View Full Version : Hero and dunce.
09-05-2011, 11:31 PM
Unemployment Just Before World War 2 9-23-9
As today's economic crisis continues, it would be useful to look at just how well, or badly, Hitler and Nazi Germany handled the world depression in the 1930's. The following chart appears in Burton Folsom's excellent new book: Raw Deal or New Deal? on page 243.
The chart speaks for itself. One can see that in 1932, the year before Hitler and Roosevelt came to power, Germany's unemployment rate was at 30.1% and America's was at only 24.9%. But within just five years, Germany's unemployment rate was reduced to only 4.6% (1937) and dropped even further to only 2.1% a year later.
By contrast, FDR in 1937 still had an unemployment rate of 13.2% in 1937 which actually rose to 19.8% a year later. Hitler was the clear, unmatched winner in terms of economic management.
No doubt, the fiendish Nazis must have been in league with the devil himself to pull off this economic miracle which is unmatched in all of human history.
America was and still is a vast country with vast resources whereas Germany was a small country with coal as its only resource.
Germany had been defeated in a terrible war which America won and to whom the world was deeply in debt financially. Germany was the target of a worldwide Jewish economic boycott with no gold reserves whereas America had plenty of everything.
Can America bring itself to ever admit that it might learn something, anything at all, from the Nazis to deal with the mess America is in in today? Of course, not!
The "holocaust" will continue to blind America to real economic solutions and so, indirectly, it will continue to pay a monumental price for the holocaust mytho-mania which it has embraced. The Jews will run America--and they will run the country even deeper into the ground than they already have.
There is some real poetic justice there.
Friedrich Paul Berg
09-05-2011, 11:41 PM
Highest Since Weimar Era
By Tony Paterson in Berlin
The Sunday Telegraph - UK
Accusations of a mismanaged economy piling up against Chancellor Gerhard Schroder were compounded last week by an official admission that the figures for the number of people unemployed in Germany - four million, itself a post-war record - were at least half a million short of their true figure.
The federal labour office in Nuremberg disclosed that an average of 500,000 German unemployed took part in state-subsidised retraining programmes each year, but although they were without a job, they were not counted in the official tally of four million unemployed, 9.4 per cent of the population eligible for work.
"It is not government policy to include those unemployed who are enrolled in retraining programmes in the monthly jobless figures," a spokesman told The Telegraph.
The 500,000-plus unemployed on state-run retraining schemes come on top of about 800,000 jobless Germans on social security who have officially dropped out of the labour market, and tens of thousands of older workers who have been given early retirement.
Because none of these groups features in the monthly unemployment record, the true number of German jobless has been estimated as nudging 15 per cent or six million people - the "nightmare" figure associated with the country's pre-Nazi Weimar era of the 1920s and early 1930s.
Government massaging of unemployment statistics has become a permanent feature in Germany, but it is the first time that the labour office has admitted the real figure.
The practice was introduced by the former Chancellor, Helmut Kohl, to conceal the true extent of unemployment resulting from reunification. It has continued despite suspicions that the job retraining system is little more than a bureaucratic scam.
Auditors found earlier this year that 70 per cent of the 3.8 million so-called "job placements" made by the Federal Labour Office in 2001 had simply been reshuffled into job creation schemes and had not found real work at all.
Reform of the labour market is one of the main goals of Chancellor Schroder's Red-Green coalition government, which pledged to halve unemployment during its first term, and which was narrowly re-elected on a wafer-thin majority two months ago.
Details concerning the massaging of unemployment statistics came on the heels of revelations of an alarming fall in tax revenues, leading to predictions that Germany's budget deficit is set to rise by £20 billion this year.
The European Commission has already announced plans to impose sanctions on Germany for breaching its budget deficit targets which are part of the monetary union stability pact.
Mr Schroder's beleaguered finance minister, Hans Eichel, said that he expected Germany to be in breach of the EU deficit target again in 2003 and admitted that unemployment was projected to rise by 100,000 to well over four million by early next year.
At the same time he has been forced to reduce Germany's growth target to 0.2 per cent for this year. The government's response has been to break its pre-election promises by imposing a swathe of new taxes that are expected to cost German companies an extra £11 billion next year.
A 15 per cent tax is to be levied on the sale of shares and rented property, and cuts in government subsidies to prospective home owners are expected to bring a serious downturn in the German construction industry.
A parliamentary commission is to investigate whether the government lied about the state of the economy earlier this year to get re-elected. Meanwhile, the leaders of Mr Schroder's Social Democrat party in two German states have announced that they will boycott the government's tax plans.
The Social Democrats have seen their popularity drop by 10 per cent since the country's general election in September while the Chancellor's popularity rating has slumped to an all-time low.
Two months ago he was rated as the country's second most popular politician. He has now dropped to seventh place and become the object of derision in a CD entitled The Tax Song, which mocks his legislation and tops the German charts.
Public fury has spilled into the streets of Berlin with demonstrations by health workers, teachers, builders and lorry drivers. Last week, the mass circulation Bild newspaper covered its front page in photographs of angry readers under the headline: "We've had enough".
"Schroder does not want to make the urgently needed reforms," commented Germany's liberal Der Spiegel magazine last week. "His friends are no longer the bosses but trade union functionaries."
09-05-2011, 11:48 PM
Polish Firebrand Praises
Hitler's Early Policies
By Katarzyna Mala
WARSAW (Reuters) - Polish firebrand Andrzej Lepper, whose nationalist Self-Defence party tops popularity rankings, has been quoted as saying he believes Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler's early policies were good.
"At the beginning of his activities, Hitler had a really good programme," Lepper told the Zycie Warszawy newspaper. "I don't know what happened to him later...who had such influence over him that he moved towards genocide."
Lepper's growing popularity is part of a wider backlash in future European Union members from central Europe against years of tough market reforms and government sleaze.
His nationalist, anti-establishment views also fit into a wider phenomenon of support for far-right politicians in western Europe such as Austria's Joerg Haider or France's Jean-Marie Le Pen, both of whom scored electoral successes in the last decade.
Haider also once praised Hitler's "enviable" record in job creation.
Lepper's remarks are bound to stir controversy in Poland, a country which Nazi Germany invaded in 1939, unleashing World War Two. Five million Polish citizens, including over three million Jews, were killed by the Nazis.
Asked to confirm the remarks, Lepper said the newspaper had manipulated his comments. "All I said concerning Hitler is that, yes, he eliminated unemployment," Lepper told Reuters on Wednesday. "Hitler was the biggest criminal and murderer in history."
The newspaper played a tape recording of the interview to Reuters including the quoted remarks.
ONE IN THREE
Surveys show one in three Poles could vote for Lepper in the next parliamentary elections, which are due next year but could be brought forward as the current leftist coalition struggles to reconstruct its government.
Unpopular Prime Minister Leszek Miller will step down on May 2, a day after Poland joins the EU. His designated successor Marek Belka has yet to assemble a parliamentary majority.
Some Polish commentators have drawn parallels between Hitler's tactics on his way to power and Lepper's.
Like Hitler, who scorned Germany's feeble Weimar Republic, Lepper uses fiery rhetoric to attack the mainstream parties and the shortcomings of Poland's young democracy.
He opposes Poland's EU membership, wants more state intervention in the economy and advocates strong presidential powers such as those enjoyed by Russia's Vladimir Putin.
His popularity is fuelled by promises to slash the country's high unemployment, running at about 20 percent, by launching wide-scale public works.
Hitler launched huge infrastructure projects including building Germany's autobahn network and the armaments industry after he seized power in 1933.
Copyright © 2004 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
09-05-2011, 11:56 PM
The Good Society?
By Matt Koehl
The following is a transcript of a presentation by Matt Koehl to students of a senior Political Science class at a high school in Worthington, Ohio, on January 11, 2005...
I want to thank you for giving me this opportunity to discuss with you a few ideas, which I hope will prove both stimulating and challenging.
This morning I would like to talk about the good society. More specifically, I would like to discuss the economic and social aspects of a good society.
What should these be? What are the signs of such a society? Let's take a look...
Among other things in such a society, we would want a stable and prosperous economy, one with full employment and living wages. We would want affordable housing, whether in the purchasing or renting of a home. We would want a system of health care accessible to everyone, regardless of economic circumstance. We would want generous provision for disability, maturnity leave and retirement. We would want free access to college education and vocational training for any qualified applicant. We would want a healthy farming community, one which favors small family farms over large agribusiness conglomerates.
We would want the kind of public safety where one didn't have to live in gated communities to feel secure, and where one could walk down the street of any city at any time, day or night-without fear of being mugged, assaulted, or worse. We would want rigorous protection of the environment under a regime that is more concerned about the condition of our forests, our earth, our air and our waters than about corporate profit and pollution.
These are some the things we would want - for every citizen of our good society.
Today, we have NONE of these things. Why? Do these expectations of a good society sound unreasonable, or utopian?
I say to you that they are not - as is proven by the fact that there once was a society which had all of these things and more.
This society first came to my attention when I had the opportunity to meet and talk to people who had the privilege of living in such a society. In talking about their experience, they invariably described it as the happiest and most memorable time of their lives, and they looked back upon it with deepest fondness.
The society I am talking about was none other than - Pre WWII National Socialist Germany under Adolf Hitler.
I would like to take a few moments to describe and summarize some of the social and economic achievements of this remarkable society. In so doing, I think it will help to explain why the people I have just mentioned felt the way they did.
* * *
But first, we have to go back and consider the condition of Germany following the First World War.
There was mass starvation in the land. There was a vindictive peace treaty-the Treaty of Versailles-which imposed humongous reparations on the German people and caused great suffering. There was runaway inflation, and money became worthless. People were actually living in hovels and going hungry.
After that came the Great Depression, in which 7 million Germans were thrown out of work and the economy collapsed.
UNEMPLOYMENT & THE ECONOMY
Then Hitler came to power in 1933. Immediately he set about turning things around. His first challenge was that of unemployment, as well as that of restoring Germany's ruined agriculture.
The problem was aggravated by the fact that the German economy was bankrupt. It didn't have gold reserves. It had no foreign credit. At the same time, it was suffering under the burden of crushing reparations payments. It seemed like situation impossible.
But that didn't stop Hitler.
"Okay," he said. "We don't have gold. But we do have workers willing to work. They will be our gold."
He then came up with a very simple solution to put it all together. He launched a program of public works: flood control, repairing public buildings and private residences and constructing new ones, building roads, bridges, canals, port facilities, but most notably the famous Autobahn-the first extensive superhighway system in the world. In so doing, he was able to put millions back to work.
How did he pay for it all? The treasury was broke. Foreign bankers wouldn't give him any credit.
What he did was simply go around the international banks and create his own banking system, based-not on the gold standard or some other superfluous metal-but on the productivity of the German worker himself: He introduced the work standard.
Here's how it worked. The projected cost of the various public works programs was fixed at $1 billion Reichsmarks. An exact number of non-inflationary bills of exchange, called Labor Treasury Certificates, were then issued against that cost.
The workers were then paid; and with their new purchasing power, they began to spend their earnings in shops and businesses across the country, which in turn enabled these to create more jobs and hire more people.
With this as a stimulus, the German economy gradually took off. Within two years, the core unemployment problem was licked, and the country was back on its feet. And all of this with a solid, stable currency and no debt or inflation.
Meanwhile, by comparison, the economies of the United States, England and the other Western countries remained stagnant, with millions out of work and living on the dole. Not until these countries started to crank up their war industries were they able to solve their unemployment problem.
At the same time that Hitler was reviving Germany's economy and putting millions back to work, he was also able to restore his country's crippled foreign trade. Denied foreign credit and faced with an economic boycott in England and America, Hitler came up with a very simple but ingenious device: the barter system, in which equipment and commodities were exchanged directly with foreign countries, circumventing the international banks.
For example, if Germany had manufactured goods which Argentina wanted, and Argentina had grain or beef which Germany wanted, the two countries would simply draw up a contract and swap- without recourse to an international middleman. He was cut out of the deal completely. Again, this system of direct exchange occurred without debt or trade deficit-something which upset some people.
In a word, what Hitler did was smash the prevailing finance- capitalist system of debt and usury-which, as we now know, was a primary cause of World War II.
By making a moral distinction between productive capital and speculative capital, Hitler set himself on a collision course with those international financial interests, whose ox he had gored and whose very existence as parasites was now threatened by the success of the National Socialist model. They were prepared to do anything-indeed, drag the entire world into war-to maintain their parasitic existence and not allow other countries to follow the National Socialist example.
But that's another story for another time. I won't get into it here.
This, then, was the economic miracle which made all of Hitler's other social programs possible, some of which I have already touched on.
* * *
I mentioned the restoration of the German farming community as a high priority of the National Socialist government.
This was more than a matter of mere economics. In National Socialist thinking, a nation can prosper only if it has a sound rural population. The traditional family farm is regarded as of prime importance, because it concerns a way of life whose moral and spiritual values are vital to the health and well-being of society as a whole.
During the hard times in Germany before Hitler, many farmes saw their lives ruined by falling commodity prices, exorbitant interest payments, and foreclosure to unscrupulous Jewish land speculators. One can image the desperation of these farmers, as they saw the loss of their farms-many of which had been in the family for hundreds of years-and they, too, were now forced to join the ranks of the unemployed.
Hitler was determined to put an end to this misery and injustice. Not only were these farms restored to their rightful owners, but at the same time they were made productive and self-sustaining.
And so Hitler created what was called the National Food Estate, a public corporation which included not only the farmer himself, but everyone else connected with the production, processing and distribution of food: the canners, the millers, the bakers and middlemen, as well as the local grocer.
The Food Estate guaranteed the farmer a market for his product at a reasonable fixed price-high enough to cover his costs of production and prepare for the next harvest season, but low enough, so the customer could always count on a fair price.
By adjusting supply to consumer demand and allowing for individual initiative and competition, but excluding speculation in commodities, the food corporation was able to create a stable market, which assured a dependable supply of food, upon which all parties-producer and consumer-could rely.
* * *
Concerning the worker, Adolf Hitler himself had at one time been a common day laborer, and he understood well the problems of the ordinary workingman.
He considered man to be more than a disposable economic unit. He believed in the idea of the whole person, as a productive and creative member of his people; that he should have meaningful work and job security; and that he should be treated with dignity and respect-and not be downsized, for example, and handed a pink slip as a Christmas present!
He believed that work should not be a drudge but rather a creative effort, a source of fulfillment and personal pride, and that the dignity and honor of every workingman and woman should be respected.
Accordingly, one of the first things he did after coming to power was to order a clean-up of German factories. Drab, dreary plant yards and coal piles were replaced with parks, swimming pools and other amenities designed to humanize surroundings by providing a bright, clean, cheerful environment, with plenty of sunshine and fresh air.
One innovation introduced under National Socialism as part of its efforts on behalf of working people was the KdF, the so-called Strength Through Joy program.
The idea behind this program was that those who worked hard and produced should be rewarded, not only with a decent salary, but also with special amenities that make life more pleasant and allow one to recharge one's batteries.
Under this program, ordinary workingmen and their families were given special access to the arts, culture, popular entertainment and sport. Above all, they were given the opportunity to travel, not only around their own country but to other places as well. They could go on free, two-week, overseas cruises, while in Germany itself they could take a lengthy holiday for just 2 marks a day, including travel, meals and lodging.
As someone who believed fervently in the laws of Nature, Hitler introduced the first comprehensive measures to protect the environment, including so-called scrubbers to eliminate pollution emissions from coal-burning plants.
His critics said it could't be done. But Hitler said, "Do it"-and it was done!
Hitler also ordered affordable housing, especially for young married couples. Neat, sturdy houses, with garden space around them, were built, which they could then purchase for 600-1,000 RM at no interest and minuscule monthly payments.
The best part was that a quarter of the mortgage was canceled with the birth of each child, so that after their fourth child a couple would be home free! How's that for child- and family-friendly?
Older homes and apartments were refurbished and upgraded, and there were no slums, such as we see in America's inner cities.
No German had to worry about the expense of getting sick or injured. Under National Socialism there was universal health care at no cost. No weaseling, chiseling HMOs. No welching under the government of Adolf Hitler, which made the health and well-being of its citizens a top priority!
German hospitals offered the finest care and had the most modern equipment, surpassing even that in the United States. Patients had a right to choose their own doctor and hospital, and even the poorest were assured full medical treatment. They could stay up to one year in the hospital-with a special allowance of pocket money! If they were still on the sick list after that, they could remain indefinitely with public health funds.
The same went for retirement. German's citizens didn't have to worry about a Social Security system going broke or their retirement accounts disappearing.
College education was free for all qualified applicants, regardless of financial circumstance or family background. The same applied to vocational and technical schools. Students didn't have to worry about tuition or loan repayments. Those things were unknown in Hitler's Germany.
In National Socialist Germany there was never concern about public safety and rampant crime, such as we have today in America. One could walk the streets of any German city or town any time, day or night, without fear of being knocked in the head, killed or raped.
And, I might add, the number of police per capita in what some have described as a "police state" was but a small fraction of what we see in America today!
* * *
This, then, is a brief snapshot of a society which we today come nowhere close to matching, but one which stands as a model for what a well-run, progressive and orderly society should look like.
In coming years, as you face the challenges of an increasingly sick and dysfunctional society, I sincerely hope that you will pause from time to time to think about the way a good and decent society should function, as shown by this timeless example.
For a rare glimpse of this extraordinary society, see Stanley McClatchie's Look to Germany, the 248-page album with 300 vivid photographs, in which the author presents his first-hand observations of the miracle that was Pre-World War II National Socialist Germany. See what life was really like under Hitler.
We also recommend The Truth in Money Book, the clear-cut, easy-to-understand, no-nonsense, 262-page analysis by engineers Theodore Thoren and Richard Warner, amply illustrated with charts and graphs, in which the authors cut through all the myths and mumbo-jumbo about money and present a plan-similar to Hitler's-for dealing with the inevitable crisis posed by an unsustainable economic system based on smoke and mirrors and counterfeiting by the Federal Reserve and other institutions of High Finance.
The cost of Look to Germany is $34 postage paid. That of The Truth in Money Book is $19 postage paid. Both titles are available from: NS Publications, Box 188, Ottawa Lake MI 49267. Please note - You may save $4 by ordering both books for just $49.
Matt Koehl's article, "The Good Society," which appeared on your site this evening is a tremendously powerful, eye-opening piece. A must read for every brain-dead American. Thank you.
From Althea Morgan
Thanks for posting this highly-informative piece of history. It's a lot easier to understand how and why the German people supported Hitler now. It's a shame it is so hard to study history in an honest and open fashion.
From Douglas Yates
Matt Koehl is living in a fantasyland. Pushing this half-baked history at high school students without the benefit of an alternative perspective is irresponsible. Visit http://www.john-loftus.com/ or the site listed below the following quote for an unvarnished and highly accurate rendition of how the Third Reich built banking and industrial partnerships with major western corporations.
"To Germans burdened by reparations payments to the victors of World War I, and threatened by hyperinflation, political chaos, and a possible Communist takeover, Hitler, frenzied yet magnetic, offered scapegoats and solutions. To the economically depressed he promised to despoil Jew financiers, to workers he promised security. He gained the financial support of bankers and industrialists with his virulent anti-Communism and promises to control trade unionism."
09-05-2011, 11:56 PM
From Tom Marchetti
There is a fascinating book that is well worth your time. It is titled 'Into The Darkness' and written by Lothrop Stoddard in 1940. Here is an Amazon review of it...
A Perceptive Book -- Must Read
Twentieth-century America's most perceptive, influential, and prophetic writer on race -- Lothrop Stoddard -- spent four months in late 1939-early 1940 covering National Socialist Germany, as its leaders and its people girded for total war. Stoddard criss-crossed the Third Reich to observe nearly every aspect of its political, social, economic, and military life, and he talked with men and women from all walks of life, from Adolf Hitler, Heinrich Himmler, and Joseph Goebbels to taxi drivers and chambermaids. The result -- Into the Darkness -- is not only a classic of World War II reportage, but a unique evaluation of Germany's National Socialist experiment.
For Stoddard was no ordinary journalist. A Harvard Ph.D in history, the author of The Rising Tide of Color and other works that played a key role in the enactment of America's 1924 immigration act, fluent in German and deeply versed in European politics and culture, Stoddard brought to Into the Darkness a sophistication and a sympathy impossible for William Shirer and a myriad of other journalistic hacks. To be sure, the New England Yankee Stoddard was no supporter of the Hitler dictatorship, but he was deeply interested in National Socialist policies, above all in the social and the racial sphere. Reading Into the Darkness brings you to hearings before a German eugenics court, to an ancestral farm in Westphalia, to the headquarters of the National Labor Service, to German markets, factories, medical clinics, and welfare offices, as keenly observed and analyzed by Stoddard.
You'll read, too, of Stoddard's conversations with German policy makers in all fields: Hans F. K. Guenther and Fritz Lenz on race and eugenics; Walther Darré on agriculture; Robert Ley on labor; Gertrud Scholz-Klink on women in the Third Reich; General Alexander Löhr on the Luftwaffe's Polish campaign, as well as Hitler, Himmler, Goebbels and many other leaders. And you'll travel with Stoddard to Slovakia, where he interviews Monsignor Tiso, the national leader later put to death by the Communists, and to Hungary, where the Magyars, still at peace, gaze apprehensively at Soviet Russia.
Into the Darkness (so named from the mandatory air-defense blackout that Stoddard found so vexing) shines a torch of sanity and truth against the vituperation of all things National Socialist that has been practically obligatory for the past sixty years. Knowledgeable, urbane, skeptical, and above all fair, Stoddard's book is a unique, an indispensable historical document, a time capsule for truth, and a stimulating page-turner for everyone interested in the Third Reich and the German people.
From Erik D. Hilsinger
Pretty timely to have all the pro-Hitler hoo-ha in time for the second inauguration. Unfortunately people have not yet realized whose foot is in the boot up their ass. The collusion of industry and government with the willing help of organized religion has never satisfied anyone for very long, and certainly not anyone with a concept of democracy. Just watch how the religious right will fracture when state-run religious policies are more frequently enacted. It will be like medieval Europe. And can you imagine how great it will be when the last of the family farmers band together to overthrow ADM, Cargill, Monsanto, and the other agribusiness players who depend on taking over family farms, turning out the people, and basically share cropping the land to people who don't own anything, just run the equipment? And, of course, drink the toxic runoff and breathe the malodorous whiffs of industrial feedlots.
I'm more interested in how Katrina Leung, REpublican activist and Chinese spy as well as sometime lover of the FBI agent tasked with investigating Al Gore's fundraising, managed to get off so lightly, as did Mr. FBI apparently. Maybe Prescott Bush got them a deal in exchange for say, a Navy spy plane and discount US Dollar debt?
09-06-2011, 12:10 AM
The German economy continued to improve and as unemployment fell, so did the support for extremist political parties such as the NSDAP. In the General Election held in May, 1928, the Nazi Party won only 14 seats, while the left-wing parties, theGerman Social Democrat Party (153) and the German Communist Party (54) still continued to grow in popularity.
The fortunes of the NSDAP changed with the Wall Street Crash in October 1929. Desperate for capital, the United States began to recall loans from Europe. One of the consequences of this was a rapid increase in unemployment. Germany, whose economy relied heavily on investment from the United States, suffered more than any other country in Europe.
Before the crash, 1.25 million people were unemployed in Germany. By the end of 1930 the figure had reached nearly 4 million. Even those in work suffered as many were only working part-time. With the drop in demand for labour, wages also fell and those with full-time work had to survive on lower incomes. Hitler, who was considered a fool in 1928 when he predicted economic disaster, was now seen in a different light. People began to say that if he was clever enough to predict the depression maybe he also knew how to solve it.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: cushioncrawler</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Friedrich Paul Berg </div></div>
Using holocaust deniers as sources?
Mac, I commend you. You stand alone on the left in publicly embracing your love of Hitler's economic agenda. The rest do so either in the silence of deceit or the silence of ignorance.
09-06-2011, 04:01 AM
Yes i did see one awfull holocaust denial article in there somewhere and it might hav been berg's.
The strange thing iz that az far az i know hitler's germany had a shortage of labour, allmost straight away, ie overemployment, yet krappynomicysts keep kumming up with at best very low unemployment figures for hitler's germany, lies.
And then on top of that krappynomicysts say that hitler's success woz due to military spending, which shows that krappynomicysts dont hav the wit to realize that had hitler spent on farm and industrial machinery and infrastructure the german economy would hav absolutely skyrocketed and gone into orbit.
And keynes iz treated for a while az a genius koz he wrote some suppozedly brilliant suppozedly novel thinking in 1936, when at the same time hitler, who sayd that he (hitler) didnt know anything about economix, had allready performed miracles.
09-06-2011, 04:32 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: synchronous</div><div class="ubbcode-body">nice information thank that you have aware of these stuff.</div></div>I hav had zero schooling in economix. I remember getting a loan of an economix book by samuelson (a student of keynes) from my uncle (the youngest ever direktor on the board of heinz) in 1970 and reading it in bed.
Nowadays i am amazed at the komplikated rubbish that iz taught. To me economix iz eezy. Most ideas can be analyzed by starting with 2 simple questions.
1..... Duzz plan XX inkreec the size of the cake, or not.
2..... Duzz plan XX affekt the slicing of the cake, and how.
But krappynomix iz full of financial dogma, allmost all of it true but wrong. Some dogma iz equivalent to kutting a virgin's heart out and offering it to the gods, so that the sun will continue to rize, and so that the rains will come -- no great harm dunn here. But most iz harmfull, some iz poizonous.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.