PDA

View Full Version : News the Obamedia doesn't want spoonfed to know!



LWW
07-26-2011, 05:19 AM
OBAMATRONS ... do not read the following:

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">CNN touted results from its newly-released poll Thursday showing Americans favor a balance of spending cuts and tax increases in the debt ceiling debate, as well as raising the debt ceiling. What the network completely failed to report -- although NewsBusters reported it -- was that Americans also favored two conservative positions – passage of a balanced budget amendment, along with spending cuts and future spending caps.</div></div>

OH DEAR! (http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/matt-hadro/2011/07/21/cnn-ignores-poll-results-showing-strong-support-cut-cap-and-balance)

LWW
07-26-2011, 05:24 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">But if a deal is made to cut spending and raise taxes only on the wealthy, 75% think the end result is likely to include a middle class tax hike. Only 21% consider a middle class tax increase to be unlikely. </div></div>
EVIDENCE (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/july_2011/75_see_middle_class_tax_hikes_as_likely_in_debt_ce iling_deal) that the nutty 25% will overwhelmingly believe whatever dear leader tells them that they believe.

LWW
07-26-2011, 05:27 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">57% favor repeal of the health care law passed in March of last year, including 46% who Strongly Favor its repeal. That’s the strongest support for repeal since early May. Thirty-six percent (36%) oppose repeal of the law, including 24% who are Strongly Opposed. </div></div>
MORE EVIDENCE (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/health_care_law) that the regime can count on the nutty 25% to lick the spoon clean of the "DAILY TRUTH" and regurgitate it on command.

LWW
07-26-2011, 05:32 AM
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/var/plain/storage/images/media/obama_index_graphics/july_2011/obama_approval_index_july_25_2011/492083-1-eng-US/obama_approval_index_july_25_2011.jpg

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Presidential Tracking Poll for Monday shows that 23% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as president. Forty-four percent (44%) Strongly Disapprove, giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -21% </div></div>

And, finally, EVIDENCE (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll) that dear leader has pretty much no solid support outside of the nutty 25%.

Soflasnapper
07-26-2011, 11:05 AM
Not with this stupid index again?

The one that Rasmussen just invented as Obama was coming into office?

The one that whatever Obama comes in at, he'll be at the record level, either good or bad, simply because there has never been anyone else who has been measured this way? ROFL!

Especially by a pollster who slants 5% toward the GOP, by his unusual sampling and RV screenings well ahead of election season?

LOL!

Since O's ACTUAL job approval ratings are unusually high given the lackluster economy, THIS is what they use to prove alleged extreme disapproval.

Actually, the REAL job approval rate, as has been used for all prior presidents shows O in the mid- to high-40%s, when all other presidents who've been in such bad economic times have sunk to the mid- to lower-30%s . He has an unusual, and perhaps astonishing, core of support that keeps him above 40% and has, throughout his term so far.

Now it's true, if you just poll Republicans, you can find him at under 5% job approval, or whatever. That isn't the way the population is accurately sampled, however.

LWW
07-26-2011, 04:03 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Soflasnapper</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Not with this stupid index again?

The one that Rasmussen just invented as Obama was coming into office? </div></div>

Why do you continue repeating this lie when it has been shown to you ad infinitum that the index goes back at least to 2006?