PDA

View Full Version : Scott Walker gets spanked once again



Qtec
03-12-2012, 07:45 PM
I think he likes it!


<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Scott Walker

WASHINGTON -- A Wisconsin judge declared a state law requiring people to show photo ID in order to be allowed to vote unconstitutional on Monday, issuing a permanent injunction blocking the state from implementing the measure.

"Without question, where it exists, voter fraud corrupts elections and undermines our form of government," wrote Dane County Circuit Judge Richard Niess in his decision. "The legislature and governor may certainly take aggressive action to prevent its occurrence. <span style='font-size: 17pt'>But voter fraud is no more poisonous to our democracy than voter suppression. Indeed, they are two heads on the monster."</span></div></div>

So the judge agrees that these voter ID laws are just a despicable attempt to exclude voters from voting.

<span style='font-size: 14pt'>Who would ever have thought that?</span>

Surely these Republicans who passed these laws [ all round the country! ] must have known they were unconstitutional?
Don't they have access to legal advice?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">an attorney with the firm Cullen Weston Pines & Bach who is working on the case, told The Huffington Post at the time that <span style='font-size: 17pt'>their argument against the voter ID law was quite simple: It violates the provision in the Wisconsin constitution that determines who can vote.</span>

Niess agreed with this argument:

Article III is unambiguous, and means exactly what it says. It creates both necessary and sufficient requirements for qualified voters. Every United States citizen 18 years of age or older who resides in an election district in Wisconsin is a qualified elector in that district, unless excluded by duly enacted laws barring certain convicted felons or adjudicated incompetents/partially incompetents.

<span style='font-size: 17pt'>The government may not disqualify an elector who possesses those qualifications on the grounds that the voter does not satisfy additional statutorily-created qualifications not contained in Article III,<span style='font-size: 26pt'> such as a photo ID</span></span> </div></div>

Duhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.........


Q..... link (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/12/wisconsin-voter-id-law-unconstitutional_n_1339830.html?ref=politics)

Soflasnapper
03-12-2012, 08:16 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So the judge agrees that these voter ID laws are just a despicable attempt to exclude voters from voting.

Who would ever have thought that? </div></div>

??? NO WAY!!! /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif

eg8r
03-13-2012, 07:38 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So the judge agrees that these voter ID laws are just a despicable attempt to exclude voters from voting.
</div></div>Looks like the left was successful in getting this tried in front of a dumb judge. Well that or the right did a poor job fighting for a sane judge.

eg8r

Qtec
03-13-2012, 07:55 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So the judge agrees that these voter ID laws are just a despicable attempt to exclude voters from voting.
</div></div>Looks like the left was successful in getting this tried in front of a dumb judge. Well that or the right did a poor job fighting for a sane judge.

eg8r </div></div>

Actual voter fraud is such a RARE occurrence, the Judge ruled that the ID law was NOT motivated by a sudden urge to make elections more honest, but a deliberate attempt to exclude Democratic voters their USCON rights.

Its very simple.

Like I've told you a million times, context is everything.

Q

LWW
03-13-2012, 09:43 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Soflasnapper</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So the judge agrees that these voter ID laws are just a despicable attempt to exclude voters from voting.

Who would ever have thought that? </div></div>

??? NO WAY!!! /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif </div></div>

So you are in favor of necro-american suffrage?

Imagine that.
GREAT CAESAR'S GHOST OLSON ... HOW COULD THE DEMOKROOKS EVER WIN A NATIONAL ELECTION WITHOUT THE NECRO-AMERICAN VOTE! (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/13/OKeefe%20Video%20Exposes%20Voter%20Fraud-Friendly%20Policies%20in%20Vermont)

eg8r
03-13-2012, 09:55 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Actual voter fraud is such a RARE occurrence,</div></div>Yes idiot and you can thank proof of ID for that.

eg8r

LWW
03-13-2012, 11:50 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Actual voter fraud is such a RARE occurrence,</div></div>Yes idiot and you can thank proof of ID for that.

eg8r </div></div>

Snoop thinks that because a crime is seldom prosecuted then it seldom happens.

In reality ... when you have no idea who voted, how would you know how often someone voted illegally?

Soflasnapper
03-13-2012, 12:58 PM
What we know from recent history was that Bush appointed US Attorneys were tasked to find evidence it was going on in their areas of jurisdiction, and about 8 of them said there was nothing they'd found, resulting in their firings.

So it was looked at in depth, by Bush appointees, and they found zilch. Should mean SOMETHING, but I guess, according to you, they were all Democratic Party plants, or RINOs, or what, exactly, to impeach their null findings as false or fraudulent?

As is usual in these things, whatever the GOP screams most loudly about is what they themselves are doing, and are deflecting away from. I can just imagine what you'd say if two of the few electronic polling machine companies were held by two brothers, each of whom was in the radical left (as is the case now for those companies, except they are on the radical religious right).

Qtec
03-14-2012, 04:03 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eg8r</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Actual voter fraud is such a RARE occurrence,</div></div>Yes idiot and you can thank proof of ID for that.

eg8r </div></div>

Thanks for confirming that the present system works.

If it works, why change it.

Q

eg8r
03-14-2012, 08:54 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Thanks for confirming that the present system works.
</div></div>Proof of ID is what works, why do you want to strip that away?

eg8r

LWW
06-06-2012, 02:41 AM
So who got spanked last night?