View Full Version : bizarro Tea Party
link (http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-february-21-2011/crisis-in-dairyland---revenge-of-the-curds)
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">And while Stewart understands that Walker was elected to cut costs, his method defeats the purpose of having a union:
<span style='font-size: 14pt'>"That can't be right. Take away a union's collective bargaining rights? I believe that makes them just a bunch of people wearing identical T-shirts."</span> </div></div>
Q
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_022211/content/01125107.Par.45298.ImageFile.jpg
LWW
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">FDR may have had that opinion at that time, but times and opinions do change as situations change. FDR originally did not want to get involved in WWII. FDR did not want African Americans flying airplanes either, until he was convinced by his wife Eleanor to change his mind and found the Tuskegee Airmen. This was only one of the opinions he changed as the years went by, and the letter you refer to may have been his opinion at that time but does not preclude a possible change of attitude in later years. 1937 America was a very different place than 2011 America, therefore it would be impossible to predict FDR's attitude regarding public unions now. </div></div>
Q
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Another non-post.
Q </div></div>
LWW
Actually they can still collectively bargain for their salaries.
They can also opt out of the union.
What is it the party or pro-choice of the the party of no choice in this matter??
Gayle in MD
02-23-2011, 07:29 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">FDR may have had that opinion at that time, but times and opinions do change as situations change. FDR originally did not want to get involved in WWII. FDR did not want African Americans flying airplanes either, until he was convinced by his wife Eleanor to change his mind and found the Tuskegee Airmen. This was only one of the opinions he changed as the years went by, and the letter you refer to may have been his opinion at that time but does not preclude a possible change of attitude in later years. 1937 America was a very different place than 2011 America, therefore it would be impossible to predict FDR's attitude regarding public unions now. </div></div>
Q </div></div>
Neanderthal # One, using irrelevant, outdated, ridiculous comparisons.
/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif
Bargain with what?
Q....this could be interesting if sev actually dares answer the question.....
The same way they always have. They just cant collectively bargain for their benefits.
The rest of the powers are still intact.
Of course based on the reading proficiency in the schools perhaps they should not have jobs in the first place.
I also believe that the police and fire fighters are exempt in the law.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> I also believe that the police and fire fighters are exempt in the law.</div></div>
If its collective bargaining that is the problem, why are they exempt?
Answer...they supported him in his election bid.
So its not about money and its not about collective bargaining rights therefore its an attack on Democrats and their supporters.
Q
Which brings us back to the point. The unions are upset because it disturbs their power base. That and not the employee's is the concern.
Gayle in MD
02-23-2011, 08:30 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> I also believe that the police and fire fighters are exempt in the law.</div></div>
If its collective bargaining that is the problem, why are they exempt?
Answer...they supported him in his election bid.
So its not about money and its not about collective bargaining rights therefore its an attack on Democrats and their supporters.
Q </div></div>
Hence, an attack on the Middle Class....
Repiglicans ONLY represent the wealthy top, and the rest who voted for them, are ignorant sheep, voting against their own best interests...
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Hence, an attack on the Middle Class.... </div></div>
Its an attack on Joe Sixpack...their hero in the last election.
Have they no shame?
Q...hypocrites.
Gayle in MD
02-23-2011, 01:08 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Hence, an attack on the Middle Class.... </div></div>
Its an attack on Joe Sixpack...their hero in the last election.
Have they no shame?
Q...hypocrites. </div></div>
And they pretend to be listening to, "The People."
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Unions in all of the embattled states say they're willing to make concessions to help their governments balance their budgets, but contend that Republicans are engaged in a campaign to undermine organized labor. They got a boost <span style='font-size: 17pt'>Tuesday from a Gallup poll that found that 61% of Americans disapprove of stripping public workers of their ability to collectively bargain.</span> </div></div>
LMAO! Jobs. Jobs. Jobs...so far the only thing they have done is destroy jobs, with their policies and reveal that their ONLY game, is political gamesmanship.
We now have proof, since Walker was spoofed on the phone today, by someone pretending to be Koch, this Republican Govenor's Organized, Union Killing plot, to destroy Barbaining rights, is nothing more than a cheap political trick, for political purposes.
PIGS!
G.
Don't confuse him with reality.
LWW
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.