PDA

View Full Version : The Freedom Party wants more control.



Qtec
10-09-2011, 05:06 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Fri Oct 07, 2011 at 03:30 PM PDT
<span style='font-size: 17pt'>Republican political leaders want to prevent you from using birth control </span>


Yes, the so-called pro-life movement and the politicians sucking oxygen off of it is not about abortion, <span style='font-size: 14pt'>it's about controlling women.</span> Here's another raft of <span style='font-size: 17pt'>old, white, Republican men </span>fighting the idea that contraception is a critical component of women's health, couching their opposition as "religious freedom," of course.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">In the letter, the Senators wrote that they are concerned "with the lack of due consideration given by [Sebelius] and your Department to the adverse impact that IOM's recommendations would have on our core constitutional value of religious liberty." The Senators added that "[t]hough the IFRs' 'religious exemption' purports to protect religious organizations, health care professionals, and health care plans, it is clear that this protection falls well short of securing this constitutional right." </div></div> </div></div>

Secretary Sebelius nailed the effort in her response.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">"They don't just want to go after the last 18 months, <span style='font-size: 14pt'>they want to roll back the last 50 years in progress women have made in comprehensive healthcare in America,</span>" Sebelius said of the mandate's opponents at an NARAL Pro-Choice America luncheon. "We've come a long way in women's health over the last few decades, <u>but we are in a war."</u>

Sebelius said the regulations are necessary, <span style='font-size: 14pt'>considering that insurance companies had previously categorized <u>"Viagra an essential medication and birth control a lifestyle choice."</u> </span></div></div>

LOL.




Q........ link (http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/10/07/1024005/-Republican-political-leaders-want-to-prevent-you-from-using-birth%C2%A0control?via=blog_1)

LWW
10-09-2011, 06:12 AM
Oh you poor poor thing ... you don't have the slightest understanding of the issue do you.

Qtec
10-09-2011, 06:54 AM
So, once again, the drive by -one liner- troll burps and thinks its somehow significant.



Q

Gayle in MD
10-09-2011, 07:03 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Fri Oct 07, 2011 at 03:30 PM PDT
<span style='font-size: 17pt'>Republican political leaders want to prevent you from using birth control </span>


Yes, the so-called pro-life movement and the politicians sucking oxygen off of it is not about abortion, <span style='font-size: 14pt'>it's about controlling women.</span> Here's another raft of <span style='font-size: 17pt'>old, white, Republican men </span>fighting the idea that contraception is a critical component of women's health, couching their opposition as "religious freedom," of course.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">In the letter, the Senators wrote that they are concerned "with the lack of due consideration given by [Sebelius] and your Department to the adverse impact that IOM's recommendations would have on our core constitutional value of religious liberty." The Senators added that "[t]hough the IFRs' 'religious exemption' purports to protect religious organizations, health care professionals, and health care plans, it is clear that this protection falls well short of securing this constitutional right." </div></div> </div></div>

Secretary Sebelius nailed the effort in her response.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">"They don't just want to go after the last 18 months, <span style='font-size: 14pt'>they want to roll back the last 50 years in progress women have made in comprehensive healthcare in America,</span>" Sebelius said of the mandate's opponents at an NARAL Pro-Choice America luncheon. "We've come a long way in women's health over the last few decades, <u>but we are in a war."</u>

Sebelius said the regulations are necessary, <span style='font-size: 14pt'>considering that insurance companies had previously categorized <u>"Viagra an essential medication and birth control a lifestyle choice."</u> </span></div></div>

LOL.




Q........ link (http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/10/07/1024005/-Republican-political-leaders-want-to-prevent-you-from-using-birth%C2%A0control?via=blog_1) </div></div>

As I have been saying for decades, Repiglicans are misogynists, and most religious organizations are, as well.

Religion is where it all started.

Organized Religion has prosecuted more inhumane treatment, violent actions and and overall discrimination and dictatorial behavior, than any other phenomenon known to man, IMO.

Repiglicans are misogynistic, homophobic idiots.

The Radical Religious Fundamentalist in this country are as ignorant as the Taliban....

Love, Honor that's fine, but <span style='font-size: 14pt'>OBEY????</span>

What a crock!

Misogyny runs rampant in organized religion, AND in the Repiglican Party.
G.

Gayle in MD
10-09-2011, 07:09 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So, once again, the drive by -one liner- troll burps and thinks its somehow significant.



Q </div></div>

A total nincompoop!