Qtec
02-14-2012, 01:54 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">WASHINGTON — Despite criticism of Fannie Mae by Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, his campaign accepted nearly $280,000 in donations raised by a registered lobbyist who once represented the government mortgage giant and whose clients now include a private equity firm and the drug company Pfizer.
Yet Romney has not identified all of his so-called fundraising "bundlers" who have raised hundreds of thousands of dollars, <span style='font-size: 14pt'>even after President Barack Obama's re-election campaign released the names of his top fundraisers.</span> <span style="color: #3333FF">Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich also haven't disclosed their bundlers.</span> Ron Paul's campaign has said it doesn't use them. For more than a decade, since the election of George W. Bush in 2000, presidential campaigns have identified their bundlers.
In an age of "super" political action committees, which can pull in millions of dollars from anonymous donors, bundlers still matter to modern presidential campaigns. Like Wayne Berman, the chairman of Ogilvy Government Relations and former Fannie Mae lobbyist who gathered $279,075 for Romney in 2011, these are well-connected executives who collect or direct multiple individual contributions of up to $2,500 to a campaign in amounts that can range from $50,000 to more than $500,000.
<span style='font-size: 17pt'>The lack of disclosure prevents voters from knowing who wields influence within a presidential campaign. Keeping their identities secret could end up stinging Romney – like the mishandled release of his income tax returns – if voters conclude he is withholding politically damaging information. </span></div></div>
No surprise here really.
Q........ link (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/13/mitt-romney-campaign-fundraising-bundlers_n_1274157.html)
Yet Romney has not identified all of his so-called fundraising "bundlers" who have raised hundreds of thousands of dollars, <span style='font-size: 14pt'>even after President Barack Obama's re-election campaign released the names of his top fundraisers.</span> <span style="color: #3333FF">Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich also haven't disclosed their bundlers.</span> Ron Paul's campaign has said it doesn't use them. For more than a decade, since the election of George W. Bush in 2000, presidential campaigns have identified their bundlers.
In an age of "super" political action committees, which can pull in millions of dollars from anonymous donors, bundlers still matter to modern presidential campaigns. Like Wayne Berman, the chairman of Ogilvy Government Relations and former Fannie Mae lobbyist who gathered $279,075 for Romney in 2011, these are well-connected executives who collect or direct multiple individual contributions of up to $2,500 to a campaign in amounts that can range from $50,000 to more than $500,000.
<span style='font-size: 17pt'>The lack of disclosure prevents voters from knowing who wields influence within a presidential campaign. Keeping their identities secret could end up stinging Romney – like the mishandled release of his income tax returns – if voters conclude he is withholding politically damaging information. </span></div></div>
No surprise here really.
Q........ link (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/13/mitt-romney-campaign-fundraising-bundlers_n_1274157.html)