PDA

View Full Version : How leftists are told, and obey, to view Romney:



LWW
07-24-2012, 06:07 AM
http://liberallogic101.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/liberal-logic-101-136.jpg

LWW
07-24-2012, 06:14 AM
http://liberallogic101.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/liberal-logic-101-137.jpg

What's scary is that Romney is a fascist tool ... literally one with most of the left on most issues ala Bush ... and they still fear him so.

But, in their defense, dear leader demands that they fear him.

Soflasnapper
07-24-2012, 05:30 PM
What's the word? Stupid? Ridiculous?

Anyway, nobody on 'the left' needs to know anything about Romney but that he's adopted the entire right wing governing mantra/fantasy. Tax returns or no tax returns.

Just a few words will do: Paul. Ryan. Budget. Plan.

'Nuff said.

LWW
07-25-2012, 02:52 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Soflasnapper</div><div class="ubbcode-body">What's the word? Stupid? Ridiculous?

Anyway, nobody on 'the left' needs to know anything about Romney but that he's adopted the entire right wing governing mantra/fantasy. Tax returns or no tax returns.

Just a few words will do: Paul. Ryan. Budget. Plan.

'Nuff said. </div></div>

You don't even know what "RIGHT WING" even means.

What's hilarious to watch is the fascists wail and gnash their collectivist teeth about Romney ... even though he is a political soul mate with them ... solely because he doesn't have the golden (D) next to his name.

Soflasnapper
07-25-2012, 01:43 PM
I'm always amused by how true your statements are when put through a mirror, meaning in the opposite way from what you claim.

So, apologies to you, this would be true:

You don't even know what 'left wing' even means.

What's hilarious to watch is the far right wail and gnash their rugged individualist teeth about Romney... even though he is a political soul mate with them... even though he had the golden (R) next to his name (and has adopted all their preferred policies).

Reviewing some of his policies, are these left wing (TM) ideas, or rather, the opposite?

Ending Roe v. Wade, and supporting the 'personhood at conception' law or Constitutional amendment (as in MS), that would actually outlaw many forms of CONTRACEPTION? THE LEFT (TM) favors that? Really?

Lowering the 35% top bracket to 28%. THAT'S a LEFT WING policy prescription??? Or is it rather the other side?

Increasing the already bloated Pentagon budget by some hundreds of billions of dollars? LW, or something else?

Reducing all of discretionary spending in the federal budget to no more than half its current share of gdp? THAT'S LW, or actually, isn't it the fever dream of the smaller government crowd you say are the conservatives/right wing?

Care to dispute any of those policies as what they are-- the right wing's policies-- and instead claim they are left wing? Really?

LWW
07-25-2012, 04:24 PM
You almost get it ... no, rethuglicans are not right wingers.

They are merely left wingers who are to the right of moonat crazy leftists.

DiabloViejo
07-25-2012, 06:12 PM
Interesting. Aha! Of course! You, being the staunch libertarian minarchist that you are, will promptly vote for Romney rather than the LP candidate Gary Johnson. And of course, being a true libertarian, you take every single opportunity to come to the defense of those same 'rethuglicans' without any regards as to the facts or any consideration or respect for different views.

Do you really think we are fooled by your laughably transparent attempts to blow smoke? Well, I for one, am not. Although I admit they are comically amusing in a buffoonish sort of way!

BTW, remember that that miserable bitch heroine of yours, Ayn Rand? The inspiration for The Church of Satan. The patron saint of Libertarians, Tea Party members, and the lunatics that have taken over the modern day GOP. A woman who drew inspiration from one William Hickman ( a man who kidnapped, murdered, and dismembered a 12 year old girl, was an armed robber and committed another murder)...yeah, THAT Ayn Rand! The one who wrote in regards to Hickman's statement where he said, "What is good for me is right.", that it was.."The best and strongest expression of a real man's psychology I have ever heard". Remember her? Well remember this..that old, bitter, chain smoking, sociopathic bitch monster, spent the last 7 years of her life living off Social Security and receiving health care from Medicaid for her lung cancer. So much for your objectivist heroine, huh?

You are not John Galt. You are a pawn, a willing dupe, conspiring in the evil machinations of evil men. A <u>true master of doublethink</u>.

"The keyword here is blackwhite. Like so many Newspeak words, this word has two mutually contradictory meanings. Applied to an opponent, it means the habit of impudently claiming that black is white, in contradiction of the plain facts. Applied to a Party member, it means a loyal willingness to say that black is white when Party discipline demands this. But it means also the ability to believe that black is white, and more, to know that black is white, and to forget that one has ever believed the contrary. This demands a continuous alteration of the past, made possible by the system of thought which really embraces all the rest, and which is known in Newspeak as doublethink. Doublethink is basically the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them."

— Part II, Chapter IX — The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism-- by Emmanuel Goldstein

Since you like to quote from Orwell's 1984 I leave you this quote as a warning of what it is you are actually supporting:

"The ideal set up by the Party was something huge, terrible, and glittering—a world of steel and concrete, of monstrous machines and terrifying weapons—a nation of warriors and fanatics, marching forward in perfect unity, all thinking the same thoughts and shouting the same slogans, perpetually working, fighting, triumphing, persecuting—three hundred million people all with the same face."

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/75/1984_Social_Classes_alt.svg/250px-1984_Social_Classes_alt.svg.png

Soflasnapper
07-26-2012, 08:52 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">You almost get it ... no, rethuglicans are not right wingers.

They are merely left wingers who are to the right of moonat crazy leftists. </div></div>

So which of the above set of policies are unacceptable to, and opposed by, the true right?

Isn't it the case that ALL of them are supported by the right?

LWW
07-27-2012, 01:28 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Soflasnapper</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">You almost get it ... no, rethuglicans are not right wingers.

They are merely left wingers who are to the right of moonat crazy leftists. </div></div>

So which of the above set of policies are unacceptable to, and opposed by, the true right?

Isn't it the case that ALL of them are supported by the right? </div></div>

There are no "above set of policies" ... only obedience to the party, which you are quite well trained at.

As to the Goldstein quote ... you obviously googled it as Goldstein was referring to members of the church of state, such as yourself.

Now ... if your point was to prove your fealty to the state as a hyper-partisan tool, well ... I ALREADY KNEW THAT.

If your point was anything else, you have my sympathy.

LWW
07-27-2012, 01:38 PM
http://liberallogic101.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/liberal-logic-101-139.jpg