PDA

View Full Version : Socialism vs Capitalism explained ...



LWW
10-18-2011, 02:57 PM
It's really that simple. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=angbZB2WeMQ)

cushioncrawler
10-19-2011, 08:56 AM
Marx would hav been reasonably happy with theusofa today. Marx would hav been overjoyed with fascizm, especially Hitler's fascizm. Funny that -- Hitler came to power koz he woz anti-Marxist.
mac.

ugotda7
10-19-2011, 02:25 PM
Bump for the resident useful idiots.

Qtec
10-20-2011, 03:45 AM
Typical load of crap from you. Reagan goes from Marxism to Socialism in one sentence, as if today's Democrats are all Marxists!

Your hero,

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">1962: Reagan Warns that Medicare Will Lead to Socialism, Destruction of American Democracy' </div></div>

bought and paid for (http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a1962reaganama)

Q

LWW
10-20-2011, 03:50 AM
So far he's been right.

Thanks for making my point.

Again.

Qtec
10-20-2011, 03:58 AM
Tha American way.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> AMERICAN Wesley Warren Jr has told how he needs a <span style='font-size: 14pt'>$1million operation</span> to remove his SEVEN STONE testicles.

The 47-year-old has suffered in silence with the enormous growth on his scrotum but is now pleading for help so he can get life-changing surgery.

His testicles have grown so large that he cannot wear jeans or trousers anymore and lives on a diet of antibiotics and medications.

Instead Wesley, from Las Vegas, US, has to wear a hoodie - placing his legs in the arms and using the hood to support the growth.

Wesley said: "It's not easy to get around, it makes me stay in most of the time."

But he refuses to let his unfortunate condition get him down, according to the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

He added: "I want to have real friends and a relationship with a woman.


Surgeons said Wesley - who is 6ft tall and weighed 21stone before the growth took hold - would need a seven figure operation to correct the problem <span style='font-size: 26pt'>but that his medical insurance would not cover it. </span> </div></div>

poor guy (http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3879480/Man-with-giant-testicles-needs-1million-op.html)


Q

LWW
10-20-2011, 05:11 AM
His medical insurance is the government owned and operated MEDICAID ... thanks for proving how grossly inefficient and black hearted state ran medicine can be.

<span style='font-family: Arial Black'><span style="color: #000099"><span style='font-size: 26pt'><u>BRAVO!</u></span></span></span>

eg8r
10-20-2011, 07:52 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">1962: Reagan Warns that Medicare Will Lead to Socialism, Destruction of American Democracy' </div></div>Sounds like he was on to something. Medicare is one of our top 4 biggest expenditures leading this country into the massive amounts of debt we are currently seeing. If we dropped all funding for Medicare this country would be in an incredibly better financial standing. Understand this would not be good for those firmly entrenched in this handout, but as far as the Government balance sheet it would be an incredible boost.

eg8r

Qtec
10-20-2011, 05:59 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Medicare is one of our top 4 biggest expenditures leading this country into the massive amounts of debt we are currently seeing. </div></div>

That's because you have a FOR PROFIT HC. Doctors in the USA earn DOUBLE than their nearest competitors. Everything costs double than anywhere else. Plus,....

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Over half of all insured Americans are taking prescribed medicine regularly for chronic health problems, according to a recent study. <span style='font-size: 14pt'>Americans are by far the largest consumers of medicine in the world</span> </div></div>

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">For Dworkin, the proof is in the statistics. According to a government study, antidepressants have become the most commonly prescribed drugs in the United States. They're prescribed more than drugs to treat high blood pressure, high cholesterol, asthma, or headaches. CNN's Elizabeth Cohen discusses the CDC study on antidepressants

In its study, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention looked at 2.4 billion drugs prescribed in visits to doctors and hospitals in 2005. Of those, 118 million were for antidepressants.

High blood pressure drugs were the next most-common with 113 million prescriptions.

The use of antidepressants and other psychotropic drugs -- those that affect brain chemistry -- has skyrocketed over the last decade.

Adult use of antidepressants almost tripled between the periods 1988-1994 and 1999-2000.

Between 1995 and 2002, the most recent year for which statistics are available, the use of these drugs rose 48 percent, the CDC reported. </div></div>

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Drugging the children in America: 84 percent of ADHD kids put on medication

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/030334_ADHD_psychotropic_drugs.html#ixzz1bMxy0O47
</div></div>

read this (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/8618424.stm)

You can watch the Docu here.. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-yjo8OkpUIg)



Q

eg8r
10-20-2011, 06:49 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">. Americans are by far the largest consumers of medicine in the world </div></div>Yep, I believe the ratio is quite high. Lot of dumb people out there taking drugs for everything under the sun. While I was on my cruise a few weeks ago we went to Belize. The stupid people on the cruise ship were buying as much Viagra as they could because it was only $3/pill. Dumb people are always removed of their money first.

eg8r

Qtec
10-21-2011, 04:58 AM
Watch the docu. Its quite informative.

Q

LWW
10-22-2011, 07:54 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: cushioncrawler</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Hitler came to power koz he woz anti-Marxist.
mac. </div></div>

Not quite true.

Hitler opposed the Marxists simply because they were a different political party, and thereby a threat.

Ideologically Marx and Hitler were soul mates.

cushioncrawler
10-22-2011, 03:33 PM
Google iz komplikated. Hitler thort and sayd and wrote different things at different periods. And the official Nazi Party ideologys had lots of different sub-party beleefs, at different periods, mainly to appeal to the poor, early on. The Nazis were suppozedly very socialist early on but not so much later on. Hitler i think hated the idea of true Marxizm. Stalin did.
mac.

Qtec
10-23-2011, 04:14 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Hitler thort and sayd and wrote different things at different periods.</div></div>

So he went with the flow?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Hitler i think hated the idea of true Marxizm. Stalin did.
mac. </div></div>

You have said all along that labels don't mean anything but you use them yourself!

Even true Marxists could argue on the <span style='font-size: 14pt'>'true meaning of true Marxism!'</span>

According to who, Trotsky, Lenin, Stalin.?




Q

LWW
10-23-2011, 04:46 AM
Perhaps, but in the end the result of Marxism is tyranny.

LWW
10-23-2011, 04:58 AM
http://texasscribbler.com/images/Marx_Brothers_1931.jpg

These are the only Marxists I could ever support.

Soflasnapper
10-24-2011, 08:45 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">1962: Reagan Warns that Medicare Will Lead to Socialism, Destruction of American Democracy' </div></div>Sounds like he was on to something. Medicare is one of our top 4 biggest expenditures leading this country into the massive amounts of debt we are currently seeing. If we dropped all funding for Medicare this country would be in an incredibly better financial standing. Understand this would not be good for those firmly entrenched in this handout, but as far as the Government balance sheet it would be an incredible boost.

eg8r </div></div>

Ending Medicare would save the government a ton of money at first. However, it would put so many people into such hugely increased expenses, that it would first greatly harm the pocketbooks of citizens through vastly increased costs to them, and then probably cost the government a lot of money, as the cries would mount about the human death toll such a decision would cause. And then, as always, the people would demand that 'the government do something.'

eg8r
10-24-2011, 01:19 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">However, it would put so many people into such hugely increased expenses, that it would first greatly harm the pocketbooks of citizens through vastly increased costs to them, and then probably cost the government a lot of money, as the cries would mount about the human death toll such a decision would cause.</div></div>The sky is falling, the sky is falling...

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">And then, as always, the people would demand that 'the government do something.</div></div>It is a shame the greedy free handout crowd is not seeing medicare for what it is, a money pit, and demanding 'the government do something' right now. Medicare cuts are badly needed but then we have alarmists like the nutcase lefties on this board that think budget cuts can only mean the worst will happen and everyone will start dying.

eg8r

cushioncrawler
10-24-2011, 03:20 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Hitler thort and sayd and wrote different things at different periods.</div></div><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So he went with the flow?</div></div><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Hitler i think hated the idea of true Marxizm. Stalin did. mac.</div></div><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body">You have said all along that labels don't mean anything but you use them yourself! Even true Marxists could argue on the <span style='font-size: 14pt'>'true meaning of true Marxism!'</span> According to who, Trotsky, Lenin, Stalin.? Q</div></div>Mussolini and Hitler certainly went with the flow -- they turned 180dg on lots of things, if it helped.

I cut labels off most of my stuff. I hate the way they uze lasers to kut labels, leevs prickly edges -- even az i write i hav an urge to skratch an itch on the back of my neck.
mac.