now, we are seeing records broken, as follows....



http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/27/business/27markets.html?_r=1&hp


All in spite of the gross Republican obstructionism, filibuster record, broken, and their filthy lies and misstatements.

The ONLY adults, are Democratics, and that has been so for decades.

Republican Presidents, mean higher gas and oil prices, treasonist activities, law breaking, waste and corruption.

the Middle Class, and upper middle class, always LOSE, when Republicans have the ball, ALWAYS!


Then, their voters spend a decade denying and lying abut what the rest of us SAW, and can PROVE, with charts, studies and facts.

G.

pooltchr
01-26-2011, 10:17 AM
What an idiotic post.

Roosevelt ushered in the foundation for the socialist agenda that runs throughout Washington. Social programs, bigger government, more spending, and more intrusion into the private lives of Americans...all of it goes right back to FDR.

And yes, Bush was just as liberal as anyone with his fiscal policies. Nobody here will argue that he didn't spend too much. Where we will argue is that you continue to slam Bush for his spending, while you praise Obama for spending even more than Bush.

You have to decide which actions you approve of, and which you don't. You can't just decide that anything goes with a Dem, but everything is wrong with the Reps.

Somehow, I doubt if you will ever really comprenend the concept.

Steve

LWW
01-26-2011, 11:08 AM
Let's not forget that FDR:

- Had 100,000+ US citizens incarcerated simply because they were of the wrong race.

- Had crops burned in the field, while citizens starved, to prop up prices for his backers.

- Had crops livestock slaughtered in the field, while citizens starved, to prop up prices for his backers.

- Took a recession and turned it into a depression.

- So mismanaged the US economy that we were the last to come out of the depression.

- Appointed a Klansman to the SCOTUS.

IOW ... he was a typical moonbat crazy leftist.

LWW

LWW
01-26-2011, 02:22 PM
I love how the leftists flee whenever the reality of FDR is brought up.

LWW

pooltchr
01-26-2011, 02:57 PM
Drive-by posters! LOL


Steve

Qtec
01-26-2011, 04:54 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Took a recession and turned it into a depression. </div></div>

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The economy spiraled downward until the banking system began a complete nationwide shutdown as Hoover's term ended.[47] In February 1933, </div></div>

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">When Roosevelt was inaugurated March 4, 1933 (32 days after Hitler was appointed Chancellor of Germany), <span style='font-size: 20pt'>the U.S. was at <u>the nadir of the worst depression in its history.</u></span> A quarter of the workforce was unemployed. Farmers were in deep trouble as prices fell by 60%. Industrial production had fallen by more than half since 1929. Two million were homeless. </div></div>

Q

LWW
01-26-2011, 05:59 PM
And we had depressions deeper than that before, and the economy always snapped back quickly ... then came FDR.

And, why did you ignore illegal incarceration of citizens ... and his infliction of starvation?

LWW