PDA

View Full Version : ALL WHO OPPOSE DEAR LEADER MIST BE DESTROYED!



LWW
10-22-2011, 08:05 AM
The leftist hate machine marches on:

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Manuel Roig-Franzia is a reporter for the Washington Post who once got punched by his 70 year old editor, Henry Allen, for writing “the second worst story [Allen had] seen in Style in 43 years.” That’s right, Roig-Franzia wrote a horrible piece in the Style section. His 70 year old editor did not like it. Roig-Franzia reportedly called his 70 year old editor and Marine a “c**ksucker”, and the Marine punched him.

Manuel Roig-Franzia has a well documented history of being an apologist for the Cuban communist regime and a hater of the Catholic church. He is also now writing a book on Marco Rubio.

We can get a sense of the book by his stunning hit job on Marco Rubio in the Washington Post.. Roig-Franzia claims Rubio has embellished his “compelling version of his family’s history that had special resonance in South Florida.” Again, keep in mind that Roig-Franzia is an apologist for the Cuban communist regime.

Roig-Franzia writes, “a review of documents — including naturalization papers and other official records — reveals that the Florida Republican’s account embellishes the facts. The documents show that Rubio’s parents came to the United States and were admitted for permanent residence more than 21 / 2 years before Castro’s forces overthrew the Cuban government and took power on New Year’s Day 1959.”

Now, there are two problems for Roig-Franzia. First, the communist apologist failed to actually quote Marco Rubio embellishing his story. The Miami Herald really destroys the piece.

The Washington Post just released this interesting story headlined “Marco Rubio’s compelling family story embellishes facts, documents show.” The paper flagged a clear inaccuracy in his official Senate biography that states the Senator’s parents “came to America following Fidel Castro’s takeover.”

That’s false. Rubio’s parents came to the US before then, in 1956. They remained in the US after Castro took over in 1959. They returned to Cuba for brief stints early on, before the country devolved into Soviet-style totalitarianism.

But the top of the story suggests Rubio himself has given this “dramatatic account:” that “he was the son of exiles, he told audiences, Cuban Americans forced off their beloved island after ‘a thug,’ Fidel Castro, took power.”

However, the story doesn’t cite one speech where Rubio actually said that.

To back up the lead, the Washington Post excerpts from a 2006 address in the Florida House where Rubio said “in January of 1959 a thug named Fidel Castro took power in Cuba and countless Cubans were forced to flee… Today your children and grandchildren are the secretary of commerce of the United States and multiple members of Congress…and soon, even speaker of the Florida House.”

The catch: If you listen to the speech, Rubio isn’t just talking about those who specifically fled Cuba after Castro took power. He doesn’t say that his parents fled Cuba. Instead, he was talking about “a community of exiles.” That is: He was talking about all the Cubans who live in Mia

What’s more, Manuel Roig-Franzia does not say how he came to know these facts about Marco Rubio. But Gabriel Malor knows.

Rubio has been hounded since he rose to prominence by birthers intent on sabotaging any further rise he might have in politics. Malor notes, “Birthers intent on somehow proving that he’s not a “natural-born citizen” dug up his parents’ adjustment and naturalization paperwork. That’s where WaPo got the dates for his parents’ arrival to the United States.”

That’s right boys and girls. Manuel Roig-Franzia, who was once punched by a 70 year old for atrocious writing in a freaking style section, uses a Birther originated attack to discredit Marco Rubio and can’t even offer up a quote from Rubio.

And you know what? Even if he could offer up a quote, does it matter? How many of you know the full and accurate story of your parents and grandparents? </div></div>

THE STATE RUN MEDIA SLIME MACHINE STRIKES AGAIN! (http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=47026)

Stretch
10-22-2011, 09:35 AM
Mist be? St.

LWW
10-22-2011, 10:02 AM
Such a scathing rebuttal.

Stretch
10-22-2011, 02:45 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Such a scathing rebuttal.

</div></div>

You're not worth it. St.

hondo
10-23-2011, 07:26 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Such a scathing rebuttal.

</div></div>


Nahhh ... his D game is sufficient to deal with the wingnut trolls of this forum. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/laugh.gif

LWW
10-23-2011, 11:05 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Stretch</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Such a scathing rebuttal.

</div></div>

You're not worth it. St. </div></div>

Probably true in your case, because a true intellectual match up between would likely leave you quivering on the floor as the victim of a brain aneurysm,

LWW
10-23-2011, 11:09 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: hondo</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Such a scathing rebuttal.

</div></div>


Nahhh ... his D game is sufficient to deal with the wingnut trolls of this forum. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/laugh.gif </div></div>

Sometimes my D- game ... you, of all members, have learned that the hard way many times.

Tell me the one again about how the McCarthy hearings of the 1950's led to the HUAC hearings of the 1940's.

Don't leave out the part about how you saw McCarthy chair the HOUSE hearings ... even though he was never a member of the house and years from being a senator ... live on TV before WV even had a TV station and you hadn't been born yet.

That one's a knee slapper brother man.

hondo
10-23-2011, 11:58 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: hondo</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Such a scathing rebuttal.

</div></div>


Nahhh ... his D game is sufficient to deal with the wingnut trolls of this forum. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/laugh.gif </div></div>

Sometimes my D- game ... you, of all members, have learned that the hard way many times.

Tell me the one again about how the McCarthy hearings of the 1950's led to the HUAC hearings of the 1940's.

Don't leave out the part about how you saw McCarthy chair the HOUSE hearings ... even though he was never a member of the house and years from being a senator ... live on TV before WV even had a TV station and you hadn't been born yet.

That one's a knee slapper brother man. </div></div>

Nope. Not gonna do it. You have asked the same question time and again and I have answered each time. You simply ignore my answer , wait 2 months, and start again.
You are intellectually dis-honest. This is your whole life.
You must win.
Not going to play your game. Sorry.

It was nice to read on AZ that you actually came out of your house the other day and took some pictures.
Plus, I was shocked to learn that you actually knew one of the protesters.
Get out more often, little dubbie. I worry about you.

cushioncrawler
10-23-2011, 03:25 PM
joachim1
10/23/2011 3:36 PM UTC+1100It should be noted that the Cubans who fled Castro at, and shortly following the New Year's Eve capitulation to Castro, were in league with the Batista regime, one of the most corrupt ever in the endlessly corrupt Caribbean Islands. Batista, who stole billions, and subjected the vast majority of Cubans to abject poverty, was on the Mafia's payroll, the CIA's payroll and on the payroll of multiple US corporations who siphoned money out of Cuba. The Castro revolution had a cause, and that was the ...See Moreutter subjugation of the Cuban people for power and money. Castro liberated Cuba, and it was America's choice to ignore him and ignore the corruption, leaving Castro no choice but to turn to the Communists for support.

Rubio could have fashioned a very convincing and heroic story that his family turned its back on the vile Batista, but with Americans so ill informed as to what really happened there, he chose to fashion his family story with the anti-Castro Cuban faction that financially raped their people while Batista was in power. Shame on him and all like him. See Less
User ID:http://washingtonpost.com/zlH/krmK0sAeat7qrEtYX3rE7VgS76krNWZjM5N3fM%2B%2B%2Bfrl KkwhFQ%3D%3D/

cushioncrawler
10-23-2011, 03:26 PM
The supposed flight of Rubio’s parents has been at the core of the young senator’s political identity, both before and after his stunning tea-party-propelled victory in last year’s Senate election. Rubio — now considered a prospective 2012 Republican vice presidential candidate and a possible future presidential contender — mentions his parents in the second sentence of the official biography on his Senate Web site. It says that Mario and Oriales Rubio “came to America following Fidel Castro’s takeover.” And the 40-year-old senator with the boyish smile and prom-king good looks has drawn on the power of that claim to entrance audiences captivated by the rhetorical skills of one of the more dynamic stump speakers in modern American politics.

hondo
10-23-2011, 03:37 PM
CC, I was told the same account in the mid 70s by a Chicano militant from L.A. named Alfredo Hernandez.
He also talked about how outraged the U.S. was that Castro confiscated Joe Kennedy and Meyer Lansky's casinos in Havana.
America withdrew support, Castro turned to Russia for help, and the rest is history.
I personally believe that Castro was a vicious sumbitch , but, nonetheless, Americans don't know the whole story.

Stretch
10-23-2011, 04:07 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Stretch</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Such a scathing rebuttal.

</div></div>

You're not worth it. St. </div></div>

Probably true in your case, because a true intellectual match up between would likely leave you quivering on the floor as the victim of a brain aneurysm,
</div></div>

All you have is cartoons, quips, and one liners delivered in your usuall condescending bait laced BS. The only thing you have is a juvenile compulsion to get the last word, which (in your tortured mind)equates to a victory. Proove me wrong.....but intellectual? LMFAO whatever looser. St.

hondo
10-23-2011, 04:24 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Stretch</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Stretch</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Such a scathing rebuttal.

</div></div>

You're not worth it. St. </div></div>

Probably true in your case, because a true intellectual match up between would likely leave you quivering on the floor as the victim of a brain aneurysm,
</div></div>

All you have is cartoons, quips, and one liners delivered in your usuall condescending bait laced BS. The only thing you have is a juvenile compulsion to get the last word, which (in your tortured mind)equates to a victory. Proove me wrong.....but intellectual? LMFAO whatever looser. St. </div></div>

You have to admit, dubbie, everything Stretch says here is true.

LWW
10-24-2011, 04:16 AM
Still stalking me I see.

LWW
10-24-2011, 05:59 AM
I threw you a bone and gave you the attention you crave on AZB.

Happy Halloween.

Soflasnapper
10-24-2011, 08:51 AM
In back channel negotiations with Castro, JFK had his representative tell Castro that his famous mid-revolution communique stated genuine grievances of the people of Cuba against Batista, and that he (JFK) agreed with the stated bill of particulars of that indictment. JFK also had his representative say that of all peoples abused and oppressed across the world, the Cubans under Batista had the worst oppression and abuse of them all.

Soflasnapper
10-24-2011, 09:49 AM
JFK repeated this openly to a reporter:

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> "I believe that there is no country in the world including any and all the countries under colonial domination, where economic colonization, humiliation and exploitation were worse than in Cuba, in part owing to my country’s policies during the Batista regime. I approved the proclamation which Fidel Castro made in the Sierra Maestra, when he justifiably called for justice and especially yearned to rid Cuba of corruption. I will even go further: to some extent it is as though Batista was the incarnation of a number of sins on the part of the United States. Now we shall have to pay for those sins. In the matter of the Batista regime, I am in agreement with the first Cuban revolutionaries. That is perfectly clear."

— U.S. President John F. Kennedy, interview with Jean Daniel, 24 October 1963[8]
</div></div>

LWW
10-24-2011, 01:34 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Soflasnapper</div><div class="ubbcode-body">JFK repeated this openly to a reporter:

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> " ... I approved the proclamation which Fidel Castro made in the Sierra Maestra, when he justifiably called for justice and especially yearned to rid Cuba of corruption ... "

— U.S. President John F. Kennedy, interview with Jean Daniel, 24 October 1963[8]
</div></div>

</div></div>

How'd that work out?

Soflasnapper
10-24-2011, 07:04 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Soflasnapper</div><div class="ubbcode-body">JFK repeated this openly to a reporter:

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> " ... I approved the proclamation which Fidel Castro made in the Sierra Maestra, when he justifiably called for justice and especially yearned to rid Cuba of corruption ... "

— U.S. President John F. Kennedy, interview with Jean Daniel, 24 October 1963[8]
</div></div>


</div></div>

How'd that work out? </div></div>

Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.
John F. Kennedy, In a speech at the White House, 1962

LWW
10-26-2011, 01:21 AM
Are you actually implying that Che and Fidel attempted a peaceful revolution?

Soflasnapper
10-26-2011, 09:40 AM
A fairer reading would take that to imply that BATISTA (BATISTA), prevented a peaceful revolution, and got Fidel and Che as a result.