PDA

View Full Version : New York Times Reader Kills Dozens in Norway!!!!



LWW
07-28-2011, 04:20 PM
Once again the far left is pimped to believe that a man who:

- Is irreligious.

- Is an economic leftist.

- Is an admitted statist.

- Doesn't believe in Christianity.

is somehow a fundamentalist Christian right wing extremist.

But, in the far left's defense ... that is what they were spoon fed.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style='font-size: 11pt'>The New York Times wasted no time in jumping to conclusions about Anders Behring Breivik, the Norwegian who staged two deadly attacks in Oslo last weekend, claiming in the first two paragraphs of one story that he was a "gun-loving," "right-wing," "fundamentalist Christian," opposed to "multiculturalism."</span>

It may as well have thrown in "Fox News-watching" and "global warming skeptic."

This was a big departure from the Times' conclusion-resisting coverage of the Fort Hood shooting suspect, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan. <span style='font-size: 11pt'>Despite reports that Hasan shouted "Allahu Akbar!" as he gunned down his fellow soldiers at a military medical facility in 2009, only one of seven Times articles on Hasan so much as mentioned that he was a Muslim.</span>

Of course, that story ran one year after Hasan's arrest, so by then, I suppose, the cat was out of the bag.

<span style='font-size: 11pt'>In fact, however, Americans who jumped to conclusions about Hasan were right and New York Times reporters who jumped to conclusions about Breivik were wrong.</span>

True, in one lone entry on Breivik's gaseous 1,500-page manifesto, "2083: A European Declaration of Independence," he calls himself "Christian." <span style='font-size: 11pt'>But unfortunately he also uses a great number of other words to describe himself, and these other words make clear that he does not mean "Christian" as most Americans understand the term.</span> <span style='font-size: 14pt'>(Incidentally, he also cites The New York Times more than a half-dozen times.)</span>

Had anyone at the Times actually read Breivik's manifesto, they would have seen that <span style='font-size: 11pt'>he uses the word "Christian" as a handy moniker to mean "European, non-Islamic" -- not a religious Christian or even a vague monotheist. In fact, at several points in his manifesto, Breivik stresses that he has a beef with Christians for their soft-heartedness.</span> (I suppose that's why the Times is never worried about a "Christian backlash.")

A casual perusal of Breivik's manifesto clearly shows that <span style='font-size: 11pt'>he uses the word "Christian" similarly to the way some Jewish New Yorkers use it to mean "non-Jewish." In this usage, Christopher Hitchens and Madalyn Murray O'Hair are "Christians." </span>

I told a Jewish gal trying to set me up with one of her friends once that he had to be Christian, and she exclaimed that she had the perfect guy: a secular Muslim atheist. (This was the least-popular option on the '60s board game Dream Date, by the way).

Breivik is very clear that you don't even have to believe in God to join his movement, saying in a self-interview:

Q: Do I have to believe in God or Jesus in order to become a Justiciar Knight?

A: <span style='font-size: 11pt'>As this is a cultural war, our definition of being a Christian does not necessarily constitute that you are required to have a personal relationship with God or Jesus.</span>

<span style='font-size: 14pt'>He goes on to say that a "Christian fundamentalist theocracy" is "everything we DO NOT want," and a "secular European society" is "what we DO want."</span>

<span style='font-size: 11pt'>"It is enough," Breivik says, "that you are a Christian-agnostic or a Christian-atheist." That statement doesn't even make sense in America.</span>

At the one and only meeting of Breivik's "Knights Templar" in London in 2002, there were nine attendees,<span style='font-size: 11pt'> three of whom he describes as "Christian atheists" and one as a "Christian agnostic."</span> (Another dozen people mistook it for a Renaissance Faire and were turned away.)

Breivik clearly explains that his "Knights Templar" is "not a religious organization but rather a Christian 'culturalist' military order." He even calls on the "European Jewish, Buddhist and Hindu community" to join his fight against "the Islamization of Europe."

He doesn't believe in Christianity or want anyone else to, but apparently supports celebrating Christmas simply to annoy Muslims.

<span style='font-size: 11pt'>Breivik says he is "not an excessively religious man," brags that he is "first and foremost a man of logic,"</span> <span style='font-size: 14pt'>calls himself "economically liberal" and reveres Darwinism.</span>

But Times reporters had their "Eureka!" moment as soon as they heard Breivik used the word "Christian" someplace to identify himself. No one at the Times bothered to read Breivik's manifesto to see that he doesn't use the term the way the rest of us do. That might have interfered with the paper's obsessive Christian-bashing.

<span style='font-size: 11pt'>Other famous killers dubbed conservative Christians by the Times include Timothy McVeigh and Jared Loughner.

McVeigh was a pot-smoking atheist who said, "Science is my religion."</span>

<span style='font-size: 14pt'>Similarly, Breivik says in his manifesto that "it is essential that science take an undisputed precedence over biblical teachings"</span> –- a statement that would be incomprehensible to all the real scientists, such as Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo, Descartes, Bacon, Newton, Mendel, Pasteur, Planck, Einstein and Pauli, all of whom believed the whole purpose of science was to understand God.

<span style='font-size: 11pt'>The Tucson shooter, Jared Loughner, was lyingly described by the Times as a pro-life fanatic. Not only did more honest news outlets, such as ABC News, report exactly the opposite -- for example, how Loughner alarmed his classmates by laughing about an aborted baby in class -- but Loughner's friends described him as "left wing," "a political radical," "quite liberal" and "a pothead."</span> Another said Loughner's mother was Jewish.

The only reason Timothy McVeigh has gone down in history as a right-wing Christian and Jared Loughner has not -- despite herculean efforts by much of the mainstream media to convince us otherwise -- is that by January 2011 when Loughner went on his murder spree, conservatives had enough media outlets to reveal the truth.

As explained in the smash best-seller "Demonic: How the Liberal Mob Is Endangering America," <span style='font-size: 11pt'>the liberal rule is: Any criminal act committed by a white man with a gun is a right-wing, Christian conspiracy, whereas any criminal act committed by a nonwhite is the government violating someone's civil liberties. </span>

It's too bad Breivik wasn't a Muslim extremist open about his Jihadist views, because I hear the Army is looking for a new psychiatrist down at Fort Hood. </div></div>

HAMMER MEETS NAIL! (http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=45145)

cushioncrawler
07-28-2011, 05:33 PM
Wikileaks.
"......Dagens Næringsliv writes that Breivik sought to start a Norwegian version of the Tea Party movement in cooperation with the owners of document.no, but that they, after expressing initial interest, ultimately turned down his proposal because he did not have the contacts he promised.[70]...."

LWW
07-28-2011, 06:20 PM
And?

Stretch
07-28-2011, 08:10 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">And? </div></div>

......and from that we can conclude that the only difference between terrorists and the Tea Party is "contacts". Your welcome. St.

Gayle in MD
07-28-2011, 09:00 PM
/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif

This thread title has got to be the dumbest one yet! And for him, that's saying something!

G.

LWW
07-29-2011, 05:43 AM
This whole thing reminds me of the left's Eddie Long debacle.

He loaned his personal jet to the Obama campaign, had a long history of backing democrook candidates, and funded an Obama victory party in Atlanta ... which all become proof that he was a republican after it was found out that he was a boy buggerer.

eg8r
07-29-2011, 05:45 AM
Don't you get the humor? He paid homage to you Gayle. This thread title is chosen specifically to replicate some of the dumbest accusations you have made in many of your thread titles.

eg8r

LWW
07-29-2011, 06:00 AM
Satire is lost on bots.

Qtec
07-29-2011, 06:54 AM
Humour? More like a Freudian slip.

People like O´Rielly are saying this guy cant have been a Christian because what he did was something no real Christian would do.
The moderate Muslims around the world said the same thing about the 9-11 bombers but it didn't make any difference.


Q

Qtec
07-29-2011, 07:32 AM
Jon makes the point better than I can. Watch link (http://crooksandliars.com/john-amato/tds-destroys-oreillys-arguments-anders-)

Q

eg8r
07-29-2011, 07:41 AM
Is it a Freudian slip for LWW to mimi Gayle? I guess if you say so. The similarities were striking I will admit.

What is scary is that gayle actually believes the BS when she makes thread titles like this.

eg8r

Gayle in MD
07-29-2011, 08:10 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Is it a Freudian slip for LWW to mimi Gayle? I guess if you say so. The similarities were striking I will admit.

What is scary is that gayle actually believes the BS when she makes thread titles like this.

eg8r </div></div>

What is telling, is that here again, your prove you can't read the language, and comprehend the meaning.


From my article:

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">New YORK -- The bombing and shooting spree in Norway on Friday has raised questions about whether federal law enforcement agencies in the United States are devoting enough resources and attention to the threat posed by right-wing extremists here.

On the alert for such threats posed by white supremacists and members of a sovereign citizen movement that rejects government authority and militias, law enforcement officials around the country have reportedly asked for budget increases to handle the task.

Department of Homeland Security officials insist that the level of activity by such groups has remained consistent over the past few years and that the agency is focused on the menace posed by such groups.

"As it stands today, we have been much more focused than at any time in the last 10 years on threat posed by homegrown terrorism," a senior DHS counterterrorism official told The Huffington Post.

</div></div>

Which, is correctly representative of my thread title.

Again, you miss the point, as you usually do, then you lie about what was written in another thread.

Typical of your usual childish games...

/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif

Carry on, sonny, not that it will be anything important, or relevent.

g.

LWW
07-29-2011, 09:35 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Humour? More like a Freudian slip.

People like O´Rielly are saying this guy cant have been a Christian because what he did was something no real Christian would do.
The moderate Muslims around the world said the same thing about the 9-11 bombers but it didn't make any difference.


Q
</div></div>

The difference is that this idjit acted because he was a statist wanting to impose his will on society, as statists all do.

Radical Islamists act in the name of Allah.

eg8r
07-29-2011, 10:48 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">What is telling, is that here again, your prove you can't read the language, and comprehend the meaning.
</div></div>If that thread was your only BS titled thread you might have had a say in the discussion but given your history of BS thread titles you are out of the game. Lww played you like a fiddle.

eg8r

Gayle in MD
07-29-2011, 11:06 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">What is telling, is that here again, your prove you can't read the language, and comprehend the meaning.
</div></div>If that thread was your only BS titled thread you might have had a say in the discussion but given your history of BS thread titles you are out of the game. Lww played you like a fiddle.

eg8r </div></div>

I don't read what your friend LWW writes, I only see his absurd thread titles.

I don't write thread titles with no factual information included in the thread, that isn't indicated by the title.

Try again. You fail, over and over.

G.

LWW
07-29-2011, 11:14 AM
Did you know Charles Edward Daniels and Itzhak Perlman both named their Stradivarius "CHARLOTE" ... what's the odds?

eg8r
07-29-2011, 01:15 PM
Yeah right, which is what makes his homage to you even more hilarious. You don't even recognize the BS you post.

eg8r