PDA

View Full Version : Condi



Qtec
08-31-2012, 04:44 AM
Notice how she jumps from 9/11 to the 2008 crash as if nothing happened in between!

link (http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7419844n)

"sorry 'that I didn't do my job.
" sorry for going along with the Neo-cons peddling their FALSE information."

I am blameless for the deception.

Trust me.



Q

cushioncrawler
08-31-2012, 05:31 AM
Intelligence warningsThe 9/11 Commission Report states that "the 9/11 attacks were a shock, but they should not have come as a surprise. Islamic extremists had given plenty of warnings that they meant to kill Americans indiscriminately and in large numbers."[26] The Report continued:

"During the spring and summer of 2001, U.S. intelligence agencies received a stream of warnings about an attack al Qaeda planned, as one report puts it "something very, very, very big." Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet told us "the system was blinking red.""[27]

The US administration, CIA and FBI received multiple prior warnings from foreign governments and intelligence services, including France, Germany, the UK, Israel, Jordan, Afghanistan, Egypt, Morocco and Russia.[3][28] The warnings varied in their level of detail, but all stated that they believed an Al Qaeda attack inside the United States was imminent. British Member of Parliament Michael Meacher cites these warnings, suggesting that some of them must have been deliberately ignored.[29] Some of these warnings include the following:

March 2001 - Italian intelligence warns of an al Qaeda plot in the United States involving a massive strike involving aircraft, based on their wiretap of al Qaeda cell in Milan.
July 2001 - Jordanian intelligence told US officials that al-Qaeda was planning an attack on American soil, and Egyptian intelligence warned the CIA that 20 al Qaeda Jihadists were in the United States, and that four of them were receiving flight training.
August 2001 - The Israeli Mossad gives the CIA a list of 19 terrorists living in the US and say that they appear to be planning to carry out an attack in the near future.
August 2001 - The United Kingdom is warned three times of an imminent al Qaeda attack in the United States, the third specifying multiple airplane hijackings. According to the Sunday Herald, the report is passed on to President Bush a short time later.
September 2001 - Egyptian intelligence warns American officials that al Qaeda is in the advanced stages of executing a significant operation against an American target, probably within the US.
In her testimony to the 9/11 Commission, Condoleezza Rice stated that "the threat reporting that we received in the spring and summer of 2001 was not specific as to time nor place nor manner of attack. Almost all the reports focused on al Qaeda activities outside the United States." However, on August 6, 2001, the President's Daily Briefing, entitled Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US warned that bin Laden was planning to exploit his operatives' access to the U.S. to mount a terrorist strike:

FBI information... indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country, consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attack.

cushioncrawler
08-31-2012, 05:32 AM
Able DangerMain article: Able Danger
A classified military intelligence program known as "Able Danger" was created in October 1999 specifically targeting al Qaeda. Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer and Congressman Curt Weldon (R-PA) charged before the Senate Judiciary Committee that Able Danger had identified Mohamed Atta, and three of the other hijackers, prior to 9/11.

The existence of Able Danger, and its purported early identification of the 9/11 terrorists, was first disclosed publicly on June 19, 2005.[30] On June 27, 2005, Weldon stated to the House:

Mr. Speaker, I rise because information has come to my attention over the past several months that is very disturbing. I have learned that, in fact, one of our Federal agencies had, in fact, identified the major New York cell of Mohamed Atta prior to 9/11; and I have learned, Mr. Speaker, that in September 2000, that Federal agency actually was prepared to bring the FBI in and prepared to work with the FBI to take down the cell that Mohamed Atta was involved in in New York City, along with two of the other terrorists. I have also learned, Mr. Speaker, that when that recommendation was discussed within that Federal agency, the lawyers in the administration at that time said, you cannot pursue contact with the FBI against that cell. Mohamed Atta is in the U.S. on a green card, and we are fearful of the fallout from the Waco incident. So we did not allow that Federal agency to proceed.[31]

There is no mention of Able Danger in the 9/11 Commission Report. Two 9/11 Commission members, Timothy J. Roemer and John F. Lehman, both claimed not to have received any information on Able Danger.[32] Weldon alleged that intelligence concerning Able Danger was provided to the 9/11 Commission but was ignored.[33]

Following coverage in the national media of Weldon's claims in August 2005, Thomas Kean and Lee H. Hamilton, former Chair and Vice Chair of the 9/11 Commission, issued a statement[34] in which they stated the Commission had been aware of the Able Danger program, and requested and obtained information about it from the Department of Defense (DoD), but none of the information provided had indicated the program had identified Atta or other 9/11 hijackers.[35][36]

Curt Weldon issued a response to this statement clarifying the mission of Able Danger, expressing concern over the statements made by various members of the 9/11 Commission, and promising to push forward until it is understood why the DoD was unable to pass the information uncovered by Able Danger to the FBI, and why the 9/11 Commission failed to follow up on the information they were given on Able Danger.[37]

cushioncrawler
08-31-2012, 05:35 AM
Blocked al-Qaeda investigationsSee also: Responsibility for the September 11, 2001 attacks#Culpability
Numerous whistleblowers and officials have surfaced, claiming that there was a deliberate effort, from high-ranking officials, to prevent investigations into Al Qaeda.

In 2002, FBI agent Coleen Rowley wrote to FBI director Robert Mueller describing her experience working with Minneapolis FBI agents tracking suspected terrorist Zacarias Moussaoui prior to the attacks.[38] She describes how FBI HQ personnel in Washington, D.C. had mishandled and failed to take action on information provided by the Minneapolis Field Office, and had failed to issue a warrant to search Moussaui's computer despite having probable cause.[39] Rowley goes on to describe her superior, Agent Marion "Spike" Bowman, as having “consistently, almost deliberately thwarted the Minneapolis FBI agents' efforts” to obtain the search warrant. Senator Chuck Grassley later wrote that “If the application for the FISA warrant had gone forward, agents would have found information in Moussaoui's belongings that linked him ... to a major financier of the hijacking plot". Rowley was credited as a whistleblower and jointly awarded the TIME Magazine "Person of the Year" for 2002. Her testimony to the 9/11 Commission was omitted from their final report.

FBI agent and Al-Qaeda expert John P. O'Neill warned of an Al-Qaeda threat to the United States in 2000. He retired from his position in mid 2001, citing repeated blocking of his investigations of Al Qaeda by FBI officials. After his retirement from the FBI, the World Trade Center hired him as its chief of security. He started work on August 23, 2001. O'Neill was killed on September 11 and his remains were recovered by 9/11 rescue workers in a staircase inside the South Tower rubble on September 21.[40]

Shortly after the attacks, David Schippers, the chief prosecutor for the impeachment of Bill Clinton, stated that the government had been warned in 1995 about a future attack on a government building and that later he was contacted by three FBI agents who mentioned uncovering a possible terrorist attack planned for lower Manhattan.[41] According to Schippers, as the agents informed their superiors, they were briefed not to pursue the issue and were threatened with prosecution. Schippers declared, "Five weeks before the September 11 tragedy, I did my best to get a hold of Attorney General John Ashcroft with my concerns." According to Schippers, Ashcroft responded that the Justice Department does not start investigations at the top. Author William Norman Grigg agrees with Schippers in his article "Did We Know What Was Coming?" According to the article, three unnamed veteran federal law enforcement agents confirmed "the information provided to Schippers was widely known within the Bureau before September 11."[42]

According to Senator Bob Graham, who was chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee from June 2001 through the buildup to the Iraq war, "Two of the September 11, 2001, hijackers had a support network in the United States that included agents of the Saudi government, and the Bush administration and FBI blocked a congressional investigation into that relationship," as reported by the Miami Herald. And in Graham's book, Intelligence Matters, he makes clear that some details of that financial support from Saudi Arabia were in the 27 pages of the congressional inquiry's final report that were blocked from release by the administration, despite the pleas of leaders of both parties on the House and Senate intelligence committees."[43] In March 2012, as part of a lawsuit by 9/11 victims families Graham and another former U.S. Senator Bob Kerry said in affidavit's that they were certain there were direct links between the Saudi government and the attacks.[44]

There have also been allegations that the hijackers' preparations may have been given assistance by U.S. intelligence. According to CBS news, "two of the September 11 hijackers who lived in San Diego in 2000 rented a room from a man who reportedly worked as an undercover FBI informant... the FBI informant prayed with them and even helped one open a bank account."[45] Doubts have been raised about the speed with which the hijackers were identified, leading to suggestions that the FBI already had the names of the hijackers in advance. In his book Against All Enemies, Richard Clarke said that at 9:59 am on September 11, which is the time when WTC2 collapsed and 8 minutes before NORAD even knew Flight 93 had been hijacked, the FBI already had a list of the 19 alleged hijackers.[46] A former high-level intelligence official said that "Whatever trail was left was left deliberately—for the F.B.I. to chase."[47]

LWW
08-31-2012, 05:50 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Notice how she jumps from 9/11 to the 2008 crash as if nothing happened in between!

link (http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7419844n)

"sorry 'that I didn't do my job.
" sorry for going along with the Neo-cons peddling their FALSE information."

I am blameless for the deception.

Trust me.



Q </div></div>

Why are you being racist?

Gayle in MD
08-31-2012, 01:16 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Notice how she jumps from 9/11 to the 2008 crash as if nothing happened in between!

link (http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7419844n)

"sorry 'that I didn't do my job.
" sorry for going along with the Neo-cons peddling their FALSE information."

I am blameless for the deception.

Trust me.



Q </div></div>

She absolutely nauseated me! She is a disgrace to this country, to her race and to her gender.

In fact, every single one of the speakers at that convention, were a disgrace to this country, IMO. She was among the very worst. All of that BS about Not being jealous of other people's successes, after four years of Republican slander and racist attacks on the president, all of it Republican pettiness and jealousy over losing the last presidential election!

she has no honor, at all.

That entire convention was a new low for America!

G.

llotter
08-31-2012, 02:17 PM
yes, with the Democrat convention planning on celebrating abortion with several live demonstrations and at least one will be preformed on a lesbian and another late termer where the screams of the baby will be amplified for all to enjoy. They are also considering doing a post-birth abortion as an in-your-face act that demands society accept the new norms.

Day two will be hosted by the porn industry with more live demos on stage showing new levels of freedom of expression for international broadcast on primetime. The entire delegation of one or more states will conduct their 'affairs' in the nude that day.

Day three will be co-hosted by the unions and OWS. Plans are in place to demonstrate vote-getting tactics using a baseball bat and other intimidation by the unions while the OWS crowd will be urinating and defecating in random locations and raping and pillaging as opportunity presents itself. All of this is intended to show the behavior restricting days of civility are over.

this should be a fun week for the entire country.

Soflasnapper
08-31-2012, 03:29 PM
After the imaginary Obama strawman that has been created and attacked, it was only a matter of time before the DNC/Democratic National Convention was similarly counterfeited and attacked.

I have to say though, if that's a look into your imagination, you may need some professional help. That's some sick shnit there, pal.

Soflasnapper
08-31-2012, 03:31 PM
Why are you being racist?

Why are you concern trolling, or Alinsky-style agitprop trying to start up a different topic/argument?

Oh, wait! It's what he does. He puts the lotion in the basket. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif

Now wait a second yourself! Maybe it's a post-modernist, Rush homage-- illustrating absurdity with absurdity. Like that ever works?

Ok, third try. There is no defense for this former government official, who blew her duties and failed the American people, herself part of the misleading and lying to them, and then lying in the aftermath, SO CHANGE THE SUBJECT!!!

llotter
08-31-2012, 04:14 PM
That is not my imagination. It is simply putting on stage what the Democrats represents.

I have also heard that as the winner of a drawing for gals only, will get to spend some time in Bill Clinton in his special quarters within the convention center, possibly to be taped for broadcast on the Playboy Channel.

Gayle in MD
08-31-2012, 04:41 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
I have to say though, if that's a look into your imagination, you may need some professional help. That's some sick shnit there, pal. </div></div>


I agree!

Particularly hard to read this stuff after three days of equally sick Republican dishonorable, disgustng behavior as well.

But, I have to push this man's sick stuff out of my head, because I am celebrating over the newly released Ohio Judge's decision, on the attempted Republican voter Obstruction, of ohio's African American votes!

Obama wins, Romney loses, and yet another of Romney vicious les about the president is exposed in the process!

See my new post! /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/laugh.gif

llotter
08-31-2012, 05:21 PM
What? I have to admit it does seem sick to me but it is the bread and butter of the Democrat Party, so why not embrace and celebrate what you support so adamantly?

Sid_Vicious
08-31-2012, 05:39 PM
Rice,,,if I was her...would disappear by my own effort effort. What a sorry joke. That's the dumbest bitch to hold office,,,seriously. She and Bush should feel lucky they are not still hanging on the end of a treasonist rope! sid

Soflasnapper
09-01-2012, 09:51 AM
I would disagree. She is fairly brilliant, so far as I've seen.

This is the choice she was facing.

The great power centers in this country and the world (whom I will let remain nameless) wanted a war in Iraq, as part of a project to reshape the entire Middle East. We have those plans in writing, as they telegraphed their plan years earlier.

In her position, she could try to stand athwart these figurative lines of armored divisions on the move, hoping to accomplish what that one person did in Tianemen Square, stopping a tank with a flower, whatever.

Which had no chance of working. Those guys play for keeps. She'd instead have met the same fate as Rachel Corrie (which see) before the bulldozer in Israel, and have been crushed. Her personal reputation would have been shot, her earning power in the future destroyed, and at a reasonable chance of occurrence, she could easily have been killed.

I think she willfully chose collaboration with the PTB, out of some fear for her life and career, and possibly out of an idea that she could somewhat moderate or lessen the evil effects. (I only say the latter out of generosity of spirit, since I have no evidence of any such moderating influence).

And I expect she foresaw a far better run false flag, that didn't leave so many loose ends where everyone paying attention could see them, and so did not anticipate the severe hit to her reputation and credibility that ensued from such a sloppy set up.

It's still a mystery why it was so sloppy as to be easily seen through, but it could be a) they don't worry too much about problems in the doing as they have full control over the subsequent reporting and 'serious' discussion as to what is allowed to be spoken in media, or b) part of the plan is to be so obviously evil and careless so as to break the spirit of opponents, by appearing untouchable even when their stories are full of holes.

LWW
09-01-2012, 10:20 AM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Soflasnapper</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Why are you being racist?

Why are you concern trolling, or Alinsky-style agitprop trying to start up a different topic/argument?

Oh, wait! It's what he does. He puts the lotion in the basket. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif

Now wait a second yourself! Maybe it's a post-modernist, Rush homage-- illustrating absurdity with absurdity. Like that ever works?

Ok, third try. There is no defense for this former government official, who blew her duties and failed the American people, herself part of the misleading and lying to them, and then lying in the aftermath, SO CHANGE THE SUBJECT!!! </div></div>

Because it has long been a staple of the cabal that the only reason anyone would disagree with a black political leader is racism.

Why isthe cabal so offended when they are asked to live up to their own standards?

Gayle in MD
09-01-2012, 10:41 AM
Sorry, there is absolutely no excuse for what she failed to respond to in the months preceeding 9/11.

Her gross incompetence, or gross corruption, if she was in on the sick Bush/Cheney/neocon plan to ignore specific warnings of the coming attack, and then lie about what she knew to the American People, should have landed her charged with Treason.

She was the NSA, and refused to meet with top intelligence, high level CIA and Alex Unit people, all of them requesting emergency meetings. She contiually refused to meet with them, creating a fire wall between Bush and those who were anxiously demanding one on one, emergency meetings, with Bush.

Her Statements, "The President wasn't going to swat at flies" and "Maybe someone down in the bowels of the agency had that informtion" were lies, and she knew they were lies when she uttered them. Even the video of her saying them, is very indicative that she lied, if one knows anything about the study of facial language, grimices, while lying.

They all knew there was a coming attack, and they allowed it to happen. She should have been hanging from a noose, right next to Bush and Cheney, long ago!

Many books have been written by respectable top level intelligence people who were among many frustrated experts, who were trying for months to get the administration to DO something to prevent the attack.

These were not flunkies, they were known as the most dedicated national Security intelligence, focused on al Qaeda, who "eat, sleep and drink al Qlqaeda and getting bin Laden". They can't all be lying, and many of them were appointed under Bush one, so party line had nothing to do with their revelatons after they left on princible, or were axed. Among the first things that changed after Bush CRASHED the White House, was a directive straight from Bush that the White House want the focus on Iraq, not bin Laden, and not al Qaeda.

Now that the latest 9/11 release of classified information that Bush et al buried, classified, from the 9/11 report, under the pretence of National Security, has recently been released, forced by law suits. We now have far more incriminating information, such as Bush forbidding the investigations on the Saudis living here and in Saudi Arabia, who were linked to al Qaeda, and financing their run up to 9/11.

I, personally have no doubt of their involvement in allowing the attack to happen, or worse, a "disaster" was what they didn't want to waste, their perfect excuse to justify their Pre-White house agenda.


I was present on the days the 9/11 families were having meetings with Republicans, begging for an investigation, and I saw how Republicans treated them, just like dirt. I have never been more shocked.

Remember, Bush did everything he could do, to prevent that investigation. Even cut off funds.

She is a demon. Just seeng her face, repulses me. I give her no passes, none whatsoever!

G.

Soflasnapper
09-01-2012, 10:51 AM
So it WAS the second one?

Maybe it's a post-modernist, Rush homage-- illustrating absurdity with absurdity. Like that ever works?

LWW
09-01-2012, 03:32 PM
With you ... nothing works, and certainly not reality.