Soflasnapper
07-21-2012, 09:24 AM
Says Drudge in today's headlines.
He links to a NY Daily News editorial.
Which says that, but adds (right in the headline!):
<span style='font-size: 14pt'>Blood on hands of Obama, Mitt and NRA! </span>
Condolences are empty words - what actions are you gonna take?
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/blood-hands-obama-mitt-nra-article-1.1119049#ixzz21Gqb8idt
By his truncated headlined link, Drudge of course badly misleads his readers as to the tenor and meaning of that piece.
[un]Fair and [un]Balanced, Drudge places himself squarely into the post-modernist post-truth band of merry prevaricators and trimmers and I'll add, stone cold LIARS who make up the GOP messaging machine in general, and in particular, who are running Mr. Romney's campaigning.
If they had any good argument, they wouldn't have to rely on selective editing so much, unless they just like lying 'cause it's fun and easy to get away with considering their monophasic low information/highly spinnable partisans.
He links to a NY Daily News editorial.
Which says that, but adds (right in the headline!):
<span style='font-size: 14pt'>Blood on hands of Obama, Mitt and NRA! </span>
Condolences are empty words - what actions are you gonna take?
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/blood-hands-obama-mitt-nra-article-1.1119049#ixzz21Gqb8idt
By his truncated headlined link, Drudge of course badly misleads his readers as to the tenor and meaning of that piece.
[un]Fair and [un]Balanced, Drudge places himself squarely into the post-modernist post-truth band of merry prevaricators and trimmers and I'll add, stone cold LIARS who make up the GOP messaging machine in general, and in particular, who are running Mr. Romney's campaigning.
If they had any good argument, they wouldn't have to rely on selective editing so much, unless they just like lying 'cause it's fun and easy to get away with considering their monophasic low information/highly spinnable partisans.