PDA

View Full Version : Correcting Leftist Lies 101



LWW
06-08-2011, 07:50 AM
Once again, the cabal is trying to pass off one of their own ... their crazy uncle Adolf ... as a right winger.

The right wing believes in a minimalist state. The left wing believes in a maximum state.

The right believes in leadership by a properly elected official operating with the constructs of the law. The left believes in a series of messianic Godkings beginning with the Pharaohs and continuing through Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, Pot, Minh, Castro, FDR, Che, Obama, and many more.

To believe that Hitler was a right wing leader requires a devastating amount of historical ignorance.

But, don't believe me ... listen to the man himself"

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style='font-size: 14pt'>"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions."</span>
<span style='font-size: 11pt'>-Adolf Hitler-</span></div></div>

From John Toland's:Adolf Hitler: The Definitive Biography ... (http://constitutionalistnc.tripod.com/hitler-leftist/) generally recognized as the most in depth biography ever penned.

LWW
06-08-2011, 09:45 AM
Let me add that of the platform of the Nazi Party, it is remarkably scary actually ... to the current regime's platform:

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Abolition of unearned (work and labour) incomes. Breaking of debt (interest)-slavery.

In consideration of the monstrous sacrifice in property and blood that each war demands of the people, personal enrichment through a war must be designated as a crime against the people. Therefore we demand the total confiscation of all war profits.

We demand the nationalisation of all (previous) associated industries (trusts).

We demand a division of profits of all heavy industries.

We demand an expansion on a large scale of old age welfare.

We demand the creation of a healthy middle class and its conservation, immediate communalization of the great warehouses and their being leased at low cost to small firms, the utmost consideration of all small firms in contracts with the State, county or municipality.

We demand a land reform suitable to our needs, provision of a law for the free expropriation of land for the purposes of public utility, abolition of taxes on land and prevention of all speculation in land.

We demand struggle without consideration against those whose activity is injurious to the general interest. Common national criminals, usurers, profiteers and so forth are to be punished with death, without consideration of confession or race.

We demand substitution of a German common law in place of the Roman Law serving a materialistic world-order.

<span style='font-size: 11pt'>The state is to be responsible for a fundamental reconstruction of our whole national education program, to enable every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education and subsequently introduction into leading positions. The plans of instruction of all educational institutions are to conform with the experiences of practical life. The comprehension of the concept of the State must be striven for by the school [Staatsbuergerkunde] as early as the beginning of understanding. We demand the education at the expense of the State of outstanding intellectually gifted children of poor parents without consideration of position or profession.</span>

<span style='font-size: 11pt'>The State is to care for the elevating national health by protecting the mother and child, by outlawing child-labor, by the encouragement of physical fitness, by means of the legal establishment of a gymnastic and sport obligation, by the utmost support of all organizations concerned with the physical instruction of the young.</span>

We demand abolition of the mercenary troops and formation of a national army.

We demand legal opposition to known lies and their promulgation through the press. In order to enable the provision of a German press, we demand, that: a. All writers and employees of the newspapers appearing in the German language be members of the race: b. Non-German newspapers be required to have the express permission of the State to be published. They may not be printed in the German language: c. Non-Germans are forbidden by law any financial interest in German publications, or any influence on them, and as punishment for violations the closing of such a publication as well as the immediate expulsion from the Reich of the non-German concerned. Publications which are counter to the general good are to be forbidden. <span style='font-size: 11pt'>We demand legal prosecution of artistic and literary forms which exert a destructive influence on our national life, and the closure of organizations opposing the above made demands.</span>

We demand freedom of religion for all religious denominations within the state so long as they do not endanger its existence or oppose the moral senses of the Germanic race. The Party as such advocates the standpoint of a positive Christianity without binding itself confessionally to any one denomination. It combats the Jewish-materialistic spirit within and around us, and is convinced that a lasting recovery of our nation can only succeed from within on the framework: The good of the state before the good of the individual.[12]

<span style='font-size: 11pt'>For the execution of all of this we demand the formation of a strong central power in the Reich. Unlimited authority of the central parliament over the whole Reich and its organizations in general. The forming of state and profession chambers for the execution of the laws made by the Reich within the various states of the confederation.</span> The leaders of the Party promise, if necessary by sacrificing their own lives, to support by the execution of the points set forth above without consideration. </div></div>

EIN VOLK, EIN REICH, EIN FUEHRER! (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Program)

Soflasnapper
06-08-2011, 02:11 PM
Let me add that of the platform of the Nazi Party, it is remarkably scary actually ... [similar] to the current regime's platform:

Complete balderdash. At least as I complete your incomplete sentence as above, which I think is a fair clarification of what you must have meant (but couldn't quite say? Odd).

Similar, yes, but only if by 'similar' you mean 'the complete opposite.' (Humpty, is this you again?) There is hardly a single plank that the Obama administration has as a policy. Yes, they favor keeping child labor laws IN PLACE, but they are already in force from long ago. Aside from that, not so much. Unless you blame them for keeping the Bush policy to control education from the federal level in place for No Child Left Behind.

LWW
06-08-2011, 02:25 PM
The similar ones are the ones in bold.

This is where you now claim that dear leader is against Obamacare, taking over the finance and auto industries, expanding social security, putting education further under federal control, giving the UAW massive shares in GM/CHRYSLER while wiping his arse with the interests of secured creditors, protecting those who threaten those who oppose the regime, and subsidizing the Obamedia.

LWW
06-08-2011, 02:36 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Soflasnapper</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Unless you blame them for keeping the Bush policy to control education from the federal level in place for No Child Left Behind.

</div></div>

Why can't you discuss something honestly?

Education has been under federal control since Imam Carter's time.

What NCLB did was come up with a way of measuring which schools/teachers were performing their duties and which weren't.

And FWIW, it was a bill co-authored by, and rammed through by, Teddy Kennedy.

So, I suppose it must be good because Teddy wrote it ... and bad because Bush signed it.

I see it as a good first effort to bring accountability to the puclic school system ... which is no doubt why the NEA opposes it.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">No Child Left Behind requires all government-run schools receiving federal funding to administer a state-wide standardized test (all students take the same test under the same conditions) annually to all students. The students' scores are used to determine whether the school has taught the students well. Schools which receive Title I funding through the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 must make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in test scores (e.g. each year, its fifth graders must do better on standardized tests than the previous year's fifth graders).

If the school's results are repeatedly poor, then a series of steps are taken to improve the school.[10] Schools that miss AYP for a second consecutive year are publicly labeled as being "in need of improvement" and are required to develop a two-year improvement plan for the subject that the school is not teaching well. Students are given the option to transfer to a better school within the school district, if any exists. Missing AYP in the third year forces the school to offer free tutoring and other supplemental education services to struggling students. If a school misses its AYP target for a fourth consecutive year, the school is labeled as requiring "corrective action," which might involve actions like the wholesale replacement of staff, introduction of a new curriculum, or extending the amount of time students spend in class. The fifth year of failure results in planning to restructure the entire school; the plan is implemented if the school fails to hit its AYP targets for the sixth year in a row. Common options include closing the school, turning the school into a charter school, hiring a private company to run the school, or asking the state office of education to directly run the school.
The act requires states to provide "highly qualified" teachers to all students. Each state sets its own standards for what counts as "highly qualified". Similarly, the act requires states to set "one high, challenging standard" for its students. Each state decides for itself what counts as "one high, challenging standard", but the curriculum standards must be applied to all students, rather than having different standards for students in different cities or other parts of the state. </div></div>

<span style='font-size: 26pt'>OH, THE HUMANITY! (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_child_left_behind)</span>

Soflasnapper
06-08-2011, 06:04 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The similar ones are the ones in bold.

This is where you now claim that dear leader is against Obamacare, taking over the finance and auto industries, expanding social security, putting education further under federal control, giving the UAW massive shares in GM/CHRYSLER while wiping his arse with the interests of secured creditors, protecting those who threaten those who oppose the regime, and subsidizing the Obamedia.
</div></div>

You are hilariously incorrect.

What expansion of social security does the Obama administration advocate?

What further control of education?

How could he want to take over the auto industry when he left Ford out, and has sold the shares that were taken to secure the government's bridge-loan type investment?

What part of the financial industry did he take over? AIG is an insurance company. Did he take over investment banks, commercial banks, or brokerage houses?

Qtec
06-08-2011, 11:35 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Why can't you discuss something honestly? </div></div>


LMAO.....


<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Nazism (Nationalsozialismus, National Socialism; alternatively spelled Naziism[1]) was the ideology and practice of the Nazi Party and of Nazi Germany.[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] It was a unique variety of fascism that incorporated biological racism and antisemitism.[10] Nazism presented itself as politically syncretic, <u>incorporating policies, tactics and philosophies from right- and left-wing ideologies; <span style='font-size: 14pt'>in practice, Nazism was a far right form of politics.</span></u>[11] </div></div>


Q

Qtec
06-08-2011, 11:39 PM
All the things LWW accuses Obama of are things that he could have done but didn't when he had the chance.

Q

Gayle in MD
06-09-2011, 02:50 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body">All the things LWW accuses Obama of are things that he could have done but didn't when he had the chance.

Q

</div></div>

Tap Tap Tap!

LWW
06-09-2011, 03:55 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Soflasnapper</div><div class="ubbcode-body">What expansion of social security does the Obama administration advocate?

What further control of education?

How could he want to take over the auto industry when he left Ford out, and has sold the shares that were taken to secure the government's bridge-loan type investment?

What part of the financial industry did he take over? AIG is an insurance company. Did he take over investment banks, commercial banks, or brokerage houses?</div></div>

1 - The state has been using SS as a vote buying scam for years. We today have kids receiving SS who aren't even old enough to have held employment, because they suffer from the mythical ADD. We have people who qualify for SS because they are an alcoholic or drug addict. PLease.

2 - The regime took over 2 auto companies, ignored secured creditors, and installed the UAW as large stockholders ... this is a fascist economic system. The union extorts dues from the workers to send to the party ... in exchange the party protects the company with tax dollars ... in exchange the company produces what the stae wishes them to produce.

3 - Again, in the financial segment we have implemented a fascist economy. When the state can dictate who gets paid what, what rates can be charged, what credit criteria must be followed, and maintains the legal authority to take over any institution without warning ... the state controls the industry. The "CAPITALIST MANAGEMENT" of the industry is merely a shell to fool the rubes.

Because the 3 of you cabalists lack the intellectual integrity to see what is clearly happening does not mean that I will join you by burying my head in the sand.

Soflasnapper
06-09-2011, 01:27 PM
Unresponsive, underwhelming, unconvincing. In other words, you cannot back up the charges I challenged at all? Quelle surprise!

Oh, and

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> cabalists [...] intellectual integrity</div></div>

? I do not think you understand those words you misuse.

LWW
06-09-2011, 04:01 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Soflasnapper</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style='font-size: 14pt'>I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... </span></div></div>

llotter
06-09-2011, 04:31 PM
I'm afraid lil Softie is quibbling over semantics much like Clinton did. LWW is obviously correct in comparing the Nazi platform to the modern Left's central planning theme over the years.

And shame on Q for plucking out some definition of Nazism to perpetuate a lie that it represents the Right an any meaningful way. The Right/Conservatism is for limited government under the rule of law and in no way is similar to the Nazi party.

One leftist lies and the other one swears to it.

LWW
06-10-2011, 06:14 AM
The only substantive difference between the German Nazis and the modern democratic party in the USA is that Hitler was a genocidal maniac and Obama isn't.

That's why I've so often said that Obama's followers scare me worse than he, cults always demand strong leaders ... and I have no doubt that if Obama did demand the shuttering of the free press and the arrest and execution of "enemies of the people" the Obamatrons would oblige.

We see glimpses of it now with the union thug violence, idiots attempting citizen's arrest of former officials, and the rare bit of raw meat that Obama feeds to the mob ... like punishing their enemies and bringing guns to discussions.

This isn't Germany 1933 ... yet.

Germany 1920, that one is a much scarier comparison.

LWW
06-10-2011, 06:33 AM
Let's not also forget that the Nazi party was heavy into eco-nuttiness such as controlling all land use ... often placing wildlife above human life ... and passing animal rights laws.

And, just as one can find "NEW AGE" people in droves at any leftist event, the Nazis were very heavy into astrology and other junk science.

The Nazis were also into organic farming and the limiting of mechanized farming.

One of the Nazi's early legislative works was the "Reich Nature Protection Law" and they also banned medical experimentation on animals ... which led to the likes of Josef Mengele.

They also began with panels to determine who should receive medical care and who should not based on cost effectiveness, and this quickly evolved into deciding which races and nationalities were worthy of surviving and which deserved extermination.

Gayle in MD
06-10-2011, 09:58 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: llotter</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I'm afraid lil Softie is quibbling over semantics much like Clinton did. LWW is obviously correct in comparing the Nazi platform to the modern Left's central planning theme over the years.

And shame on Q for plucking out some definition of Nazism to perpetuate a lie that it represents the Right an any meaningful way. The Right/Conservatism is for limited government under the rule of law and in no way is similar to the Nazi party.

One leftist lies and the other one swears to it. </div></div>


<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The Right/Conservatism is for limited government under the rule of law and in no way is similar to the Nazi party.
</div></div>


LMAO! WRONG!

The Right/Conservatism, is for growing government, which they ALWAYS do, and subverting The Law, just as you yourself admit to doing, by harrassing women while they are accessing their own Constitutional Right, to seek and secure an abortion, as they so desire. That is settled loaw, which RWers have consistantly tried to subvert.

The Rightwing, were Nazi's, and the Hallmark of Statism is when force of any kind is used to invade the privacy, of one's personal life, seek to dictate, and/or remove their right to, for example, negotiate their own contracts, or subvert their right to the total control of their own body.

RW Religious dictatorship, and government dictatorship, is always the hallmark, of Fascits Statists.

Fascist: Noun...

An adherant of Facism, or other <span style='font-size: 17pt'>RW authoritarian views.</span>


Wake up! You are the one using false semantics.

LWW
06-10-2011, 12:25 PM
Talk about using words not understood by the poster.

The political left is pro big state. Taken to the extreme you have the state owning/operating/controlling everything.

The political right is anti big state. Taken to the extreme you have anarchy where the state owning/operating/controlling nothing.

For your nonsensical rant to be true one must accept that Hitler was an anarchist.

In reality, the Nazi state was among the most intrusive and controlling of any in history.

Qtec
06-11-2011, 01:51 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Soflasnapper</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style='font-size: 14pt'>I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... </span></div></div> </div></div>


Meltdown......LOL

Q

LWW
06-11-2011, 02:54 AM
I concur ... he has had a few.

Leftists do that when they are forced to face up to the idea that their past messiahs were actually one of their own.

LWW
06-11-2011, 09:23 AM
To add another similarity, in 1935 the Nazis amended their eugenics laws to allow for legal abortion ... especially if the fetus was a byproduct of infidelity and/or racial crossbreeding.

Odd that those are two of the main reasons abortion are sought today.

Soflasnapper
06-11-2011, 07:09 PM
Odd that those are two of the main reasons abortion are sought today.

Odd that you'd make that assertion, which I think is quite false.

Soflasnapper
06-11-2011, 07:11 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> On average, women give at least three reasons for choosing abortion: three-fourths say that having a baby would interfere with work, school, or other responsibilities; about two-thirds say they cannot afford a child; and half say they do not want to be a single parent or are having problems with their husband or partner.

Read more: Abortion in the United States Infoplease.com http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0904509.html#ixzz1P1Huz8j3
</div></div>

Odd that what you say doesn't appear in the listed reasons.

LWW
06-11-2011, 08:03 PM
Strangely, your "SOURCE" doesn't list the reasons women have abortions.

Imagine that.

Qtec
06-12-2011, 12:33 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Strangely, <span style='font-size: 26pt'>your "SOURCE" <u>doesn't list the reasons women have abortions.</u></span>

<span style='font-size: 23pt'>Imagine that.</span> </div></div>


<span style='font-size: 26pt'>LMAO</span>

From SoFla's link.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <span style='font-size: 14pt'>Abortion in the United States</span>
Incidence of Abortion

49% of pregnancies among American women are unintended; almost half of these are terminated by abortion.
In 2000, 1.31 million abortions took place, down from an estimated 1.36 million in 1996. From 1973 through 2000, more than 39 million legal abortions occurred.
Each year, 2 out of every 100 women aged 1544 have an abortion; 48% of them have had at least one previous abortion and 61% have had a previous birth.
An estimated 43% of women will have at least one abortion by the time they are 45 years old.
Each year, an estimated 46 million abortions occur worldwide. Of these, 20 million procedures are obtained illegally.

<span style='font-size: 14pt'>Who Has Abortions</span>

52% of U.S. women obtaining abortions are younger than 25: Women aged 2024 obtain 33% of all abortions, and teenagers obtain 19%.
Black women are more than three times as likely as white women to have an abortion, and Hispanic women are two-and-a-half times as likely.
43% of women obtaining abortions identify themselves as Protestant, and 27% identify themselves as Catholic.
Two-thirds of all abortions are among never-married women.
More than 60% of abortions are among women who have had one or more children.
<span style='font-size: 14pt'>On average, women give </span><span style='font-size: 26pt'><u>at least three reasons</u> for choosing abortion:</span> <span style='font-size: 14pt'>three-fourths say that having a baby would interfere with work, school, or other responsibilities; about two-thirds say they cannot afford a child; and half say they do not want to be a single parent or are having problems with their husband or partner.
About 13,000 women have abortions each year following rape or incest. </span>


Read more: Abortion in the United States Infoplease.com http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0904509.html#ixzz1P2aCmA6V
</div></div>

Brain Dead Liberals???? /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif

http://bshistorian.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/shot-down.jpg

Q

Qtec
06-12-2011, 05:35 PM
Bump.

Q /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/smirk.gif

Gayle in MD
06-13-2011, 01:02 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Bump.

Q /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/smirk.gif </div></div>

LOL, prove him wrong, and he vanishes, to fill the forum with thread that will cov er up his exposed ridiculous assertions.

But he can keep a hateful, slanderous thread going on for months on end, all by himself.

Typical of hate spewing trolls.

G.

Soflasnapper
06-13-2011, 05:05 PM
To add another similarity, in 1935 the Nazis amended their eugenics laws to allow for legal abortion ... especially if the fetus was a byproduct of infidelity and/or racial crossbreeding.

Odd that those are two of the main reasons abortion are sought today.

To be fair, perhaps he meant to add to the last sentence, "...by Nazis."?

That could be true?

Gayle in MD
06-13-2011, 10:14 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: llotter</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I'm afraid lil Softie is quibbling over semantics much like Clinton did. LWW is obviously correct in comparing the Nazi platform to the modern Left's central planning theme over the years.

And shame on Q for plucking out some definition of Nazism to perpetuate a lie that it represents the Right an any meaningful way. The Right/Conservatism is for limited government under the rule of law and in no way is similar to the Nazi party.

One leftist lies and the other one swears to it. </div></div>


<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The Right/Conservatism is for limited government under the rule of law and in no way is similar to the Nazi party.

</div></div>

LMAO!!!! Except for when the RW dictators invade private lives. Ignore women's constitutional rights to personal, private LEGAL CHOICES UNDER THE COTUS!

Except when Nazi's like Bush, fly all the way back to D.C., to prevent a husband from following the wishes of his brain dead wife.

Except when the Gay Population was dying left and right, and Reagan never even mentioned, AIDS.

Except when Repiglicans try to remove workers rights to have a voice, and negotiate their own work contracts!

Except when Bush broke the FISA laws, and illegally spied on Americans, Journalists included.

Except when Bush and Cheney outed a covert agent, committing treason, and then lied their way out of it.

Except for when the Repiglican policies seek to remove a woman's right to use birth control, and seek to imprison doctors, and women, for practicing their constitutional rights.

Except for when the Bush Regime, used our soldiers, to help their oil cronies, get refining contracts in Iraq, by lying to the people, and exploiting our patiotism, during our national grief, by exploiting it, after the worst attack on our nation.

All except for when people like you show up outside of abortion clinics, and taunt women for accessing their Constitutional rights.

Except for when Repiglican Representatives privatize and take over the prisons and use them to lock up people of color, in the interest of their social engineering.

Except for when Bushies spied on Americans' Library records!

Except when Repiglican Governors, try to ban certain books, from certain libraries.

Except when Repiglicans try to dictate what consenting adults do in private.

Except when Rep[iglicans legislate to dictate that women cannot sue their cronies, the no bid war profiteers, for raping our women during wartime.

Except for when Republicans vote against outlawing sex discrimination in the job market.


It is RW politicians who act just like the Nazi's.

They are a party of homophobic, misogynistic, racist, sexist, fascist pigs, whose policies amount to social engineering, on every level, from destroying our freedom of personal choice, our control over our own bodies, our rights to privacy, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and even our rights to live in a clean, safe environment.

G.

Stretch
06-14-2011, 07:02 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Soflasnapper</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style='font-size: 14pt'>I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... I MUST DEFEND THE REGIME ... I MUST ATTACK ALL WHO OPPOSE ... </span></div></div> </div></div>


Meltdown......LOL

Q </div></div>

TILT TILT TILT!! /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/smile.gif St.

Gayle in MD
06-14-2011, 07:17 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Soflasnapper</div><div class="ubbcode-body">To add another similarity, in 1935 the Nazis amended their eugenics laws to allow for legal abortion ... especially if the fetus was a byproduct of infidelity and/or racial crossbreeding.

Odd that those are two of the main reasons abortion are sought today.

To be fair, perhaps he meant to add to the last sentence, "...by Nazis."?

That could be true? </div></div>

Respectfully, I don't find that to be true, as regards the reasons for abortion.


To be brief, too young, too poor, and learning the husband is either leaving for another woman, or involved with another woman, are among the top reasons, according to my studies on the subject.

Single Mothers, who can barely feed the children they already have, yet in spite of all of that we have Republicans trying to take away access to birth control.

Women cannot even get the morning after pill in many regions of this country, because of idiotic RW religious fanatics.

Wrapped in the flag, waving the cross....

LWW
06-14-2011, 07:42 AM
Don't forget boys and girls ... to buy into the cabal's denial on this one, you must believe that Hitler wasn't a statist but instead an anarchist.

LWW
06-14-2011, 07:49 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Soflasnapper</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Unresponsive, underwhelming, unconvincing. In other words, you cannot back up the charges I challenged at all? Quelle surprise!

Oh, and

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> cabalists [...] intellectual integrity</div></div>

? I do not think you understand those words you misuse. </div></div>

Of the cabal, you are the one that truly amazes me.

The rest are simply bots, unable to comprehend things ... hence the love of being told what they believe by the state.

You, OTOH, have every appearance of being capable of "getting it" ... yet you staunchly refuse to get it.

You insist on buying into the myth that D = left and R = right in US politics.

You also insist upon believing that the leftist leaders are capable of, and intend on, bringing Shangri La to America and the world ... this in spite of history's lessons that every leftist leader (Hitler ... Mao ... Lenin ... Stalin ... Ceaucescu ... Pot ... Minh ... Castro ... Chavez ... Amin ... Robespierre ... Bonaparte ... Hussein ... Omar ... and many, many more.) who pitched this utopian nonsense to the naive masses has enslaved the people and crushed the nation they ruled over.