PDA

View Full Version : The man speaks the truth.



Qtec
05-17-2012, 02:02 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Reagan wouldn’t identify with this party. There’s a streak of intolerance in the Republican Party today that scares people. Intolerance is a very dangerous thing in a society because it always leads to a tragic ending. Ronald Reagan was never driven by ideology. He was a conservative but he was a practical conservative.<u> He wanted limited government but he used government and he used it many times. And he would work with the other party. …</u>

<span style='font-size: 14pt'>Now the Republican Party is in the hands of the right, I would say the extreme right, more than ever before. You’ve got a Republican Party that is having difficulty facing up to the fact that if you look at what happened during the first 8 years of the century, it was under Republican direction. …</span>

The Republican Party is dealing with this schizophrenia. It was the Republican leadership that got us into this mess. <span style='font-size: 14pt'>If Nixon or Eisenhower were alive today, they would be run out of the party</span>.</div></div>

Surely not?????????????






<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If you're among that 12 percent of the American public that looks at our dysfunctional and divided Congress and gives it a thumbs up, then I have the perfect political candidate for you.

His name is Richard Mourdock, and he proudly says that if he is elected to the U.S. Senate<span style='font-size: 14pt'> he'll do what he can to deepen those partisan divides, which would only add to the dysfunction in Washington,</span> D.C. When asked in an interview last week at The Star about the problems with partisan gridlock in Congress, he pushed back with this depressing bit of philosophy: <span style='font-size: 20pt'>"We need less bipartisanship in Congress."</span> </div></div>

He won the election!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Q

LWW
05-17-2012, 04:13 AM
There is a kernel of truth in there.

Nixon most certainly was a moon bat crazy leftist.

cushioncrawler
05-17-2012, 04:16 AM
If theusofa keeps going the way it iz going i am going to get cable for sure.
I am allmost hoping that obama loozes.
Either way, the usofa iz gonna looz sure thing.
mac.

Soflasnapper
05-17-2012, 04:21 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">There is a kernel of truth in there.

Nixon most certainly was a moon bat crazy leftist. </div></div>

Sure, and JFK was a rock-ribbed conservative, some (you) say.

Funny, though, that didn't prevent the right of the day from portraying JFK as a Fabian Socialist.

And neither did it prevent the right of the day from embracing Nixon as one of them, a devoted anti-Communist.

Qtec
05-18-2012, 03:19 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Nixon most certainly was a moon bat crazy leftist. </div></div>

LOL

...and Palin is a Marxist.

Nutjob.

another nutjob (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SQTxxkdSIs)

link to nutjob West (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rr5jKbZzVH4)

Both say, "maybe they should look into this."

West, another lying turd.

Q

Gayle in MD
05-18-2012, 06:20 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Reagan wouldn’t identify with this party. There’s a streak of intolerance in the Republican Party today that scares people. Intolerance is a very dangerous thing in a society because it always leads to a tragic ending. Ronald Reagan was never driven by ideology. He was a conservative but he was a practical conservative.<u> He wanted limited government but he used government and he used it many times. And he would work with the other party. …</u>

<span style='font-size: 14pt'>Now the Republican Party is in the hands of the right, I would say the extreme right, more than ever before. You’ve got a Republican Party that is having difficulty facing up to the fact that if you look at what happened during the first 8 years of the century, it was under Republican direction. …</span>


<span style="color: #CC0000"> <span style='font-size: 14pt'>The entire Repiglican Party IS the extreme right, and on every level, their policies have failed. </span> </span>

The Republican Party is dealing with this schizophrenia. It was the Republican leadership that got us into this mess. <span style='font-size: 14pt'>If Nixon or Eisenhower were alive today, they would be run out of the party</span>.</div></div>

Surely not?????????????






<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If you're among that 12 percent of the American public that looks at our dysfunctional and divided Congress and gives it a thumbs up, then I have the perfect political candidate for you.

His name is Richard Mourdock, and he proudly says that if he is elected to the U.S. Senate<span style='font-size: 14pt'> he'll do what he can to deepen those partisan divides, which would only add to the dysfunction in Washington,</span> D.C. When asked in an interview last week at The Star about the problems with partisan gridlock in Congress, he pushed back with this depressing bit of philosophy: <span style='font-size: 20pt'>"We need less bipartisanship in Congress."</span> </div></div>

He won the election!!!!!!!!!!!!!


<span style="color: #CC0000"> <span style='font-size: 11pt'>If you don't hate the government, Gays, women, the poor, the old and the ill,and love killing people on the other side of the world, who are no threat whatsoever, you can't win a Repiglican seat.
Additionally, it helps if you are sexually repressed.</span> </span> /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif





Q </div></div>