PDA

View Full Version : LimpDick Rush calls student a slut and a whore!



Qtec
03-01-2012, 01:09 AM
Limpdick is a wart on the face of humanity.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh called Sandra Fluke, the Georgetown student whom House Republicans wouldn’t let testify at a contraception hearing last week, a “slut” and a “prostitute” today, because, Limbaugh argued, she’s having “so much sex” she needs other people to pay for it:

LIMBAUGH: What does it say about the college co-ed Susan Fluke [sic] who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex. What does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute. She wants to be paid to have sex. She’s having <u>so much sex</u> she can’t afford the contraception. She wants you and me and the taxpayers to pay her to have sex.

Listen here, via Media Matters: </div></div>

Listen to it.
How many times does he call Ms Fluke, Flake?
How many times does he say, "<u>so much sex</u>"?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">While it’s probably not even worth engaging with Limbaugh on the facts, <span style='font-size: 17pt'>Fluke’s testimony was about a friend who is a lesbian and needed birth control for non-sexual medical reasons, so he’s only wrong about three times over, and offensive many more times over than that.</span>

Later, he feigned a walk-back, saying “OK, she’s not a slut, she’s round-heeled” — <span style='font-size: 14pt'>a colloquialism for a loose woman.</span> </div></div>

I hope they sue him for every $ he has. I also hope her father kicks the crap out of him if he ever sees him, which he has every reason and right to do so. No jury would ever convict him.

Its amazing that this disgusting piece of dog $hit is still alive. Its even more amazing that this disgusting vile excuse for a human being is the darling of the Republican party!?

What he just did is indefensible, no matter what party you support.

Q.........or was it just the Hillbilly Heroin? talking (http://www.google.nl/search?q=Hill+Billy+Heroin&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:nl:official&client=firefox-a)

LWW
03-01-2012, 03:50 AM
What non sexual medical reason would she need birth control for?

LWW
03-01-2012, 03:58 AM
Whenever I see you use MM as a source for an RL quote ... I know you have been pimped, again.

Did you ever dare to actually read a TRANSCRIPT (http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/02/29/butt_sisters_are_safe_from_newt_and_rick) so you would be educated fully on what was said?

Of course you didn't. Dear leader doesn't allow you such independence.

What a tool you are.

LWW
03-01-2012, 04:01 AM
KNOWLEDGE (http://cnsnews.com/blog/craig-bannister/sex-crazed-co-eds-going-broke-buying-birth-control-student-tells-pelosi-hearing) that the regime forbids Snoop to know.

Qtec
03-01-2012, 04:20 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">What non sexual medical reason would she need birth control for? </div></div>

Look up Google. It will open a whole new world for you.

Then again, you could just read what Ms Fluke actually said.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">A friend of mine, for example, has polycystic ovarian syndrome and <span style='font-size: 23pt'>has to take prescription birth control to stop cysts from growing on her ovaries.</span> </div></div>

Next question dumba$$.

Q

Qtec
03-01-2012, 04:23 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Whenever I see you use MM as a source for an RL quote ... I know you have been pimped, again.</div></div>

..and that's YOUR problem. You can't read. You are incapable of believing any FACT that goes against what you BELIEVE!

You dismiss this new info without even reading it.

Thanks for confirming what we already know.

Q

Qtec
03-01-2012, 04:24 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Did you ever dare to actually read a TRANSCRIPT so you would be educated fully on what was said? </div></div>

Yes I read it, I also HEARD what he said on Radio!

So what?

What's your point?

<span style='font-size: 20pt'>Do you have one?</span>

A transcript is 2nd hand. I provided a tape of what he ACTUALLY said.

Where was I wrong?

Did I misquote LimpDick?

Q

LWW
03-01-2012, 04:28 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Did you ever dare to actually read a TRANSCRIPT so you would be educated fully on what was said? </div></div>

Yes I read it, I also HEARD what he said on Radio!

So what?

What's your point?

<span style='font-size: 20pt'>Do you have one?</span>

A transcript is 2nd hand. I provided a tape of what he ACTUALLY said.

Where was I wrong?

Did I misquote LimpDick?

Q </div></div>

That was just precious.

The recording is at the link also ... which is proof that, as I predicted, you lacked the testicular fortitude to question the spoon.

Dance some more.

LWW
03-01-2012, 04:29 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Then again, you could just read what Ms Fluke actually said.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">A friend of mine, for example, has polycystic ovarian syndrome and <span style='font-size: 23pt'>has to take prescription birth control to stop cysts from growing on her ovaries.</span> </div></div>

Next question dumba$$.

Q </div></div>

In that scenario, it wouldn't be birth control and would be covered.

Do you get paid for being pimped?

LWW
03-01-2012, 04:31 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> KNOWLEDGE (http://cnsnews.com/blog/craig-bannister/sex-crazed-co-eds-going-broke-buying-birth-control-student-tells-pelosi-hearing) that the regime forbids Snoop to know. </div></div>

Any comments on her testimony??
What's that?

You could care less about the truth?

But ... I already knew that.

llotter
03-01-2012, 04:45 AM
As usual, Rush is right. Not only is he right but his skills shine as he presents the issue with the mockery that it deserves. It is unbelievable that the Georgetown sluts want the taxpayer to subsidize their part-time vocation.

Qtec
03-01-2012, 04:57 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> KNOWLEDGE (http://cnsnews.com/blog/craig-bannister/sex-crazed-co-eds-going-broke-buying-birth-control-student-tells-pelosi-hearing) that the regime forbids Snoop to know. </div></div>

Any comments on her testimony??
What's that?

You could care less about the truth?

But ... I already knew that. </div></div>


<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Sex-Crazed Co-Eds Going Broke Buying Birth Control, Student Tells Pelosi Hearing Touting Freebie Mandate </div></div>

LOL You are starting to sound like M Bachmann!!!!!!!!

Q...hello Michele!

LWW
03-01-2012, 07:45 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> KNOWLEDGE (http://cnsnews.com/blog/craig-bannister/sex-crazed-co-eds-going-broke-buying-birth-control-student-tells-pelosi-hearing) that the regime forbids Snoop to know. </div></div>

Any comments on her testimony??
What's that?

You could care less about the truth?

But ... I already knew that. </div></div>


<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Sex-Crazed Co-Eds Going Broke Buying Birth Control, Student Tells Pelosi Hearing Touting Freebie Mandate </div></div>

LOL You are starting to sound like M Bachmann!!!!!!!!

Q...hello Michele! </div></div>

So when her testimony fits your agenda it's infallible ... and when it doesn't it's fatally flawed?

Once again ... you proclaim something to be both true and false at the same time.

Imagine that.

eg8r
03-01-2012, 07:49 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Limpdick is a wart on the face of humanity.
</div></div>And by making this statement you have proved you are exactly the same thing.

He does go overboard many times though but your article makes the reader believe he called her a slut and then makes it seem like some time down the road he retracks his statement and says she isn't a slut, she's round-heeled. This actually takes place like 30 seconds after calling her a slut. Now I don't know anything about the chick and she might have a case against him, who knows, but when will the reporters ever have the dignity to report on what happened instead of chopping it up to suit their desire?

eg8r

eg8r
03-01-2012, 08:04 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Sex-Crazed Co-Eds Going Broke Buying Birth Control</div></div>This should actually read, Sex-Crazed Co-Eds Going Broke Having Sex Nearly 3 Times a Day For 3 Years Straight.

eg8r

LWW
03-01-2012, 08:23 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body">... when will the reporters ever have the dignity to report on what happened instead of chopping it up to suit their desire?

eg8r </div></div>
What is this madness of which you speak?

llotter
03-01-2012, 12:26 PM
Well, Rush started off his show today backpedaling his way into an heartfelt apology to the Georgetown Slut.....NOT

Soflasnapper
03-02-2012, 11:34 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: llotter</div><div class="ubbcode-body">As usual, Rush is right. Not only is he right but his skills shine as he presents the issue with the mockery that it deserves. It is unbelievable that the Georgetown sluts want the taxpayer to subsidize their part-time vocation. </div></div>

I thought maybe Rush would ramp back down on the crazy, now that Beck is no longer a leading media figure. But no, what was I thinking???

Shades of his early syndicated days, when he refused to take women callers unless they sent in pictures of themselves.

Now he demands any woman receiving subsidized contraception film their sexual encounters and put them up on the web?

And you say he's right about that? He is right about the tactic that will drive women voters from the right wing, into the arms of the Democrats, and further cement his position as THE MOST DESPISED media figure of our day.

DiabloViejo
03-02-2012, 12:26 PM
So Rush, the self admitted drug addict and THREE times rehab aficionado, the man with talent on loan from drugs, the man who got canned by ESPN for racially biased comments, the man who can't get it up without help from Viagra and frequent trips to the Dominican Republic to consort with whores. The man who makes tons of money from spewing sh*t which is then eagerly gobbled up by the moronic far right imbeciles who depend on him for their marching orders, is now the right's head of the Anti-Sex League? LOL!

DiabloViejo
03-02-2012, 02:40 PM
As of late this morning the traffic to the "Boycott Rush" site and it's mirror site has spiked to the point where they have temporarily crashed. In addition Rush's advertising sponsors have been deluged with e-mails, phone calls, and faxes demanding they end sponsoring him.

BTW, it wasn't all that long ago that the right wingers thought that Beck was "untouchable" and now he's off the air.

Maybe Rush will gain a new sponsor..

https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/300449_10150350212950885_550735884_8309994_1065851 142_n.jpg

llotter
03-02-2012, 07:13 PM
You make my point. Even the most outrageous demand of a slut are more important to the Left than the religious liberty that used to be taken for granted here. This incredible stupidity must be called out and I am grateful that Rush is making the case.

I understand that you cannot see the obvious truth because the Left is blind to any contradiction between their ideology and reality.

Soflasnapper
03-02-2012, 07:34 PM
There is no way to tell if this young woman is either a slut or a whore, and Rush is on thin ice to say it it so. He's opened himself for a slander suit, as his bad reasoning skills will not hold up as a defense, and I do not believe she would be considered any kind of public figure.

The way I think about these terms, they do not apply simply in the case of a sexually active woman, unless she is promiscuous, or changes monogamous partners frequently, and of course, is actually paid for sex (to qualify as a whore).

Rush uses an atrocious equivocation that is the hallmark of a bad thinker, 'she is asking to be paid for sex,' and on that thin reed, he hangs what is a slanderous charge without foundation-- in fact, a classic 'reckless disregard for the truth' that is one component of slander or libel.

I'm surprised you'd think there was any merit at all to his statements about her, let alone agree with them, and frankly, I don't really believe you do. I take it rather as a yanking the chain, pulling my leg, and what is jokingly termed as punching the hippy in the face, out of perceived cultural grievances.

If you oppose abortion, I cannot understand why you'd object to preventing the pregnancies in the first place, except as 'tweaking the enemy.'

Rush more or less admits that is a substantial part of his schtick-- tweaking the allegedly so-called liberal media drivebys.

eg8r
03-02-2012, 09:12 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">There is no way to tell if this young woman is either a slut or a whore, and Rush is on thin ice to say it it so.</div></div>Well, you are right he is on thin ice but he has packed correctly for the trip. Think about it. The woman is saying that they are spending $3000 in three years on contraception. Condoms are $1/piece. Sex 3 times a day not too shabby. Now sure that could be with the same guy but do you really think so? This is a college girl?

Besides that...based on our insurance when my wife did need contraception we paid $20 (office visit) to have the mirena put in. That was good for 5 years. Why doesn't this woman have friends and family that care for her and tell her about these much cheaper opportunities? Do you think they have and she really is just exaggerating on how much she is spending?

eg8r

ugotda7
03-03-2012, 01:08 AM
You useful idiots got taken.....again.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/03/...ights-activist/ (http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/03/stunner-georgetown-coed-sandra-fluke-is-a-30-year-old-womens-rights-activist/)

Stunner. Georgetown “Coed” Sandra Fluke Is a 30 Year-Old Women’s Rights Activist

Posted by Jim Hoft on Friday, March 2, 2012, 1:23 PM

What a shock! It was all a BIG PRODUCTION!

The Democrat’s token abused college coed is actually a 30 year-old hardcore women’s rights activist.

Sandra Fluke is also the past president of Law Students for Reproductive Justice.

I put that in quotes because in the beginning she was described as a Georgetown law student. It was then revealed that prior to attending Georgetown she was an active women’s right advocate. In one of her first interviews she is quoted as talking about how she reviewed Georgetown’s insurance policy prior to committing to attend, and seeing that it didn’t cover contraceptive services, she decided to attend with the express purpose of battling this policy. During this time, she was described as a 23-year-old coed. Magically, at the same time Congress is debating the forced coverage of contraception, she appears and is even brought to Capitol Hill to testify. This morning, in an interview with Matt Lauer on the Today show, it was revealed that she is 30 years old, NOT the 23 that had been reported all along.

In other words, folks, you are being played. She has been an activist all along and the Dems were just waiting for the appropriate time to play her.

Unreal. This was all just a big dishonest Democrat ploy to take the attention off of Barack Obama’s assault on religious freedom.

Qtec
03-03-2012, 01:20 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Really? Show me the quote of her saying that.

Q</div></div>


<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> [ Try 2:15 of the video you linked to. </div></div>

What she says is this,

"I am here today to share THEIR voices and I want to thank you for allowing THEM, THEM, NOT ME to be heard.
Without insurance coverage, contraception can cost a woman over $3,000 during Law school....40% said they struggled financially because of this policy."

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">she said she spends $3000 in 3 years having sex. </div></div>

No she doesn't.

Q

Qtec
03-03-2012, 01:28 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">You useful idiots got taken.....again. </div></div>

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">While she is described as a “third year law student” <span style='font-size: 14pt'>they always fail to mention that she is also the past president of Law Students for Reproductive Justice.</span> </div></div>


video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlRC0nsjtKQ)

Start at the 60 sec mark. She tells the WHOLE friggin world that can understand that she is a past <span style='font-size: 17pt'>president of Law Students for Reproductive Justice. </span>

Keep trying punchy....Duhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Q

DiabloViejo
03-03-2012, 01:48 AM
Hit Rush where it hurts, sign the petition:

Tell Rush Limbaugh's advertisers to pull their support for him (http://act.credoaction.com/campaign/ads_limbaugh/?rc=LA_Rush_03022012_a1)

Qtec
03-03-2012, 01:58 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> The woman is saying that they are spending $3000 in three years on contraception. Condoms are $1/piece. Sex 3 times a day not too shabby. Now sure that could be with the same guy but do you really think so? This is a college girl?</div></div>

First of all she was not talking about herself, she was speaking for others. She never uttered the word condom or sex and certainly the words "so much sex" that Limpdick and the article that you seem to get all your info from did.
IN in her example of the <span style='font-size: 14pt'>lesbian</span> friend who developed cancer because of a lack of treatment, no condoms were required in any sexual activity that might have taken place!!!! Dillhole.


BTW,
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Mirena is a small plastic T-shaped contraceptive device that contains the active ingredient levonorgestrel. It is an intrauterine system (IUS) that is inserted into the womb in a similar way to a contraceptive coil. Once inserted it steadily releases the levonorgestrel into the womb (uterus). Levonorgestrel is a synthetic form of the female sex hormone, progesterone.
What is it used for?

Contraception.
Heavy or prolonged menstrual periods with no known cause (idiopathic menorrhagia).
Protection from overgrowth of the womb lining (endometrial hyperplasia) in women taking oestrogen-only hormone replacement therapy (HRT) following the menopause.

How does it work?

The levonorgestrel released from Mirena prevents pregnancy by increasing the thickness of the natural mucus at the neck of the womb. This makes it more difficult for sperm to cross from the vagina into the womb. By preventing sperm entering the womb, successful fertilisation of an egg is less likely.

<span style='font-size: 14pt'>Levonorgestrel also prevents the womb lining (endometrium) from thickening each month in preparation to receive <u>a fertilised egg.</u></span> </div></div>

You should read it. link (http://www.netdoctor.co.uk/sex-and-relationships/medicines/mirena.html)

Mirena is not 100% effective. No contraception is. <span style='font-size: 17pt'>Sometimes a sperm does get through and fertilizes an egg.</span> That fertilized egg travels down and tries to attach itself to the womb.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The levonorgestrel released from Mirena prevents pregnancy by increasing the thickness of the natural mucus at the neck of the womb..... Levonorgestrel also prevents the womb lining (endometrium) from thickening each month in preparation to receive a fertilised egg. <span style='font-size: 14pt'>This stops any eggs that are fertilised from successfully implanting onto the wall of the womb,</span> and prevents pregnancy in another way.</div></div>

Q

DiabloViejo
03-03-2012, 02:09 AM
Advertisers bail from Rush Limbaugh show:
Advertisers Bail from Limbaugh (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/73545.html)

DiabloViejo
03-03-2012, 02:12 AM
Social Media Firestorm: 6 Advertisers Drop Rush, Others May Follow
Rush Limbaugh's Advertisers Pull Out (http://thinkprogress.org/media/2012/03/02/436852/rush-limbaugh-advertisers/)

LWW
03-03-2012, 03:58 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Soflasnapper</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If you oppose abortion, I cannot understand why you'd object to preventing the pregnancies in the first place, except as 'tweaking the enemy.'
</div></div>

Nobody is opposing contraception, as noted earlier ... the left has been played like Perlman plays a Strad.

This entire issue is a pure Alinsky tactic.

I am most disappointed with the R's because they are reacting in the manner which Alinskyites count on.

LWW
03-03-2012, 04:00 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ugotda7</div><div class="ubbcode-body">In other words, folks, you are being played. She has been an activist all along and the Dems were just waiting for the appropriate time to play her.

Unreal. This was all just a big dishonest Democrat ploy to take the attention off of Barack Obama’s assault on religious freedom.
</div></div>

The amazing is that this forum's leftist cabal loves being played.

They will drown the truth in order to embrace the lie.

Doublethink is a fascinating mental disease.

DiabloViejo
03-03-2012, 01:12 PM
Cabals, Alinksky, Orwell references, oh my! Run children, run!

http://rlv.zcache.com/lions_and_tigers_and_bears_oh_my_sticker-p217703702596965867z85xz_400.jpg