PDA

View Full Version : Repig Majority Destroys Job Growth



Gayle in MD
09-03-2011, 07:54 PM
WASHINGTON (AP) Employers added no net workers last month and the unemployment rate was unchanged, a sign that many were nervous the U.S. economy is at risk of slipping into another recession.

The Labor Department says total payrolls were unchanged in August, the weakest report in almost a year. It's the first time since February 1945 that the government has reported a net job change of zero. The unemployment rate stayed at 9.1 percent.

A strike by 45,000 Verizon workers lowered the job totals. Those workers are back on the job.

Job gains in June and July were revised lower, to show 57,000 fewer jobs added. The downward revisions were all in government jobs. The average work week also declined and hourly earnings fell by 3 cents to $23.09.


/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif

LWW
09-03-2011, 08:09 PM
Really?

What policy have they trumped an Obama veto on?

Sev
09-03-2011, 11:18 PM
So hows business toots?

eg8r
09-05-2011, 06:05 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Repig Majority Destroys Job Growth </div></div>Yes and repugnant people on the CCB make ignorant subject headings like this which they could never back up. The Dems were in charge for 4 years with absolute majority during the last two. They blew it by only creating jobs that lasted one year and all were on the taxpayers back. Failure failure failure. You guys did absolutely nothing and you had every chance possible.

The American people saw the Dem failures for what they were and decided yet again they wanted "Change". Now that you don't have a blank check any more you want to blame the group that is doing its best to slow your nonsense.

Get used to it gayle your guys were failures.

eg8r

Qtec
09-06-2011, 03:44 AM
Is 57 Senators an absolute majority ?

Usually in a Democratic system , yes. Not according to the GOP though.

Q

Gayle in MD
09-06-2011, 07:55 AM
Can't reason with sheep.

The crash happened on Bush's watch, after his boy Greenspan, a Repiglican ignored the warnings of a Democratic woman, Brooksly Born, who told them exactly what was going to happen, if they didn't stop the hidden, dark, corrupt market, and their shady goings on. Greenspan smashed her.

Repiglican policies are all about deregulation, and have been for decades.

Without Bush's "Ownership Society" and Greenspan's, laissez Faire economics, without regulatory oversight, and his attitude, that he didn't care about FRAUD in the market, and maintaining irresponsibly low interest rates, which flamed the Real Estate Bubble, the crash would never have happened.

SEC souce, when asked why they didn't come down harder on the shady dealings that led to the crash...."It would have been against the president's (ownership society) policies."

Without the Bush Tax cuts, and his mismanaged, illegal War in Iraq, the grand theft by the Bush/Cheney corporate cronies to whom they gave no bid contracts, and the Repiglican Bank check Congress's unprecedented spending and borrowing, the deficits wouldn't have made us impotent to deal with Bush's multi-level disastrous failures.

We couldn't even handle a damn hurricane, his administration was so dysfunctional.

Five former Secretaries of State, from both parties, called his invasion of Iraq, the worst foreign policy decision in history.

Our own National Security Estimate, of 16 Government Agencies, found that his War On Terror, and his torture policies, emboldened our enemies, and franchised their operations all over the world.

The most respected Economissts on both sides, stated that cutting taxes, during war time, was a disastrous mistake, even Greenspan, says the Bush tax cuts should be repealed!

The fact is the crash was a done deal, before Democrats ever took the majority. By the end of 06, the crash could not be prevented.

The right is still in denial, and illogically they think more of the same failed policies that put us into this ditch, will cure our economic problems.

Repiglican Policies, have destroyed this country, increased and enflamed our enemies, and put our country at greater risk.

Then, they turned right around and filibustered the recovery, admitting that their main goal, in the midst of the <span style='font-size: 20pt'>Bush</span> worst recession, and worst legacy ever left to a President since the great Depression, was for more political power, to make this president a one term president.

The polling numbers show that American's two lowest confidence numbers were...

number one, after katrina,

and number two, the Repiglican created Debt ceiling crises, which hurt not only our economy, but the global economy.

They are PIGS! They must be stopped!

G.

Sev
09-06-2011, 07:58 AM
OH MY.

Looks like we are heading for a double dip.

LWW
09-06-2011, 08:03 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Is 57 Senators an absolute majority ?

Usually in a Democratic system , yes. Not according to the GOP though.

Q </div></div>

The answer would be yes.

LWW
09-06-2011, 08:07 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Sev</div><div class="ubbcode-body">OH MY.

Looks like we are heading for a double dip. </div></div>

In newspeak that is known as a "DOUBLEPLUSBAD GOLDSTEINIAN EVENT!"

Did you see yesterday's "TWO MINUTES HATE" starring Komrade Hoffa?

Surely you know it's time to put dem summummabeaches down?

Or ... are you a thoughtcriminal?

eg8r
09-06-2011, 12:14 PM
Failure qtip. The number was 60 for a while if I remember correctly. Yep you guys absolutely blew it.

eg8r

LWW
09-07-2011, 02:38 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Failure qtip. The number was 60 for a while if I remember correctly. Yep you guys absolutely blew it.

eg8r </div></div>

He doesn't even understand the words he used.

50 would be an absolute majority being that VPOTUS Biden would be the tie-breaking vote.

60 is the number needed to bring a vote into being. A rule written by the democrooks.

Qtec
09-07-2011, 04:01 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Failure qtip. The number was 60 for a while if I remember correctly. </div></div>

LMFAO.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><span style='font-size: 17pt'>if I remember correctly</span> </div></div>

LMFAO again.


If<span style='font-size: 17pt'><u> I </u></span> remember correctly, <span style='font-size: 17pt'>GW is an alien cross breed.</span>


You just don't get it. DO YOU.


You seem to have this INSANE idea that every thing you utter is a fact??????????????

Q......that,s insanity.

eg8r
09-07-2011, 08:43 AM
I get the fact that your guys were absolute and utter failures. 4 years of majority, 2 years of absolute majority and all they have done is fail fail fail.

eg8r

eg8r
09-07-2011, 08:44 AM
They had the house, senate, VP and President, majority all the way yet that idiot cannot figure it out.

eg8r

Gayle in MD
09-07-2011, 08:58 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body">They had the house, senate, VP and President, majority all the way yet that idiot cannot figure it out.

eg8r </div></div>

And your gueys were the ones who created the disasters, we're trying to recover from, with twelve years of Republican control, and six of the last years, with a Repiglican President, who borrowed more than all previous administrations, combined, and put us into a trade trick bag, borrowing from a communist country, that owns us now.

The Crash happened on Bush's watch. The recession was worse than we knew originally. Much of Bush's spending, is still secret, we don't even have the tally.

Repiglicans broke the earmark record.

Bush launched two wars, and didn't pay for either of them.

The crash was a result of DEREGULATORY REPIGLICAN POLICIES, corruption on Wall St., predatory lending, all of which Bush et al, were warned about, and it was beyond saving after late 06, before the Dems won the majority, IOW&lt; completely a REpiglican creation! All under total Repiglican control, from 2001, through 2006.

Wake up Sherlock!
Wealthy sepculators, were the culprits, not average earners.
G.

eg8r
09-07-2011, 09:18 AM
So qtip acts like I was wrong, and then gayle backs me up. The Dems failed. Good job.

eg8r

Gayle in MD
09-07-2011, 09:24 AM
Another post from Ed's alternate Universe, lol.

You are as delusional as LWW, and that's pretty bad, my SHORT friend!

G.

eg8r
09-07-2011, 09:26 AM
LOL, if I am delusional that really doesn't look so great for your mental state. You have always been a step behind. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/smile.gif

eg8r

Gayle in MD
09-07-2011, 09:28 AM
You're irrelevant.

LWW
09-07-2011, 09:41 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">You're irrelevant. </div></div>

You seem to be having a hard time convincing even yourself of that.

Qtec
09-07-2011, 10:44 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body">They had the house, senate, VP and President, majority all the way yet that idiot cannot figure it out.

eg8r </div></div>

Tell me dumba$$, where do you get your info from?
The Glenn Beck Encyclopaedia?
The Rush Limbaugh Book of Facts?

To pass the ACA [ obamacare to you] the Dems needed 3 Rep votes!!!!!!!!!

Moron.

Q

LWW
09-08-2011, 02:57 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: synchronous</div><div class="ubbcode-body">They blew it by only creating jobs that lasted one year and all were on the taxpayers back. Failure failure failure. You guys did absolutely nothing and you had every chance possible. </div></div>

BTW ... welcome aboard.

LWW
09-08-2011, 03:04 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body">They had the house, senate, VP and President, majority all the way yet that idiot cannot figure it out.

eg8r </div></div>

Tell me dumba$$, where do you get your info from?
The Glenn Beck Encyclopaedia?
The Rush Limbaugh Book of Facts?

To pass the ACA [ obamacare to you] the Dems needed 3 Rep votes!!!!!!!!!

Moron.

Q
</div></div>

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The PPACA passed the Senate on December 24, 2009, by a filibuster-proof vote of 6039 with all Democrats and two Independents voting for, and all Republicans voting against. It passed the House of Representatives on March 21, 2010, by a vote of 219212, with all 178 Republicans and 34 Democrats voting against the bill. </div></div>
YOU ARE WRONG AGAIN. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act)

That's bad enough, but you are willfully wrong with a belligerent thug attitude.

Qtec
09-08-2011, 03:37 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> The PPACA passed the Senate on December 24, 2009, by a filibuster-proof vote of 6039 with all Democrats and two Independents voting for</div></div>

So, you are claiming that if ONLY DEMS had voted FOR the bill would have been passed?

link (http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/111/senate/1/59)

Another example that shows the Dems didn't have a super majority.



Q

Qtec
09-08-2011, 03:44 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Elections to the United States Senate were held on November 2, 2010, for 37 of the total of 100 seats. A special election for a 38th seat was held in Massachusetts on January 19, 2010, for a term that ends in January 2013. Thirty-four of the seats were for six-year terms to the Senate's "class three", while three (in Delaware, New York, and West Virginia) were special elections for shorter terms.

<span style='font-size: 26pt'>After the 2008 elections and their subsequent events, the United States Senate was composed of 57 Democrats, 41 Republicans, and two independents who caucus with the Democrats.</span> Of the above 37 seats up for election in 2010, 19 were held by Democrats (seven of whom retired or were defeated in the primary) and 18 were held by Republicans (eight of whom retired or were defeated in the primary)</div></div>

Q

LWW
09-08-2011, 03:46 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> The PPACA passed the Senate on December 24, 2009, by a filibuster-proof vote of 6039 with all Democrats and two Independents voting for</div></div>

So, you are claiming that if ONLY DEMS had voted FOR the bill would have been passed?

Q </div></div>

Not at all.

I'm claiming that when you said that 3 R's voted for the bill, you were wrong. As usual.

Once I pointed that out, you ask us to believe that this wasn't your point at all. As usual.

In the end ... you made yourself look like a buffoon. As usual.

Qtec
09-08-2011, 03:54 AM
here is the vote (http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/111/senate/1/59)

My bad, but the point is the same. egor claims the dems had a super majority and that they could have passed any legislation they want. Its BS.

Q

LWW
09-08-2011, 04:08 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> here is the vote (http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/111/senate/1/59)

My bad, but the point is the same. egor claims the dems had a super majority and that they could have passed any legislation they want. Its BS.

Q </div></div>

Wrong again.

That wasn't the vote.

THIS (http://www.opencongress.org/vote/2009/s/396) was the vote.

Qtec
09-08-2011, 04:17 AM
That was <u>A</u> vote.

Why are you so evasive and just like a GOP/TP nutjob AFRAID to answer a Q honestly?

Q

LWW
09-08-2011, 04:23 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body">That was <u>A</u> vote.

Why are you so evasive and just like a GOP/TP nutjob AFRAID to answer a Q honestly?

Q </div></div>
THIS (http://animal.discovery.com/convergence/ugly_dog/poll/poll.html) was also A vote.

What was your point ... other than a lame attempt to hide the fact that you have again made a fool of yourself

LWW
09-08-2011, 04:25 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Another example that shows the Dems didn't have a super majority.



Q </div></div>

Then how did they get the bill passed without a single R vote?

Qtec
09-08-2011, 05:30 AM
You seem to know. You tell me.

Q

Qtec
09-08-2011, 05:35 AM
Did they?

link (http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/111/senate/1/59)
Q

LWW
09-08-2011, 06:15 AM
Why do you continue to link to what wasn't the vote and ignore what was?

Qtec
09-08-2011, 06:32 AM
Why do you continue to ignore reality?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Why do you continue to link to what wasn't the vote and ignore what was? </div></div>

The ACA needed 60 votes, JUST to get a vote.

Q

eg8r
09-08-2011, 07:22 AM
They got the HC bill through, if they really stood behind anything they could have passed it. Nope they sat around and did nothing because the only thing they have done well was blame others for their failures.

eg8r

LWW
09-08-2011, 03:32 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Why do you continue to ignore reality?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Why do you continue to link to what wasn't the vote and ignore what was? </div></div>

The ACA needed 60 votes, JUST to get a vote.

Q </div></div>

I find it hard to believe that even you are this incredibly stupid.

The vote you have linked to was not ... let this sink in through the cement to to the pea sized proto-brain that the regime allows you to possess ... was not the vote for OBAMACARE as you falsely claim.

What you have linked to is the vote on the PORKULUS bill.

Now, I realize that you are simply an Obamatron who believes that all things which spring from the regime are equally awesome ... but these are two distinctly different votes on two issues.

Gayle in MD
09-14-2011, 09:30 AM
We must destroy Repiglican Fascism before it's too late!