PDA

View Full Version : Another Sympathy Card Play From Poor Little Ann?



Gayle in MD
08-23-2012, 07:22 PM
Ann Romneys years ago miscarriage. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/smirk.gif


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/23...26pLid%3D196420 (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/23/ann-romney-had-miscarriag_n_1825137.html?1345756080&icid=maing-grid10%7Chtmlws-main-bb%7Cdl2%7Csec1_lnk2%26pLid%3D196420)

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Ann Romney, who has spoken candidly about her battle with multiple sclerosis and surviving breast cancer, suffered a previously-undisclosed miscarriage.

The miscarriage was revealed deep inside an Associated Press profile of the would-be first lady published last week. It said "a source close to Mrs. Romney confirmed" that she lost the child, thought to be a boy, between her fourth son, Ben, born in 1978, and her fifth son and last child, Craig, born in 1981.

According to another report, by CNN, Romney, now 63, suffered a miscarriage in her fifth month of pregnancy around 1991, 10 years after Craig was born.

<span style='font-size: 14pt'>The couple, who have 19 grandchildren, have never publicly spoken about the miscarriage, despite sharing other personal details during Mitt Romney's presidential campaign or previous runs for office. </span><span style='font-size: 14pt'>The disclosure in the days leading up to the Republican National Convention in Tampa has already raised some questions. The timing has prompted some cynical political observers to suggest it was designed to evince sympathy and perhaps help narrow a gaping gender gap between her husband and President Barack Obama. </span>

"It humanizes them,” Baruch College political scientist Doug Muzzio told the Daily News. “They become more real people who suffered the slings and arrows of fate.”

</div></div>




Curiously, no one talked about this information until now, lol.

Things about the Romneys are getting curiouser and curiouser.

Qtec
08-24-2012, 01:36 AM
Recently, Mitt gave a new excuse for not releasing his tax returns.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So here's Mitt Romney's newest tax return excuse: <span style='font-size: 14pt'>he doesn't want to release his taxes because he doesn't want to talk about how much he's given his church.</span> You probably already know <u>that's baloney</u> and if so, you're not alone because last month Ann Romney retroactively rebutted her husband's claim during an interview with ABC News: </div></div>

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">ROBIN ROBERTS: Your husband has been adamant about only the two years that will be released. Why will he not follow the example of others on both sides of the aisle?

ANN ROMNEY: You know, I think there is reason for all of these things. You know, you should really look at where Mitt has led his life and where he's been financially. He's been a very generous person.<span style='font-size: 14pt'> We give ten percent of our income to our church every year. Do you think that is the kind of person that is trying to hide things?</span> </div></div>

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So if Mitt really wanted to hide his tithing, it would be too late because the cat is already out of the bag. And he knows this because he's retroactively rebutted himself, releasing specific information about 2010 and 2011 and saying last week that his tithing was basically the same as paying taxes.

The only thing we know for sure about Mitt Romney and his taxes is that he's hiding something—and whatever that may be, it's not his tithing. Unless, of course, he's dodged his tithing responsibilities. But if he's dodged on tithing, you can be damn sure he's also dodged on taxes. And that's really what we care about. </div></div>

link (http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/08/23/1123465/-Ann-Romney-retroactively-rebuts-Mitt-s-newest-excuse-for-tax-return-secrecy)

Now we have Poor Little Ann giving us her sob story!

Q

Q

Soflasnapper
08-24-2012, 05:17 PM
How many little human beings were 'miscarried' (killed) during their sons' ungodly in vitro fertilization schemes? Ten?

Or are they all still alive, in frozen stasis? What can be done to free them to have their own lives, if that's still possible?

When will the prolifers start bombing fertilization clinics? Or storming them to 'free' those captives?

-------

Just me playing the pro-life outrage card, which I do not believe in. But interesting questions for someone who said he'd sign the personhood amendment and right to life amendment.

Gayle in MD
08-24-2012, 06:37 PM
Yes, well, as we know, IIARIOK!


Both of the Romneys are such total phonies! And now we see, Ryan is jast as bad. I notice his Lobbyist Wife, stays out of the limelight!


Maybe she has some resistance to being seen with a group of such phonies and liars!

I often wonder how these supposed Right to Lifers justify their well spaced families, as well. Such MURDERERS! LMAO!

Those poor cold little people at those fertilization Clinics! LOL, how can those parents, like romney's kids, leave them all there like that, and just walk away and forget them! /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif

G.

Soflasnapper
08-24-2012, 08:05 PM
Such cold must violate the fetal pain standards. At least, give them a blankie!!