PDA

View Full Version : Outrageous Race-Based Attack On Obama



Qtec
12-24-2011, 09:23 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Fox Celebrates Holidays With Outrageous Race-Based Attack On Obama

December 23, 2011 12:26 am ET by Solange Uwimana

Fox News' animosity toward President Obama, three years into his presidency, is by now well-known. This is the network that routinely calls Obama a socialist, accuses him of being involved in all sorts of conspiratorial plots, and claims that he hates America. But, as witnessed Thursday on Hannity, Fox's attacks have taken an increasingly racially charged tone: Brent Bozell, who runs the factually challenged outfit of conservative misinformation known as the Media Research Center, likened Obama to "a skinny, ghetto crackhead."

Bozell appeared on Hannity as part of the show's weekly "Media Mash" segment to talk about purported mainstream media failings. After listening to a clip of MSNBC host Chris Matthews saying that Newt Gingrich "looks like a car bomber," Bozell responded:</div></div>


<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">BOZELL: How long do you think Sean Hannity's show would last if four times in one sentence, he made a comment about, say, the President of the United States, and said <span style='font-size: 14pt'>that he looked like a skinny, ghetto crackhead?</span> <span style='font-size: 17pt'><span style="color: #990000">Which, by the way, you might want to say that Barack Obama does.</span></span> Everybody on the left would come forward and demand he be fired within five minutes for being so insulting towards a leader of the United States. </div></div>

must be true, its on Fox (http://mediamatters.org/blog/201112230001?frontpage)

Fair and Balanced. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif

Q

Soflasnapper
12-24-2011, 10:31 AM
I disagree on this one. There was no attack, but a comparison that was drawn. The closest to an attack there was, was that Bozell said that attack line was somewhat true, in so many words.

Bozell's over-riding point-- that Chris Matthews uses intemperate language and vile imagery to attack people in politics-- happens to be accurate. Bozell apparently didn't mind when it was Al Gore who was Matthews' target in the 2000 race, but Matthews was brutal, and should have been permanently taken off the air for it, if I were of a more censorial mindset. Disgraceful then, but now, because his employers have a more-Dem-friendly business model, he attacks the other side, and the Dems smile in delight.

Well it was bad before, and it's still bad. I hold no brief for Gingrich, obviously, but there is enough to say about him that 'he looks like a car bomber' is not appropriate, and is rather, way out of bounds.

Qtec
12-25-2011, 05:11 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Soflasnapper</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

Well it was bad before, and it's still bad. I hold no brief for Gingrich, obviously, but there is enough to say about him that 'he looks like a car bomber' is not appropriate, and is rather, way out of bounds. </div></div>

He did go on to say,

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">You know this car bomber reference is very clear to me, Matthews said. I have this notion of a guy. <u>Its not a car bomber,</u> but this guy,[ Newt ] its kind of like he loves the attack. Its kind of like he gets a thrill, Clarence, from going for the opponents midsection and hitting him so hard and getting delight in the attack itself.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2011/03/02/new-to.../#ixzz1hXfarzRF (http://dailycaller.com/2011/03/02/new-tone-chris-matthews-on-newt-gingrich-he-looks-like-a-car-bomber/#ixzz1hXfarzRF)
</div></div>


It was more of a joke than an insult. OTOH,

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">and said that he looked like a skinny, ghetto crackhead? <u>Which, by the way, you might want to say that Barack Obama does.</u> </div></div>

No joke here.

I agree, two wrongs don't make a right and both sides are guilty, but Bozell could have used a less racially tinged example. He choose not to because that,s really what he believes.

Q

Soflasnapper
12-25-2011, 04:05 PM
You are right-- Matthews immediately put it differently after kind of stepping in it (h/t to Perry!), whereas Bozell went there secondly with more apparent consideration, and was not joking.

So there's a difference that makes Matthews' transgression a bit less bad, and of course, Bozell does not have his own show to get booted from, either.

I will continue to agree with Bozell that Matthews' comments would normally see anyone else required to apologize profusely, and/or be fired, if it was a different person, and a different target. Matthews, despite his poor ratings, is some kind of golden boy in MSNBC's management team's eye, for unknown reasons. Back in the day, I understood that Jack Welch was his patron (GE owned NBC owned MSNBC), but now that Welch is gone, I really don't understand his grasp on his job.

eg8r
12-25-2011, 09:48 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Brent Bozell, who runs the factually challenged outfit of conservative misinformation known as the Media Research Center, likened Obama to "a skinny, ghetto crackhead."
</div></div>If he said this, then it shows the man has as little decency as gayle.

Where were you when gayle was calling him a crackhead?

I am not condoning this name calling of the POTUS but let's just use gayle's level of decency to see if Bozelle's adjectives fit...Is Obama skinny? Yes. Are there ghetto parts of Chicago? Yes. (close enough for gayle when she is arguing nitpicky points against a Rep) Does Obama have any history doing even the remote amount of cocaine? Gayle told us YES! YES! YES!

Based on that, gayle and Bozell are two peas in a pod.

eg8r

eg8r
12-25-2011, 09:50 PM
The same things have been said about Eminem but no one thought it was "racially tinged". The only people who argue this are race baiters, plain and simple.

Again you prove sofla is the level-headed Dem on the board and you can only look up from very far below.

eg8r

LWW
12-27-2011, 02:58 AM
So what do you say about the numerous accounts that Obama did in fact buy and use crack, in combination with his free admission to using cocaine?

LWW
12-29-2011, 05:14 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So what do you say about the numerous accounts that Obama did in fact buy and use crack, in combination with his free admission to using cocaine? </div></div>

Bump for snoopy ... there is much in the media about Obama allegedly using crack, including his admission of cocaine use, yet you run silent went this is brought to your attention.

Why?

LWW
12-29-2011, 05:20 AM
How about this quote attibuted to Obama by rapper KRS-One:

<span style='font-size: 11pt'>"I was a crack head. My wife got me off crack."</span>

Qtec
12-29-2011, 05:41 AM
Even you, a partisan nutjob fanatic, should realise, after the 1,000 times I've told you, you should provide proof when you claim an utterance from some RW radio hack is true.

Q

LWW
12-29-2011, 06:09 AM
I can't help it ... I just love to make you dance.

&gt;&gt;&gt;CLICK THIS LINE SNOOPY, IT IS A LINK&lt;&lt;&lt; (http://www.byroncrawford.com/2007/05/was_barack_obam.html)

Now, be careful, it was a b;lack man who claimed this ... and by your own definition, if you disagree that proves you to be a racist. Just ask your mammy.

eg8r
12-29-2011, 09:14 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Even you, a partisan nutjob fanatic, should realise, after the 1,000 times I've told you, you should provide proof when you claim an utterance from some RW radio hack is true.
</div></div>Why do you require this of others but don't hold yourself to the same requirements?

eg8r

LWW
12-30-2011, 02:15 AM
Bump for snoopy ... we have numerous people attesting to Obama admitting to being a crack head and to buying crack.

Why are you running away from this?

By your standards of judgement against Cain and others, the man simply must be guilty.

LWW
12-30-2011, 02:16 AM
I had the linkj the whole time ... I simply love making him expose himself as a hypocrite.

Qtec
12-30-2011, 02:40 AM
Did you read his link? Eh.......no.

Q

LWW
12-30-2011, 02:46 AM
I posted the link you insufferable nit.

Now, what is your excuse for not believing the rapper's story?

Or, not believing Larry Sinclair's story since your prior standards of judgement have been that simply an accusation is enough to convict Limbaugh, Hannity, Coulter, Bush, Cain, Reagan, Gingrich and a host of thousands more?

Qtec
12-30-2011, 02:47 AM
What a plonker you really are.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">We are now moving into a time where it's not, "Oh, I don't know. I don't know about that history. That didn't influence me. I'm a young man from off the farm in the South, I'm not a big city slinger." No, Barak Obama was like "no, I was a crack head. My wife got me off crack." <span style='font-size: 17pt'>You know he was in the hood.</span> No doubt. </div></div>

He wasn't implying that Obama REALLY was a crackhead dummy. He was making the point that he did not just 'come off the farm' [ ignorant/not streetwise ] but that he was 'in the hood'. ie he was aware of the problems of living 'in the hood' and all the drug problems that exist.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Chicago community organizer and Harvard Law School

Two years after graduating, Obama was hired in Chicago as director of the Developing Communities Project (DCP), a church-based community organization originally comprising eight Catholic parishes in Greater Roseland (Roseland, West Pullman and Riverdale) <u>on Chicago's far South Side</u>. He worked there as a community organizer from June 1985 to May 1988.[29][30] During his three years as the DCP's director, its staff grew from one to thirteen. He helped set up a job training program, a college preparatory tutoring program, and a tenants' rights organization in Altgeld Gardens.[31] Obama also worked as a consultant and instructor for the Gamaliel Foundation, a community organizing institute </div></div>

Q

LWW
12-30-2011, 02:59 AM
You truly are clueless.

Obama was in the hood.

Fess up ... either you are a racist and a homophobe for not believing the tales of a black man and a gay, or you are a hypocrite who judges solely on political/ideological orientation.

You painted yourself into the corner my friend.

Qtec
12-30-2011, 04:19 AM
LMFAO............ /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif

You are a nutjob, or at least someone who can play the part down to a fine art.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">You truly are clueless. <span style="color: #990000">OPINION not based on fact.</span>

Obama was in the hood.<span style="color: #990000"> FACT.</span>

Fess up ... either you are a racist and a homophobe <u>for not believing the tales of a black man and a gay,</u> </div></div>

LOL. So, according to you, I should believe everything a black man or a gay person says????????

<u>You are insane.</u>





Q...

LWW
12-30-2011, 04:59 AM
Not at all ... according to you that is what you should do.

Your contention, along with the rest of the cabal, has always been that all opposition to dear leader has been because he was black.

So, by your own ideology, opposing a black man's beliefs is prima facie evidence of racism ... then you are admitting you must be a racist by not believing this black man's story.

That, or you are admitting to being a hypocrite who judges truth by whatever the party tells you that your "OPINION" is.

This is where you dance in circles, unable to know what it is that you "THINK" until the next spoon comes around.

Soflasnapper
12-30-2011, 01:03 PM
Bizarre and entirely self-discrediting. Nicely done!

But we all already know this about you and your own dysfunctional mode of reasoning. Almost as if you had yourself suffered from cocaine abuse damage of brain functions.

But humor me by answering this question, if you will, please:

Who do you think agrees with your 'reasoning' here? Do you think there is an audience here or somewhere who finds such poor reasoning convincing, and who agree with you?

Or do you realize this is your solipsistic special needs world, that all people can easily see is a cry for help from yourself, and that all disagree with you, that even if no man is an island, he might still be a peninsula, or archipelago?

LWW
12-30-2011, 02:22 PM
How do you get it without ever getting it.

I don't agree with the reasoning I described.

That being said, it is the standards which the cabal have demanded be used in the past.

All I'm asking them to do is have the testicular/ovarian fortitude to judge both sides by a single standard.

eg8r
12-30-2011, 11:54 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">He wasn't implying that Obama REALLY was a crackhead dummy</div></div>Gayle did, why didn't you have a problem with her saying it?

eg8r

LWW
12-31-2011, 02:44 AM
Why hasn't he released his medical records?

What's he got to hide?

Gayle in MD
01-02-2012, 09:28 PM
I never called president Obama a cokehead. You never can keep anything straight, annd you are famouse for misquoting what others have written, or twisting it beyond any recognition.

I called Dick Cheney a dickhead, and I still call him that, because that's precisely what he is, in fact, he's worse than a dickhead, he's a traitor, according to Bush forty-one, who said that anyone who exposed the identity of a covert CIA Agent, was a traitor to their country, which means that his own son, and his top White House aides, including Karl Rove, and Scooter Libby, are traitors.

Now, Mark Halperin said of President Obama, "He acted like a dick" after the president had made a remark, which wasn't off color, or insulting at all, IMO.

Halperin said it on Joe Scarlorough's program, and Halperin is still on there most mornings. In fact, he's a fixture on Joe Scarborough's show.

Dick Cheney told a United States Senator, to go F. himself, right on the Senate Floor, during a picture taking session, I believe. It was all over the news. I don't recall your having any criticism of Cheney for that.

You get on here everyday, and call Q., a Schmuck, and worse, but that's fine, when YOU are the one using insulting words against forum members.

You have called me white trash, because you attacked me for calling Cheney, Dickhead Cheneycrook.

See how you move your line around?

Then you call others, hypocrites.

/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif

LWW
01-03-2012, 03:50 AM
Ummm ... yes, you did.

LWW
01-03-2012, 03:54 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I never called president Obama a cokehead.


</div></div>

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Tap Tap Tap! I couldn't agree more. I'd wager lots of those white folks who voted for Obama early on, would make a change if given another opportunity. Last poll numbers I saw indicated Hillary had better numbers on beating McCain, than Obama.

This is just what we needed, right? Another President, just like the present one, who doesn't have any foreign policy experience, and a former coke head burn out to boot!


Gayle in Md.



</div></div>

LWW
01-03-2012, 03:55 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I never called president Obama a cokehead.

</div></div>

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">He never said that, to my knowedge, and if he did, you should provide a reliable source before making such a statement.

As for the coke use, atleast he didn't try to say he couldn't remember, like your boy Bush, who even lied about his DWI. </div></div>

eg8r
01-03-2012, 07:44 AM
Nope you called Senator Obama a crackhead.

eg8r

Gayle in MD
01-03-2012, 08:25 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Nope you called Senator Obama a crackhead.

eg8r </div></div>

Yep, but not President Obama, hence, you misstated.

As I have written, I was firmly supporting Hillary Clinton, and didn't like Obama at all, at the outset.

Then, I read his biographical books, which totally changed my opinion of him. But then, you don't really care about anything other than irritating people.

The problem with you people from the right, is that you refuse to admit to the radical views of your party, and how utterly ignorant they are.

Denying Scientific studies. Trying to remove a woman's right to use birth control. Distorting the proof that sex education, actually decreases unwanted pregnancies, AND abortions, and then contradicting your own stances, by trying to remove a woman's right to birth control, and teenagers who are educated about the dangers of teen sex, sexually transmitted diseases, and the funtions of their own bodies.

Trying to weaken the laws against rape, and criminalize women's choices in their own privet, personal lives.

Spreading havoc, with careless and corrupt energy policies, causing quakes, pollution, illness, wars and strife, destroying the environment that our kids and grand kids will have to try to live within...

Denying climate change, and the Theory Of Evolution, pure absurdity.

Standing against the rights of ALL Americans, regardless of their religious beliefs, color, gender, and sexual preferences.

Repiglicans are the divisive party of class warfare, in more ways than one, and the Bubba Mentality, is their base.

We on the left truly don't care what color our candidates are, as long as they aren't just another standard Knee Jerk, radical RW, religious nutjob, like BUSH, one of the worst presidents in history, as most historians agree.

The most ignorant on this forum insists that when a Democrat makes up their mind that they are completely against Repiglican policies, and commits to vote accordinbgly, because they fully recognize the disastrous results, of Repiglican Policies, going all the way back to Ronald Dementia Reagan, that we are unable to decipher for ourselves, what we believe. Interesting, since Repiglicans are KNOWN for denying even scientific studies, which have lasted and strengthened over the centuries.

Fact is, not one of you on the right presents a cogent argument, nor a reasonable justification for your collective, continued denial of respected scientific theories.

America is in trouble, when we allow religious radicalism to interfere with our political debate. The Founders clearly did not intend that religious views be allowed to distort the political process.

I have never understood why the so called, religious have such disdain for their fellow human beings, nor why, if they are so committed to their philosophies, they NEED to try to force their views, through the government, upon all of the rest of us.

Insecurity about what they believe? Or is it purely their inapproriate, un-American desire to dictate to all others, force their views and opinions into other's private lives, and become the new radical religious dictators, much like those ignorant radicals in the Middle East.

The result of Fux Noise Propaganda?

IMO, any political Party which can deny scientific studies,... Evolution, Climate Change, The American Dream of Separation of Church and State, so obviously dear to our Founders, or defend a president who would censor the scientific studies which support those theories, and existing threats, should never hold public office.

These are not opinions, they are results of scientific studies which have proven their own validity as time goes on.

Hence, I have my own reasons for being totally against the policies of the Repiglican Party, reasons dear to my own heart, like the environment, for example, and the safety of the planet, what we breath, drink and have the good fortune to observe and enjoy asthetically.

It WAS your party, which pushed, after all, for chopping down the mountain tops, Fracking us into quakes and polluted tributaries, hiding the science which supports the theory of Climate Change, findings annd studies which WE ALL PAID FOR!

PIGS!

YOU have no right to interfere into the personal decisions of women, period, regardless of your religious views, and sicko intentions. You have called women who have had abortions, murderers, while you have used for years birth control which also aborts fertilized fetuses.

Moving their line around, is the forte' of the right. You prove that here everyday.

G.

Qtec
01-03-2012, 08:43 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Nope you called Senator Obama a crackhead.

eg8r </div></div>

No she didn't. If she did call him anything it was a cokehead, there is a difference.

Obama has already been honest and admitted he smoked weed and on at least one occasion, used cocaine when he was young. It makes him normal, not abnormal.

Q

eg8r
01-03-2012, 08:51 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">No she didn't. If she did call him anything it was a cokehead, there is a difference.
</div></div>LOL...Could you enlighten us on the difference between cokehead and crackhead. Do you think because one is more addictive then it would be better for gaylio to refer to the less addictive variety of cocaine?

eg8r

eg8r
01-03-2012, 08:52 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Yep, but not President Obama, hence, you misstated.
</div></div>LOL, you are right. Right after calling him every name in the book you turned around and showed the world the partisan hackjob you really are. Sicko!

eg8r

Gayle in MD
01-03-2012, 09:01 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">No she didn't. If she did call him anything it was a cokehead, there is a difference.
</div></div>LOL...Could you enlighten us on the difference between cokehead and crackhead. Do you think because one is more addictive then it would be better for gaylio to refer to the less addictive variety of cocaine?

eg8r </div></div>

HOw about you explain how you attack those who have abortions, although you have aborted who knows how many fetuses over your lifetime?

Or how about answering the question about whether you would tell the doctors to let your wife die, rather then abort a fetus, if her life was in danger?

You and your leader, LWW, can drag up all sorts of old threads, attmpeting to discredit others here, but that is nothing but your standard juvenile policy of irritation ad distraction from the subject of the thread.

WE ALL KNOW WHO CONTINUED TO DENY THE GROWING DAMAGES OF THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION, THEIR ON-GOING LIES, LAW BREAKING, BREAKING TREATY AGREEMENTS, USING TORTURE, EXPOSING THE IDENTITY OF A COVERT SECRET AGENT, HIDING BEHIND CLOSED DOORS TO PROMOTE POLLUTION IN THE ENERGY INDUSTRY, LYING THE COUNTRY INTO AN ILLEGAL, IMMORAL WAR OF CHOICE, A PRE-EMPTIVE WAR OF CHOICE, COMPLETELY UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

YOU WERE WRONG, WE ON THE LEFT WERE RIGHT. BUSH WAS A DISASTER. HIS POLICIES PUT THIS COUNTRY INTO AN ECONOMIC TRICK BAG OF DISASTROUS RESULTS, WITH TWO UNWINNABLE WARS, AND A CRASHED ECONOMY, THROUGH UNREGULATED POLICIES ON WALL STREET, TO PROMOTE BUSH'S OWNERSHIP SOCIETY.

Neither of you have any credibility with those here who possess critical thinking skills.



G.

Qtec
01-03-2012, 09:23 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">LOL...Could you enlighten us on the difference between cokehead and crackhead. </div></div>


I could but why don't you look it up for yourself.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Do you think because one is more addictive then it would be better for gaylio to refer to the less addictive variety of cocaine?

eg8r </div></div>

Cocaine is the Wall St drug. Crack is the drug of the lost. There is no comparison.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The vote by the commission, a bipartisan group of former judges and prosecutors, was unanimous. It applies to cases in which there were no aggravating circumstances, such as gun possession. The ruling follows a pattern that has been emerging across the US, as policymakers reconsider stiff prison sentences for low-level, nonviolent drug offenders.

"Normally when we're talking about reducing sentences, it's for very small numbers of people in low-visibility settings, [but] here we're not just talking pardons for three people, but about huge numbers," says Ron Wright, a law professor at Wake Forest University. "This is one more example that our basic attitudes toward how to punish crimes are different today than they were 10 years ago."

The decision is part of the commission's long-time effort to "give the fullest remedy" to "a mistake," says Samford University law professor Deborah Young. When Congress approved the 2010 Fair Sentencing Act in August, it dramatically reduced the disparity between sentences for crack versus powder cocaine violations. <span style='font-size: 14pt'>A violation that would land a powder-cocaine offender in prison for a day would put a crack offender behind bars for 100 days, under the old law.<u> Now that ratio is 1:18,</u> but it applies only to new convictions.</span> </div></div>

Even the law now makes distinction, even though its still a racially biased one.



Q

eg8r
01-03-2012, 09:41 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Cocaine is the Wall St drug. Crack is the drug of the lost. There is no comparison.
</div></div>Exactly what I thought. There really isn't any difference when we are referencing a political figure. I knew you were only going to nitpick the "material" difference but not the connotation. You really are a simpleton.

Gayle blew it. She ran her mouth over and over during the primaries and when her girl did not win she did a complete 180. Nothing about Obama changed. Now gayle the liar will try and tell us that she just did not know enough about Obama at the time but once she read his book she was a new believer but we all know she is full of crap. If we were to believe her then we can see what little respect she has for our US Senators. When she doesn't know what she is talking about she just runs her mouth and has no problem disparaging their character. When they are her only choice she changes her hypocritical tune quickly.

You on the other hand are a just a schmuck. You emphatically defend the (D) no matter what the circumstance. At least she was playing the role of feminist even though we know she does not believe in that equality for all women stuff.

eg8r

eg8r
01-03-2012, 09:42 AM
LOL, you were caught in your lies and now you want to change the subject. Sorry granny but your game is over.

eg8r

Qtec
01-03-2012, 09:55 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">There really isn't any difference when we are referencing a political figure. </div></div>

Yes there is.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Up To 90 Percent Of US Paper Money Contains Traces Of Cocaine, Study Finds

ScienceDaily (Aug. 16, 2009) You probably have cocaine in your wallet, purse, or pocket. Sound unlikely or outrageous? Think again! In what researchers describe as the largest, most comprehensive analysis to date of cocaine contamination in banknotes, scientists are reporting that cocaine is present in up to 90 percent of paper money in the United States, particularly in large cities such as Baltimore, Boston, and Detroit. <span style='font-size: 14pt'>The scientists found traces of cocaine in 95 percent of the banknotes analyzed from Washington, D.C., alone.</span> </div></div>

In many professions, especially in the city, cocaine use is normal. Being a crackhead is something totally different. Its like comparing a shoplifter with a serial killer!

Q

Gayle in MD
01-03-2012, 10:52 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">There really isn't any difference when we are referencing a political figure. </div></div>

Yes there is.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Up To 90 Percent Of US Paper Money Contains Traces Of Cocaine, Study Finds

ScienceDaily (Aug. 16, 2009) You probably have cocaine in your wallet, purse, or pocket. Sound unlikely or outrageous? Think again! In what researchers describe as the largest, most comprehensive analysis to date of cocaine contamination in banknotes, scientists are reporting that cocaine is present in up to 90 percent of paper money in the United States, particularly in large cities such as Baltimore, Boston, and Detroit. <span style='font-size: 14pt'>The scientists found traces of cocaine in 95 percent of the banknotes analyzed from Washington, D.C., alone.</span> </div></div>

In many professions, especially in the city, cocaine use is normal. Being a crackhead is something totally different. Its like comparing a shoplifter with a serial killer!

Q </div></div>

He's a waste of time, truly, and completely out of touch with reality, and out of touch with who and what he is.

If he doesn't know the difference between crack and cocaine, he should shut his big mouth.

I'd like to see a shipment of high quality, purest cocaine, dropped on Wall St. for a good price one friday night.

/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/wink.gif

G.

pooltchr
01-03-2012, 12:02 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
didn't like Obama at all, at the outset.

Then, I read his biographical books, which totally changed my opinion of him.
G.

</div></div>

What a crock. When you saw that Obama was going to beat Hillary to become the Dem candidate, you knew you had to backtrack, because that is what the Dem party would want you to do.

You are a joke.

Steve

eg8r
01-03-2012, 12:18 PM
This is exactly true. She knew her "girl" got beat so she had to save as much face as possible. She absolutely did her best, for months, to denigrate Obama and then directly after he won she completely changed her tune.

eg8r

eg8r
01-03-2012, 12:21 PM
LOL, you are such an idiot. You are going to tell us coke is ok because there are traces on money. LOL, you freaking tool. If I put money in my wallet you think that is the equivalent of me snorting coke up my nose? Sorry idiot. When we are talking about politicians and their illegal drug habits there is absolutely NOTHING different from a cokehead and a crackhead. Even gayle did not bother to try and argue this distinction when she agreed that she called him these names. Her only issue was that I said President Obama instead of Senator Obama. She has no problem disparaging senators. Her morality meter gets turned on only if they are the President.

You on the other hand just want to argue for the sake of arguing.

eg8r

Gayle in MD
01-03-2012, 12:28 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body">This is exactly true. She knew her "girl" got beat so she had to save as much face as possible. She absolutely did her best, for months, to denigrate Obama and then directly after he won she completely changed her tune.

eg8r </div></div>

Not true, I spent months saying that either one of them would suit me, long before we knew whichh would win the nomination, and as I recall, no one knew until close to the end, which one would win. It was close, for a long time. Also, I didn't turn against Hillary, but added Obama to my favorite, it was either or, for me, long before the end of the campaign, and the same with the choice for VP, either Biden, or Hillary, would have suited me fine, as I have always been a fan of Biden, AND, of course, of Hillary.

Additionally, my daughter was the one who turned me around on Barack Obama, when she purchased his books for me as a gift, which I wrote about here way back then, long before I had any idea who would get the nomination.

Neither you, nor your "Oh so thoroughly Neoconned and Bushwhacked" forum friends on here have any relevance with me, anyway.

I'm currently watching your entire Repiglican Party, jump back and forth between a bunch of clowns, and you think anything you could write here could possibly intimidate ME!

BWA HA HA HA HA...dream on, sonny. Go play with your guns, I don't like your nasty attitude, Sonny boy, have a Twinkie and buzz off.

Ignorant, Misogynistic Southern Bubbas are not my thing, LMAO!

You're all going to lose, annyway. There aren't enough misogynistic, racist, Bubbas in this country to vote for any of the Repiglican line up, anywaym hence, you all resort to your usual sore loser mentality, pre-e,ection, this time. HA HA HA...what a sorry bunch you all are.

<span style='font-size: 14pt'>The definition of Republican Policies: fascism n. a merging of the interests of big corporations and government, adjoined with a systematic curtailment of civil liberties

Gayle in Md.</span>

eg8r
01-03-2012, 12:38 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Not true, I spent months saying that either one of them would suit me,</div></div>Whatever. OK, let's say this is true. Let's move the date from the nomination backward a few months. It doesn't change anything. You can only move it as far back as it was evident Hitlary would not win. Once you knew she was out you changed your tune. It was hilarious to watch.

eg8r

Gayle in MD
01-03-2012, 12:48 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Not true, I spent months saying that either one of them would suit me,</div></div>Whatever. OK, let's say this is true. Let's move the date from the nomination backward a few months. It doesn't change anything. You can only move it as far back as it was evident Hitlary would not win. Once you knew she was out you changed your tune. It was hilarious to watch.

eg8r </div></div>

Glad you got such a kick over it, even if you do have the whole thing wrong.

I wrote before the selection was made, that either would be fine with me, so your version is wrong, but then, you usually are wrong, Bubbaboy.

I'm very happy with President Obama, and very proud that I was never stupid enough to vote for any sicko, lying, incompetent, corrupt, con artist named BUSH! OR a Mc Insane!

/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif

Were going to win the election, anyway, so go lick your wounds early, Sherlock. You've been consistantly on the losing side of every issue on here for over a decade, so who cares what you think. The Repiglicans have painted themselves right into a corner with the Tea Bagging nutjobs, anyway, just as I predicted.

The definition of Republican Policies: fascism n. a merging of the interests of big corporations and government, adjoined with a systematic curtailment of civil liberties

Gayle in Md.

LWW
01-03-2012, 04:22 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> The definition of Republican Policies: fascism n. a merging of the interests of big corporations and government, adjoined with a systematic curtailment of civil liberties

Gayle in Md.


</div></div>

Odd that you just described the current regime perfectly.

pooltchr
01-03-2012, 06:53 PM
I guess she doesn't remember stating that she could never vote for a former cokehead.

Steve

LWW
01-04-2012, 02:55 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: pooltchr</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
didn't like Obama at all, at the outset.

Then, I read his biographical books, which totally changed my opinion of him.
G.

</div></div>

<span style='font-size: 14pt'>What a crock. When you saw that Obama was going to beat Hillary to become the Dem candidate, you knew you had to backtrack, because that is what the Dem party would want you to do.</span>

You are a joke.

Steve </div></div>

<span style='font-size: 26pt'>*DING-DING-DING-DING*</span>

<span style='font-size: 14pt'>Ladies and gentlemen ... we have a winner!</span>

LWW
01-04-2012, 02:57 AM
So why are you giving charlotte a pass for what you claim to be an "Outrageous Race-Based Attack On Obama?"

Qtec
01-04-2012, 05:30 AM
When G criticized Obama for his cocaine use, it had nothing to do with his race. It was about his character.

Q

Qtec
01-04-2012, 05:51 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">You are<u> going to tell us</u> coke is ok because there are traces on money. </div></div>

Am I?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If I put money in my wallet you think that is the equivalent of me snorting coke up my nose? </div></div>

Eh....No!

What is shows is that cocaine use is more prevalent than you want to believe.

If G called O a cokehead, then she is wrong. Its the same as calling some one who only drinks a glass of champagne at New Year an alcoholic. Further, the fact that he has used cocaine puts him in with the majority of Americans.



Q

Gayle in MD
01-04-2012, 08:07 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Nope you called Senator Obama a crackhead.

eg8r </div></div>

No she didn't. If she did call him anything it was a cokehead, there is a difference.

Obama has already been honest and admitted he smoked weed and on at least one occasion, used cocaine when he was young. It makes him normal, not abnormal.

Q </div></div>

Not only does it prove his honesty, but shows that he is ten times the man that Bush was, or Bush's Da DA Crook, since the father refused to even answer the questions about his mistress in Virginia, and the son refused to answer questions about his own cocaine use, or the girl he got pregnent, and paid for her abortion, even Smile-nod Laura, refuses to answer questions about thhe poor guy she mowed down, and never even had to go to court after she committed manslaughter.

Preston in bed with Hitler, and the whole Bush family with decades of doing business with terrorists financiers.

Who cares what these rightwing nutjobs on here thing.

IMO, none of them are rational, John Dean had them pegged, authoritarian loving lemmings, who would make Hitler look like Captain Kangaroo!

G.

LWW
01-04-2012, 10:35 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body">When G criticized Obama for his cocaine use, it had nothing to do with his race. It was about his character.

Q </div></div>

What about when she said this:

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">"Between the Blacks spewing hate in their churches, and the Islamists spreading hate in their Mosques, I'm just damned glad I've got a gun!"</div></div>

LWW
01-04-2012, 10:36 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body">When G criticized Obama for his cocaine use, it had nothing to do with his race. It was about his character.

Q </div></div>

And thank you for admitting that Obama has low character.

There is hope for you yet snoopy.

LWW
01-04-2012, 10:47 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body">When G criticized Obama for his cocaine use, it had nothing to do with his race. It was about his character.

Q </div></div>

How about here, where she mingled character and race?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Obama's wife did the same. I lost all respect for the Obama's when she did that.

OTOH, I did n't think that Bill Clinton's statements which recieved so much media bashing were at all out of line. When South Carolina's blacks voted for Obama, and he referred to Jessie Jackson's wins, with the Black support, why is that racist? What are we supposed to do, pretend Obama isn't black, or that the blacks in South Carolina didn't vote their race?</div></div>

LWW
01-04-2012, 10:50 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body">When G criticized Obama for his cocaine use, it had nothing to do with his race. It was about his character.

Q </div></div>

Or this one?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Obama wouldn't be where he is if he were white. His meager accomplishments would be seen as nothing to crow about, if he were white. The press, and many other Americans would be far less forgiving of Obama, if people weren't so afraid of being accused of being racist. </div></div>

LWW
01-04-2012, 10:55 AM
Or this:

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gayle in MD</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Obama has nothing of substance as far as I can see, to warrant his present success, other than being a black man who gives a dynomite speech,</div></div>