PDA

View Full Version : Real Wages Fell In 2011



Qtec
02-07-2012, 02:45 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Real Wages Fell In 2011 Amid Record Corporate Profits

A new report out Tuesday shows that working Americans made less money last year, as real wages fell about two percent in 2011, when accounting for inflation, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The problem is largely tied to unemployment. Even as the jobless rate falls from recession highs -- dropping to 8.5 percent in December -- the large number of unemployed people willing to work for less has pushed down wages, said Gary Burtless, a labor economist at the Brookings Institution.

"There's never been a postwar era in which unemployment has been this high for this long," Burtless said. "Workers are in a very weak bargaining position."

This comes at a time of record profits for corporations. Corporate profits were $1.97 trillion in the third quarter of 2011, an all-time high since the end of World War II.

"Part of the reason why business profits are so high is it is a zero-sum game, so labor is on the losing end of that," said Aaron Smith, senior economist at Moody's Analytics. "Businesses are getting more out of each worker they have." Labor's share of new income has fallen even lower -- to 57.1 percent in the third quarter of 2011 -- and is likely to fall even more, according to Smith.

<span style='font-size: 14pt'>Many employees are also working longer hours and getting more done without raises or overtime pay. Worker output grew at a 3.2 percent annual rate in the third quarter of 2011,</span> according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

After mass layoffs, companies have "figured out to get by with fewer people," said Richard Cooper, an economics professor at Harvard.

Chris Christopher, senior principal economist at IHS Global Insight, said that the U.S. economy is now stuck in a catch-22: Companies are not hiring in the U.S. because they do not expect the economy to improve, but the economy will not pick up until companies speed up their hiring. <span style='font-size: 14pt'>So for now, companies are keeping wages and benefits low while working their employees harder --<u> because they can</u>.</span>

With negative wage growth, the economy is now depending more on the government's transfer payments to people who are struggling to make ends meet.

"The public sector is having to step in and fill that void," Smith said. "If the labor share continues to decline and we keep throwing more government money at it when we're on a clearly unsustainable fiscal path, what is the end game there? It's not exactly rosy."</div></div>

Q.......... /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif

cushioncrawler
02-07-2012, 04:25 AM
And the slaves suffer.
mac.

America the grate iz going down in ate.
http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k206/biggie_j/grate.jpg

LWW
02-07-2012, 04:27 AM
And this is the result of the fascist economic policy of the current regime ... which you have supported at every turn.

You should be ashamed.

cushioncrawler
02-07-2012, 04:30 AM
http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u158/zeniththevampireruler/grate.jpg

cushioncrawler
02-07-2012, 04:30 AM
http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x221/Riogreyhound/grate.jpg

cushioncrawler
02-07-2012, 04:31 AM
http://i230.photobucket.com/albums/ee92/scythecorruptus/grate_toiletpaper.jpg

eg8r
02-07-2012, 09:29 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">After mass layoffs, companies have "figured out to get by with fewer people," said Richard Cooper, an economics professor at Harvard.
</div></div>This was definitely true when you praised the government for laying off those prison guards. You were a champion for this cause then but now you don't like it?

eg8r

Soflasnapper
02-07-2012, 01:20 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">And this is the result of the fascist economic policy of the current regime ... which you have supported at every turn.

You should be ashamed. </div></div>

Probably more the result of the last 30 years of fascist economic policies, which you have probably supported at every turn.

How many times have we heard about the problems that started '30 years ago'? Hint: that's code for 'under Reagan.'

Even Santorum has called that time frame out as the beginning of a long war on the middle class support levels.

By contrast, there is nothing this administration has done that can be shown to be responsible.

LWW
02-07-2012, 04:43 PM
Actually the move towards a fascist US economy started under FDR.

Reagan was a brief break.

LWW
02-07-2012, 04:47 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Soflasnapper</div><div class="ubbcode-body">By contrast, there is nothing this administration has done that can be shown to be responsible. </div></div>

http://www.websmileys.com/sm/happy/516.gifhttp://www.websmileys.com/sm/happy/516.gifhttp://www.websmileys.com/sm/happy/516.gifhttp://www.websmileys.com/sm/happy/516.gifhttp://www.websmileys.com/sm/happy/516.gifhttp://www.websmileys.com/sm/happy/516.gifhttp://www.websmileys.com/sm/happy/516.gifhttp://www.websmileys.com/sm/happy/516.gifhttp://www.websmileys.com/sm/happy/516.gifhttp://www.websmileys.com/sm/happy/516.gifhttp://www.websmileys.com/sm/happy/516.gifhttp://www.websmileys.com/sm/happy/516.gifhttp://www.websmileys.com/sm/happy/516.gifhttp://www.websmileys.com/sm/happy/516.gifhttp://www.websmileys.com/sm/happy/516.gifhttp://www.websmileys.com/sm/happy/516.gifhttp://www.websmileys.com/sm/happy/516.gifhttp://www.websmileys.com/sm/happy/516.gifhttp://www.websmileys.com/sm/happy/516.gifhttp://www.websmileys.com/sm/happy/516.gifhttp://www.websmileys.com/sm/happy/516.gifhttp://www.websmileys.com/sm/happy/516.gifhttp://www.websmileys.com/sm/happy/516.gifhttp://www.websmileys.com/sm/happy/516.gifhttp://www.websmileys.com/sm/happy/516.gif

That you can say that with a straight face is astounding.