PDA

View Full Version : Do tax cuts truly stimulate?



Qtec
07-13-2011, 12:49 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> A. Bruce Bartlett : I think the vast bulk of Tea Party members are ignorant fools when it comes to understanding how government really operates. I have thought so for 2.5 years and see no reason to change my opinion.

Q. “Specifically” who benefits from failure to raise the debt ceiling?

A. Bruce Bartlett : Those who shorted government bonds, like Eric Cantor.

Q. Do tax cuts truly stimulate? If 10 years of tax cuts are supposed to stimulate the economy and create jobs, where is that economy and where are those jobs?

A. Bruce Bartlett : <span style='font-size: 17pt'>The Bush tax cuts were economically worthless. </span> </div></div>

link (http://bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2011/07/myths-about-the-debt-ceiling.html)

Q

LWW
07-13-2011, 02:58 AM
So a moron quotes another moron and that is supposed to prove what?

Qtec
07-13-2011, 04:52 AM
..so a moron speaks and that is supposed to prove what?

Q

Qtec
07-13-2011, 04:53 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So a moron quotes another moron and that is supposed to prove what? </div></div>

A. Bruce Bartlett : <span style='font-size: 20pt'>The Bush tax cuts were economically worthless.</span>


Q........LOL

cushioncrawler
07-13-2011, 05:19 AM
Of course tax kuts stimulate. In fakt rupert murdoch's shoes are probly overflowing with cream.
mac.

LWW
07-13-2011, 05:27 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body">..so a moron speaks and that is supposed to prove what?

Q </div></div>

Well ... so far you've proven nothing.

LWW
07-13-2011, 05:35 AM
Here are a few questions to help you understand, and you may use google to assist you in finding the answers

1 - All other things being equal, who is more likely to buy a new car?

A - The person with more take home pay.

B - The person with less take home pay.

c - The person with unchanged take home pay.

2 - All other things being equal, which auto dealer is most likely to hire more employees and order more inventory?

A - The dealership with increasing sales.

B - The dealer with static sales.

C - The dealer with decreasing sales.

3 - All other things being equal, which auto manufacture is most likely to hire more assemblers?

A - The manufacturer with increasing sales.

B - The manufacturer with static sales.

C - The manufacturer with decreasing sales.

4 - All other things being equal, which results in the employee having a higher level of take home pay?

A - Reduced tax rates.

B - Increased tax rates.

C - Unchanged tax rates.

Here's a study tip ... the answer to all 4 questions is A.

Let's see if you can pass this economics pop quiz?

eg8r
07-13-2011, 05:40 AM
Does he mean the Obama tax cuts?

eg8r

LWW
07-13-2011, 05:49 AM
Touche'.

Gayle in MD
07-13-2011, 07:23 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> A. Bruce Bartlett : I think the vast bulk of Tea Party members are ignorant fools when it comes to understanding how government really operates. I have thought so for 2.5 years and see no reason to change my opinion.

Q. “Specifically” who benefits from failure to raise the debt ceiling?

A. Bruce Bartlett : Those who shorted government bonds, like Eric Cantor.

Q. Do tax cuts truly stimulate? If 10 years of tax cuts are supposed to stimulate the economy and create jobs, where is that economy and where are those jobs?

A. Bruce Bartlett : <span style='font-size: 17pt'>The Bush tax cuts were economically worthless. </span> </div></div>

link (http://bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2011/07/myths-about-the-debt-ceiling.html)

Q </div></div>

The Repiglican spending never ends. Their tax cuts for the wealthy, amount to spending. Their lies about their failed policies, go on and on. They have millions of ignorant supporters in the fly over states, who enable them to bilk tax payers out of their money, in their perpetual spending for the wealthy. Asking if tax cuts for the wealthy stimulate jobs, would be a thing of the past, by now, given all of the proof of the FAILED BUSH TAX CUTS, which clearly produced nothing but more job losses, annd a collapsed economy.

Even the Pre-Bush idiots, Bush one, and Reagan, realized they had to raise taxes to escape their own economic failures.

These days, with Fux around to spread lies to the idiots, we are seeing the most inept Repiglican contenders for the presidency we've ever seen.

Perhaps we'll get lucky. Perhaps Murdoch will lose everything, when the whole story comes out, and perhaps, more psychologically damaged gay adults who were conned by the Bachmann's, and used by the Bachmann's, who conned them, in order to fill their own pockets, while they practiced a disgracefull form of chld abuse, for profit, will come forward, and finnally, we'll get rid of the biggest liar on the hill.

WE all know, tasx cuts do not pay for themselves, any more than spending our revenues, in order to give more to the wealtiest, produced any jobs.

The deniers never learn. Learning from proven facts, is forbidden by the religious conservative big spenders who created this mess.

Some good news of late, the foundation for global human rights has stated they will go forward to convict Bush/Cheney/Rice/Rumsfeld/Armitage on their criminal WAR CRIMES.

I don't think Murdoch, the global crook, has enough money to run the whole world, yet, so maybe we will finally see some justice for the Repiglican War Crimes!

G.

G.

Sev
07-13-2011, 07:30 AM
More blather.

eg8r
07-13-2011, 07:36 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The Repiglican spending never ends. Their tax cuts for the wealthy, amount to spending.</div></div>Ooops, you forgot it was the Dems in control during the last round of, "spending on the wealthy", tax cuts.

eg8r

Gayle in MD
07-13-2011, 07:49 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The Repiglican spending never ends. Their tax cuts for the wealthy, amount to spending.</div></div>Ooops, you forgot it was the Dems in control during the last round of, "spending on the wealthy", tax cuts.

eg8r </div></div>

More incorrect information, spread around by Ed.

Dems were not in control of the House, when the Bush Tax Cuts expired, Ed. Repiglicans put the President in the trick bag, threatening to cut unemployment benefits, if he didn't continue the Bush Tax Cuts, which failed to produce jobs.

G.

eg8r
07-13-2011, 08:15 AM
LOL, more deflection from you when the tax cuts for the rich became Obama's tax cuts.

eg8r

Gayle in MD
07-13-2011, 08:31 AM
<span style="color: #990000">No. More lies and twisting of the facts, from you. </span>

eg8r
07-13-2011, 11:24 AM
The fact is Obama was the President and he helped push them through. Facts seem to not be your strong point.

eg8r

Soflasnapper
07-13-2011, 11:58 AM
That wasn't his preference, but his compromise with the other side.

He DID want to keep the lowered tax rates in effect for all but the top bracket, and he couldn't get that without extending the top bracket's discount as well.

It's not that long ago, and already you've forgotten?

eg8r
07-13-2011, 12:29 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">He DID want to keep the lowered tax rates in effect for all but the top bracket, and he couldn't get that without extending the top bracket's discount as well.

It's not that long ago, and already you've forgotten? </div></div>There you go, it was his bill. I did not say he got everything he wanted but it is his tax bill and can no longer blame W for the effects. He signed it into law.

eg8r

Gayle in MD
07-13-2011, 01:39 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">He DID want to keep the lowered tax rates in effect for all but the top bracket, and he couldn't get that without extending the top bracket's discount as well.

It's not that long ago, and already you've forgotten? </div></div>There you go, it was his bill. I did not say he got everything he wanted but it is his tax bill and can no longer blame W for the effects. He signed it into law.

eg8r </div></div>


You are telling lies again????


You never get thhe facts straight!

Extending the Bush Tax cuts, aka revenue spending, for the wealthy, have NEVER been Obama's, nor the Democratic's policy.

Stop twisting the facts, Ed. The Repiglicans held unemployment beneifts hostage to extending the Bush tax cuts, aka spending of our revenues, for the wealthiest billionaires, and polluting corporations.

It is known as social engineering, corprorate welfare, redistribution of wealth, to the wealthiest.

When, oh when will you ever learn!



G.

eg8r
07-13-2011, 02:35 PM
Sorry but you are not living in reality.

eg8r

Gayle in MD
07-13-2011, 02:47 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Sorry but you are not living in reality.

eg8r </div></div>

No, YOU are not living in reality.