PDA

View Full Version : I DENOUNCE THESE ENEMIES OF THE PEOPLE!



LWW
08-24-2011, 05:41 AM
38% APPROVE ... 54% DISAPPROVE! (http://www.gallup.com/poll/113980/Gallup-Daily-Obama-Job-Approval.aspx)

<span style='font-size: 14pt'>GALLUP ... YOU ARE AN ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE!</span>

Why can't you be like the more reasonable Rasmussen?

<span style='font-size: 14pt'>WE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN AT WAR WITH GALLUP!</span>

45% APPOVE ... 54% DIAPPROVE! (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/obama_approval_index_history)
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/var/plain/storage/images/media/obama_index_graphics/august_2011/obama_approval_index_august_23_2011/498228-1-eng-US/obama_approval_index_august_23_2011.jpg

<span style='font-size: 26pt'>TRAITORS!</span>

<span style='font-family: Comic Sans MS'><span style='font-size: 26pt'>WE HAVE EVEN LOST 24% OF THE NUTTY 25%!!!!</span></span>

CHRISTIE POLLS AHEAD OF OBAMA!!! (http://www.ibopezogby.com/)

Soflasnapper
08-25-2011, 10:56 AM
Christie 'polls' ahead of Obama if the interactive polling of Zogby is real polling, which it is not. Or rather, it is so different a kind of polling (self-selected people choosing to answer on-line), that it is the well-known 'not a scientific poll' kind of on-line polling, which has no probative value whatsoever.

As the media itself says, although still touting the results as if they meant something they admit they do not.

LWW
08-25-2011, 10:59 AM
Really?

What about it troubles you ... other than the result.

Gayle in MD
08-25-2011, 11:21 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Soflasnapper</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Christie 'polls' ahead of Obama if the interactive polling of Zogby is real polling, which it is not. Or rather, it is so different a kind of polling (self-selected people choosing to answer on-line), that it is the well-known 'not a scientific poll' kind of on-line polling, which has no probative value whatsoever.

As the media itself says, although still touting the results as if they meant something they admit they do not. </div></div>

Rassmucous polling has always been known for it's RW slant, and poll fixing.

That's a given with the informed.

G.

Soflasnapper
08-25-2011, 07:41 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Really?

What about it troubles you ... other than the result. </div></div>

You can read my concerns above. Voluntary answering on-line (in the 'interactive polling,' so-called, by Zogby himself), is not a randomized sample of the public, but a self-selected group of persons who chose to be involved.

Therefore, such a result shows nothing about the population at large in general, or the sentiment of registered voters, or likely voters, in particular.

It is essentially meaningless, as to predictive value.

LWW
08-26-2011, 03:37 AM
Why can't you ever discuss things on the merits of the truth?

What's that?

Because you don't like the results?

You prefer polls that are front loaded to assure the desired result?

But ... I already knew that.

REALITY (http://www.ibopezogby.com/services/methodologies/)