PDA

View Full Version : The Borrowitz Report.



Qtec
05-26-2011, 03:08 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <span style='font-size: 14pt'>Schwarzenegger: ‘I Am the Sperminator’
Former California Governor in Emotional Confession</span>

LOS ANGELES (The Borowitz Report) – Amid rumors that he fathered a child with a member of his household staff ten years ago, former California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger made an emotional confession at a hastily called press conference today.

“I am the Sperminator,” Mr. Schwarzenegger told the room of stunned reporters.

The former governor and film star said that he knew the child in question was his “after no one could understand a damn thing it was saying.”

He said that when he first learned he had fathered the child, he considered a variety of options to remedy the situation, including traveling back in time ten years and using a condom.

According to Mr. Schwarzenegger, today’s shocking revelation could end his political career, but he added, “On the plus side, I am now qualified to run the IMF.”</div></div>

LOL


Q

LWW
05-26-2011, 03:20 AM
And, again, with the moral equivalence lie.

Arnold's adultery was wrong.

Anal rape is a felony.

Claiming the two as equivalent is moonbattery.

Qtec
05-26-2011, 03:31 AM
I don´t know what you are talking about but <span style='font-size: 17pt'>ANY RAPE</span> is a felony.


Q

LWW
05-26-2011, 04:22 AM
Even you aren't <u><span style='font-size: 26pt'>THAT</span></u> stupid.

Qtec
05-26-2011, 04:27 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Even you aren't <u><span style='font-size: 26pt'>THAT</span></u> stupid. </div></div>

Why don´t you enlighten me and give the rest a good laugh at the same time.


Q............LOL

LWW
05-26-2011, 05:44 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Even you aren't <u><span style='font-size: 26pt'>THAT</span></u> stupid. </div></div>

Why don´t you enlighten me and give the rest a good laugh at the same time.


Q............LOL </div></div>

Well, maybe you are that stupid ... and UI discovered long ago that enlightening you is an impossibility until you decide to light your intellectual flame yourself.

But I'll make an attempt as I just can't give up hope on you Snoopy.

Your story claims that Arnold's infidelity qualifies him to be the head of the IMF, who happens to be charged with anal rape of a poor woman of color.

Gayle in MD
05-26-2011, 05:57 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <span style='font-size: 14pt'>Schwarzenegger: ‘I Am the Sperminator’
Former California Governor in Emotional Confession</span>

LOS ANGELES (The Borowitz Report) – Amid rumors that he fathered a child with a member of his household staff ten years ago, former California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger made an emotional confession at a hastily called press conference today.

“I am the Sperminator,” Mr. Schwarzenegger told the room of stunned reporters.

The former governor and film star said that he knew the child in question was his “after no one could understand a damn thing it was saying.”

He said that when he first learned he had fathered the child, he considered a variety of options to remedy the situation, including traveling back in time ten years and using a condom.

According to Mr. Schwarzenegger, today’s shocking revelation could end his political career, but he added, “On the plus side, I am now qualified to run the IMF.”</div></div>

LOL


Q </div></div>

Borrowitz is hilarious.

LMAO! The sour nature of some members prohibits any damn funny jokes.

Some are expert at turning a silk purse into a sow's ear. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif

/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif

pooltchr
05-26-2011, 07:23 AM
I'm really surprised that you would support such tasteless humor, when your sisters have been the victims of such activity.

Your pretend outrage is quite selective. You either support all women, or you don't.

How can you look yourself in the mirror, when you find humor in a man refering to himself as the sperminator, or in suggesting that having an a child out of wedlock puts him in the same catagory as a man who has been charged with sodomy and rape of one of your sisters?

Steve

LWW
05-26-2011, 08:17 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <span style='font-size: 14pt'>Schwarzenegger: ‘I Am the Sperminator’
Former California Governor in Emotional Confession</span>

LOS ANGELES (The Borowitz Report) – Amid rumors that he fathered a child with a member of his household staff ten years ago, former California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger made an emotional confession at a hastily called press conference today.

“I am the Sperminator,” Mr. Schwarzenegger told the room of stunned reporters.

The former governor and film star said that he knew the child in question was his “after no one could understand a damn thing it was saying.”

He said that when he first learned he had fathered the child, he considered a variety of options to remedy the situation, including traveling back in time ten years and using a condom.

According to Mr. Schwarzenegger, today’s shocking revelation could end his political career, but he added, “On the plus side, I am now qualified to run the IMF.”</div></div>

LOL


Q </div></div>

Borrowitz is hilarious.

LMAO! The sour nature of some members prohibits any damn funny jokes.

Some are expert at turning a silk purse into a sow's ear. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif

/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif

</div></div>

Let it live forever.

When the chips are down, Charlotte ... the self proclaimed champion of the poor, women, and people of color ... funds it "damn funny" that a socialist thug anally raped a poor woman of color.

Some people don't know the difference between a silk purse and a sow's ear.

Perky
05-26-2011, 08:19 AM
/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/laugh.gif Love The Borrowitz Report ... always right on the mark.

Asking The Whining Weenie for enlightenment /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/sick.gif

You forget he exists in an eternal world of darkness::

The Weenie lives in a world of weenie-poop...
/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/laugh.gif (but you already knew that ) /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/laugh.gif
...it is hardly surprising since...
The Weenie’s political opinions are weenie-poop
...his logic is weenie-poop
...his level of integrity is weenie-poop
...he is blinded by weenie-poop

eg8r
05-26-2011, 11:13 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The sour nature of some members prohibits any damn funny jokes.

</div></div>While I agree lww's response was weird you might remember way back into the past, yesterday, when your sour nature tried to get in the way of my joke. Seems there are lot of people here that are just wound way too tight and need to take a breather.

eg8r

Soflasnapper
05-26-2011, 11:36 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">And, again, with the moral equivalence lie.

Arnold's adultery was wrong.

Anal rape is a felony.

Claiming the two as equivalent is moonbattery. </div></div>

Assuming a sodomy charge was anal rape is wrong. Here are the charges:

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> The announcement came shortly after his indictment on seven criminal charges was announced. They are: two counts of criminal sexual act, two counts of sexual abuse, and one count each of attempt to commit rape, unlawful imprisonment and forcible touching.

In the charge of criminal sexual act in the first degree, Strauss-Kahn is accused of having "engaged in oral sexual conduct with an individual ... by forcible compulsion," the indictment says.</div></div>

Oral sex is sodomy as well; hence your evident confusion on this matter.

LWW
05-26-2011, 11:48 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Soflasnapper</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Oral sex is sodomy as well; hence your evident confusion on this matter. </div></div>

Even oral rape is a heinous offense, but I am not confused.

I don't know if you are confused, but I'll give you the benefit of a doubt since if you aren't confused you are willfully using deceit to cover for an anal rapist.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style='font-size: 11pt'>International Monetary Fund chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn allegedly forced a New York City hotel housekeeper to perform oral sex and submit to anal sex</span>, in addition to allegedly attempting to rape her, according to a complaint filed today by the office of Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance. </div></div>

From the rabid right wing ABC News. (http://abcnews.go.com/International/imf-chief-dominique-strauss-kahn-arraigned-sex-charges/story?id=13609991)

Gayle in MD
05-26-2011, 11:49 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The sour nature of some members prohibits any damn funny jokes.

</div></div>While I agree lww's response was weird you might remember way back into the past, yesterday, when your sour nature tried to get in the way of my joke. Seems there are lot of people here that are just wound way too tight and need to take a breather.

eg8r </div></div>

I didn't try to get in the way of anything you wrote, Ed. In fact, I thought we had engaged in a pretty rational discussion.

I also wasn't feeling, "Sour" as you put it, about anything.

As I recall it, you launched an attack against the President, and then tried to flip your owrds by calling it a joke....which it really, wasn't, I assume, since there were no indications, that you were originally joking...at all, but I let that part, go.

G.

eg8r
05-26-2011, 01:16 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I also wasn't feeling, "Sour" as you put it, about anything.

</div></div>Then why do you think responses to this thread are "sour" as you put it?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">As I recall it, you launched an attack against the President, and then tried to flip your owrds by calling it a joke....</div></div>Flip my words? Are you kidding? Are you not aware of a pretty common statement, "Are you on drugs" as being a comical reply to someone doing something or saying something stupid? I refuse to put smileys all over the place. You had a knee jerk reaction when you responded, plain and simple. The funny part about it is that I even called out him or Clinton being Dem because it would make absolutely no sense for him to call on W for help when he has built his entire presidential career on a blame game.

eg8r &lt;~~~~think everyone just needs to chill out

Soflasnapper
05-26-2011, 06:19 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Soflasnapper</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Oral sex is sodomy as well; hence your evident confusion on this matter. </div></div>

Even oral rape is a heinous offense, but I am not confused.

I don't know if you are confused, but I'll give you the benefit of a doubt since if you aren't confused you are willfully using deceit to cover for an anal rapist.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style='font-size: 11pt'>International Monetary Fund chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn allegedly forced a New York City hotel housekeeper to perform oral sex and submit to anal sex</span>, in addition to allegedly attempting to rape her, according to a complaint filed today by the office of Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance. </div></div>

From the rabid right wing ABC News. (http://abcnews.go.com/International/imf-chief-dominique-strauss-kahn-arraigned-sex-charges/story?id=13609991)
</div></div>

I hadn't read those details or heard them reported, so I went with what I found when I searched (finding still a more complete list of the charges than I'd heard before, although lacking the specific detail ABC mentions).

However, this confusion stems from legal terminology. You say 'oral rape.' Such a crime doesn't exist. Forced oral sex is sodomy. Evidently, the same is true for 'anal rape.' Not rape-- sodomy. As to rape, there is NO RAPE CHARGE among these counts, only attempted rape. So either the anal rape (and I understand the conflation of the terms for that, as it's more or less accurate) didn't occur but was only attempted while achieving anal contact, or even if it did occur, it is called by its legal term, and wasn't rape per se.

pooltchr
05-26-2011, 06:35 PM
I suspect the lady involved might disagree.

Steve

Soflasnapper
05-26-2011, 06:52 PM
Someone said it was consensual.

Wait, that was the guy charged who said that.

Let's ask Kobe. Maybe this woman will take a 5 carat diamond and drop the charge?

Sev
05-26-2011, 08:05 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <span style='font-size: 14pt'>Schwarzenegger: ‘I Am the Sperminator’
Former California Governor in Emotional Confession</span>

LOS ANGELES (The Borowitz Report) – Amid rumors that he fathered a child with a member of his household staff ten years ago, former California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger made an emotional confession at a hastily called press conference today.

“I am the Sperminator,” Mr. Schwarzenegger told the room of stunned reporters.

The former governor and film star said that he knew the child in question was his “after no one could understand a damn thing it was saying.”

He said that when he first learned he had fathered the child, he considered a variety of options to remedy the situation, including traveling back in time ten years and using a condom.

According to Mr. Schwarzenegger, today’s shocking revelation could end his political career, but he added, “On the plus side, I am now qualified to run the IMF.”</div></div>

LOL


Q </div></div>

He'll be baaack!!!!

LWW
05-27-2011, 03:59 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Soflasnapper</div><div class="ubbcode-body">However, this confusion stems from legal terminology. You say 'oral rape.' Such a crime doesn't exist. Forced oral sex is sodomy. Evidently, the same is true for 'anal rape.' Not rape-- sodomy. As to rape, there is NO RAPE CHARGE among these counts, only attempted rape. So either the anal rape (and I understand the conflation of the terms for that, as it's more or less accurate) didn't occur but was only attempted while achieving anal contact, or even if it did occur, it is called by its legal term, and wasn't rape per se.</div></div>

OK, once more I will give you the benefit of a doubt as you seem to be sincerely naive as to how the leftist media is pimping you and covering for this thug.

First off, here are the charges:

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The case of Dominique Strauss-Kahn, managing director of the International Monetary Fund, has shocked both sides of the Atlantic and much of the world. <span style='font-size: 11pt'>The official charges filed against him in a New York City court include: two counts of criminal sexual act in the first degree; one count of attempted rape</span>; and one count each of sexual abuse in the first degree, unlawful imprisonment in the second degree, sexual abuse in the third degree and forcible touching.</div></div>

Now, here's what the slimy leftist media did to deceive the public.

They used legal jargon such as "criminal sexual act in the first degree" and then flipped to lay terms using "attempted rape" to hide the fact of what happened and make it appear that this was a dirty old man who tried to rape someone.

But, we need to possess the intellectual courage to see what "criminal sexual act in the first degree" actually means.

Since nobody on the left seems willing to do this on their own, be glad you have El Dubb to do the critical research that most Americans simply won't do anymore.

Behold, the truth according to New York law (http://law.onecle.com/new-york/penal/PEN0130.50_130.50.html):

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style='font-size: 14pt'>§ 130.50 Criminal sexual act in the first degree.
A person is guilty of criminal sexual act in the first degree when he
or she engages in oral sexual conduct or anal sexual conduct with
another person:
1. By forcible compulsion</span>; or
2. Who is incapable of consent by reason of being physically helpless;
or
3. Who is less than eleven years old; or
4. Who is less than thirteen years old and the actor is eighteen years
old or more. </div></div>

So, yes there is a legal charge of anal rape, and of oral rape available for prosecution in the state of New York ... and DSK has been charged with both.

From the rabid right wing Huffington Post! (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/17/dominique-strauss-kahn-charges_n_863108.html)

Soflasnapper
05-27-2011, 03:35 PM
LWW, stop twisting yourself in pretzels to try to explain why your improved story is true.

The leftwing media is allegedly fooling people by QUOTING THE ACTUAL CHARGES?

And those charges are really oral and anal rape, even though that isn't what they say?

Here's how it's explained by the link from Huffy, to Time:

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">What's the difference between a criminal sexual act and sexual abuse?

The two charges of criminal sexual act are what used to be called "sodomy" and refer to the oral sex [that Strauss-Kahn allegedly forced a hotel worker to perform on him at the Sofitel in midtown Manhattan]. Sexual abuse in the third degree is a misdemeanor touching, it's a far less serious crime, it may have been the first time he grabbed her and touched her buttocks or breasts or some sexual part but without the force needed to drag her down the hall. [...]

So the two charges of "criminal sexual act" is attempted oral sex?

No, it was completed oral sex. The only thing that was attempted was vaginal penetration, which is attempted rape.

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2071865,00.html#ixzz1Naf4QaPK
</div></div>

So, the only rape or attempted rape that can be charged that way, using that term, under NY law, involves vaginal penetration (either accomplished or attempted).

He didn't TRY to get oral sex, he SUCCEEDED, and there is no rape charge, but as is explained, what used to be called sodomy, and is now called "criminal sex act in the first degree."

Otherwise, as there is no distinction in the law, a WOMAN who forced (perhaps with a weapon) a man to submit to a blow job, by your theory would be chargeable with RAPE. And clearly she wouldn't, not under this law-- it would be a charge of a criminal sexual act.

LWW
05-27-2011, 04:01 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Soflasnapper</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style='font-size: 8pt'>I MUST NEVER ADMIT I WAS PIMPED ...

I MUST NEVER ADMIT I WAS PIMPED ...</span>

<span style='font-size: 11pt'>I MUST NEVER ADMIT I WAS PIMPED ...</span>

<span style='font-size: 14pt'>I MUST NEVER ADMIT I WAS PIMPED ...</span>

<span style='font-size: 17pt'>I MUST NEVER ADMIT I WAS PIMPED ...</span>

<span style='font-size: 20pt'>I MUST NEVER ADMIT I WAS PIMPED ...</span>
</div></div>

LWW
05-27-2011, 04:03 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Soflasnapper</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So the two charges of "criminal sexual act" is attempted oral sex?


</div></div>

You are now being completely dishonest, or willfully ignorant, in a lame attempt to defend an anal rapist because he supports the same warped ideology as you.

You should be ashamed.

Soflasnapper
05-27-2011, 04:55 PM
Go commit a criminal sexual act on yourself after that comment. (I mean that in the best of ways!)

I support the just punishment for all his acts, as PROPERLY CHARGED, if he's found guilty. As they have been, evidently.

So do his prosecutors, who will not be discussing a charge of 'oral rape,' in your unique styling, even as you cite the NY law's language that doesn't support your characterization.

Nor will he be charged with bestiality, although sex with animals is illegal, and humans are animals too.

Gayle in MD
05-27-2011, 06:58 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I also wasn't feeling, "Sour" as you put it, about anything.

</div></div>Then why do you think responses to this thread are "sour" as you put it?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">As I recall it, you launched an attack against the President, and then tried to flip your owrds by calling it a joke....</div></div>Flip my words? Are you kidding? Are you not aware of a pretty common statement, "Are you on drugs" as being a comical reply to someone doing something or saying something stupid? I refuse to put smileys all over the place. You had a knee jerk reaction when you responded, plain and simple. The funny part about it is that I even called out him or Clinton being Dem because it would make absolutely no sense for him to call on W for help when he has built his entire presidential career on a blame game.

eg8r &lt;~~~~think everyone just needs to chill out </div></div>

No Clue what you're yapping about.