PDA

View Full Version : LMAO! Colburn's Rovarian Style NON DENIAL DENIAL!



Gayle in MD
05-27-2011, 10:19 AM
<span style="color: #990000">Shades of Karl Rove's active role of a confirming source for Novak, in the outing of a CIA NOC Secret Agent.

<span style='font-size: 14pt'>"Novak told me that he had heard, Wilson's wife was working for the CIA.
"I said, I've heard that too."</span>

Clearly, a Rove WAS a confirming source for Novak, which is why he goes off like the typical, hot headed, guilty SOB that he is when someone says, "We know you were a confirming source for Robert Novak."
</span>



WASHINGTON Sen. Tom Coburn on Thursday decried as "totally inaccurate" an account by the Senate ethics panel of his role in negotiations involving disgraced colleague Sen. John Ensign and the husband of the woman with whom Ensign was having an affair.

Coburn said an account by another key witness who said Coburn took an active role in negotiations between Ensign and former aide Doug Hampton over relocating Hampton and a potential payout "is not an accurate reflection of what happened."

In an interview taped for C-SPAN's Newsmakers, Coburn said he was proud of the role he played in helping break off the affair between Ensign and Hampton's wife Cynthia.

"What I did I would do exactly the same way again," Coburn said. "And there's nothing unethical in what we did."

In 2008, Hampton received a $96,000 gift from Ensign's parents, and the Ethics Committee report casts Coburn as participating in subsequent, unsuccessful negotiations in May 2009 over a far larger amount.

<span style='font-size: 14pt'>Earlier this year, Coburn testified to the Ethics Committee that he told Hampton's attorney, Daniel Albregts, last year that he was not "the negotiator" and that he would just pass information on to Ensign. The report also says Albregts initially asked for an $8 million payment and Coburn called the figure "absolutely ridiculous."</span>

<span style='font-size: 14pt'>"I got a call from Hampton one day who said, `Would you communicate a message to John,'" Coburn said Thursday. "And I said, `I don't know, I'll call John and ask him if he wants me too.' I called John Ensign and I said, `Do you want me to?' He said "yeah.'[/size[size:14pt]]"And so the story that you hear is not an accurate reflection of what happened."</span><span style='font-size: 14pt'>The panel says Hampton's attorney "testified that Senator Coburn took an active role in the negotiations ... and this role included proposing specific resolutions."</span>

<span style="color: #CC0000"> <span style='font-size: 14pt'>A clear admission of guilt, a non denial, denial, just like Rove's.

Was he involved in the negotiations? Of course he was!

I hope the Senate launches the appropriate investigations. He'a already admitted, he was involved in the negotiations, while claiming he wasn't!!!

Typical Repiglican double talk! </span> </span>

Coburn's comments were the first he's made publicly since the ethics report came out two weeks ago.

Ensign quit the Senate May 3, one day before he was to have testified under oath about the affair with the Cynthia Hampton, Doug Hampton's subsequent lobbying of Ensign's office, and the payment from Ensign's parents.

An ethics watchdog group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, has filed a complaint with the Ethics Committee seeking a probe into Coburn's role in the negotiations.

Coburn said the ethics panel hasn't contacted him about the watchdog group's complaint.

"I have no worries," Coburn said.

<span style='font-size: 14pt'>An Ethics Committee spokesman declined comment.</span>

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/26/tom-coburn-john-ensign-_n_867711.html

eg8r
05-28-2011, 10:09 AM
Man that secretary is freaking old non-news.

eg8r

Gayle in MD
05-28-2011, 10:14 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Man that secretary is freaking old non-news.

eg8r </div></div>

This thread is about Colburn's unethical, and possibly illegal role he played in the Ensign unethical, possibly illegal, bribes to his mistresses family.

Any thoughts on the subject of the post?


BTW, the whole world knows tht Valarie wasn't a secretary, and knows as well, that that slander came stright from Cheney.
But, that isn't the subject, it was only used to demonstrate the pervasive RW denial practiced by Repiglicans, who committed TREASON, in the case of their outing a covert, CIA, NOC Secret Agent specialist on WMD, after which, some of her contact allies in the Middle East, in fact, a whole family, of OUR allies, were murdered.
G.

eg8r
05-28-2011, 10:31 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">This thread is about Colburn's unethical, and possibly illegal role he played in the Ensign unethical, possibly illegal, bribes to his mistresses family.

Any thoughts on the subject of the post?
</div></div>Maybe you should take your own advice. If you don't want to talk about the secretary then don't mention her if she is not part of the subject.

eg8r

Gayle in MD
05-28-2011, 10:35 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">This thread is about Colburn's unethical, and possibly illegal role he played in the Ensign unethical, possibly illegal, bribes to his mistresses family.

Any thoughts on the subject of the post?
</div></div>Maybe you should take your own advice. If you don't want to talk about the secretary then don't mention her if she is not part of the subject.

eg8r </div></div>

Again, Ed, you don't get to tell me how I write, or what I write.
If you don't like my posts, stop reading them.


You can, BTW, call her a secretary till dooms day, that won't make it true.

Sorry to see how comfortable you are with continuing to post a lie, over and over, that you know is a lie.

G.

eg8r
05-28-2011, 10:38 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Again, Ed, you don't get to tell me how I write, or what I write.
If you don't like my posts, stop reading them.
</div></div>Practice what you preach.

eg8r

Gayle in MD
05-28-2011, 10:39 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Again, Ed, you don't get to tell me how I write, or what I write.
If you don't like my posts, stop reading them.
</div></div>Practice what you preach.

eg8r </div></div>
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> You can, BTW, call her a secretary till dooms day, that won't make it true.

</div></div>

Pointless.

G.

eg8r
05-28-2011, 10:44 AM
Yes your mention of the secretary was pointless and had nothing to do with your subject. When I chose to comment on your pointless comment you did not know what to do and acted like I was the one in the wrong.

If you don't want to talk about something don't bring it up. An adult, without a sour attitude, would take that as advice not a demand of how you should handle yourself.

eg8r

Gayle in MD
05-28-2011, 10:54 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Yes your mention of the secretary was pointless and had nothing to do with your subject. When I chose to comment on your pointless comment you did not know what to do and acted like I was the one in the wrong.


<span style="color: #990000">LOL, what makes you think I did not know what to do????

I made the comparison, of an additional, RW NON DENIAL, DENIAL. If you couldn't follow, too bad. </span>

If you don't want to talk about something don't bring it up. An adult, without a sour attitude, would take that as advice not a demand of how you should handle yourself.

eg8r </div></div>

Your OPINION that my comparison of another case of RW NON DENIAL, DENIAL, was pointless, is off the mark, and to say differently, is your personal opinion, only.


I don't have a sour attidude, Ed. Nor did I say, I didn't want to talk about it. An adult, without a sour attitude, wouldn't still be lying about Valarie Plame's job, for years and years after her position has been confirmed, completely, as a Secret CIA, NOC, AGent, specializing in WMD.

I'd say, the facts in the thread, suggest that YOU are the one with a sour attitude.

Every post you've written in it, so far, is snarky.

G.

Qtec
05-29-2011, 02:29 AM
What about the sordid pay off?

Q...you know nothing about this.

Gayle in MD
05-29-2011, 08:23 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body">What about the sordid pay off?

Q...you know nothing about this. </div></div>

That's the very subject that he is trying to avoid and cover up.
Hence, he tried to flip the comparison I made between Rove's non denial, denial and Colburn's non denail, denial, over to V. Plame.

Plame wasn't the subject of any part of the thrust of my thread, anyway. It was about Rovarian style, non denial, denials, IOW, Repiglican lies, and how the same non denials, denials are being handled exctly the same way by Colburn, right now.

Essentially, Colburn has already admitted being a go between, between Ensign, and his Mistress and her family, and the pay off, while at the same time, denying that he was a go between..
Same exact thing that Rove did.

"I said I've heard that too."

An admission of guilt, clearly he was affirming for Novak, what he had heard. Rove was a confirming source, for Novak, period.

Ensign used Colburn, to do his negotiations.

Clearly, Colburn, had admitted to that, while in full denial, that he performed any negotiations.

/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif

hondo
05-29-2011, 03:11 PM
Your posts seem rather hypocritical. Why make this personal?
If you have nothing to say about content, why not just butt out?

eg8r
05-29-2011, 08:52 PM
The secretary is old NON-news.

eg8r

eg8r
05-29-2011, 08:54 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Hence, he tried to flip the comparison I made between Rove's non denial, denial and Colburn's non denail, denial, over to V. Plame.
</div></div>Actually I am not, it is your sour attitude that is keeping you from actually just reading what I posted and taking it as that...the secretary is non-news and pretty old. You mentioned the secretary and I mentioned it was old non-news.

eg8r

Gayle in MD
05-31-2011, 03:40 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Hence, he tried to flip the comparison I made between Rove's non denial, denial and Colburn's non denail, denial, over to V. Plame.
</div></div>Actually I am not, it is your sour attitude that is keeping you from actually just reading what I posted and taking it as that...the secretary is non-news and pretty old. You mentioned the secretary and I mentioned it was old non-news.

eg8r </div></div>


<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Hence, he tried to flip the comparison I made between Rove's non denial, denial and Colburn's non denail, denial, over to V. Plame.
</div></div>


As you just did again.

Why do you always try to muddy up the waters, Ed.

Obviously, that is exactly what you're doing.


<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I'd say, the facts in the thread, suggest that YOU are the one with a sour attitude.

Every post you've written in it, so far, is snarky </div></div>


Stick to the subject, stop with the constant snarky attempts of muddying up of the waters....

Everytime you call Valarie Plame, a Secretary, you are only showing your own ignorance, or your grand appetite to irritate.

Either address the subject, Non Denila, Denials, of Rove and Colburn, or keep your unreleated comments to yourself, please.

G.

eg8r
05-31-2011, 08:38 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Either address the subject, Non Denila, Denials, of Rove and Colburn, or keep your unreleated comments to yourself, please.
</div></div>Stop attempting to control the discussion. I post what I want.

eg8r

Gayle in MD
05-31-2011, 08:41 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">No comment on the subject of the thread? Only interested in making another personal attack?

</div></div>