View Full Version : Must be a fake.
This could not possibly be real.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> BIRMINGHAM, Ala, March 31 (Reuters) - Police have placed two officers on paid administrative leave as part of an investigation into the apparent beating of a black man that was caught on tape.
Birmingham Mayor William Bell also called for more training on the appropriate use of force by police after the man's attorney released video of the incident to media this week.
"The mayor is disturbed by what he has seen of the video," the major's chief of staff, Erskine "Chuck" Faush Jr., said on Thursday.
A security video captured the March 20 run-in between police and 29-year-old Travarious Daniel.</div></div>
You decide. video (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/01/birmingham-alabama-video-beating-police_n_843418.html)
04-01-2011, 09:30 AM
He probably deserved a good beating.
Amazingly the far left isn't bothered in the least by SEIU thugs beating a black man for not supporting dear leader?
Gayle in MD
04-01-2011, 09:54 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: llotter</div><div class="ubbcode-body">He probably deserved a good beating. </div></div>
If you can watch that video and make such an ignorant, irrational statement, you are nothing but a total racist!
I'd really like to understand why you so called "Christian" Republican righties, lack any empathy, for your fellow man, and why you carry so much racism, misogyny, sexism, and overall hatred in your hearts.
04-01-2011, 10:16 AM
Yeah. They probably should have gone ahead and tazed him, and saved all that energy!
04-01-2011, 10:26 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Amazingly the far left isn't bothered in the least by SEIU thugs beating a black man for not supporting dear leader? </div></div>
Isn't bothered by something that didn't happen? Correct.
Snoopy's ability to deny reality is astounding.
Even the NAACP (http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2010/07/08/naacp-leader-explains-why-kenneth-gladney-deserved-his-seiu-thug-beating-hes-an-uncle-tom-and-not-black-enough/) admits that Kenneth Gladney, a black man, was beaten by SEIU thugs because he was an "UNCLE TOM" who dared not support dear leader:
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Well iím glad thats all cleared up now. The Missouri NAACP holds a press conference to get the St Louis Prosecutor to drop charges against two men, one white and one black, who are accused of attacking a black man outside a tea party townhall in August 2009. In this video, the host of the press conference says Kenneth Gladney, the African American victim, is a poster child for Uncle Toms because he works against his race, and was photographed being kissed on the head by a European.
<span style='font-size: 11pt'>"Back in the day, we used to call someone like that, and I want to remind you, uh, when this incident occurred, I was really struck by a front page picture of this guy, which we called, a Negro, i mean that we call him a Negro in the fact that </span><span style='font-size: 14pt'>he works for not for our people but against our people. In the old days, we call him an Uncle Tom. I just gotta say that. Here it is, the day after a young brother, a young man, I didnít mean to call him a brother, but on the front page of the Post Dispatch, ironically, heís sitting in a wheelchair, being kissed on the forehead, by a European. Now just imagine that as a poster child picture, not working for our people."</span>
Isnít it great to see the tolerance and love and peace from progressive liberals? Want to see some more? See some progressive liberal Democrat racist e-mails send to Michelle Malkin.
The two men accused of attacking Gladney go on trial this month. Elston McCowan, the man standing next to the speaker, can be seen laughing when the speaker says Gladney is not a brother.</div></div>
04-01-2011, 01:43 PM
Of course, they did not, as there is no evidence that it occurred other than the man's statements, which are not backed up by the video (which see).
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Go watch the YouTube video. (Or, the "shocking video," as Power Line hypes it.) The first thing you notice when the camera starts rolling is a union member already sprawled out on the ground with somebody standing over him. No explanation of how he got there (pushed, shoved, punched?) and Ham couldn't care less. Then yes, Gladney is pulled to the ground by somebody wearing a union shirt. (At the :06 mark.) But instead of Gladney being beaten and punched, as his attorney describes, and instead of union "thugs" standing over him and threatening him, Gladney bounces right back on his feet in approximately two seconds and the scuffle ends.
That was the savage "beating" the conservative blogosphere can't stop talking about? </div></div>
Inventing tales of a union 'beating' (http://mediamatters.org/blog/200908080004)
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.