PDA

View Full Version : Pipeline Delay



llotter
11-15-2011, 06:01 PM
Is it possible that The Moron's decision to delay/kill the Keystone XL pipeline was in order to reward another big contributor? An alternative to using a pipeline to transport the oil is to use rail and Warren Buffet is a real Johnny on the Spot with his recent purchase of the BNSF railway. With so much money rolling in to Buffet, he would certainly have no problem transferring some of it into The Moron's Swiss bank account(s).

Gayle in MD
11-15-2011, 11:47 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: llotter</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Is it possible that The Moron's decision to delay/kill the Keystone XL pipeline was in order to reward another big contributor? An alternative to using a pipeline to transport the oil is to use rail and Warren Buffet is a real Johnny on the Spot with his recent purchase of the BNSF railway. With so much money rolling in to Buffet, he would certainly have no problem transferring some of it into The Moron's Swiss bank account(s). </div></div>

No, It isn't possible. In fact, It's incredibly stupid to even make such a suggestion.

This pipeline would be an ecological disaster.

We are fortunate to have a president who is pushing for further investigations into the environmental impact.

We already have faucet water flaming up all over this country, contaminated water and entire areas where farming is no long possible, and wells are destroyed for futuer use....all thanks to Bush.

People and animals, dying with cancer, due to the fracking chemicals that are poisoning all of us.

Scientific reports of vast ecological destruction that will be caused by this pipeline are chilling.

G.

Qtec
11-16-2011, 02:37 AM
Yeah, I think you are on to something here. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif

Q

LWW
11-16-2011, 05:17 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">No, It isn't possible. In fact, It's incredibly stupid to even make such a suggestion.

This pipeline would be an ecological disaster.

G. </div></div>

How could you possibly know this when countless pipelines exist which aren't?

How can this be your opinion when the pipeline will be built anyway, except now towards the Pacific where it will aid the Chinese economy?

What's that?

You know this because it was prophesied by dear leader?

Imagine that.

Tool.

Qtec
11-16-2011, 05:57 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">How can this be your opinion when the pipeline will be built anyway, <u>except now towards the Pacific where it will aid the Chinese economy?</u> </div></div>

You obviously know ZERO about this.

The whole point of the pipeline is to bring this toxic sludge to the refineries in Texas and then export it to Europe.

http://kytx.images.worldnow.com/images/16009293_BG2.jpg

Q

Gayle in MD
11-16-2011, 06:28 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">How can this be your opinion when the pipeline will be built anyway, <u>except now towards the Pacific where it will aid the Chinese economy?</u> </div></div>

You obviously know ZERO about this.

The whole point of the pipeline is to bring this toxic sludge to the refineries in Texas and then export it to Europe.

http://kytx.images.worldnow.com/images/16009293_BG2.jpg

Q

</div></div>

Supporters of The Stupid Party, have no clue about anything at all. Just a glance at their presidential contenders, proves it.







G.

Soflasnapper
11-16-2011, 11:18 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: llotter</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Is it possible that The Moron's decision to delay/kill the Keystone XL pipeline was in order to reward another big contributor? An alternative to using a pipeline to transport the oil is to use rail and Warren Buffet is a real Johnny on the Spot with his recent purchase of the BNSF railway. With so much money rolling in to Buffet, he would certainly have no problem transferring some of it into The Moron's Swiss bank account(s). </div></div>

In some sense, most anything is possible, however unlikely.

However, in this case, there is a ready explanation that makes far more sense, which is that Obama is playing to his base, where most environmentalists are. More than likely he will eventually approve this project in some form (as the tool of big business he is), but he doesn't want it depressing the environmentalist part of the base for the election.

And he may well truly believe the environmentalists' concern and warning, that to extract and burn this tied-for-first or second largest store of hydrocarbons known on the planet (next to the giant Saudi field) will destroy any chance of leveling off the temperature rise already baked in the cake, to below a 3 degree rise in average temperature.

Gayle in MD
11-17-2011, 08:34 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Soflasnapper</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: llotter</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Is it possible that The Moron's decision to delay/kill the Keystone XL pipeline was in order to reward another big contributor? An alternative to using a pipeline to transport the oil is to use rail and Warren Buffet is a real Johnny on the Spot with his recent purchase of the BNSF railway. With so much money rolling in to Buffet, he would certainly have no problem transferring some of it into The Moron's Swiss bank account(s). </div></div>

In some sense, most anything is possible, however unlikely.

However, in this case, there is a ready explanation that makes far more sense, which is that Obama is playing to his base, where most environmentalists are. More than likely he will eventually approve this project in some form (as the tool of big business he is), but he doesn't want it depressing the environmentalist part of the base for the election.

And he may well truly believe the environmentalists' concern and warning, that to extract and burn this tied-for-first or second largest store of hydrocarbons known on the planet (next to the giant Saudi field) will destroy any chance of leveling off the temperature rise already baked in the cake, to below a 3 degree rise in average temperature. </div></div>



<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">And he may well truly believe the environmentalists' concern and warning, that to extract and burn this tied-for-first or second largest store of hydrocarbons known on the planet (next to the giant Saudi field) will destroy any chance of leveling off the temperature rise already baked in the cake, to below a 3 degree rise in average temperature. </div></div>

I believe that if the president is re-elected you will see the most impressive environmental protections under Presidential mandate that we have ever seen in our history.

There is no question that it would be silly for him to even begin to try to protect the environment, until his second term. Hence, he is delaying what would be an ecological disaster.

Likewise, as regards toughening up on Wall St. crooks. We will see much more of that in his second term, as well.

G.

LWW
11-17-2011, 09:12 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">How can this be your opinion when the pipeline will be built anyway, <u>except now towards the Pacific where it will aid the Chinese economy?</u> </div></div>

You obviously know ZERO about this.

The whole point of the pipeline is to bring this toxic sludge to the refineries in Texas and then export it to Europe.

http://kytx.images.worldnow.com/images/16009293_BG2.jpg

Q

</div></div>

Are you completely stupid.

With that pipeline blocked, which an Obama 2012 win would assure, do you think the Canadians will eat the oil?

No. They will march the pipeline west and ship to China.

LWW
11-17-2011, 09:14 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I believe that if the president is re-elected you will see the most impressive environmental protections under Presidential mandate that we have ever seen in our history.

There is no question that it would be silly for him to even begin to try to protect the environment, until his second term. Hence, he is delaying what would be an ecological disaster.

Likewise, as regards toughening up on Wall St. crooks. We will see much more of that in his second term, as well.

G. </div></div>

So there we have it ... Charlotte confesses that dear leader puts winning in 2012 above the needs of the people, even in her warped POV as to what is good for the people.

Once again ... keep a leftist talking and they will eventually expose their evil side.

eg8r
11-17-2011, 10:10 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I believe that if the president is re-elected you will see the most impressive environmental protections under Presidential mandate that we have ever seen in our history.
</div></div>Hey qtip, be aware...gayle is forcasting major increases in government regulation.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">There is no question that it would be silly for him to even begin to try to protect the environment, until his second term.</div></div>I think it is silly for anyone to even begin to think he could protect the environment. Considering his track record protecting jobs and the unemployed, I won't be holding my breath.

eg8r

Gayle in MD
11-17-2011, 12:43 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I believe that if the president is re-elected you will see the most impressive environmental protections under Presidential mandate that we have ever seen in our history.
</div></div>Hey qtip, be aware...gayle is forcasting major increases in government regulation.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">There is no question that it would be silly for him to even begin to try to protect the environment, until his second term.</div></div>I think it is silly for anyone to even begin to think he could protect the environment. Considering his track record protecting jobs and the unemployed, I won't be holding my breath.

eg8r </div></div>



<span style="color: #990000"> More of your RW bull****. The Democrats and the president, protected the unemployed.

The jobs losses were a result of twelve years of Repiglican control of the House, and eight years of Bush slanted tax policies, spending, borrowing, looking the other way as the banks and financial institutes, and regulating and ratings agencies, all in concert, ignored the growing Real Estate Bubble.

Our current circumstances are due to Repiglican policies....all of them....wake TFU!

George Bush left this country on the brink of disaster. President Obama, prevented the Bush Depression. Those are the facts.

Repiglicans just make themselves look more and more stupid, yapping about spending, after they spent us into a debt ditch. Blaming the Dems, after they created a Real Estate Bubble, and Repiglican Greenspan chose to ignor it, AND the fraud on Wall Street, and enflamed the growing threats, with his irrationally low interests rates, all for the Bush Ownership Society, and for Greenspans proven idiotic Trickle Down Bull****! The Repiglican Bull**** about the Free Market, is a proven lie and failure. The markets must be regulated, or the crooks steal from all of us.

Repiglicans had twelve years of control. They caused this mess. Now they want to blame the man who inherited their mess, when the enntire globe is fighting against the global ponzi scheme, which war born right here on Wall St., under George Bush, and failed Repiglican policies.

No wonder even conservative journalists are calling people like you and your Party, The Party Of The Stupid!




G. </span>

eg8r
11-17-2011, 06:21 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">More of your RW bull****. The Democrats and the president, protected the unemployed.
</div></div>Yep they made sure the early UE were not lonely and continue to increase the number of UE. No wonder his approval ratings are in the 40s. With friends like you why should the UE every worry about having a job again.

eg8r

Gayle in MD
11-17-2011, 06:46 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">More of your RW bull****. The Democrats and the president, protected the unemployed.
</div></div>Yep they made sure the early UE were not lonely and continue to increase the number of UE. No wonder his approval ratings are in the 40s. With friends like you why should the UE every worry about having a job again.

eg8r </div></div>


No wonder even conservative journalists are calling people like you and your Party, The Party Of The Stupid!



G.