PDA

View Full Version : INCONVENIENT TRUTH OF THE DAY 02/22/12!



LWW
02-21-2012, 12:02 PM
Delivered a day early as a courtesy.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f8/Ice_Age_Temperature.png

<span style='font-size: 20pt'>GLOBAL WARMING STARTED 20,000 YRS AGO</span>

LWW
02-22-2012, 06:19 AM
My how the crickets come out when the truth hits the table.

The thing that is so dangerous about Goremonism is that it looks back upon the last 10,000 years ... obviously the most stable and conducive to higher life forms of all eras in the last 450,000 years ... and see it as a bad thing.

Soflasnapper
02-23-2012, 02:26 PM
Your claim would appear to be that the climatologists, and even the paleo-climatologists, have never heard of ice ages, don't know their normal course of development, and haven't found anomalies FROM that normal course of development, to indicate the hand of man being involved in our current situation.

But on the contrary, looking at the ice age cycles, when they switch over to their opposite phases (warming), how the CO2 tracks or doesn't, is exactly what the climatologists and the paleo-climatologists do. You do not have a prima facie winning argument here-- you are begging the question instead.

Maybe you can name a couple of paleo-climatologists who'd agree with the argument that can be made along the lines you suggest.

But consider when the prize-winning Princeton physicist Robert Dicke put up a strong challenge to general relativity, based on the discovery that the oblateness of the sun's surface (under rotational effects) accounts for almost all the precession of the perihelion of Mercury, which had been a key general relativity prediction/explanation. That didn't disturb the consensus that general relativity is still sound in the physics community, despite his eminence and sound findings.

JohnnyD
02-24-2012, 12:26 AM
What a wonderful and very informative post as usual.Jesus loves you.

LWW
02-24-2012, 04:08 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Soflasnapper</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Your claim would appear to be that the climatologists, and even the paleo-climatologists, have never heard of ice ages, don't know their normal course of development, and haven't found anomalies FROM that normal course of development, to indicate the hand of man being involved in our current situation.</div></div>

Not at all.

My point is that the GOREMONS know nothing of any of this, and deny actual science at every opportunity.

Qtec
02-24-2012, 06:58 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Your claim would appear to be that the climatologists, and even the paleo-climatologists, <span style='font-size: 17pt'>have never heard of ice ages,</span> don't know their normal course of development, and haven't found anomalies FROM that normal course of development, to indicate the hand of man being involved in our current situation.
</div></div>

Tap. Tap. Tap. Nice one. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/cool.gif

LWW is the one who is 'spoon fed'.

CO2,

http://www.climate.unibe.ch/~joos/images/sres_jan99/co2_history.gif

Q