View Full Version : Abortion survivor to Obama.
And she is hot to.
Hw dare this whelp not die, as dear leader has voted for all abortion survivors to be denied medical attention.
They should have ice picked her head to the table as soon as it popped out.
08-29-2012, 06:30 AM
LOL! We get it. You extreme Right wing, tea partiers love all people of all races, male or female, while Democrats hate America, blacks, and , actually, everybody.
Yet all your posts, the rhetoric, the voting records, indicate something quite different.
Why is that?
Back to taking a few nips before breakfast my boy???
You appear a bit confused.
08-29-2012, 10:16 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Sev</div><div class="ubbcode-body">And she is hot to.
She has a misunderstanding of Obama's votes, and what he did and did not support in this regard.
I wonder how she got confused? Certainly such a delicate question would not be the subject of gross exaggeration or partisan spin, would it? That would be a shame and a disgrace.
Anyway, a different take on it:
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> That bill, which Obama did vote against, would have required doctors to resuscitate an aborted fetus <span style='font-size: 14pt'>if legislators felt it had any chance of viability</span> [wtf?]. But Obama’s reasoning for voting against the bill was nothing like how Gingrich and Huckabee represent it. In interviews with a range of media outlets, Obama expressed that he feared the bill would undermine Roe v Wade by defining any fetus as a human with human rights and claimed it could be used to take down any abortion rights legislation that anti-choice activists didn’t like.
Obama was, however, “fully in support” of a federal bill that provided the same protection viable fetuses while also including protections for Roe v Wade :
OBAMA: I have said repeatedly that I would have been completely in, fully in support of the federal bill that everybody supported – which was to say – that you should provide assistance to any infant that was born – even if it was as a consequence of an induced abortion. That was not the bill that was presented at the state level. What that bill also was doing was trying to undermine Roe vs. Wade. [crazy talk. When has the GOP ever tried to do that??? /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif]
Obama also felt that the legislation would have taken decision-making out of the hands of doctors [but into the hands of the legislators, where their keen medical knowledge can dictate these outcomes, as it should be?], giving anti-abortion activists an opening to sue abortion providers by alleging that they chose to terminate the life of a viable fetus on purpose. He did not, however, express any support for “infanticide” or for ending the life of a viable fetus, as Huckabee and Gingrich claim. </div></div>
Bbbbbbut, Huckabee is a PREACHER!? Surely he wouldn't engage in gross mischaracterization bordering on or crossing over to lying just for his political partisan agenda.
08-29-2012, 02:38 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Sev</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Back to taking a few nips before breakfast my boy???
You appear a bit confused. </div></div>
I said exactly what I intended to say, Sev. What part did you find confusing?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2015 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.